Connect with us

Colorado

Will mountain lion hunting be banned in Colorado? Anti-hunting group takes aim practice

Published

on

Will mountain lion hunting be banned in Colorado? Anti-hunting group takes aim practice


play

An animal rights organization attempting to ban mountain lion hunting in Colorado has brought out the big guns for a final push to acquire enough signatures to place the measure on the November ballot.

Cats Aren’t Trophies held an online rally June 4, saying it has about 130,000 to 135,000 signatures collected but still needs 40,000 to 50,000 signatures in the final month to secure enough valid signatures to deliver to the Colorado Secretary of State.

Advertisement

It assumes around a 75% signature validation rate.

The deadline to submit just more than 124,000 verified signatures for proposed citizens initiative 91 is July 5. If enough valid signatures are secured, the measure will be on the Nov. 5 ballot.

During the June 4 rally, those answering questions included Colorado First Gentleman Marlon Reis; Pat Craig, founder of the Wild Animal Sanctuary in Keenesburg; Wayne Pacelle, president of Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy; and Howard Baskin, husband of Big Cat Rescue founder Carole Baskin of “Tiger King” fame.

Reis joined the online rally and said his role for the last six years as first gentleman was to advocate for animals. He said it was a no-brainer to back the mountain lion hunting ban effort, as he did the successful citizen initiative to reintroduce wolves.

“It’s a treat for me to be in the role I’m in,” he said during the online rally. “Whenever I find an effort to help animals not be taken advantage of or dispatched or treated in a really cruel way, I’m happy to help.”

Advertisement

Jennifer Burbey, president of the Colorado Outfitters Association, said the so-called “rewilding” of the West by organizations like Cats Aren’t Trophies, which want to revert to a landscape before human settlement, is pie-in-the-sky ideology.

“They truly believe that we can put the genie back in the bottle,” she said. “We have 5.8 million people in Colorado. Do we have to tell more than 5 million people they can’t live here anymore? Coexisting with wildlife is a beautiful idea until a mountain lion grabs your child from your backyard and you want to fight them to the death.

“The whole thing is grabbing at heartstrings,” Burbey said.

If the initiative receives enough valid signatures, voters will basically be deciding whether they believe hunting mountain lions and hunting and trapping bobcats is inhumane or if those actions should still be allowed since the populations of both species are stable to increasing with current hunting seasons.

Advertisement

Should citizen-initiated ballot measures regarding wildlife issues be allowed in Colorado?

Colorado is one of 26 states that allows at least one form of statewide citizen-initiated ballot measure. It allows for citizen-initiated constitutional amendments, statutes and veto referendums.

There are states that do not allow wildlife-related citizen initiatives.

Wildlife citizen-initiated ballot measures that have passed in Colorado include:

Sam Miller, Cats Aren’t Trophies campaign manager, told the Coloradoan: “We have gone to the legislature with this before and got a lot of pushback from hunting organizations. So as a last resort we have taken the initiative of using democracy and science to bring it to the voters. I am very confident we can win.”

Advertisement

Perry Will is a Republican member of the Colorado Senate, representing parts of seven western counties. He was against the citizens initiative to introduce wolves but was a sponsor of a recently passed bill to reintroduce wolverines. He was also a 40-year employee of the state wildlife agency now known as Colorado Parks and Wildlife.

“Ballot box biology is the absolute worst way you can manage wildlife,” Will told the Coloradoan. “Our capable wildlife professionals are put in charge to manage our wildlife. But they feel the power to do this because that’s how reintroducing wolves was passed. They would have done it with wolverines if I wouldn’t have put a bill in place, which is a better way to do these things.”

What initiative 91 is asking the voters to decide if it gets on the ballot

The initiative calls for banning hunting of mountain lions, bobcats and lynx.

A hunting season currently exists for mountain lions and hunting and trapping seasons exist for bobcats.

You can neither hunt nor trap lynx, which are federally protected as endangered in Colorado. Cats Aren’t Trophies included lynx on the measure because it believes the rare animals are accidentally injured or killed by hunters and trappers who mistake them for similarly-looking bobcats.

Advertisement

The proposed measure allows for the killing of mountain lions and bobcats if deemed a threat to human life, livestock and property.

Dylan Roberts is a Democrat member of the Colorado Senate, representing parts of 10 western counties. He was against the citizens initiative to introduce wolves but also was a sponsor of the bill to reintroduce wolverines.

“When voters from the entire state make decisions on matters that will only negatively impact a certain part of the state, we widen the rural-urban divide,” he told the Coloradoan. “I hope this question does not make it to the ballot. If it does, Colorado voters should reject it.”

Main reasons Cats Aren’t Trophies proposed banning the killing of mountain lions and bobcats

What Colorado Parks and Wildlife says about hunting mountain lions and hunting/trapping bobcats

Colorado Parks and Wildlife said it takes no position for or against proposed initiatives such as initiative 91 but does provide information regarding the recreational hunting and trapping regulations of mountain lions, bobcats and lynx; population trends and study research.

  • Trophy hunting is already illegal in Colorado. Colorado law requires hunters to prepare big game, including mountain lions, for human consumption and hunters and trappers are required to present the head and hide of mountain lions and bobcats for mandatory checks. The agency told the Coloradoan it has not had a “wanton waste” citation for mountain lions in the past five years.
  • The agency said the mountain lion population has grown in Colorado since 1965 when they were classified as a big game species and hunting was allowed. It said bobcat populations are stable and may be increasing in some areas.
  • It said its highly regulated hunting does not negatively affect the population stability of the state’s mountain lions or bobcats and added, “Allowing lions to coexist with humans without thoughtful management has not proven successful in real-world scenarios.”

Why does Colorado allow the use of dogs to hunt mountain lions? Do other states allow the practice?

Colorado is one of 13 western states that allow mountain lion hunting, with California the lone exception.

Some states, including Wyoming, Montana, Utah, New Mexico and Idaho, allow the use of dogs or hounds. Others, including Oregon and Washington do not.

Advertisement

Colorado Parks and Wildlife said mountain lion hunting with hounds allows for hunters to be more selective of gender. It said the statewide annual hunting proportion of females in Colorado is generally at or under 40%, whereas states that have banned hound hunting see females making up around 60% of the animal taken during a hunting season.

Colorado Parks and Wildlife told the Coloradoan more than 90% of mountain lions killed during the hunting season is with the use of dogs. It also said prospective mountain lion hunters must complete an additional lion certification course to ensure they can properly determine sex and age of a lion.

This is what Miller said about the practice: “I have hunted myself and using packs of dogs equipped with electronic devices to tree and kill mountain lions at close range is target hunting.”

Colorado recently closed the April mountain lion hunting season and banned the use of electronic calls statewide after pressure from animal rights groups.

Mountain lion near Estes Park: Photographer captures footage of mountain lion fending off coyotes

Advertisement

What is the population of mountain lions, bobcats and lynx in Colorado?

Here are Colorado Parks and Wildlife population estimates:

  • Mountain lions: 3,800 to 4,400, not including kittens. A recent agency study found Boulder County has one of the highest reported densities in the country. 
  • Bobcats: The agency doesn’t make statewide population estimates for abundant wildlife such as bobcats, which are found throughout Colorado and are the most common North American wildcat species. The agency is in the process of an ongoing bobcat research study to further estimate bobcat density.
  • Lynx: 150 to 250 believed to be in Colorado. Colorado Parks and Wildlife started reintroducing lynx in 1999.

Craig, of the Wildlife Animal Sanctuary, said during the June 4 online rally that he is fearful for the future of mountain lions in Colorado.

“We are murdering these animals, and they are disappearing at an alarming rate,” he said. “Pretty soon they will be on the endangered list and eventually become extinct.”

Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s data on mountain lion population trends disagrees with Craig’s assessment: “Mountain lion populations are not biologically threatened” in Colorado and data suggests Colorado’s lion population “is strong and lions are abundant in appropriate habitat.”

play

Watch as mountain lion makes deer kill in Colorado backyard

This incident took place in the backyard of a foothills subdivision near Livermore, Colo., on April 28, 2024.

Advertisement

How many mountain lions and bobcats are killed by hunting and trapping each year in Colorado

Colorado Parks and Wildlife said its mountain lion hunting season is the shortest among states that allow hunting lions and that regulations protect kittens and females with kittens.

  • Mountain lions: 505 killed on average annually in the three most recent years. Colorado Parks and Wildlife sets a quota for certain areas and if that quota is reached for hunter kills, the area is closed for the season. Colorado has sold, on average, 2,500 mountain lion licenses per year during the past three years, generating nearly $287,000 annually in revenue. Hunter success rate is around 20%. The success rate for hunters in Oregon, where use of hounds is not allowed, is around 2%. The Colorado season runs November through March.
  • Bobcats: 880 killed on average annually in the three most recent years. Bobcat hunting/trapping is allowed December through February. There is no limit on how many bobcats can be killed during the three-month season.

Senior reporter Miles Blumhardt is a general assignment reporter with emphasis on trending and breaking news, wildlife, outdoors, weather and transportation. Contact him at milesblumhardt@coloradoan.com or follow him on X or Facebook.

Here are other recent stories he has written.



Source link

Colorado

Denver shelter working to end homelessness for at risk youth, funding at risk

Published

on

Denver shelter working to end homelessness for at risk youth, funding at risk


Urban Peak is working to help Colorado youth have safe housing and support, and the organization says the community need is growing. They say 90% of the youth they assisted have been able to find safe housing and, even with funding cuts looming, it will continue to help those in need.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

GUEST COLUMN: Principles for Guiding River Water Negotiations – Calexico Chronicle

Published

on

GUEST COLUMN: Principles for Guiding River Water Negotiations – Calexico Chronicle


Next week is the annual gathering of “water buffaloes” in Las Vegas. It’s the Colorado River Water Users Association convention. About 1700 people will attend, but probably around 100 of them are the key people—the government regulators, tribal leaders, and the directors and managers of the contracting agencies that receive Colorado River water.

Anyone who is paying attention knows that we are in critical times on the river. Temporary agreements on how to distribute water during times of shortage are expiring. Negotiators have been talking for several years but haven’t been able to agree on anything concrete.

I’m just an observer, but I’ve been observing fairly closely. Within the limits on how much information I can get as an outsider, I’d like to propose some principles or guidelines that I think are important for the negotiation process.

See also

Advertisement
  1. When Hoover Dam was proposed, the main debate was over whether the federal government or private concerns would operate it. Because the federal option prevailed, water is delivered free to contractors. Colorado River water contractors do not pay the actual cost of water being delivered to them. It is subsidized by the U.S. government. As a public resource, Colorado River water should not be seen as a commodity.
  2. The Lower Basin states of Arizona, California, and Nevada should accept that the Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are at the mercy of Mother Nature for much of their annual water supply. While the 1922 Colorado River Compact allocates them 7.5 million acre-feet annually, in wet years, they have been able to use a maximum of 4.7 maf. During the long, ongoing drought, their annual use has been 3.5 maf. They shouldn’t have to make more cuts.
  3. However, neither should the Upper Basin states be able to develop their full allocation. It should be capped at a feasible number, perhaps 4.2 maf. As compensation, Upper Basin agencies and farmers can invest available federal funds in projects to use water more efficiently and to reuse it so that they can develop more water.
  4. Despite the drought, we know there will be some wet years. To compensate the Lower Basin states for taking all the cuts in dry years, the Upper Basin should release more water beyond the Compact commitments during wet years. This means that Lake Mead and Lower Basin reservoirs would benefit from wet years and Lake Powell would not. In short, the Lower Basin takes cuts in dry years; the Upper Basin takes cuts in wet years.
  5. Evaporation losses (water for the angels) can be better managed by keeping more of the Lower Basin’s water in Upper Basin reservoirs instead of in Lake Mead, where the warmer weather means higher evaporation losses. New agreements should include provisions to move that water in the Lower Basin account down to Lake Mead quickly. Timing is of the essence.
  6. In the Lower Basin states, shortages should be shared along the same lines as specified in the 2007 Interim Guidelines, with California being last to take cuts as Lake Mead water level drops.
  7. On the home front, IID policy makers should make a long-term plan to re-set water rates in accord with original water district policy. Because IID is a public, non-profit utility, water rates were set so that farmers paid only the cost to deliver water. Farmers currently pay $20 per acre foot, but the actual cost of delivering water is $60 per acre foot. That subsidy of $60 million comes from the water transfer revenues.
  8. The SDCWA transfer revenues now pay farmers $430 per acre-foot of conserved water, mostly for drip or sprinkler systems. Akin to a grant program, this very successful program generated almost 200,000 acre-feet of conserved water last year. Like any grant program, it should be regularly audited for effectiveness.
  9. Some of those transfer revenues should be invested in innovative cropping patterns, advanced technologies, and marketing to help the farming community adapt to a changing world. The IID should use its resources to help all farmers be more successful, not just a select group.
  10. Currently, federal subsidies pay farmers not to use water via the Deficit Irrigation Program. We can lobby for those subsidies to continue, but we should plan for when they dry up. Any arrangement that rewards farmers but penalizes farm services such as seed, fertilizer, pesticide, land leveling, equipment, and other work should be avoided.
  11. Though the IID has considerable funding from the QSA water transfers, it may need to consider issuing general obligation bonds as it did in its foundational days for larger water efficiency projects such as more local storage or a water treatment plant to re-use ag drain water.

Much progress has been made in using water more efficiently, especially in the Lower Basin states, but there’s a lot more water to be saved, and I believe collectively that we can do it.





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado mother says Lakewood crash killed son, left 2 of her children critically injured as driver is arrested

Published

on

Colorado mother says Lakewood crash killed son, left 2 of her children critically injured as driver is arrested


A mother is grieving after a crash in the Denver metro area last weekend left her son brain-dead and two of her other children fighting for their lives.

Lakewood police say 22-year-old Andrew Logan Miller has been arrested in connection with the crash, which happened Dec. 6 around 7:30 p.m. near Kipling Parkway and West 6th Avenue.

Police say Miller was driving an SUV southbound on Kipling Parkway at a high rate of speed when it collided with a bus carrying a wrestling team from Central High School, which is located in Grand Junction in Mesa County.

Sixteen people were taken to hospitals.

Advertisement

Among the injured were three siblings who were riding inside the SUV.

On Friday, their mother, Suleyma Gonzalez, identified them as Julio Gonzalez, 18, Analelly Gonzalez, 17, and Christopher Gonzalez, 14.

Analelly and Christopher remain in critical condition. Julio will never wake up.

“I didn’t want to believe it, until they had to do the second testing where they didn’t find blood going through his brain,” she said. “My other two are in comas.”

Gonzalez said doctors ultimately declared Julio brain-dead.

Advertisement

She describes her children as disciplined students and ROTC members with plans for the future.

“Two of my kids were going to graduate this year,” she said. “No drugs. No alcohol. They were good kids.”

CBS Colorado’s Tori Mason, right, interviews Suleyma Gonzalez.

CBS

Advertisement


Gonzalez confirmed that Miller, who was driving the SUV at the time of the crash, was her daughter’s boyfriend.

“I know he loved my daughter,” she said. “I don’t think he did this on purpose or intentionally. It was an accident.”

Police say the investigation is ongoing, but believe speed played a major role in the crash.

Miller was arrested Wednesday night and is facing multiple charges, including:

• Vehicular assault (7 counts)
• Speeding 40 mph or more over the limit
• Reckless driving
• Child abuse (2 counts)
• Reckless endangerment

Advertisement

“My kids know when you get in somebody’s car, there’s always a risk. Always,” she said.

Julio’s organs will be donated. He’s on life support, while the hospital searches for matches.

“He wanted to give to the world,” she said. “Now that I can’t get him back, we want to give life to somebody else.”

family-photo.jpg

Suleyma Gonzalez with her family  

Suleyma Gonzalez

Advertisement


Miller is currently being held in the Denver County Jail and is awaiting transfer to the Jefferson County Jail. His bond and court appearance have not yet been announced.

Lakewood police say the investigation remains active.

Gonzalez, a single mother of five, says her focus now is on her surviving children and getting clarity.

“I just want answers.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending