Connect with us

Alaska

OPINION: Help Alaska’s fisheries by reducing methane emissions

Published

on

OPINION: Help Alaska’s fisheries by reducing methane emissions


By Linda Behnken and Kate Troll

Updated: 1 hour ago Published: 1 hour ago

NOAA now confirms that another critical Alaska fishery is in decline due to successive marine heat waves. First there was the loss of 10 billion snow crabs and the close of the once-lucrative Bering Sea crab fisheries; now we know that climate change (warming seas) is the culprit behind the crash of chum salmon on the Yukon and Kuskokwim watersheds. Both these fisheries are the lifeblood of many Alaska communities and villages. From the Yukon to Kodiak, from the Arctic to Ketchikan, Alaska’s coastal fisheries must now confront the dual threat of heat waves and ocean acidification.

Advertisement

Even though Alaska alone cannot solve the climate crisis and save Alaska’s fisheries we can do our part to address climate impacts head-on. We are still nowhere near the scale and pace of emission reductions required to put us on track toward limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (a goal of the Paris Accords). As a result, warming oceans and ocean acidification remain active, serious threats to Alaska’s fisheries. Whether it’s out of concern for the oceans, storm events, landslides, and/or wildfires, it’s clearly a moment when we need “all hands on deck” to deal with the climate crisis.

One area where Alaska can make a big difference in climate change is by addressing methane leaks. Methane, also known as natural gas waste, traps 80 times more heat than carbon dioxide. It is also important because industrial emissions from Alaska’s oil and gas operations account for approximately 60% of Alaska’s total 2020 greenhouse emissions. Altogether, this means that even though Alaska’s total emission contribution may be small on the global scale, Alaska can still make a significant difference because we emit plenty of methane.

Unfortunately, the watchdog for methane leaks, the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC), has repeatedly shown itself unwilling to act. One example occurred when a Hilcorp gas pipeline burst in Cook Inlet a few years ago and spewed gas into the atmosphere for months, causing the loss of tens of thousands of barrels of oil production. AOGCC took the alarming position that it was powerless to do anything. Hauled into court, and eventually corrected by the Alaska Supreme Court on the extent of its jurisdiction, the commission still refused to hold Hilcorp accountable.

Since the 1990s, there have been increases in the frequency and intensity of marine heat waves in the North Pacific. Scientists project that this trend will accelerate, off Alaska and globally. In other words, it’s not far-fetched to ask which major fishery will be the next one to succumb to climate change?

Perhaps what’s happening at the U.N. climate talks could spur some commensurate action here in Alaska. As noted by the Washington Post, “many of the world’s biggest oil companies (including Exxon Mobil) announced recently that they would slash methane emissions from their wells and drilling by more than 80% by 2030.″

Advertisement

According to research done by a team of scientists from the Environmental Defense Fund and several U.S. universities, halving methane emissions by 2030 could slow the rate of global warming by more than 25% and start a path to prevent one-half a degree Celsius of warming by 2100. Furthermore, according to the International Energy Agency, the oil and gas industry could eliminate more than 75% of its methane emissions with existing and well-known technology. Taken all together, this means that taking action on methane is not only hugely significant in addressing the climate crisis but eminently doable.

If the oil and gas industry is now seeking to position itself as a problem-solver on the international stage, why not do the same here in Alaska? By statute, the state considers any non-emergency release of oil and gas (venting or flaring) in excess of one hour as potential “waste.” Consequently, we already have one key tool in the toolbox.

For the sake of Alaska’s Fisheries, surely Alaska can become part of the climate crisis solution by joining the industry-supported international action to reduce methane emissions. Now would be the time for the AOGCC to take its statutory obligation seriously and begin reining in non-emergency flaring and venting of methane. As noted earlier, Alaska has plenty of methane to make a difference.

Linda Behnken is a commercial fisherwoman and executive director of Alaska Longline Fishermen’s Association. Kate Troll has more than 22 years of experience in coastal management, fisheries and climate/energy policy and is the former Executive Director of United Fishermen of Alaska. In 2018 Kate, along with 400 Alaskans, petitioned the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to reduce methane emissions.

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.

Advertisement





Source link

Alaska

Alaska senators react to government spending bill passing, avoiding shutdown

Published

on

Alaska senators react to government spending bill passing, avoiding shutdown


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska senators Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan shared their reactions on avoiding a government shutdown, with the government funding bill passing through Congress late Friday evening.

In a press release, Senator Lisa Murkowski said, “There is never, ever a time when a government shutdown is a good thing for Americans or Alaskans. I’m relieved that cooler heads prevailed and a needless shutdown was avoided.”

Murkowski supported extending the federal government funding deadline to March 14, 2025. This would provide disaster recovery funds for communities across the country.

After garnering support from both chambers of Congress, $300 million will go towards the U.S. Department of Commerce’s fishery disaster assistance, which according to the press release, Senator Murkowski played a crucial role in securing.

Advertisement

Senator Dan Sullivan also released a statement on “X” saying:

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Who works unpaid or gets furloughed in government shutdown

Published

on

Who works unpaid or gets furloughed in government shutdown


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – With a federal spending bill now approved by the House and headed to the Senate for votes, the possibility of a government shutdown that was slated to begin at 12:01 a.m. ET (8:01 p.m. Friday AKST) on Saturday now seems to have been averted, but the stopgap measure will only last for three months.

If and when the federal government shuts down, each federal agency determines its own plan for how to handle a shutdown, although government operations deemed nonessential will stop happening.

The last time Alaska faced a government shutdown, the governor’s office issued a news release on Sept 26, 2023, stating, “Approximately 4,700 state executive branch positions are at least partially federally funded. Employees in these positions would see no disruption in their pay and will continue to report to work. A small number of federal employees work within state departments. Their status would be determined by the guidance from the federal agency that employs them.”

Alaska’s News Source has emailed the governor’s office requesting an update.

Advertisement

The longest previous federal shutdown was 35 days.

According to labor stats from the state, as of November of this year, there were 15,100 people were listed as “federal government” employees in Alaska with 81,600 in “government” jobs.

Compared to this time last year, there were 15,000 “federal government” employees and 80,400 “government jobs.”

Nationally, if legislators can’t reach a deal, 1.5 million federal employees will be furloughed or told to work without pay.

Most national parks will close.

Advertisement

Air traffic controllers and food safety inspectors would continue to work, but without pay.

“The State of Alaska administers many programs on behalf of the federal government,” the 2023 news release from the governor’s office stated. ”Federal programs that are mandatory by law, authorized outside of the annual appropriations process and have existing carry-forward funds, or classified by the federal administration as ‘excepted’ due to life, health and safety implications would continue to operate during a shutdown. These categories include programs such as Medicaid and federal air traffic control.”

A list of frequently asked federal government furlough questions is also available on the State of Alaska website.

This story was updated with new information.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Environmentalist group sues to gain information about Alaska trawler toll on marine mammals

Published

on

Environmentalist group sues to gain information about Alaska trawler toll on marine mammals


The federal government has failed to give adequate information on deaths of killer whales and other marine mammals that become entangled in commercial trawling gear in Alaska waters, claims a lawsuit filed on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Anchorage.

The lawsuit, filed by the environmental group Oceana, targets the National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency of the National Oceanic and atmospheric Administration.

The whales and other marine mammals killed in fishing gear are subjects of what is known as bycatch, the unintended, incidental catch of species that are not the harvest target.

Advertisement

The lawsuit focuses on three Freedom of Information Act requests filed by Oceana from 2021 to 2023. Oceana asked for records, photographs and videos of animals that have been killed as bycatch in Alaska fisheries. The agency denied some requests and provided information in response to others, but that information was heavily redacted, with photographs blurred and made unrecognizable through a pixelation technique and text blacked out, the lawsuit said.

Distorted photos sent to Oceana included images of whales, Steller sea lions, a walrus, and bearded, fur and ribbon seals, according to the complaint, which seeks to compel the agency to provide more complete information.

NMFS justified the redactions and image distortions as necessary to protect confidentiality, according to the lawsuit. But Oceana, in its lawsuit, said those redactions “are not based on any valid legal requirement to protect confidential information and are not consistent” with applicable laws: the Freedom of Information Act, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

“Public access to information is essential to hold the government accountable and ensure U.S. fisheries are managed sustainably,” Tara Brock, Oceana’s Pacific legal director and senior counsel, said in a statement issued by the organization. “The unlawful withholding of information by the Fisheries Service related to the deaths of whales, fish, and other ocean life is unacceptable. People have the right to know how commercial fisheries impact marine wildlife.”

Oceana filed a related lawsuit on Thursday in the U.S. District Court of Central California over bycatch of various species of mammals and fish by the halibut trawl fishery that operates off that state’s coast.

Advertisement

An altered photo of a killer whale that died as bycatch in Alaska trawl gear is part of the evidence presented by Oceana in a lawsuit against the National Marine Fisheries Service. The lawsuit, filed onThursday, cites this an other photos provided by NMFS as evidence that the agency is withholding important information about marine mammal deaths in the Alaska trawl fisheries. (Photo provided by Oceana)

That halibut harvest “catches enormous quantities of marine species as bycatch,” which “results in the injury and death of thousands of fish and other animals,” including Dungeness crab, giant sea bass, elephant seals, harbor porpoises and cormorants, among other species. That halibut fishery “has the highest bycatch rate in the nation,” and it discards about 77% of the fish it catches, the lawsuit said.

The National Marine Fisheries Service declined to comment on the lawsuits filed Thursday.

The legal actions follow a period with an unusually high number of killer whales ensnared in trawl gear used to harvest Bering Sea fish. Nearly a dozen killer whales were found dead in 2023, compared to 37 cases of killer whale deaths in fishing gear that were recorded in Alaska from 1991 to 2022.

A different environmental organization, the Center for Biological Diversity, last year filed a notice of intent to sue NMFS over the trawl bycatch of whales and other marine mammals.

Advertisement

So far, no such lawsuit has been filed, said Cooper Freeman, the center’s Alaska director. Instead, his organization has been meeting with NMFS to try to find ways to reduce the dangers to marine mammals from trawling, he said.

“At this point we have not decided to bring a lawsuit although we continue to have very, very serious concerns about the fisheries and are tracking the harms,” Freeman said.

The agency has pledged some corrective action, Freeman said. It has committed to reassess harms to endangered species and it has promised to analyze Alaska’s killer whales as separate populations, one in the Bering Sea and the other in the Gulf of Alaska, he said. Lumping the two populations as one can understate the impacts of bycatch deaths, he said.

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending