Connect with us

Arizona

Arizona genetic abnormality abortion ban ongoing

Published

on

Arizona genetic abnormality abortion ban ongoing


TUCSON, Ariz. (13 News) – While the 1864 abortion ban has been repealed in Arizona, there’s another abortion ban that is currently the law in the Grand Canyon state.

It bans abortions due to any genetic abnormalities, no matter the stage a woman is at in her pregnancy.

“Arizona, even in the absence of, you know, the 1864 ban, it has very, very strict abortion laws on the books,” said Jessica Sklarsky, senior staff attorney in U.S. litigation, Center for Reproductive Rights.

Arizona passed a law in 2021 banning abortions solely based on the genetic makeup of a fetus or embryo, and the court did not challenge that law.

Advertisement

“That law is fully applicable today and it should be fully applicable moving forward. And that’s a good thing because life is a human right, and every human life is worth protecting,” said Jake warner, senior counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom.

However, the law was passed before Roe v. Wade was overturned, causing pro-choice organizations to challenge the law in court.

“In this case, we do challenge, we refer to it as, as the Reason Scheme because it’s really a whole suite of laws that were intended to make it impossible for somebody who may have, who may have a suspected or diagnosis of a fetal condition, make it impossible for them to obtain abortion care,” Sklarsky said.

Over the past three years, they have continued their fight in the Isaccson v. Mayes case.

There’s been a lot of back and forth, not just due to Roe being overturned, but the 1864 abortion ban taking a front-row seat in the abortion fight.

Advertisement

Attorney General Kris Mayes also said she wouldn’t enforce or defend the law in court, but a few Arizona legislators decided to defend it.

The fight is far from over, and Sklarsky said the Center for Reproductive Rights will continue to fight the case.

“Regardless of the repeal going through the fight is going to continue,” Sklarsky said.

And Warner said the same for the ADF.

“We’re hopeful that the Arizona Supreme Court will allow Arizona law to protect unborn children as much as possible,” Warner said.

Advertisement

If a doctor were to be convicted under the law, they could lose their medical license, be sued by the father for medical damages, and even face jail time.

Sklarsky described the law as quote “unconstitutionally vague.”

Be sure to subscribe to the 13 News YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/@13newskold



Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Idaho 78-58 Northern Arizona (Feb 26, 2026) Game Recap – ESPN

Published

on

Idaho 78-58 Northern Arizona (Feb 26, 2026) Game Recap – ESPN


MOSCOW, Idaho — — Jackson Rasmussen had 19 points in Idaho’s 78-58 win over Northern Arizona on Thursday.

Rasmussen also had seven rebounds for the Vandals (16-13, 8-8 Big Sky Conference). Isaiah Brickner scored 15 points while shooting 6 of 11 from the field and 2 for 4 from the line. Jack Payne shot 4 for 5 from beyond the arc to finish with 12 points.

Diego Campisano finished with 11 points for the Lumberjacks (10-19, 4-12). Chris Komin added 11 points for Northern Arizona. Karl Markus Poom also had 10 points.

—-

Advertisement

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Former Arizona town employee sentenced in COVID-19 relief, embezzlement case

Published

on

Former Arizona town employee sentenced in COVID-19 relief, embezzlement case


PARKER, AZ (AZFamily) — A former employee of a western Arizona town has learned her fate after being convicted in connection with COVID-19 relief fraud and embezzlement.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said Thursday that Jennifer Elizabeth Alcaida, 50, a former office specialist for the Town of Parker, was sentenced by a Mohave County Superior Court judge to three and a half years in prison.

According to court records, between July and Sept. 2021, Alcaida took a total of $173,295.54 by writing unauthorized checks from town accounts, keeping cash she was required to deposit, and making personal purchases on a town-issued credit card.

Records also show she received more than $20,000 from the federal Paycheck Protection Program through the U.S. Small Business Administration after claiming the funds were needed to cover payroll for a personal business that did not exist.

Advertisement

Alcaida pleaded guilty Jan. 6 to felony charges of fraudulent schemes and theft. After her prison term, she will serve seven years of probation and has been ordered to pay $194,128.54 in restitution.

“This case is a clear example of someone who abused the public’s trust for personal gain,” Mayes said in a written statement. “Arizonans deserve to know that those who steal from their communities will be held accountable, and this sentence reflects exactly that.”

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KTVK/KPHO. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona high school banned from playoffs after harassment allegations

Published

on

Arizona high school banned from playoffs after harassment allegations


COOLIDGE, AZ (AZFamily) — Student-athletes at an Arizona high school won’t participate in the playoffs following harassment and intimidation allegations during a basketball game last week.

The Arizona Interscholastic Association (AIA) Executive Board, which oversees high school athletics in the state, said it placed the Coolidge High School athletic department on probation Wednesday, effective immediately. That means all the school’s teams cannot participate in the postseason.

“The AIA and its member schools are committed to highest levels of respectful behavior from all of the participants at all AIA events,” the AIA said in an emailed statement.

The postseason ban is in response to a 3A boys basketball game Friday between Chinle High School and Coolidge High School in Coolidge. People who were at the game took to social media to say Chinle players were harassed and had racial slurs yelled at them.

Advertisement

A livestream video of the game shows that, as teams lined up to shake hands, a uniformed officer can be seen holding some people back. One viewer claims someone on the court spat on a Chinle player.

During a meeting between the Coolidge Unified School District and the AIA, the harassment allegations included fans making “inapproproiate use of belts” and officials complained of Coolidge fans used derogatory and racist language.

There were also claims Chinle players feared for their safety so they remained in the locker room after the game and left the building in pairs “due to safety concerns.”

The Chinle Chapter Government of the Navajo Nation passed a resolution Sunday asking the AIA to investigate the game. They said Coolidge players used verbal abuse, threatening gestures and “belligerent disregard” toward the Chinle players.

“This resolution sends a clear message to the Arizona Interscholastic Association that we stand in solidarity with the safety of our students. Our student athletes adhere to the rules of conduct and we will not allow for them to be disrespected and intimidated at an AIA Sanctioned Event,” Shawna Ann Claw, a Chinle Council delegate for the Navajo Nation Council, said on social media.

Advertisement

The chapter urged the AIA to punish those responsible and set strict rules to prevent something like this from happening again.

The AIA said Monday morning that it was aware of the incidents “before, during and after” Friday’s game.

During Wednesday’s meeting, Coolidge officials said they disagreed with characterizations that the end of the game was “out of control” and that anyone’s safety was in jeopardy, saying they “provided clarification during the meeting.”

The school district said it’s asking for another meeting with the AIA executive board and consulting with attorneys about what to do next, including filing an injunction and appealing.

“We believe the ruling is disproportionate to the circumstances and carries substantial consequences for student-athletes who were not involved in the incidents in question,” Coolidge Unified School District Superintendent Dawn Dee Hodge said in a written release.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KTVK/KPHO. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending