Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado Can’t Top This Southern State On Controversial Court Rulings

Published

on

Colorado Can’t Top This Southern State On Controversial Court Rulings


The Colorado Supreme Court’s December 19 ruling to remove former President Donald Trump (R) from the 2024 ballot was unprecedented and sparked nationwide debate, but its ultimate fate will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments for the case on February 8. The same goes for the Maine Secretary of State’s December 28 decision to remove Trump, who is leading President Joe Biden (D) in multiple polls, from the 2024 ballot in a second state.

A December decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, meanwhile, forced a redraw of Wisconsin’s state legislative maps. As a result of those new maps, which were approved by Governor Tony Evers (D-Wisc.) on February 19, “Republicans will now have an uphill fight to maintain their majorities this year and in 2026,” the Wall Street Journal editorial board noted, adding that “the left could soon run all of state government.”

Advertisement

The Wisconsin Supreme Court, which shifted to a progressive majority in 2023, will rule later this year on a lawsuit filed by unions seeking to overturn Act 10, the landmark entitlement reform enacted by former Governor Scott Walker (R) in 2011. Act 10, which restricted collective bargaining and gave workers a say in whether or not to support a union, has since saved Wisconsin taxpayers more than $16 billion.

Should the Wisconsin Supreme Court overturn Act 10, it would drive up costs for Wisconsin taxpayers by billions of dollars moving forward. Beyond Wisconsin, some are concerned that such a decision out of a battleground state, on the heals of the ballot access ruling in Colorado, could embolden justices in other states to push the envelope and issue decisions that are akin to setting policy from the bench.

Controversial Supreme Court Rulings Are Nothing New In North Carolina

Among all U.S. residents, North Carolinians in particular are no strangers to controversial state supreme court decisions. Years before the current drama in the Colorado and Wisconsin Supreme Courts garnered national attention, North Carolina Supreme Court justices handed down multiple rulings, some of which are still being adjudicated, that have been criticized as examples of judicial activism and legislating from the bench. In that respect, the 2022 ruling by the then-Democratic majority North Carolina Supreme Court, which found that a lower court judge could overturn two constitutional amendments approved by voters, stands out.

In the 2018 general election, 57% of North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment to lower the state’s personal income tax rate cap from 10% to 7%. Another constitutional amendment on that same ballot instituting a photo ID requirement to vote passed with support from 55% of voters. Yet the will of North Carolina voters was subsequently overruled by four members of the North Carolina Supreme Court, all Democrats, who issued a ruling that could pave the way for the ultimate overturning of voter-approved constitutional amendments based on an unprecedented legal theory. The theory posits that because the two measures were referred to the ballot by a legislature comprised of gerrymandered districts, the measures were illegitimate despite being approved by voters.

Advertisement

Though the then-Democrat-controlled North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that a trial court could overturn voter approved constitutional amendments using a novel legal theory, the Democratic justices sent the case back to the trial court for further deliberation before making a final ruling. Further developments in this case, which is now sitting with a three-judge panel, could occur as early as March.

“The majority concedes that constitutional procedures were followed,” North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Phil Berger Jr. (R) wrote in his dissent from the 2022 decision made by his Democratic colleagues, “yet they invalidate more than 4.1 million votes and disenfranchise more than 55% of North Carolina’s electorate.”

“When Democratic Supreme Court justices tried to use dubious legal ideas to block the will of the people, some of us started referring to them as the Usurper Four,” said Mitch Kokai, senior political analyst at the John Locke Foundation, a free-market think tank focusing on North Carolina. “Voters replaced two of the four Democrats with conservatives during the last election cycle. The future of the state’s constitutional law depends on continued vigilance from voters.”

In the 2022 midterm elections, Republicans won two state supreme court races, flipping the court to a 5-2 GOP majority. Voter ID requirements will be in effect in North Carolina for the 2024 elections. That’s because, in April of 2023, the now GOP majority North Carolina Supreme Court upheld the voter ID law enacted by legislators weeks after the 2018 constitutional amendment to require voter ID was approved by voters. The income tax cap reduction, however, remains an unresolved matter.

North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper (D) and other Democrats, like President Biden, can be expected to talk frequently about alleged threats to democracy in 2024, with the Associated Press reporting on February 17 that it is “central to Biden’s campaign messaging.” Yet it won’t be lost on North Carolinians that many of the same politicians offering warnings about threats to democracy have themselves backed a decision by four judges that went against the will of a clear majority of North Carolina voters.

Advertisement

Controversial state supreme court decisions go back much further in North Carolina than the past decade. In fact, the North Carolina Supreme Court is still adjudicating a three decade-old lawsuit, referred to as the Leandro case, alleging that the state is underfunding certain school districts.

State supreme court justices are selected by voters in 22 states. 14 of those 22 states hold nonpartisan judicial elections, while eight hold partisan elections. In the past few years, lawmakers in North Carolina and Ohio moved their states to partisan judicial elections, joining Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Given the heightened importance of state supreme court majorities, many believe the most open and democratic approach is to have voters decide who fills state supreme court seats and that it should be done in partisan elections in order to maximize transparency and voter information.

Evidence suggests putting the selection of state supreme court justices on the ballot can lead to greater voter engagement. Researchers at Michigan State University and the University of Pittsburgh examined 260 state supreme court elections across 18 states from 1990 to 2004, finding that “increased spending significantly improves voter participation in these races.”

Advertisement

Recent decisions by the Colorado, Wisconsin, and North Carolina Supreme Courts have driven home the importance of state supreme court control when it comes to setting policy. Voters can put one of the two parties in charge of both the governor’s mansion and legislature. As has been demonstrated in a number of states, however, legislatively enacted and voter approved reforms can be overturned or reversed if the state supreme court is in the hands of political or ideological opponents. Expect media attention and campaign spending on state supreme court races to escalate in the coming years, and for good reason.



Source link

Colorado

Colorado forecasts $27 million deficit after Deion Sanders pay raise, NIL payments

Published

on

Colorado forecasts  million deficit after Deion Sanders pay raise, NIL payments


play

The University of Colorado’s athletic department is projecting that it will run a $27 million deficit during the current fiscal year ending in June 2026, in addition to needing $11.9 million in institutional support from the university and $2.2 million from student fees, according to budget figures obtained by USA TODAY Sports.

Those numbers are not final. The athletic department is hoping to bring that deficit down by the end of June with revenue from donations, sponsorships and concerts at Folsom Field. But it has never reported a deficit that big before, which could potentially leave the athletic department in need of more than $41 million in subsidies from the university, including the institutional support and student fees.

Advertisement

It also comes at a critical time:

  • Athletic director Rick George announced recently he’s stepping down at the end of the fiscal year in June.
  • Colorado nearly doubled the pay of football coach Deion Sanders in March, giving him a new five-year contract worth more than $10 million annually. His team just finished 3-9 in 2025 as attendance started to wane after selling out his first season in 2023.
  • Like other major college sports programs, Colorado is committed to providing players with up to $20.5 million in annual benefits and direct payments under terms of the NCAA-House legal settlement. That cost is new this year, with the $20.5 million cap going up by 4% next year and the year after.

The latter two costs are the biggest reasons for the projected deficit — the $20.5 million for players and the $10 million per year for Sanders. Colorado previously told USA TODAY Sports in September it was “to be determined” how it would come up with the money to pay for those two big new costs.

Colorado says it won’t cut sports

The projected answer now is that it will run a deficit with the university as the potential backstop for funding.  Asked who would be paying for these expenses if not the university, spokesman Steve Hurlbert said, “The mechanics of that are still to be determined.”

The school said it will “not cut sports nor cut any resources for student-athletes” but will look to cut expenses.

Advertisement

Hurlbert also stressed tuition money and state funds will not be used to address the deficit.

However, some observers who are familiar with Colorado’s budget expressed skepticism about that claim because money is fungible. The money the university provides to athletics also is discretionary.

“This notion that they’re spending resources that otherwise couldn’t be spent on putting more kids through college or funding cancer research is just absurd,” said Jack Kroll, a former member of the university’s Board of Regents. “There’s no truth to that whatsoever.”

‘The university will have to fill the gap’

The projected revenue for fiscal year 2026 is $136.7 million with $163.7 million in expenses. The biggest expense is football at $60.4 million. The department is still finalizing its numbers for fiscal year 2025, which ended in June 2025, but said it expects a “balanced” budget of $141 million in revenues and expenses for that year, including $24 million in institutional support revenue from the Boulder campus and the university’s president’s office.

Colorado isn’t the only school facing these challenges. In fiscal 2024, at least 33 athletic departments received at least $30 million in university support, including Colorado ($31.9 million), Houston ($38.4 million), Arizona State ($51.7 million) and South Florida ($63.7 million), according to public records collected by USA TODAY Sports in conjunction with the Knight-Newhouse College Athletics Database at Syracuse University.

Advertisement

The House settlement added a potential new $20.5 million expense to their bills starting July 1, 2025.

At Colorado, last year the university projected a small but growing budget deficit for the campus starting in fiscal 2027. It even told faculty and staff to move forward by “being comfortable with being uncomfortable.” This has led to concerns about how football is paying for its big new expenses.

“With a lame-duck athletic director, a dismal football season, who-knows-what to happen with the (transfer) portal, donor fatigue, the distancing of football leadership from football alums — the prospects for making much of a dent in that deficit seem very slim,” said Roger Pielke, an emeritus professor at Colorado who previously taught sports governance in the CU athletics department. “That would mean that the university will have to fill the gap.”

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Sales and scams to look out for this Cyber Monday

Published

on

Sales and scams to look out for this Cyber Monday



This Cyber Monday, sales are expected to surpass $14.2 billion online, according to Adobe Analytics. As you’re searching for those holiday deals for your loved ones or maybe a little something for yourself, you might be wondering where to look and what to look out for.

Advertisement

There are major deals for you on electronics and clothes:

• Amazon is offering 40% off select toys, 50% off on clothing
• Target is offering $200 off some Apple products
• Retailers like Abercrombie and Fitch are giving you 50% off everything

Before you click buy, watch out for scammers who want to steal your personal information and your money. So far this year, Americans have reported more than $7 billion of fraud.

Here are five of the most common types of scams to watch for this holiday season, according to Visa:

• Fake retail websites: Websites that appear authentic but have been constructed for the sole purpose of scamming customers are proliferating, according to Visa. These sites can closely mimic popular companies, duping shoppers into handing over credit card information. Trust if your gut instinct says something is awry. Check the web address for typos, like numbers swapped out for letters, or vice versa.
• Package delivery scams: Scam artists are sending consumers texts claiming there is a “delivery problem” with an online order they probably didn’t place. Criminals posing as package delivery services like UPS or FedEx tell consumers they must turn over their credit card information to receive a phony delivery. Criminals may sell and trade your personal information on the dark web or enroll you in recurring billing cycles you never signed up for. Some consumers might not catch these issues if they don’t pay close attention to their credit card statements, according to Visa.
• Paying for seasonal work: Fake job offers also crop up during the holidays, when many Americans are trying to earn extra cash to cover gift-giving and travel. Scammers take advantage of that financial pressure.
• Travel-related fraud: Scammers are also creating fake travel sites and sending phishing emails targeting people with holiday travel plans. Make sure to make reservations through trusted travel sites, and if a deal appears to be too good to be true, it probably is.
• Charity scams: The year-end giving season also attracts scammers who exploit people’s generosity by setting up phony charities. Fraudsters may build convincing websites or approach people in person with tap-to-donate schemes, Visa said. As with other scams, it’s wise to confirm a charity’s legitimacy before donating.

Advertisement

If you do get hit, call your bank or credit card company right away. Time is critical. Also, file a police report. That can sometimes help you recover your funds.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Rivalry Week Winners and Losers as Ohio State Soars And Colorado Flops

Published

on

Rivalry Week Winners and Losers as Ohio State Soars And Colorado Flops


The final full weekend of the college football regular season delivered everything the sport promises in late November—rivalry drama, playoff-shifting results, and, for some programs, a harsh reminder of how far they still have to climb.

Nov 29, 2025; Manhattan, Kansas, USA; Colorado Buffaloes head coach Deion Sanders looks on during the second quarter against

Nov 29, 2025; Manhattan, Kansas, USA; Colorado Buffaloes head coach Deion Sanders looks on during the second quarter against the Kansas State Wildcats at Bill Snyder Family Football Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Sewell-Imagn Images / Scott Sewell-Imagn Images

For the Colorado Buffaloes, the script remained painfully familiar. A snowy road loss to Kansas State capped a frustrating 3–9 campaign in year 3 under Deion Sanders. In contrast, Ohio State strengthened its claim as the nation’s best team with a massive win in The Big House. Meanwhile, Texas A&M squandered a golden chance at the SEC Championship.

Here are the biggest winners and losers from Week 14 of the college football season.

Nov 29, 2025; Manhattan, Kansas, USA; Colorado Buffaloes quarterback Kaidon Salter (3) is tackled by Kansas State Wildcats de

Nov 29, 2025; Manhattan, Kansas, USA; Colorado Buffaloes quarterback Kaidon Salter (3) is tackled by Kansas State Wildcats defensive end Chiddi Obiazor (8) during the fourth quarter at Bill Snyder Family Football Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Sewell-Imagn Images / Scott Sewell-Imagn Images

Another Game, Another Loss — But a Few Signs of Hope

For the fifth straight week, the Colorado Buffaloes land on the wrong side of the ledger. Their 24–14 loss at Kansas State was a microcosm of the entire season: flashes of potential drowned out by inconsistency and key absences.

Advertisement

Colorado’s defense opened the game with resilience, holding K-State in check after an early touchdown drive and keeping the Buffs within striking distance well into the fourth quarter. But missing multiple starters — including All-American left tackle Jordan Seaton, who missed the final three games with a foot injury — placed even more pressure on the offense, which struggled to sustain momentum.

Kansas State’s Joe Jackson ultimately took over, erupting for 188 yards and three touchdowns as the Wildcats punched their bowl ticket. Colorado, meanwhile, finishes the year 3–9, a sharp decline from the program’s 2024 breakthrough that featured a bowl appearance, a near Big 12 title berth, and Travis Hunter becoming the first two-way Heisman winner in a generation.

Dec 14, 2024; New York, NY, USA; Colorado Buffaloes wide receiver/cornerback Travis Hunter after winning the 2024 Heisman Tro

Dec 14, 2024; New York, NY, USA; Colorado Buffaloes wide receiver/cornerback Travis Hunter after winning the 2024 Heisman Trophy. Mandatory Credit: Todd Van Emst/Heisman Trust via Imagn Images / Todd Van Emst/Heisman Trust via Imagn Images

But there is a silver lining.

This season wasn’t about hardware — it was about experience. Colorado’s young core, headlined by freshman quarterback Julian “JuJu” Lewis, logged meaningful snaps against Big 12 competition. Those reps should make a big difference in how Lewis and the Buffs look next season. With “Coach Prime” expected to overhaul both the roster and coaching staff, the offseason becomes a crucial reset point — one that will shape whether Colorado’s growing foundation can finally translate potential into wins.

Ohio State Buckeyes cornerback Davison Igbinosun (1) celebrates after defeating the Michigan Wolverines in the NCAA football

Ohio State Buckeyes cornerback Davison Igbinosun (1) celebrates after defeating the Michigan Wolverines in the NCAA football game at Michigan Stadium on Saturday, Nov. 29, 2025 in Ann Arbor, Michigan. / Samantha Madar/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

A Rivalry Win Sets the Stage for a Historic Matchup

When the pressure and the stakes are highest, the great teams rise to the occasion, and that’s exactly what the No. 1-ranked Ohio State Buckeyes did, delivering a clean, dominant performance against their bitter rivals, the Michigan Wolverines.

Advertisement

The Buckeyes walked into Ann Arbor and delivered one of their most complete performances of the year, beating rival Michigan 27-9 to remain undefeated and stake their claim as the nation’s top team.

In a rivalry often defined by razor-thin margins, Ohio State weathered Michigan’s early momentum by controlling the trenches and smothering Michigan’s run game, forcing the Wolverines’ freshman quarterback Bryce Underwood into mistake-filled moments, including a late fourth-quarter interception that sealed the win for the Buckeyes.

The win preserved Ohio State’s perfect record and sets up a historic Big Ten Championship matchup against No. 2 Indiana — the first time the conference’s title game will feature undefeated teams ranked No. 1 and No. 2. The winner will not only claim the Big Ten crown but the No. 1 seed in the expanded College Football Playoff.

MORE: What Colorado Quarterback Julian Lewis Said After Impressing In First College Start

MORE: Three Big Takeaways From the Colorado Buffaloes’ Loss to West Virginia

Advertisement

MORE: What Deion Sanders Said After Colorado Buffaloes’ Loss to West Virginia

Nov 28, 2025; Austin, Texas, USA; Texas Longhorns quarterback Arch Manning keeps the ball and runs for a touchdown during the

Nov 28, 2025; Austin, Texas, USA; Texas Longhorns quarterback Arch Manning keeps the ball and runs for a touchdown during the second half against the Texas A&M Aggies at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Wachter-Imagn Images / Scott Wachter-Imagn Images

A Rivalry Collapse — But a Playoff Lifeline Remains

The stage was set for Texas A&M to make a national statement.

Beat Texas in Austin, and the Aggies were headed to the SEC Championship Game. Instead, Arch Manning and the Longhorns flipped the script on the maroon and white. Manning’s late touchdown run sealed a 27–17 win over the No. 3 Aggies, handing coach Mike Elko and A&M a painful loss to close the regular season.

Nov 28, 2025; Austin, Texas, USA; Head coach Mike Elko watches the first half of play against the Texas Longhorns at Darrell

Nov 28, 2025; Austin, Texas, USA; Head coach Mike Elko watches the first half of play against the Texas Longhorns at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Wachter-Imagn Images / Scott Wachter-Imagn Images

The defeat ended the Aggies’ hopes of playing for an SEC title — something the program hasn’t done in over a decade — and denied them the satisfaction of beating their archrival on the biggest stage since the rivalry was renewed.

Still, the Aggies are expected to reach the College Football Playoff thanks to their strong overall record and big road wins over Notre Dame, and Missouri. A&M star linebacker Taurean York put things bluntly after the loss:

Advertisement

“Hurts a lot,” York said after the game. “But you got to regroup and get ready for the playoffs.”

The Aggies may have lost the battle in Austin — but the war that matters most is just ahead.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending