Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Violence, downtown, Congress: Obstacles grow in Bowser’s third term

Published

on

Violence, downtown, Congress: Obstacles grow in Bowser’s third term


As she unveiled a plan for a brand new protected bike lane in Northwest Washington just lately, Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) talked breezily of her objectives of increasing the District’s transportation community whereas bettering site visitors security.

However her announcement, like many since she started her third time period in January, was quickly eclipsed by questions in regards to the newest disaster to befall her administration — the sudden resignation of her most trusted adviser.

The litany of challenges Bowser now faces is so long as any she has encountered since taking workplace in 2015: a moribund downtown and declining tax income, rising considerations about gun violence and a hostile Congress. And for the primary time as mayor, she’ll have to navigate these obstacles with out her longtime chief of workers, John Falcicchio, who led most of the metropolis’s financial improvement efforts however now has been accused of sexual harassment.

“She’s swimming upstream towards the tide of deteriorating financial circumstances, rising housing uncertainty and administrative struggles — all current in a nationwide political ecosystem the place congressional Republicans are way more keen to make use of D.C. as a punching bag,” stated Michael Ok. Fauntroy, a Howard College political science professor. “It’s not going to be simple for her.”

Advertisement

Departure of D.C. mayor’s right-hand man leaves ‘hole that needs to be stuffed’

Bowser’s problem is additional difficult by a legislative department that has more and more proven its willingness to go towards the mayor. This stress has emerged in high-profile points, such because the overhaul of the legal code, which Bowser vetoed, in addition to a few of her picks to guide key metropolis businesses. Final month, minutes after she outlined her fiscal 2024 price range, a number of lawmakers raised objections to a few of her urged cuts; the D.C. Council’s chair known as her price range a “setback” for town’s pandemic restoration and vowed to make adjustments within the coming weeks.

“Once you speak about her third time period, one of many issues of us have been screaming about all alongside from [former mayor] Adrian Fenty till now, is that common individuals in D.C. usually are not being addressed. Housing is simply too costly,” stated the Rev. Graylan Hagler, who managed the marketing campaign of considered one of Bowser’s opponents in final yr’s mayoral main and likewise co-chaired Bowser’s Black Homeownership Strike Pressure. “Through the years, we’ve ignored the struggles of common working individuals within the metropolis. The chickens are coming house to roost.”

In an interview earlier this yr, Bowser stated she was approaching her third time period with the same zeal as her first, whereas rethinking easy methods to greatest interact with residents — together with these, she says, who could also be indifferent or disagree along with her management type. However she additionally expressed a dedication to stay to her plans it doesn’t matter what hurdles arose, a place she reiterated whereas addressing reporters on Thursday.

“Being the mayor of an enormous metropolis, there are all the time challenges and surprises,” Bowser stated. “Our agenda is unchanged. What I do know is I used to be elected for a 3rd time period due to my expertise and imaginative and prescient for the following 4 years, and this imaginative and prescient contains how we convey our metropolis again from a worldwide pandemic.”

Advertisement

‘A stretch, however doable’

Weeks into her third time period and for the ninth time as mayor, Bowser held a public occasion to launch town’s famed summer season youth employment program. This yr, nonetheless, she did it with a twist: delivering her message by recording a podcast with native college students.

“I’m difficult my complete crew to speak about issues in a different way,” Bowser informed The Washington Put up.

Her administration has adjusted its strategy this yr in different methods, too. Bowser has spoken often about how residents really feel about crime within the metropolis, in an effort to acknowledge public perceptions round violence. (A current Put up-Schar College ballot discovered that whereas 3 in 4 District residents really feel secure, 90 % of residents stated crime is a reasonably or extraordinarily significant issue.) In different remarks, Bowser has additionally aimed to debate the monetary realities of the middle-class Washingtonians who’re struggling to thrive within the metropolis, a deviation from rhetoric that targeted on the haves and have-nots that dominated final yr’s mayoral main.

D.C.’s five-year financial technique: Fairness and inhabitants development

Advertisement

In January, her administration outlined its five-year financial technique, which incorporates initiatives she says will assist safe town’s tax base and mitigate the uneven distribution of facilities. The plan’s main objectives embody boosting D.C.’s inhabitants from round 671,000 residents to 725,000, with 15,000 of the brand new residents dwelling downtown, and elevating the median family revenue of Black residents by $25,000. The town authorities is exploring concepts just like the conversion of economic buildings to residential, and modifying the Peak Act, to take action.

“All of those objectives are somewhat little bit of a stretch, however doable,” Bowser added.

Erica Williams, govt director of the left-leaning DC Fiscal Coverage Institute, which final yr praised Bowser’s price range priorities, known as the mayor’s big-bet objectives “laudable.” However after reviewing the 150-page “Comeback Plan,” Williams stated it lacked specifics on how a few of it will be realized — particularly people who require unraveling many years of discriminatory U.S. coverage.

Some initiatives which might be mentioned within the plan, like lowering obstacles to occupational licensing and bettering pathways for academic, commerce and apprenticeship packages, are merely a place to begin, Williams added.

“There are good concepts, and might be a part of a plan to get to this huge shift in incomes, nevertheless it’s not adequate to get there. Not even shut,” Williams stated. “I’d’ve anticipated to see coverage concepts that match the magnitude of the change that Bowser needs to see.”

Advertisement

Extra just lately, advocates and lawmakers have taken the mayor to job over her 2024 price range proposal, which slashes funding for an emergency rental help program that many residents relied on throughout the pandemic. Williams’s group and housing advocates have additionally expressed hesitancy over Bowser’s proposed improve to town’s tax abatement for office-to-residential conversions, questioning if downtown housing would convey sufficient inexpensive and family-size items.

Hagler, who co-founded the Neighborhood Help Company of America that gives mortgage packages to assist new householders, stated the mayor shouldn’t lose sight of longtime residents in her efforts to herald new ones.

“You may speak about attracting new populations, nevertheless it gained’t occur with crime within the information daily. And it actually gained’t occur as you construct extra density and fewer locations for households,” Hagler stated. “What in regards to the various tapestry of those that existed in D.C. earlier than all this took off? Priced out of the market, no place, no voice.”

Others stated Bowser’s bold objectives assist illustrate her deal with reimagining downtown and rising town extra evenly. Anthony Williams, the District’s mayor between 1999 and 2007, recollects asserting his personal plan to attract 100,000 new residents to town over the course of a decade. That plan, additionally thought-about an extended shot, finally got here to fruition after greater than 10 years. So how achievable is Bowser’s aim for the District’s inhabitants, particularly after town noticed attrition in 2020 and 2021?

“There are two other ways of it, you may say whether or not the aim was met or not, and whether or not progress was made or not, and I believe having stretch objectives is clearly a contributor to the latter,” Williams stated. “If I hadn’t set that aim of 100,000, would we have now come near or exceeded that aim? I don’t know.”

Advertisement

As D.C.’s downtown struggles, Bowser appears to be like skyward for solutions

Now the chief director of the nonprofit civic and enterprise group known as the Federal Metropolis Council, Williams stated Bowser’s deal with downtown can be essential to town’s long-term financial outlook. On the similar time, he stated, Bowser should steadiness the objectives that may take years with making tangible features within the areas the place residents have most often criticized her.

“Progress has been made, clearly, within the efficiency of the federal government, Williams added. “However points just like the 911 name middle and D.C. Housing Authority present it’s a seamless story, and persevering with effort needs to be made.”

In February, Bowser introduced her choose to guide town’s Workplace of Unified Communications (OUC), higher generally known as the 911 name middle. OUC, which has been criticized by the general public and council for errors which have resulted in individuals dying earlier than emergency companies may arrive, is amongst a number of native D.C. businesses that lawmakers have stated want pressing consideration.

In December, council members threatened to strike down Bowser’s choice to completely lead the 911 name middle, spurring the mayor to drag the nomination of Karima Holmes altogether and promote OUC’s deputy director, Heather McGaffin. In current months, Bowser has watched a number of key cupboard members depart amid scrutiny. Amongst them had been Falcicchio and deputy mayor for public security Christopher Geldart, who left after a private coach alleged that Geldart assaulted him outdoors an Arlington health club.

Advertisement

In March, Ernest Chrappah, the previous Division of Client and Regulatory Affairs director who Bowser picked to guide the brand new Division of Buildings introduced that he plans to resign, though he didn’t give a purpose. The mayor has not but introduced a everlasting substitute for her former well being director, LaQuandra Nesbitt, who helped orchestrate town’s pandemic response.

“We’re targeted on recruiting the most effective of the most effective, and we’ve seen some individuals go and extra individuals come, and we are going to proceed to try this,” Bowser stated Thursday.

The attrition of cupboard members will not be uncommon for a three-term mayor, particularly as her high advisers search alternatives outdoors authorities, however these losses may additional complicate her efforts to deal with long-standing points.

“This is without doubt one of the downsides of long-serving mayors and governors,” stated Fauntroy, the Howard professor. “The lack of high expertise, or the shortcoming to search out equal expertise, is one thing that deserves some consideration.”

Bowser has additionally sparred with council members on faculties and housing funding, the scale of town’s police power and whether or not useful resource officers belong within the metropolis’s public faculties — points which might be anticipated to dominate price range conversations within the coming weeks. However none of these disputes has held extra penalties than disagreements over proposed adjustments to D.C.’s revised legal code, which Bowser had stated repeatedly despatched the “mistaken message” about public security.

Advertisement

Bowser unsuccessfully vetoed the revised code after it handed unanimously by the council, and introduced a new invoice that might roll again some adjustments that she stated involved her.

However Bowser’s trepidations additionally aligned her with congressional Republicans who invoked her identify whereas efficiently advancing a disapproval decision to dam it from turning into legislation. It was the primary time in 30 years that Congress used its constitutional disapproval powers over District issues. Whereas Bowser repeatedly urged Congress to not meddle within the metropolis’s affairs, she sought to steadiness these objections along with her personal qualms in regards to the code.

Some lawmakers lamented publicly and privately that Bowser didn’t foyer Congress when the disapproval decision was first being thought-about by the Home, at the same time as the whole D.C. Council, Lawyer Normal Brian Schwalb (D) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), did. However a number of weeks later, when the matter got here earlier than the Senate, Bowser chimed in with a letter of her personal and inspired members to vote “no.” Her spokeswoman later stated that Senate allies had requested her to put in writing a letter, so she did.

Home votes to dam D.C. payments on noncitizen voting, legal code

Bowser modified her strategy as Home Republicans in March moved to dam one other D.C. public security initiative: a policing reform invoice handed after the 2020 killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The mayor — together with the council chairman — wrote a letter to Home and Senate leaders opposing congressional efforts to overturn that invoice.

Advertisement

Amid the brand new congressional scrutiny, Bowser should work out easy methods to stroll a really tremendous line. She’s going to want Congress’s cooperation to advance her administration’s priorities round housing, whether or not that’s gaining native management of the federally owned RFK Stadium web site, or modifying the Peak Act to permit for larger housing density downtown.

Hours earlier than the Senate voted to dam the legal code laws, Bowser held a group stroll in Petworth and invited residents and enterprise homeowners to share their considerations about crime. There, she supplied a differing view from those that noticed the pending vote as a setback within the metropolis’s struggle to be acknowledged as a state.

Your complete ordeal, Bowser argued, gave the nation a transparent, unvarnished have a look at how D.C.’s residents are disenfranchised.

“Some individuals don’t know that D.C. residents aren’t similar to them. Some individuals in America don’t notice that we truly don’t have senators proper now. Some individuals don’t notice we’re within the shadow of the Capitol. … We go to struggle similar to they do, however we don’t have a vote,” Bowser informed the group. “So what they’ve additionally served to do is educate Individuals in regards to the issues we face and the indignities we dwell with, and the way we have now to turn out to be the 51st state to alter it.”

As she labored to quell considerations about public security, one other disaster was quietly brewing: That night, she was notified a couple of criticism regarding Falcicchio. Her administration launched an investigation the next day.

Advertisement

Paul Schwartzman contributed to this report.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington, D.C

Days before Trump takes office, thousands of protestors march in Washington, D.C.

Published

on

Days before Trump takes office, thousands of protestors march in Washington, D.C.


WASHINGTON (AP) — Thousands of people from around the United States rallied in the nation’s capital Saturday for women’s reproductive rights and other causes they believe are under threat from the incoming Trump administration, reprising the original Women’s March days before President-elect Donald Trump’s second inauguration.

READ MORE: Trump arriving in nation’s capital for inaugural celebrations to mark his return to power

Eight years after the first historic Women’s March at the start of Trump’s first term, marchers said they were caught off guard by Trump’s victory and are determined now to show that support remains strong for women’s access to abortion, for transgender people, for combating climate change and other issues.

The march is just one of several protests, rallies and vigils focused on abortion, rights, immigration rights and the Israel-Hamas war planned in advance of inauguration Monday. Around the country, over 350 similar marches are taking place in every state.

Advertisement

Jill Parrish of Austin, Texas, said she initially bought a plane ticket to Washington for what she expected to be Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris’s inauguration. She wound up changing the dates to march in protest ahead of Trump’s swearing-in instead, saying the world should know that half of U.S. voters didn’t support Trump.

“Most importantly, I’m here to demonstrate my fear, about the state of our democracy,” Parrish said.

Demonstrators staged in squares around Washington ahead of the march, pounding drums and yelling chants under a slate-gray sky and in a chilly wind. Protesters then marched to the Lincoln Memorial for larger rally and fair, where organizations at the local, state and national level will host information tables.

They held signs with slogans including, “Save America” and “Against abortions? Then don’t have one” and “Hate won’t win.”

There were brief moments of tension between protesters and Trump supporters. The march paused briefly when a man in a red Make America Great Again hat and a green camo backpack walked into a line of demonstrators at the front. Police intervened and separated him from the group peacefully as marchers chanted “We won’t take the bait.”

Advertisement

As the protesters approached the Washington Monument, a small group of men in MAGA hats walking in the opposite direction appeared to draw the attention of a protest leader with a megaphone. The leader veered closer to the group and began chanting “No Trump, no KKK” through the megaphone. The groups were separated by high black fencing and police officers eventually gathered around.

Rick Glatz, of Manchester, New Hampshire, said he came to Washington for the sake of his four granddaughters: ” I’m a grandpa. And that’s why I’m marching.”

Minnesota high school teacher Anna Bergman wore her original pink pussy hat from her time in the 2017 Women’s March, a moment that captured the shock and anger of progressives and moderates at Trump’s first win.

With Trump coming back now, “I just wanted to be surrounded by likeminded people on a day like today,” Bergman said.

Rebranded and reorganized, the rally has a new name — the People’s March — as a means to broaden support, especially during a reflective moment for progressive organizing after Trump’s decisive win in November. The Republican takes the oath of office Monday.

Advertisement

Women outraged over Trump’s 2016 presidential win flocked to Washington in 2017 and organized large rallies in cities throughout the country, building the base of a grassroots movement that became known as the Women’s March. The Washington rally alone attracted over 500,000 marchers, and millions more participated in local marches around the country, marking one of the largest single-day demonstrations in U.S. history.

This year, the crowd was far fewer than the expected 50,000 participants, already just one-tenth the size of the first march. The demonstration comes amid a restrained moment of reflection as many progressive voters navigate feelings of exhaustion, disappointment and despair after Harris’ loss.

WATCH: Harris loss causes some to question what it will take to elect a woman president

“Before we do anything about democracy, we have to fight our own despair,” said one of the event’s first speakers, Rachel O’Leary Carmona, executive director of Women’s March.

The comparative quiet contrasts sharply with the white-knuckled fury of the inaugural rally as massive crowds shouted demands over megaphones and marched in pink pussyhats in response to Trump’s first election win.

Advertisement

“The reality is that it’s just hard to capture lightning in a bottle,” said Tamika Middleton, managing director at the Women’s March. “It was a really particular moment. In 2017, we had not seen a Trump presidency and the kind of vitriol that that represented.”

The movement fractured after that hugely successful day of protests over accusations that it was not diverse enough. This year’s rebrand as a People’s March is the result of an overhaul intended to broaden the group’s appeal. Saturday’s demonstration promoted themes related to feminism, racial justice, anti-militarization and other issues and ended with discussions hosted by various social justice organizations.

The People’s March is unusual in the “vast array of issues brought together under one umbrella,” said Jo Reger, a sociology professor who researches social movements at Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan. Women’s suffrage marches, for example, were focused on a specific goal of voting rights.

For a broad-based social justice movement such as the march, conflicting visions are impossible to avoid and there is “immense pressure” for organizers to meet everyone’s needs, Reger said. But she also said some discord isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

“Often what it does is bring change and bring in new perspectives, especially of underrepresented voices,” Reger said.

Advertisement

Middleton, of the Women’s March, said a massive demonstration like the one in 2017 was not the goal of Saturday’s event. Instead, it’s goal was focusing attention on a broader set of issues — women’s and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigration, climate and democracy — rather than centering it more narrowly around Trump.

“We’re not thinking about the march as the endgame,” Middleton said. “How do we get those folks who show up into organizations and into their political homes so they can keep fighting in their communities long term?”

Associated Press writers Gary Fields, Ellen Knickmeyer and Mike Pesoli contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DCA warns flyers to bundle up after heating system outage

Published

on

DCA warns flyers to bundle up after heating system outage


The primary heating system at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) has been out since Friday evening, and the airport is warning travelers to bundle up before they arrive.

“We apologize for any discomfort to travelers as we work diligently to return the heat to normal levels,” DCA said on its website.

DCA is still operational, and the broken heating system has not affected flights, TSA or airline operations, or any of the shops and restaurants inside. Temperatures outside in Alexandria hovering around 45 degrees Fahrenheit, and according to a statement from the airport, temperatures inside the building are “generally in the 60s.”

“We are conserving heat in the building and are running alternate heating sources in a few locations,” DCA said in a statement posted to X.

Advertisement

Airport maintenance crews are working to repair the heating system, and have been since Friday night.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Thousands to gather in Washington DC to march ahead of Trump inauguration – The Times of India

Published

on

Thousands to gather in Washington DC to march ahead of Trump inauguration – The Times of India


Preparation for People’s March

The Women’s March is returning to Washington, DC on Saturday, eight years after its historic first march. The rally, now rebranded as the People’s March, aims to broaden its support and reflect on the state of progressive organising ahead President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration as President for second time on January 20.
In 2017, the Women’s March attracted over 500,000 marchers in Washington and millions more in cities across the country, marking one of the largest single-day demonstrations in US history.

Saif Ali Khan Health Update

The movement was fueled by outrage over Trump’s 2016 presidential win.
This year’s march is expected to be significantly smaller, with attendance estimated at one-tenth of the inaugural rally. The comparative quiet reflects a sense of exhaustion and disappointment among progressive voters following Vice President Kamala Harris’ loss, according to report from Associated Press.
Tamika Middleton, managing director at the Women’s March, acknowledged the challenges of recapturing the energy of the first march, stating, “The reality is that it’s just hard to capture lightning in a bottle. It was a really particular moment. In 2017, we had not seen a Trump presidency and the kind of vitriol that that represented.”
The movement has undergone an overhaul to address accusations of a lack of diversity, resulting in this year’s rebrand as the People’s March. The demonstration will promote themes related to feminism, racial justice, anti-militarization, and other issues, concluding with discussions hosted by various social justice organizations.
Jo Reger, a sociology professor at Oakland University, noted that the People’s March is unusual in the “vast array of issues brought together under one umbrella.” While conflicting visions are inevitable in a broad-based social justice movement, Reger suggested that discord can bring change and new perspectives, particularly from underrepresented voices.
Middleton emphasized that the goal of Saturday’s event is not to recreate the massive demonstration of 2017 but to focus attention on a broader set of issues and encourage participants to continue fighting in their communities long-term.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending