Connect with us

Alaska

In Alaska, air travel is a fact of life. But what happens when someone dies on a plane?

Published

on

In Alaska, air travel is a fact of life. But what happens when someone dies on a plane?


It was just before Thanksgiving two years ago that Jim Haugom died on a flight to Alaska.

Haugom and his wife, Patty, were returning from a family visit on Oahu and looking forward to the holidays at home.

Jim Haugom got up to use the lavatory about 45 minutes out of Anchorage on the early-morning flight. He lost consciousness and couldn’t be revived, despite the immediate efforts of the flight crew and their fellow passengers.

Advertisement

Two years later, Patty Haugom still expresses only gratitude for the compassion and care she experienced on one of the worst days of her life.

Flight attendants and medical professionals she’d never met before tried to save her husband. Strangers prayed with her. Responders on the ground guided her to a private space to grieve.

“The crew was heroic,” Haugom said. “In that little tiny area … there was four flight attendants and passengers in there, and they had the right equipment. They were on top of it. They never stopped. Even as we landed, they were still working on him.”

In a geographically isolated state like Alaska where flying is often a necessity, midair medical emergencies are a stark reminder of how vulnerable air travelers can be.

A death on a plane brings into sharp focus the snap decisions facing the flight crew and medical professionals who step up to help, the trauma inflicted on other passengers in such a cramped space — and the bond they all share around someone’s last moments.

Advertisement

“It’s hard for everybody involved: family, crew, passengers,” said Seth Heiple, a flight attendant and union safety chair of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA.

Midair rarities

The odds of someone dying on a plane are extremely low, even as medical emergencies have become more common with billions of passengers flying every year and “an increasing aging of air travelers” with significant health issues, according to a 2021 study published in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Since 2022, there have been an average of two midair fatalities a year involving flights landing in Anchorage, according to Cpl. Daniel Harmeling, with the Anchorage Airport Police & Fire Department. That statistic reflects scheduled flights as well as those diverted due to in-flight emergencies.

The 2021 study found there were 0.21 deaths on planes for every million passengers.

Don Young, Alaska’s lone United States representative for years and the longest-serving Republican member of Congress in history, was one of those rare cases.

Advertisement

Young — seated with his wife, Anne — died on a flight from Los Angeles to Seattle in March 2022 after losing consciousness as the plane descended into Seattle. Medics on the ground were unable to revive him. Young’s communications director, Zack Brown, was also on the plane.

“Felt like the longest day of my life and I can’t believe it’s been an entire year,” Brown posted on X a year later, in March 2023. “Always grateful for our Alaska Airlines crew and everyone who helped me get my boss’s remains & Mrs. Young back to DC. There was no playbook for what happened, but I had an amazing support system.”

Coming home

Patty Haugom said there was little indication of anything wrong with her husband’s health before they got on that 2022 flight. He’d been falling a little more than usual, she realized later.

The Haugoms moved to Alaska from South Dakota in 1971. Haugom, 76 when he died, worked at the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman before moving to a lineman position at Matanuska Telephone Association. He retired by 2007, a loving grandfather, yard-proud gardener and woodworker who could fix anything.

The Haugoms have six children, including a son who lives on Oahu. On that 2022 trip, other family members flew in from Alaska. They all spent just over a week together.

Advertisement

The long flight over the North Pacific Ocean back to Anchorage was nearing its end when Jim Haugom rose to use the restroom. Their daughter, her husband and their children were seated farther back.

Patty Haugom got the attention of a flight attendant when she realized he’d been gone too long. When the attendant unlocked the lavatory door, Haugom could see immediately that something was wrong. Her husband was slumped over, unconscious.

The flight attendant got on the intercom to ask for help transferring the big man from the confined space.

“She announced that they had a medical emergency, and she needed three strong guys,” Patty Haugom recalled. “There was three guys up there, got him out on the floor, and right across the aisle from us was a heart specialist.”

As the lights remained low, a flurry of activity surrounded her husband. Someone started CPR compressions as passengers helped Patty Haugom shield the scene with blankets.

Advertisement

“I remember standing in that archway, holding my shirt open, trying to see if I could get people not to see,” she said. “I was just in shock.”

‘It leaves a mark’

Flight attendants are trained to handle such medical emergencies, according to Heiple.

There are recurrent trainings every year and CPR training twice a year, he said. Aircraft carry AEDs — defibrillators that can deliver a shock to restore regular heart rhythm — and medical kits that include everything from blood-pressure cuffs and bandages to controlled substances that require a doctor’s permission to open.

If a passenger requires medical help, a flight crew will generally notify the pilot and call for assistance from any medical professionals on board, Heiple said. Airlines contract with third parties such as MedAire to provide real-time advice from nurses and doctors on the ground.

If someone is experiencing a cardiac arrest or stroke, the crew will continue life-saving procedures until a medical professional makes an official death pronouncement, Heiple said. Flight attendants will try to move passengers, especially those with children, who are seated near someone having a medical emergency.

Advertisement

Heiple has helped with in-flight CPR three times in his career. The people doing compressions will trade off; the procedure is exhausting as well as emotionally draining. Sometimes CPR may continue for hours.

“It can be really traumatic for the crews,” he said. “In fact, I’m getting a little emotional talking about it.”

Flight crews who work on a flight where a death occurs get seven days of paid leave, according to Heiple. They will usually receive a confidential mental health debriefing session.

“Even years later, it leaves a mark,” he said.

Compassion and respect

The family doesn’t know exactly what caused Jim Haugom’s medical emergency, but whatever it was happened very fast, his wife said.

Advertisement

At the time, she could barely process what was happening. As her daughter started texting family members that Haugom was receiving CPR on the plane, a passenger sitting in the seat in front of Patty Haugom and her daughter turned around.

She held Haugom’s hand and asked, “Do you want us to pray with you?”

Haugom, who attends St. Michael Catholic Church in Palmer, found solace in that small gesture.

“It just meant a lot to me and my daughter,” she said.

Once the plane landed, Haugom accompanied her husband as medics moved him into the airport, where he was pronounced dead. A police officer escorted her. She and her daughter were allowed to stay with Haugom’s body for as long as they wanted.

Advertisement

Her daughter has stayed in touch with the crew from that flight since.

“The passengers were wonderful, they really were. And everybody was just so respectful,” Patty Haugom said. “Flight crews put up with so much these days. Those people deserve every ounce of credit they can get.”

• • •





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Man with same name as Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan can appear on GOP primary ballot, state’s Supreme Court rules

Published

on

Man with same name as Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan can appear on GOP primary ballot, state’s Supreme Court rules


The battle of the Dan Sullivans is on. 

The Alaska Supreme Court ruled Monday that a man with the same name as Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan can challenge the sitting lawmaker in the state’s GOP Senate primary in August. The high court upheld a ruling from a lower court judge that cleared the way for Daniel J. Sullivan to appear on the primary ballot, reversing a decision by state officials earlier this month that he was ineligible because he was allegedly trying to confuse voters.

The state Supreme Court directed Alaska’s Division of Elections to decide how Daniel J. Sullivan should be listed on the ballot “within the confines of existing Alaska ballot design law.”

The conflict is taking place in one of the country’s most closely watched Senate elections. The sitting Sen. Sullivan is running for a third term, but former Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola is vying to challenge him, setting up what could be an unusually competitive race in a deep-red state that hasn’t elected a Democrat to the Senate in almost 20 years.

Advertisement

The senator has called his same-name competitor a “sham candidate” and accused him of trying to trick voters and help Democrats flip the seat. Daniel J. Sullivan — a retired teacher and former U.S. Forest Service employee from Petersburg, Alaska — has denied those allegations and insisted he is both qualified and genuinely interested in running for Senate.

Daniel J. Sullivan and sitting Sen. Dan Sullivan, both of whom are running in Alaska’s GOP Senate primary.

Karen Dillman via AP / Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images


About two weeks ago, the Alaska Division of Elections determined that the challenger Sullivan could not appear on the ballot, arguing his paperwork “was not filed in order to declare an actual good-faith candidacy, but was instead filed with a purpose to confuse or mislead.”

Advertisement

In a letter to the candidate, Director Carol Beecher pointed to the fact that Daniel J. Sullivan had initially requested to appear on the ballot as “Dan Sullivan,” the same name format as the senator. She also wrote that he hadn’t previously been affiliated with the state Republican Party, had a website design that “appears to be deliberate[ly]” similar to the senator’s campaign site and had worked with a political consultant with links to Democratic candidates.

Daniel J. Sullivan asked a state court to reverse the decision. On Friday, Judge Thomas Matthews ruled in his favor, finding the non-senator Sullivan met the requirements to run for U.S. Senate and the state didn’t have the authority to exclude him based on “good faith.”

“The court does not minimize the Division’s concern that voters should not be misled,” the judge wrote. But he added that “Alaska election law gives the Division tools to address that concern,” including regulating how candidates appear on the ballot.

With ballots set to be printed this week, the issue was appealed to the Alaska Supreme Court on an expedited basis, with both sides filing court papers over the weekend.

The state Division of Elections asked the high court to overturn Matthews’ ruling, arguing it would “leave Alaska constitutionally required to permit bad-faith ballot access.” The agency said it reached its conclusion about Daniel J. Sullivan after it received a complaint from the National Republican Senatorial Committee “credibly alleging” he was seeking to “cause voter confusion” and made a “bewildering” request to appear on the ballot with the senator’s middle initial. 

Advertisement

If Daniel J. Sullivan is permitted to remain on the ballot, the state asked the Alaska Supreme Court to allow it to print his full name and list his party affiliation as “nonpartisan” to “ensure voters are not forced to guess between two nearly identical names.”

The Alaska Republican Party and several GOP-led states filed amicus briefs siding with Alaska.

Daniel J. Sullivan’s lawyers, meanwhile, argued the state “lacked any basis in Alaska law to exclude Mr. Sullivan from the ballot” and didn’t have the power to look into his “private motivations.” They wrote that state law doesn’t give officials the power to keep qualified candidates off the ballot due to potential confusion.

“[All] that Mr. Sullivan asks here is to be listed on the ballot, and the Division is obviously empowered to do so in a non-confusing manner,” his lawyers wrote.

Following oral arguments, the high court sided with Daniel J. Sullivan in a two-page order late Monday, and said it would issue a fuller opinion at a later date.

Advertisement

Jeffrey Robinson, an attorney for Daniel J. Sullivan, told CBS News his legal team is “grateful” for the Alaska Supreme Court’s decision to “affirm Judge Matthews’ well-reasoned, thorough order vacating the Division’s unlawful decision to exclude Mr. Sullivan as a candidate.”

“We expect that the Division will act in full compliance with existing Alaska ballot design law in its preparation of the ballots,” Robinson said in an email.

The senator’s campaign spokesperson, Nate Adams, said: “We’re disappointed in the court’s decision because as the sham candidate Dan J. Sullivan’s lawyers made clear in their legal arguments, the only reason he is running is to deceive voters and manipulate Alaska’s election system.”

“However, we are encouraged by the fact that the Director of the Division of Elections will be able to use her expertise to differentiate between the Petersburg fraud and the incumbent — Senator Dan Sullivan — to the benefit of Alaska voters,” Adams said.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Jesuits say goodbye to Alaska at Bethel ceremony

Published

on

Jesuits say goodbye to Alaska at Bethel ceremony


The first Jesuit missionaries in Alaska sailed up the Yukon River in 1887. By the turn of the 20th century, the religious order of the Catholic Church had as many as 50 Jesuits in the state.

Now, only two remain. And by the end of June, there will be none.

The Jesuits’ nearly 140 years in the state was honored at an event at Bethel’s Immaculate Conception Church on June 16. A procession of priests wearing long white gowns with red hems walked down the aisle to open the event. The Bishop of the Diocese of Fairbanks, Stephen Maekawa, thumped the ground with a shimmering silver staff known as a clozier as he approached the altar.

Bishop of the Diocese of Fairbanks, Steven Maekawa, walks toward the altar at the Immaculate Conception Church in Bethel.

“My brothers and sisters, we gather together to celebrate this wonderful and blessed occasion to acknowledge the love of God and the work of God through the 139 year mission of the Society of Jesus of the Jesuit fathers,” Maekawa said to open the event.

Advertisement

A traditional Catholic mass followed, with readings in both English and Yup’ik. During the sermon, Maekawa acknowledged the vastness of the Fairbanks diocese, and the tremendous amount of work done by the Jesuits to establish it.

“All of the 46 churches of the Diocese of Fairbanks that we currently have were established by either the Jesuit fathers or by direction of a Jesuit bishop,” Maekawa said. “We have a long history of the Society of Jesus’ presence and ministry here in all of Alaska.”

The Jesuits are an order within the Catholic Church, akin to the Dominicans or Franciscans. They have a reputation for taking on some of the Catholic Church’s most remote assignments.

That missionary spirit brought the Jesuits to the Yukon River in 1887, where they built churches, schools, and ministries. Without their work, Catholicism may not have taken root in huge swaths of Alaska, particularly among Alaska Native communities.

The Immaculate Conception Church in Bethel.
The Immaculate Conception Church in Bethel.

But the Jesuits leave a complicated legacy. Their methods of converting Native people to the religion, particularly in the first half of the 20th century, created generational traumas still felt to this day.

Advertisement

Fr. Sean Carroll is the provincial of the Jesuits West Province, which oversees Alaska and nine other states.

Father Sean Carroll, provincial of the Jesuits West Province, speaks at an event recognizing nearly 140 years of Jesuit service in Alaska.
Fr. Sean Carroll, provincial of the Jesuits West Province, speaks at an event recognizing nearly 140 years of Jesuit service in Alaska.

“Thank you for all that you have taught us about who Jesus is and how to love and serve Him wholeheartedly,” Carroll said. “I also thank you for your patience with us. For there have been times when we have sinned and when we have hurt you.”

Missionaries, including the Jesuits, forcefully converted and assimilated Alaska Native people into Western culture and religion. Students at Jesuit-run boarding schools were forced to abandon their Native languages and physically punished when caught speaking languages other than English. Native dancing and drumming were also banned.

The Jesuits West Province maintains a list of 150 Jesuits with credible claims of sexual abuse against minors or vulnerable adults. A quarter of the accused Jesuits served in Alaska at some point in time.

“I ask for your forgiveness for all that we have done that was not rooted in Christ and love for Him, and for when we did not value your culture nor recognize the presence of God in you,” Carroll said.

Advertisement

Carroll gave the order to withdraw from the state last spring. A big issue was the recruitment of Jesuits willing to travel and serve in remote villages. He told the congregation that the Jesuits’ work would continue, just without a permanent presence.

Father Rich Magner, one of the two remaining Jesuit priests in Alaska, attends a ceremony in Bethel.
Fr. Rich Magner, one of the two remaining Jesuit priests in Alaska, attends a ceremony in Bethel.

Fr. Rich Magner is one of the two remaining Jesuit priests in Alaska. His last day serving Chevak, Hooper Bay, and Scammon Bay is June 30.

“We all always knew coming in, or should have known, that we’re not going to be here forever. It’s going to be mission accomplished at some point,” Magner said. “And then we hand it off to the diocese that we’ve helped create, and so that’s a good feeling.”

Magner’s next stop is a Clinical Pastoral Education residency in Tacoma, Washington.

The other remaining priest, Fr. Tom Provinsal, first came to Alaska in 1968 to teach. A fond memory, he said, was meeting Elders that practiced traditional subsistence lifestyles.

Advertisement

“Some of the grandmothers, their fingers were just all bent with arthritis and stuff like that, you know, their whole lives they’ve been working out in the cold and the wet, doing food, sewing, all that kind of stuff,” Provinsal said. “I’d say I just feel very privileged to have come when I did come and to see that.”

Provinsal returned in 1975 as a priest and has served in the region ever since. After moving away, he plans to take a five month sabbatical. What happens next, he said, is in God’s hands.

Two lines formed in the aisle for communion at the end of the mass. After taking communion, Bethel’s Parish Administrator Susan Murphy gave a final thank you.

“It’s difficult to say goodbye to people who have been a part of our lives for so long,” Murphy said. “We know that you have done what was yours to do, and have taught us to do what is ours to do. We are grateful.”

Jesuit priests form a row along the altar of Bethel's Immaculate Conception Church as members of the congregation lift their arms and pray.
Jesuit priests form a row along the altar of Bethel’s Immaculate Conception Church as members of the congregation lift their arms and pray.

Dominic Hunt, a Yup’ik deacon that flew in from Emmonak for the event, led the congregation through a final prayer.

Advertisement

“Bless them with your wisdom, that they may be a word of hope, a world in need. We ask this through Christ, our Lord. Amen,” Hunt said.

About 70 people posed for a photo on the altar – priests, deacons, parishioners, Elders and children — many of them smiling, some standing quietly.

The photo doesn’t tell the whole story. But it’s a moment when gratitude, grief, and memory all shared the same room.

Bishop of the Diocese of Fairbanks, Steven Maekawa, stands in the middle of a crowd waiting to take a photo at Bethel's Immaculate Conception Church.
Bishop of the Diocese of Fairbanks, Steven Maekawa, stands in the middle of a crowd waiting to take a photo at Bethel’s Immaculate Conception Church.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday

Published

on

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.

The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.

The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.

According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.

Advertisement

This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending