Connect with us

Sports

Tennis has a problem with players, umpires and rules. How to fix it?

Published

on

Tennis has a problem with players, umpires and rules. How to fix it?

In less than 24 hours, three tennis players subjected three umpires to three tirades of different flavors in Shanghai.

Tuesday night in that Chinese city, world No. 17 and U.S. Open semifinalist Frances Tiafoe told umpire Jimmy Pinoargote that he “f***ed the match up’ after the umpire called a time violation against him at 5-5 in a deciding tiebreak. Tiafoe had walked to the baseline as the shot clock, which adjudicates time between points, went to zero, and then tossed the ball into the air with no intention of hitting it.

Tiafoe lost his first serve for the violation, his third of the match, and then lost the next two points and the match against Roman Safiullin.

Then on Wednesday, Fergus Murphy called a time violation against world No. 12 Stefanos Tsitsipas, also a two-time Grand Slam finalist. At the change of ends, Tsitsipas laid into Murphy, saying, “You have never played tennis in your life.” Murphy replied, “I’m not as good as you, but I have.”

“No cardio,” Tsitsipas, who eventually lost to Daniil Medvedev, then said. “You probably play every time serve-and-volley.”

Advertisement

In between those two incidents, world No. 3 and two-time Grand Slam finalist Alexander Zverev on Tuesday night told Mohamed Lahyani that umpires are collectively “f***ing up the tournament” after Lahyani correctly adjudged that Zverev had failed to hit the ball before it bounced twice in his eventual win over Tallon Griekspoor.

“Every Grand Slam final I lose because of you guys,” Zverev said. He was beaten by David Goffin the following day, in a match in which he twice escaped a code violation for ball abuse.

The vast majority of tennis matches pass without even minor incident, but this cluster of incidents — two of them centered on a new shot clock rule that has caused consternation across the sport — preceded the news that Wimbledon will abolish line judges in favor of electronic line calling (ELC) from 2025.

The Athletic’s tennis team discuss the themes at the heart of these decisions, and ask how the sport can solve a problem like officiating.

Advertisement

GO DEEPER

Wimbledon jettisons line judges for electronic line calling after 147 years


James Hansen: On the face of it, the two decisions that prompted the Tiafoe and Zverev outbursts couldn’t be more different. Whether or not a ball has bounced twice is a matter of objective fact; what does or doesn’t constitute a service motion is more up for debate. Tiafoe’s tossing of the ball, even with his hitting arm by his side and not at all taking part in a service motion, was designed to buy him discretion from Pinoargote that he did not get.

Is tennis’ scoring system being built on objective facts — whether a ball is in or out, and whether it has bounced twice — part of the reason why players and umpires struggle to see eye to eye when things are more ambiguous, even if they’re pretty clear-cut?

Matt Futterman: I take issue with the idea of the sport mostly being about objective calls. Yes, the Zverev call was a fundamental rule. But like all sports, each tennis match also has a heartbeat and a temperature, which can’t always be taken by hard and fast officiating diktat. There are moments when the pros could learn something from the weekend hacker game down at the park, where indecision over a call is often resolved by a simple, “play a let”.

Advertisement

Earlier this summer at the Cincinnati Open, when Jack Draper won match point against Felix Auger-Aliassime on at the very least an incredibly debatable non-double bounce call, Draper said he would have replayed the point if a video replay were available. Why make it conditional? After all, who wants to win like that? Down at the park, we would play a do-over. Sometimes a pro does that, and they get huge applause and good karma. Most of the time, with so much on the line, they don’t. I get that, but only sort of.

With Tiafoe, the new system that the ATP started trialing after this year’s French Open automatically starts the shot clock three seconds after the last point. It’s meant to speed up play and take the job of resetting the clock out of the hands of the umpires. I think it’s a terrible development. Tennis is more taxing than ever. Why are we penalizing players for pushing themselves over the edge to win a long rally, or the kinds of points that thrill fans?

Tennis wants to prevent umpires from favoring certain players who might be more deliberate and bounce the ball too many times. I get that. But at that point in a deciding set, I don’t want an umpire to have anything to do with the outcome of a point before the ball is even in play. I want players to decide the outcome of matches, except if someone does something egregious. Was Tiafoe’s fake serve egregious? A bit. But he was trying to work around a flawed rule.

go-deeper

Charlie Eccleshare: Matt makes a great point about the power of the let and having the humility to accept sometimes that, as an umpire, you just don’t know. Tennis has so benefited from Hawk-Eye technology, compared to, say, football’s relationship with VAR (Video Assistant Referee) since its widespread introduction five years ago, because the calls it adjudicates are objective.

Subjective calls are more tricky for officials too, because they have to straddle the very delicate balance between that taking the temperature of a match and enforcing what they are expected to enforce. Sometimes in the search for clear-cut answers, they don’t really exist.

Advertisement

On Matt’s point about umpires influencing outcomes, Pierluigi Collina, probably football’s best ever referee, said one of the biggest myths around officiating is that a good referee is one you don’t notice. Nonsense, he said. If there are a number of big decisions to be made, you make them!

Was the Tiafoe call a big one to make? No. The umpire could easily have let that one lie and no one would have been talking about it. But it was his third time violation and the nature of it clearly piqued the umpire, who said outright to Tiafoe, “I’m not buying it.” The bigger issue, like you suggest James, is that I get that tennis wants to quicken matches up, and I’m all for possible solutions to a sport whose match times have gotten out of control, but this feels like chipping away at the edges when far more drastic steps are needed.

Zverev’s reaction after a correct decision was nonsensical, but these outbursts over the last few days remind us that these players are all physically and mentally exhausted. Solving those issues requires much bigger reforms than marginally reducing match times by shortening the gaps between points, and those issues cause greater damage to the sport as a product than people taking too long on serve once in a while.


Alexander Zverev could not believe Lahyani’s correct decision. (Lintao Zhang / Getty Images)

Matt: I like Charlie’s point about Collina. I also think in a lot of cases the calls that officials don’t make are as important, and maybe more so, as the ones they do. My guess is Collina would group all of them as “decisions” but we all know there are tennis officials who are more inclined to insert themselves into the action. And at the risk of making a broad generalization, I can’t think of one female official I would put in that category.

James: It seems like the shot clock is intrinsically flawed. The old version is too susceptible to being governed by subjectivity; the new version makes no concession to the contours of a match. It also doesn’t seem like the benefits outweigh the number of players complaining, or the difficult situations it’s creating for umpires.

Advertisement

Charlie: Umpires are constantly put in difficult situations, and we ask a huge amount of them. In the Tiafoe incident, the umpire risks getting a slap on the wrist from his bosses for not enforcing the shot clock, and maybe even accusations of favoritism towards the more famous player of the two. Or he will receive criticism for being too heavy-handed and not having a feel for the situation. We expect umpires to almost act as psychologists sometimes, understanding why a player is behaving in a certain way and expecting that to then inform their judgments.

James: Discipline — or a lack of it — is a big problem here. Players would not feel emboldened to swear at, insult, or in the case of Zverev in Acapulco in 2022, physically attack where umpires are sitting if the ATP Tour imposed stronger correctives. The German wasn’t even banned for that incident, and there is no question that the latitude given in these situations is making the problem worse. Players may feel like they are suffering more, because they lose a point or a match, and therefore money and ranking points, on what they perceive to be a bad call, but the lack of respect for umpires’ authority seems more pervasive than isolated extreme cases.

Charlie: Another issue is that in some cases, like with Draper, and then with Zverev, the officials and the players are the only people who cannot see the clearest view of the incident that they are disagreeing on. Everyone in the crowd, or watching at home, can just look at replays on their phone or TV. That’s clearly not right. Use of things like video review (VR) and electronic line calling (ELC) is still so fragmented that there are too many built-in disparities that umpires and players are expected to navigate.

Matt: On this, tennis is stupid. There are seven different governing bodies, all of which have rights to set up events as they please. And within the two tours, the ATP and the WTA, not all the tournaments have to comply with a singular technological system.

Why? Money. Tournaments large and small would be on the hook to pay for the cameras and computer technology to allow for video review and electronic line calling on all the courts.

Advertisement

Then there are the traditionalists. The French Open, for instance, likes the idea of umpires climbing down and inspecting ball marks on the clay. At this year’s tournament, a particularly egregious missed call derailed Zheng Qinwen, who had no grounds to challenge it. In 2023, Amarissa Toth erased a contested ball mark in a match against Zhang Shuai, who then retired because of the misfortune and pressure of a situation that players should not find themselves in.

For a while, the rationale for this was that the computer system was less foolproof because of the raised tape lines on a clay court. This problem has been fixed. Wimbledon also insisted on line judges and the Hawk-Eye challenge system until this week, even though cameras can check all the calls and often show missed calls that go unchallenged. Everyone has the proper information — except those who need it most.

go-deeper

Charlie: I’m told by well-placed sources that the ATP Tour is exploring the possibility of using VR technology at its higher category events from 2025, taking in the Masters 1000 and some 500-level events. It will be in place at the ATP Finals in Turin next month and the Next Gen Finals in Jeddah in December. Generally with technology, once the genie is out of the bottle, it’s hard to put back in, and so you’d expect VR technology will only become more widespread in the next few years.

In its one significant use at this year’s U.S. Open, between Anna Kalinskaya and Beatriz Haddad Maia, umpire Miriam Bley appeared to reach the wrong conclusion despite replays, so these systems are not yet perfect — but the option was there. As Matt said earlier, why make that option conditional?

Wimbledon’s decision to make the change with line judges after 147 years is significant, as it reflects the growing acceptance that there is just no compelling argument against the use of ELC. “Because we’ve always done it like this” is not a compelling argument for players, umpires, or fans.


Video review did not help Miriam Bley reach the correct decision at the U.S. Open. (Matthew Stockman / Getty Images)

To expand on something else Matt said about Hawk-Eye showing missed calls that players didn’t challenge, the fact that, without ELC, players are asked to essentially officiate the accuracy of their own shots has always been absurd to me. They have enough to worry about without also having to concern themselves with making calls and challenging officiating mistakes.

Advertisement

At the recent Olympics, Coco Gauff said that she always had to advocate for herself after an umpire went against her. And even with ELC in place in Cincinnati (also in August), when the system missed a call on a ball hit by Brandon Nakashima that was out, umpire Greg Allensworth told Taylor Fritz that he had to be the one to stop the point for it to be corrected. Fritz understandably went off on the idea that he had to adjudicate the match as well as play in it.

Matt: The players suffer plenty from the bad calls but line judges and umpires are the ones who look like idiots through little fault of their own. They are the ones who need the information more than anyone, and they are just about the only ones who don’t have it. Tennis leaders need to do right by them, instead of leaving them at the mercy of the fallibility of their own eyes as balls travel at 80mph (128kmh) and up. Players are not blameless either, and not only because they curse out umpires on occasion, which should be heavily penalized to reduce the frequency with which it happens.

James: And in those situations, the chair umpire becomes the face of the system and all its problems, and then has to receive all the umbrage that the player feels even if they — or the ELC system — came to the correct conclusion. Tennis officials should think about how the rules and technologies can be best applied to avoid these kinds of situations, but the split leadership makes that harder than perhaps it needs to be.

Charlie: Fundamentally, tennis needs to think: how can the rules best serve the game and create the best spectacle? And, how can the systems that enforce them be designed and implemented to ensure that players and umpires aren’t having to deal with additional stress in what is already a really stressful sport? At the moment, systems like the new shot clock and the fragmented protocols don’t seem to be serving that purpose as well as they could.

(Top photo: Andy Wong / Associated Press)

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sports

George Kittle's 2 touchdowns hand Seahawks 3rd consecutive loss; 49ers get back to .500

Published

on

George Kittle's 2 touchdowns hand Seahawks 3rd consecutive loss; 49ers get back to .500

The San Francisco 49ers played their third division game in their last four contests on Thursday, and they showed why they’re still the kings of the NFC West.

The Niners went to Seattle and took down the Seahawks, 36-24, in a game they very much needed to win.

The Niners jumped out to a 16-0 lead, getting those points with three field goals and a 76-yard touchdown from Brock Purdy to Deebo Samuel. Seattle got on the board with a field goal to end the half, but to start the second, it was George Kittle finding the end zone to put San Fran up, 23-3.

San Francisco 49ers’ George Kittle (85) reacts after a touchdown against the Seattle Seahawks, Thursday, Oct. 10, 2024, in Seattle.  (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)

Advertisement

But, the Seahawks weren’t dead yet, as Laviska Shenault took the ensuing kickoff 97 yards to the house to cut the deficit to 10 points. Seattle then forced a punt, and a 13-play drive ended with a Kenneth Walker score, making it a 23-20 game at the end of the third quarter.

Midway through the fourth quarter, Geno Smith threw a costly interception on his own side of the field, and three plays later, Kittle scored his second touchdown of the night.

Brock Purdy throws

San Francisco 49ers quarterback Brock Purdy throws during the first half of an NFL football game against the Seattle Seahawks, Thursday, Oct. 10, 2024, in Seattle.  (AP Photo/John Froschauer)

AARON RODGERS WAS STRETCHING TRUTH ABOUT HIS INVOLVEMENT IN ROBERT SALEH’S FIRING, STEPHEN A. SMITH SAYS

d scored on a 4th and goal to keep Seattle’s hopes alive, but Isaac Guerendo, in place for an injured Jordan Mason, ran for 76 yards, and then Kyle Juszczyk scored to all but ice it.

It’s the third loss in a row for Seattle as things seem to unravel after winning their first three games of the season. As for San Fran, it was a big bounce back after losing to the Arizona Cardinals last week – both teams are now 3-3.

Advertisement

Purdy threw for 255 yards and three touchdowns, completing 18 of his 28 passes. Geno Smith racked up 312 yards, but he was picked off twice.

Kenneth Walker runs the ball

Seattle Seahawks running back Kenneth Walker III (9) runs during the first half of an NFL football game against the San Francisco 49ers, Thursday, Oct. 10, 2024, in Seattle.  (AP Photo/John Froschauer)

San Fran will host the Kansas City Chiefs next week for a Super Bowl rematch, while the Seahawks will head to Atlanta. for a date with the Falcons.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Lakers' JJ Redick says he and Doc Rivers have no bad feelings for one another

Published

on

Lakers' JJ Redick says he and Doc Rivers have no bad feelings for one another

Despite past tensions and public criticisms, Milwaukee Bucks coach Doc Rivers and Lakers coach JJ Redick said there are no bad feelings between them.

“We’re fine,” Redick said before Thursday’s game. “I don’t carry beef with people. And I’m not going to get into the history of Doc and I’s relationship right now. And I probably won’t ever. He’s fine in my book.”

Redick and the Lakers went on to beat Rivers and the Bucks 107-102 for their first win of the preseason.

During a media appearance last season on ESPN, Redick pointedly questioned Rivers’ sense of accountability after the coach talked about difficulties in taking the Milwaukee job in the middle of the season.

Advertisement

“I’ve seen the trend for years,” Redick said on “First Take.” “The trend is always making excuses. Doc, we get it. Taking over a team in the middle of a season is hard. It’s hard. We get it. It’s hard. … But it’s always an excuse. It’s always throwing your team under the bus.”

Redick said Thursday that he apologized for the tone of his comments, which ESPN posted on YouTube under the headline “JJ Redick goes SCORCHED EARTH on Doc Rivers for making excuses!”

Rivers, who coached Redick for four seasons on the Clippers, said the comments aren’t an issue.

“It’s never been really for me,” Rivers said, before adding that “coaches, they pour into players. They really do. They pour in a ton of love to players. And oftentimes that love is rejected, it’s just the way it is.”

Rivers said he expected Redick’s Lakers to be strong when it came to “execution stuff, because that’s what we were known for when he played for me.”

Advertisement

Milwaukee Bucks coach Doc Rivers watches during a game against the Detroit Pistons on Sunday.

(Jose Juarez / Associated Press)

“Ran a lot of it,” Rivers said. “As a matter of fact, I watched the first two games and many of the sets we ran with the Clippers, the Lakers are running now. … I did the same thing as a player. You run what you know well and what you like. … My guess is that JJ will probably take from all the coaches he played for.”

Rivers said that he’s empathetic for his top assistant, former Lakers coach Darvin Ham, who has been viewed by some as receiving indirect criticism any time a player says something positive about the Lakers’ vibes this preseason.

Advertisement

“There’s heartbreak for coaches. Darvin’s dealing with that a little bit,” Rivers said. “He sees guys make comments now that he poured into. It’s not right. But that’s just what happens in this part of our job. We know that going into it.”

Thursday, the Lakers were without Austin Reaves because of ankle soreness. Redick said the issue wasn’t a concern. The team also kept minutes limits on Max Christie, Gabe Vincent and Cam Reddish.

LeBron James, like he did Sunday in Palm Desert against Phoenix, played only the first half. He scored 11 points with six rebounds and four assists. Anthony Davis, who played into the third quarter, had 11 points, eight rebounds and three blocks.

The Lakers trailed by as many as 15 in the fourth quarter before a 20-0 run by rookie Dalton Knecht and the Lakers’ deep bench pushed them to the win.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

USL suspension of Jermaine Jones reveals fractures within team and even wider discord

Published

on

USL suspension of Jermaine Jones reveals fractures within team and even wider discord

When Jermaine Jones joined Central Valley Fuego FC as its coach last November, the pairing carried clear upside for the former U.S. men’s national team midfielder and the club. He had longed, sometimes publicly, for a chance to be a head coach, and Fuego needed a splash to gain fans and to reasonably compete in the third-division USL League One.

Yet nearly a year later, fractures between Jones and the club’s players have led to discipline for the coach that before now has not been publicized, and an investigation that revealed clear mistrust within the league’s ranks.

According to documentation reviewed by The Athletic, Jones was suspended through the end of the 2024 season following an independent investigation. The summary of that investigation said it had “substantiated” repeated instances of harassment, retaliation and hostility from Jones toward members of the team.

The United Soccer League Players Association (USLPA), which spurred the league to commission the investigation, also filed a separate labor complaint against the club in April, accusing the team of interrogating players about union activities and threatening to retaliate against them if they supported the union. The complaint with the National Labor Relations Board is being investigated, Kayla Blado, a spokeswoman for the agency, said Thursday.

Jones has not coached the team in a match since Aug. 30. Despite his absence, neither the club nor the league announced Jones’ suspension publicly. Given that the USL is not a single-entity league, its standard is for clubs to determine themselves whether to announce suspensions or fines.

Advertisement

The USL suspended Jones on Sept. 27, and notified him, the club and other involved parties. The investigation is closed and its findings and the punishment are final, the league said.

But in separate statements on Wednesday, the club and a lawyer for Jones sought to cast doubt on the findings. They said they were seeking for the coach to be reinstated, based on an audit of the investigation that was commissioned by the club.

Soroosh Abdi, Jones’ lawyer, said the audit found “both substantial and procedural shortcomings” that negated the investigation’s findings. “Jermaine Jones was subject to bias and unfair treatment by the USLPA,” Abdi said.

“We are hopeful he will rejoin the team before the season ends,” the club said.

The players union, like the league, said it considers the cycle “fully complete.” And it dismissed Abdi’s assertion that Jones was treated unfairly.

Advertisement

“The USLPA has not seen any findings by any process to substantiate this claim. The USLPA acted as we always do when individuals bring serious claims of misconduct to the organization: We take those concerns to the USL per the league’s safeguarding policies,” the organization’s executive director, Connor Tobin, said in a statement. “And then to the extent individuals request that we participate in an observational manner during investigative interviews to help safeguard against retaliation, we do so.”

The league, which has its headquarters in Tampa, Fla., declined comment as its employees braced for Hurricane Milton.

The audit concluded Monday. The club, the league and Jones’ agent all declined to provide its results to The Athletic. The union said it has not seen anything yielded from the audit.

“We have complete confidence in the integrity of this process,” the league said in a statement. “When matters are resolved, we focus on promoting accountability and personal growth, ensuring that all individuals involved have the opportunity to learn and improve.”


The Central Valley Fuego FC starting 11 before a US Open Cup match on April 2. (Maciek Gudrymowicz / ISI Photos / USSF / Getty Images)

Three active players and an employee of Fuego FC, speaking with The Athletic on condition of anonymity to protect their jobs, painted a stark picture of the club under Jones’ leadership. They described experiences of tension, fear and mental anguish since he joined the club, consistent with the summary findings of the league’s investigation, which were reviewed by The Athletic.

Advertisement

“It’s been nothing short of a complete catastrophe, and it’s so toxic,” the club employee said. “It doesn’t need to be like that.”

The league investigation was carried out by an outside law firm, Foley & Lardner, LLP. It determined that Jones had broken the league’s policies to safeguard players in six different ways. The breaches were described in the summary document in broad categories: national origin harassment, emotional misconduct, power imbalance, harassment, hostile environment and retaliation.

The investigation found repeat instances of each of the breaches, but the summary did not detail each allegation and did not include comments from anyone involved, including Jones. The investigation produced a deeper document separate from the findings summary, which includes testimony from the players who came forward with allegations. However, the club, the league, the players union and Jones’ agent declined to provide that document to The Athletic when asked for it.

Jones was suspended through the end of 2024, with Fuego’s final game scheduled for Oct. 26, and put on probation for the 2025 season.

In a statement, the players union said it feared the suspension was not severe enough.

Advertisement

“The violations by Jermaine Jones which have been substantiated by the third-party investigation show an extremely troubling pattern of behavior,” the union said. “We are concerned that the USL’s imposed discipline may not be effective in protecting players moving forward. It is our belief that the sheer number and severity of violations found by the investigators should be disqualifying and that players should not face the very real possibility of having to endure similar circumstances next season with Jones as head coach. The priority moving forward must be protecting player welfare and upholding dignity in the workplace.”


Jermaine Jones playing in a legends game at Daytona Soccer Fest on July 03, 2022. (Sam Greenwood / Getty Images)

When a recently retired player wants to enter professional coaching, the lower leagues are a natural launching point. Coaching in a lower division isn’t a walk in the park — any coach will tell you that their job is never so simple — but it provides nascent coaches a chance to organically grow a culture and refine their tactical identities further from the public eye than at the game’s higher levels.

There are obvious benefits for the clubs, too. Experience as a player can bring an instant credibility that makes a first-time coach look like less of a gamble. Some ex-players bring a celebrity status that can feel outsized at a lower level. Heading into 2024, Central Valley Fuego hoped that hiring Jones could provide it with a major boost.

Throughout his career, Jones played with a point to prove. After his boyhood club Eintracht Frankfurt repeatedly signed veterans instead of giving him a chance as a starter, Jones moved to Schalke 04 to prove his ability. When years of youth call-ups from Germany failed to build into an extended senior international career, he pivoted to playing for the United States, earning 69 caps for the USMNT from 2010-2017 under Bob Bradley and Jurgen Klinsmann.

By the time his career ended following stints with three MLS clubs, Jones had built a singular reputation: a determined midfielder who played with steely fixation.

Advertisement

“If you look at me as a player, you will look at the games and say, man, this guy is a savage, he hates losing,” Jones told Forty-One Magazine in 2023. “He would do everything to win a game.”

He added: “For me, it was important as a player. Now, going into coaching, it’s not about me.”


(Maciek Gudrymowicz / ISI Photos /USSF / Getty Images)

Central Valley Fuego FC was founded in August 2020 in Fresno, Calif., filling a void left by a previous team. Less than a year earlier, the locally beloved Fresno FC had left town after just two seasons in the second-division USL Championship. Fresno FC was competitive, but relocated about 150 miles west to Monterey, Calif., when it had issues securing land and garnering public financial support for a stadium.

The USL launched Fuego in Fresno as a third-division club. It was named in homage to a longtime local non-professional team, with local businesspersons Juan and Alicia Ruelas as the owners. Their son, Juan Jr., is also involved as managing partner.

Unfortunately, Fuego FC has struggled at the box office. League match reports put its average attendance at 674 fans per regular season game in 2024, with a limiting 1,000-person capacity at the Fresno State Soccer Stadium. For scale, every other team in the league averages at least 1,300 fans per contest.

Advertisement

The team’s performance hasn’t helped; it finished eighth out of 10 teams in its first season in 2022 and dead last out of 12 teams in 2023. With only a few games remaining this year, Fuego is again at the bottom of the League One standings.

Despite this, players have stuck with the club for a few key reasons. First, the checks always cleared, with the interviewed players saying they have never seen their pay delayed. Second, this level of the U.S. pyramid is notorious for roster churn, and finding stable footing at any club is a luxury. Third, some players expressed strong connections with the ownership group.

“We know it’s not always perfect,” one player said of club operations at the third-division level. “We used to always let it go, let it go. Jermaine took it to the next level.”

Only a few players headed into the long offseason after 2023 with a guarantee for this season, which is reasonably normal in the lower leagues. The players were surprised, however, when the club asked them to return for a scrimmage to impress the team’s newly appointed coach. The memo did not name the coach, and Jones was later introduced – he had clinched his first head coaching role.

But players pushed back on being called back to action early. Under the league’s collective bargaining agreement, players can’t be called back early unless their contracts are already guaranteed for the next season or unless they have revenue-generating game obligations. The scrimmage did not meet that bar and was canceled.

Advertisement

Before leading his new team in its first game under his guidance, Jones used a media engagement to question the loyalty of returning players.

In a February episode of the podcast “Kickin’ It,” Jones spoke with host Kate Scott and three of his former USMNT teammates: Clint Dempsey, Maurice Edu and Charlie Davies. Edu asked Jones if it’s possible, as a coach, to build unique and meaningful relationships with an entire team of players. Jones said it was possible, before quickly pivoting and saying he had cut “the whole team” besides four players when he started as coach at Fuego FC.

“Let’s make a plan. Get rid of all the guys, we don’t need them,” he said.

Jones also said that he suspected the returning players “had the other coach fired, so they would get me fired, too. I don’t need that.”

The host and Jones’ ex-teammates laughed at the candidness of his reply.

The joking tone belied the seriousness of the career implications for the athletes.

When asked why he kept any players at all, his answer was simple: “They were under contract.”

Advertisement

(Maciek Gudrymowicz / ISI Photos / USSF / Getty Images)

Players arrived for the preseason following the podcast’s release. Some entered with excitement about playing for an esteemed ex-player. They soon felt uncomfortable by the culture established by a famously competitive figure.

The Athletic’s interviews with Fuego personnel echoed some of the themes of the league’s investigation, including the substantiated categories of emotional misconduct, power imbalance, harassment, and a hostile environment.

The conversations made clear that players feared retribution for speaking too candidly about their experiences.

All three players interviewed claimed that, early in the season, Jones told players not to interact with the USLPA. Jones told them any issues should be handled with the team directly, they said. The interactions formed the basis of the labor complaint.

“He said we can’t talk to the players’ union, but that is our right,” said one player. “He can do just about whatever he wants to do to you. He can pretty much bully you, harass you — you will say nothing to nobody. You have to be quiet and take the harassment. If you do the right things as a club, you don’t care about getting involved with the players’ union.”

Advertisement

Players also said Jones repeatedly used his status as a notable ex-player to persuade players to side with him.

“He comes in here, saying he played for the U.S. national team, he’s powerful. He has friends in the federation and all over the place. He tells us that if he wants to destroy someone, he can destroy their careers,” one of the players said.

Jones also appeared to weaponize League One’s standing to assert superiority over his players.

“You know the funny thing? He said this is a s—– league,” one player said. “That’s what makes me mad. He said this is a s—– league, that we’re at the bottom of the pyramid. He said that he doesn’t even want to be here.”

Another player independently echoed that line. “This really hit me: he said if you’re 28 and still playing League One, basically you ain’t s—. You’re done. Coming from a man who’d never coached anywhere in his life.”

Advertisement

In the summer, Jones asked a player on the team to retire and to instead coach to open up an international slot for a prospective signee, according to the three players as well as the employee. When the player declined the coaching contract, he was frozen out of the first team, they said. That moment, along with others throughout the season, left many players struggling.

“They don’t even care about mental health,” one player said, adding: “Thank God there’s just one month left (of the season). It’s just too much.”

“Guys are afraid (to speak up), because this season is still on,” another player said. “People want a job. This man has threatened them that coaches have a union, they call each other. If any coach calls him about you, ‘imma tell them straight up you ain’t s—.’ To be honest, the experience has been horrible and traumatic.”

The situation seemed to take a turn as September came around, with Jones removed from the sideline once the USL commissioned the independent investigation and the law firm began conducting interviews.

However, Jones does not appear to have been entirely hands off as the investigation was conducted.

Advertisement

The players said Jones made decisions about the team even after he went on leave, as the investigation was happening. “In the first game after his leave, against Spokane (on Sept. 7), he was on the phone with one of the assistants,” one of the players said. “They took one player out, and the coaches confirmed it was Jermaine’s decision. So yeah, he’s still involved.”

The club and the league did not respond to a specific question about that assertion, which appeared to go against the outlines of Jones’ leave during the investigation.

After serving his suspension, Jones will be able to continue as the team’s coach for the 2025 season, pending a conversation with the league’s director of player welfare and safeguarding.

That said, Jones appears to be alerting other clubs to his availability, telling German outlet Sport1 in late September that he would be “a good addition” to Schalke’s coaching staff and offering his services.

No matter how Jones’ situation plays out, it’s an open question how many players from this season’s squad will be back.

Advertisement

“I don’t know how things are going to be, but I’m not happy here,” one of the players said, adding that he did not want to stick around in bad circumstances just to play. “I don’t know what next year is gonna be, and I don’t want to repeat the same mistake. It’s better to have a different environment than to try staying here.”

(Illustration: Meech Robinson / The Athletic. Photo: Leon Bennett / GA / The Hollywood Reporter via Getty Images)

Continue Reading

Trending