Connect with us

Alaska

Seeking to speed development, Alaska aims to take over enforcement of Clean Water Act program from the feds

Published

on

Seeking to speed development, Alaska aims to take over enforcement of Clean Water Act program from the feds


JUNEAU — The Alaska Legislature, on the urging of Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s administration, is contemplating a state takeover of a serious federal environmental allowing course of. The purpose, administration officers have mentioned, is to hurry the development of roads, bridges, mines and drilling tasks.

Included within the Home’s proposed state finances for the approaching 12 months is a $4.9 million improve to the finances of the Alaska Division of Environmental Conservation. That company expects to rent 28 new employees members — the largest single-year improve in many years.

If the finances improve is included within the state finances, DEC officers plan a two-year course of to take over a part of the federal Clear Water Act generally known as Part 404.

Permits issued beneath that part decide whether or not or not a builder can fill wetlands, rivers, streams and different our bodies of water throughout development. It additionally determines whether or not a mission builder must take some form of motion to compensate for the wetlands destroyed by development.

Advertisement

“We’re clearly very excited concerning the alternative to get this going,” Jason Brune, commissioner of the Division of Environmental Conservation, informed the Senate Finance Committee on March 15.

“We consider that we will develop this appropriately, get this submitted to the EPA … and ask them to make resolution for us, with the implementation in 2024,” Brune mentioned.

Regardless of that curiosity, a number of lawmakers, together with key members of the Senate Finance committee, have expressed considerations about the fee and scope of the mission, and the concept has grow to be a topic of debate as legislators work towards a closing draft of the state finances.

Underneath federal legislation, states can take management of this system so long as they meet federal requirements. Three states have executed so — Michigan, New Jersey and Florida.

[In King Cove, Interior Secretary Haaland gets an earful from residents and receives an honor]

Advertisement

The Alaska Legislature licensed a takeover in 2013 however shelved the concept after oil costs plummeted. This 12 months, oil costs — and state income — have rebounded and Dunleavy has revived the concept.

EPA has supported the takeover, Brune mentioned, by providing grants and technical help. The Military Corps of Engineers, which usually administers 404 allowing, stayed impartial in legislative hearings.

‘A HUGE deal’

Business teams have praised the concept of a state takeover, saying the present federal allowing course of is just too gradual.

“I don’t suppose it might get any worse than it’s proper now, once I’m speaking to our contractors,” mentioned Alicia Amberg, government director of the Related Common Contractors of Alaska.

“I believe it’s price a shot for the state to attempt to take this course of over to permit the state to work by means of this course of extra effectively,” she mentioned.

Advertisement

About 90% of common permits — these affecting minimal quantities of wetlands — are issued in lower than 60 days, in response to John Budnik, a spokesman for the Alaska District of the U.S. Military Corps of Engineers. About 70% of the extra sophisticated particular person permits are issued in lower than 120 days.

Brune mentioned he expects “comparable timelines or faster, particularly for common permits” beneath a state takeover, together with improved efficiency.

He supplied an instance: When the proposed Donlin gold mine in Southwest Alaska sought its wetlands permits, its house owners wished to scrub up the defunct Purple Satan mercury mine as compensation for the hurt attributable to Donlin. The Corps rejected that proposal, and Donlin as an alternative paid to protect wetlands elsewhere.

It was a foolish outcome, Brune mentioned — Alaska has extra wetlands than the remainder of the US mixed, and the terrain that was preserved wasn’t prone to be developed.

“We might have cleaned up that Purple Satan mine and that will have had important constructive advantages to that watershed,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

Environmental and fishing organizations have been alarmed by the prospect of a takeover. Although the state would nonetheless need to observe federal requirements, opponents say the state has historically favored growth and has underfunded oversight. They consider that perspective might result in extra hurt to wetlands.

“I’m very involved. From a fish habitat perspective this can be a HUGE deal,” mentioned Lindsay Bloom, a marketing campaign strategist for SalmonState, a gaggle dedicated to preserving wild salmon.

“We consider that DEC’s assumption of this system threatens Alaska’s wetlands and salmon rivers that help our fisheries,” the United Fishermen of Alaska, the state’s largest industrial fishing group, mentioned in an April letter to the Senate Finance Committee.

Questions of value, staffing

For instance of their concern, opponents level to what occurred the final time DEC assumed duty for a federal program. In 2005, the state began to take over administration of wastewater permits.

Throughout a routine EPA assessment in 2014, the federal company discovered DEC had considerably understaffed the wastewater program and wasn’t performing sufficient inspections to fulfill federal requirements. DEC itself decided it wanted greater than 21 full-time staff to fulfill federal tips, however by 2019, it nonetheless had solely 13.

Advertisement

Requested about that situation, Brune mentioned that when the EPA raised the issue, he lobbied for extra staffing on the company. Right this moment, the division dealing with wastewater points is staffed sufficient to fulfill the federal requirements, finances paperwork point out.

He mentioned he would make comparable requests of the Legislature if the takeover mission wants extra employees or funding.

The state’s $4.9 million funding request is predicated on a 2014 estimate by DEC that was up to date by present staff.

“That’s the quantity that we consider is critical,” Brune mentioned, “and if on the finish of the day, we want extra, I’m dedicated to going for extra, however I consider that quantity that was executed and checked out by each that crew then and my crew in water now, I’m trusting their evaluation.”

Michelle Hale, now retired from DEC and serving on the Juneau Meeting, led the crew that carried out the evaluation in 2014.

Advertisement

“It’s in all probability too low,” she mentioned of the fee estimate.

The Military Corps in Alaska has a regulatory crew of about 50 folks and a finances of about $8.5 million per 12 months to deal with wetlands allowing, Budnik mentioned.

“This doesn’t embrace authorized charges, and the Division of Justice doesn’t cost us for help. This could vary about $1 million per 12 months,” he mentioned.

The state of Virginia thought of taking up wetlands allowing in that state in 2012 however finally concluded that the prices outweighed the advantages. When Florida took over wetlands allowing in that state on the finish of 2020, the mission turned out to be extra pricey than anticipated.

The environmental authorized group Earthjustice challenged EPA’s approval of the Florida takeover, and Florida itself is in a authorized battle with EPA over the place state authority ends and federal authority begins. On account of that dispute, dozens of permits have been positioned on maintain.

Advertisement

Like Florida, Alaska wouldn’t be capable to take over all wetlands permits — these affecting the ocean, tidally influenced wetlands and navigable rivers or lakes nonetheless need to undergo a federal course of. These symbolize about 25% of the Part 404 permits within the state, DEC estimated in 2014, however that proportion might change, relying on the results of an ongoing lawsuit within the U.S. Supreme Courtroom.

The underside line, Brune and others mentioned, is that large growth tasks just like the proposed Pebble mine, Donlin mine, and North Slope oil growth will nonetheless need to undergo a federal course of. That comes with a caveat: Builders might break their tasks into a number of items, with some items going by means of the federal course of and a few going by means of a state-only course of.

“I do know there are mission proponents on the market that will be very occupied with bifurcating,” Brune mentioned, however he added that he’s undecided whether or not it could occur.

Earlier than turning into commissioner, Brune labored for the mining conglomerate Anglo American. That company backed the Pebble mine till 2013.

“The rationale why we’re pursuing this has nothing to do with Pebble. Pebble positively has an impression on the funding local weather of our state … however why we’re doing that is to have state oversight of our allowing authority,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

A spokesman for the Military Corps of Engineers mentioned it isn’t clear whether or not tasks like Donlin or Pebble would wish to undergo a federal course of.

Warning within the Legislature

Improvement teams supporting the state takeover have important affect within the Alaska Legislature, the place even Democrats help drilling within the Arctic Nationwide Wildlife Refuge. Because the finances is debated within the state Senate, opponents of the takeover are utilizing fiscal considerations to make their case.

On April 19, partially due to these considerations, the Senate Finance Committee eliminated funding for the takeover from its draft of the state working finances.

Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, is co-chair of the Senate Finance Committee and mentioned he’s personally against the concept. Along with the prices, he’s involved about beginning a serious new mission within the final 12 months of a gubernatorial time period.

[New formula for Permanent Fund dividend payments heads toward Alaska Senate vote]

Advertisement

“If we do that, we should always actually begin it firstly of a governor’s time period so he has or she has the flexibility to troubleshoot points that give you it,” he mentioned.

“I believe there’s a timing situation, there’s a finances development situation, and there’s lots of concern amongst my district so far as simply DEC and EPA development and involvement within the general economic system. I’m somewhat cautious,” Stedman mentioned.

The choice to take away funding from the Senate finances doesn’t kill the concept. Funding may very well be restored in a Senate modification, and even when it doesn’t reappear within the Senate finances, it is going to be a subject of debate as lawmakers compromise the Home and Senate proposals earlier than the Legislature adjourns on Could 18.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

In Alaska, air travel is a fact of life. But what happens when someone dies on a plane?

Published

on

In Alaska, air travel is a fact of life. But what happens when someone dies on a plane?


It was just before Thanksgiving two years ago that Jim Haugom died on a flight to Alaska.

Haugom and his wife, Patty, were returning from a family visit on Oahu and looking forward to the holidays at home.

Jim Haugom got up to use the lavatory about 45 minutes out of Anchorage on the early-morning flight. He lost consciousness and couldn’t be revived, despite the immediate efforts of the flight crew and their fellow passengers.

Advertisement

Two years later, Patty Haugom still expresses only gratitude for the compassion and care she experienced on one of the worst days of her life.

Flight attendants and medical professionals she’d never met before tried to save her husband. Strangers prayed with her. Responders on the ground guided her to a private space to grieve.

“The crew was heroic,” Haugom said. “In that little tiny area … there was four flight attendants and passengers in there, and they had the right equipment. They were on top of it. They never stopped. Even as we landed, they were still working on him.”

In a geographically isolated state like Alaska where flying is often a necessity, midair medical emergencies are a stark reminder of how vulnerable air travelers can be.

A death on a plane brings into sharp focus the snap decisions facing the flight crew and medical professionals who step up to help, the trauma inflicted on other passengers in such a cramped space — and the bond they all share around someone’s last moments.

Advertisement

“It’s hard for everybody involved: family, crew, passengers,” said Seth Heiple, a flight attendant and union safety chair of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA.

Midair rarities

The odds of someone dying on a plane are extremely low, even as medical emergencies have become more common with billions of passengers flying every year and “an increasing aging of air travelers” with significant health issues, according to a 2021 study published in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Since 2022, there have been an average of two midair fatalities a year involving flights landing in Anchorage, according to Cpl. Daniel Harmeling, with the Anchorage Airport Police & Fire Department. That statistic reflects scheduled flights as well as those diverted due to in-flight emergencies.

The 2021 study found there were 0.21 deaths on planes for every million passengers.

Don Young, Alaska’s lone United States representative for years and the longest-serving Republican member of Congress in history, was one of those rare cases.

Advertisement

Young — seated with his wife, Anne — died on a flight from Los Angeles to Seattle in March 2022 after losing consciousness as the plane descended into Seattle. Medics on the ground were unable to revive him. Young’s communications director, Zack Brown, was also on the plane.

“Felt like the longest day of my life and I can’t believe it’s been an entire year,” Brown posted on X a year later, in March 2023. “Always grateful for our Alaska Airlines crew and everyone who helped me get my boss’s remains & Mrs. Young back to DC. There was no playbook for what happened, but I had an amazing support system.”

Coming home

Patty Haugom said there was little indication of anything wrong with her husband’s health before they got on that 2022 flight. He’d been falling a little more than usual, she realized later.

The Haugoms moved to Alaska from South Dakota in 1971. Haugom, 76 when he died, worked at the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman before moving to a lineman position at Matanuska Telephone Association. He retired by 2007, a loving grandfather, yard-proud gardener and woodworker who could fix anything.

The Haugoms have six children, including a son who lives on Oahu. On that 2022 trip, other family members flew in from Alaska. They all spent just over a week together.

Advertisement

The long flight over the North Pacific Ocean back to Anchorage was nearing its end when Jim Haugom rose to use the restroom. Their daughter, her husband and their children were seated farther back.

Patty Haugom got the attention of a flight attendant when she realized he’d been gone too long. When the attendant unlocked the lavatory door, Haugom could see immediately that something was wrong. Her husband was slumped over, unconscious.

The flight attendant got on the intercom to ask for help transferring the big man from the confined space.

“She announced that they had a medical emergency, and she needed three strong guys,” Patty Haugom recalled. “There was three guys up there, got him out on the floor, and right across the aisle from us was a heart specialist.”

As the lights remained low, a flurry of activity surrounded her husband. Someone started CPR compressions as passengers helped Patty Haugom shield the scene with blankets.

Advertisement

“I remember standing in that archway, holding my shirt open, trying to see if I could get people not to see,” she said. “I was just in shock.”

‘It leaves a mark’

Flight attendants are trained to handle such medical emergencies, according to Heiple.

There are recurrent trainings every year and CPR training twice a year, he said. Aircraft carry AEDs — defibrillators that can deliver a shock to restore regular heart rhythm — and medical kits that include everything from blood-pressure cuffs and bandages to controlled substances that require a doctor’s permission to open.

If a passenger requires medical help, a flight crew will generally notify the pilot and call for assistance from any medical professionals on board, Heiple said. Airlines contract with third parties such as MedAire to provide real-time advice from nurses and doctors on the ground.

If someone is experiencing a cardiac arrest or stroke, the crew will continue life-saving procedures until a medical professional makes an official death pronouncement, Heiple said. Flight attendants will try to move passengers, especially those with children, who are seated near someone having a medical emergency.

Advertisement

Heiple has helped with in-flight CPR three times in his career. The people doing compressions will trade off; the procedure is exhausting as well as emotionally draining. Sometimes CPR may continue for hours.

“It can be really traumatic for the crews,” he said. “In fact, I’m getting a little emotional talking about it.”

Flight crews who work on a flight where a death occurs get seven days of paid leave, according to Heiple. They will usually receive a confidential mental health debriefing session.

“Even years later, it leaves a mark,” he said.

Compassion and respect

The family doesn’t know exactly what caused Jim Haugom’s medical emergency, but whatever it was happened very fast, his wife said.

Advertisement

At the time, she could barely process what was happening. As her daughter started texting family members that Haugom was receiving CPR on the plane, a passenger sitting in the seat in front of Patty Haugom and her daughter turned around.

She held Haugom’s hand and asked, “Do you want us to pray with you?”

Haugom, who attends St. Michael Catholic Church in Palmer, found solace in that small gesture.

“It just meant a lot to me and my daughter,” she said.

Once the plane landed, Haugom accompanied her husband as medics moved him into the airport, where he was pronounced dead. A police officer escorted her. She and her daughter were allowed to stay with Haugom’s body for as long as they wanted.

Advertisement

Her daughter has stayed in touch with the crew from that flight since.

“The passengers were wonderful, they really were. And everybody was just so respectful,” Patty Haugom said. “Flight crews put up with so much these days. Those people deserve every ounce of credit they can get.”

• • •





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Boeing says it's turning things around a year after the Alaska Airlines incident

Published

on

Boeing says it's turning things around a year after the Alaska Airlines incident


Boeing said Friday that it had hit several internal targets on safety and quality control despite a series of embarrassing and catastrophic incidents that has seen its share price plunge and airlines around the world pull some of its planes.

The company said in a news release that it had made improvements “in multiple areas including safety culture, training, simplifying their processes, and eliminating defects.”

The announcement comes less than a week after the latest deadly incident involving one of its aircraft. In the worst air crash in South Korean history, 179 people were killed when a Boeing 737-800 belly-landed and skidded off the runway at the Muan International Airport.

Even so, in a section titled ‘Elevating Safety & Quality Culture’, Boeing said it has “addressed over 70% of action items in commercial airplanes production based on employee feedback” and implemented key criteria “across Final Assembly for the 737, 787 and portions of 767 and 777” to “mitigate risk.”

Advertisement

It has nonetheless been a difficult year for the company that — along with Europe’s Airbus — exercises a virtual duopoly over the airline market. In early 2024, a crucial fuselage panel blew out of an Alaska Airlines jet, its largest union stopped producing airplanes, and problems with its Starliner space capsule left two astronauts stranded in orbit.

These incidents came after several fatal crashes involving Boeing jets in recent years, including Boeing planes operated by Indonesia’s Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines that led to the various aviation authorities issuing grounding orders against specific Boeing jets.

All of that has combined to strip almost a third of the value off its share price since the end of 2023. 

During Boeing’s difficult 2024, whistleblowers from within the company came forward with complaints about shambolic internal processes in the production of its 737 and 787 aircraft.

One of those whistleblowers, John Barnett, was found to have died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, aged 62. After his death, his family said his attempts to highlight serious concerns were met with “a culture of concealment” that valued “profits over safety.”

Advertisement

Since then, the company has changed CEOs with new chief executive Robert “Kelly” Ortberg undertaking a massive turnaround plan since he was installed in August. In a letter to employees in October, he stressed the need for a “fundamental culture change,” going further than his recent predecessors in acknowledging the damage to Boeing’s reputation.

“This is a big ship that will take some time to turn, but when it does, it has the capacity to be great again,” Ortberg said in the letter, according to Reuters.

But just two months later in October, the Federal Aviation Authority said it was opening a three-month review of Boeing’s compliance with safety regulations as part of its intensified scrutiny of the company’s operations.

Asked by NBC News’ Lester Holt whether Boeing was too big to fail, FAA Administrator Michael Whitaker said last month that Boeing had failed “and they’re going through a pretty substantial reset. They have the resources to do this reset and to rebuild in a much higher quality and safer manner.”

But Boeing’s news release highlights the company’s investment in workforce training, with  “strengthened training for mechanics and quality inspectors with an enhanced support system,” as well as adding “hundreds of hours of new curriculum to training programs” that include “quality proficiency” and “Positive Safety Culture.”

Advertisement

In addition, Boeing said that it is trying to simplify its processes, specifically highlighting the installation plans of its 737 production line, as well as “eliminating defects.” 

The 737 aircraft was mentioned when the company said its operation with Spirit Aerosystems had “significantly reduced defects” in assembling the planes’ fuselages by increasing inspection points. Boeing said it had also “fully implemented” new procedures around the final assembly of its 737 and 787 aircrafts that tracks and secures parts “to prevent loss or improper use.”

The timing of Boeing’s statement will not be lost on many in the aerospace industry. The release itself notes both the 53-day strike as well as the Alaska Air incident that kicked off the company’s awful year. 

Sunday marks the one-year anniversary of the near-catastrophe aboard Alaska Airlines flight 1282 and the company will likely be keen to show its progress in the year since.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Armed Services YMCA of Alaska seeks nominations for ‘Salute to the Military’ awards

Published

on

Armed Services YMCA of Alaska seeks nominations for ‘Salute to the Military’ awards


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – For its 2025 Salute to the Military Awards, the Armed Services YMCA (ASYMCA) of Alaska is asking the public to help highlight civilians who have supported troops in Alaska.

Ultimately, two civilians are expected to be honored with this year’s award, with one named the Alaska Military Spouse of the Year, and the other, named the Bobby Alexander Civic Leader of the Year.

Awards will also be bestowed upon 13 enlisted servicemembers deemed exceptional in their service.

According to Kat Franchino, Marketing Director for ASYMCA of Alaska, the nonprofit organization represents enlisted members from all branches of the military in the 49th state, including some who just recently started their careers.

Advertisement

“It’s really just a way for us to honor the incredible junior enlisted service members,” she explained. “So that’s E1 through E5, who are stationed in our state.”

Franchino added that the awards are an opportunity to highlight the sacrifices these younger servicemembers make being stationed in the Last Frontier.

She said another reason for the event is to, “be able to shine a light on these incredible service members who have dedicated service before self, and … put the spotlight on them, to honor their accomplishments and the work that they’ve done.”

Beginning in 1977, the event has become a yearly tradition.

Recipients of the Service Persons of the Year awards are chosen by their command, who are seen as having gone “above and beyond,” Franchino said.

Advertisement

The civilian awards, meanwhile, were added to the proceedings a couple of years ago. Those honorees are chosen by service groups, “based on the qualities and characteristics that people have lined out in the nomination form,” according to Franchino.

The awards are slated for Feb. 15 in Anchorage, and online nominations for the civilian awards are due by Friday, Jan. 3.

Those nominating others are asked to fill out a form explaining why they are nominating a specific person, the support they’ve given the military, and any awards they may have already received.

Nomination forms can be completed on the ASYMCA of Alaska website.

See a spelling or grammatical error? Report it to web@ktuu.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending