Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Perspective | A new book charts the early years of Washington’s NAACP chapter

Published

on


Placeholder whereas article actions load

When the Nationwide Affiliation for the Development of Coloured Folks was fashioned in New York Metropolis in 1909, it was inevitable that there would finally be a department in Washington.

In spite of everything, stated archivist and historian Derek Grey, the District had a large African American inhabitants and there was “a really sturdy Black middle- to upper-middle class within the metropolis: attorneys, educators, entrepreneurs. Howard College and M Road Excessive College had been facilities of Black high quality schooling.”

However what kind of department wouldn’t it be?

That’s the query Grey addresses in his new e-book, “The NAACP in Washington, D.C.: From Jim Crow to House Rule,” printed by the Historical past Press.

Advertisement

The nationwide NAACP workplace was based and run primarily by White progressives. Washington was the fourth U.S. metropolis to have an NAACP chapter — Chicago and Boston got here earlier than it — and, stated Grey, was mainly the primary to have Black management. Mary Church Terrell was among the many first officers and John Milton Waldron, pastor of Shiloh Baptist Church, served because the department’s first president.

The members had a novel accountability.

“New York was a powerhouse, however D.C. was the middle of energy,” Grey stated. “The department had two twin roles: to serve the pursuits of the town’s Black group, but additionally to watch what was occurring in Congress by way of laws that might negatively have an effect on African Individuals everywhere in the nation.”

As with so many fledgling organizations, the early days of the NAACP in Washington had been difficult. Town’s newspapers had been dismissive. You would possibly anticipate that from White-owned papers such because the Night Star and The Washington Publish, however Grey discovered even the Black press was lower than supportive.

“That was very fascinating to me,” Grey stated.

Advertisement

A number one paper for the African American group on the time was the Washington Bee, led by the firebrand editor William Calvin Chase.

“He instantly dismissed the NAACP when it was first fashioned,” Grey stated. “He was of the mind-set that any motion that introduced collectively African Individuals and Whites simply wouldn’t work. For a very long time he simply ignored it.”

Chase thought that the sluggish, cautious educational strategy to race relations was a waste of time.

“Chase was like, no, you want activism,” Grey stated.

That dichotomy — prudence vs. activism — was emblematic of the group’s early years.

Advertisement

Grey’s e-book is an efficient primer on the civil rights points dealing with the nation within the early twentieth century. The candidacy of Woodrow Wilson “actually galvanized the department,” Grey stated. “Wilson, he talked a very good sport. He mainly portrayed himself as a liberal southerner. He condemned lynching from the beginning and impressed the NAACP, together with the Washington department.”

The NAACP endorsed Wilson — D.C. chapter president Waldron was an enormous fan — assured that the Democrat can be an ally within the White Home. He turned out to be the other, segregating federal departments and hobbling a rising Black center class in Washington.

In 1915, Wilson attended a screening of D.W. Griffith’s “The Beginning of a Nation” within the White Home. The movie was sympathetic to the Accomplice trigger, and NAACP chapters throughout the nation had been making an attempt to forestall it from being proven.

“Some branches had been in a position to get scenes deleted or get it banned altogether,” Grey stated.

For the District, the problem was an ideal illustration of the stress between moderation and militancy. Grey writes that at a month-to-month assembly of the District NAACP chapter, “a member instructed a radical answer. If all else failed, then the chemists of the town, of which he was one, ‘ought to get collectively and forestall the exhibiting of the play by means of explosives.’ ”

Advertisement

That didn’t occur. Mentioned Grey: “Direct motion — picketing and boycotts — was not the urge for food of the department. They checked out that — they known as it the ‘rowdy aspect’ — and determined, ‘We’re going to watch out, we’re going to be cautious.’ ”

Ultimately, “The Beginning of a Nation” was proven on the Nationwide Theatre with out incident.

The chapter had extra success with the so-called Mammy Monument, a statue of a Black girl tending to White kids that had the help of the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Sons of Accomplice Veterans. Grey stated even some male NAACP members had no drawback with the proposed sculpture.

“The ladies of the department had been truly chargeable for that monument not coming to be,” Grey stated. “Ladies like Mary Church Terrell, Nannie Helen Burroughs and Virginia McGuire — all these highly effective sisters — stated, ‘You recognize what, fellas? Step apart. We’ll care for it.’ ”

After we consider the civil rights motion, we have a tendency to think about the sit-ins, marches and speeches of the Fifties and Sixties. Grey hopes his e-book will remind readers of earlier battles and the individuals who fought them.

Advertisement



Source link

Washington, D.C

Thomas says critics are pushing ‘nastiness’ and calls Washington a ‘hideous place’

Published

on

Thomas says critics are pushing ‘nastiness’ and calls Washington a ‘hideous place’


FAIRHOPE, Ala. (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told attendees at a judicial conference Friday that he and his wife have faced “nastiness” and “lies” over the last several years and decried Washington, D.C., as a “hideous place.”

Thomas spoke at a conference attended by judges, attorneys and other court personnel in the 11th Circuit Judicial Conference, which hears federal cases from Alabama, Florida and Georgia. He made the comments pushing back on his critics in response to a question about working in a world that seems meanspirited.

“I think there’s challenges to that. We’re in a world and we — certainly my wife and I the last two or three years it’s been — just the nastiness and the lies, it’s just incredible,” Thomas said.

“But you have some choices. You don’t get to prevent people from doing horrible things or saying horrible things. But one you have to understand and accept the fact that they can’t change you unless you permit that,” Thomas said.

Advertisement

Thomas has faced criticisms that he took accepted luxury trips from a GOP donor without reporting them. Thomas last year maintained that he didn’t have to report the trips paid for by one of “our dearest friends.” His wife, conservative activist Ginni Thomas has faced criticism for using her Facebook page to amplify unsubstantiated claims of corruption by President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

He did not discuss the content of the criticisms directly, but said that “reckless” people in Washington will “bomb your reputation.”

“They don’t bomb you necessarily, but they bomb your reputation or your good name or your honor. And that’s not a crime. But they can do as much harm that way,” Thomas said.

During the appearance, Thomas was asked questions by U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, one of Thomas’ former law clerks who was later appointed to the federal bench. During his hour-long appearance, the longest-serving justice on the court discussed a wide range of topics including the lessons of his grandfather, his friendship with former colleagues and his belief that court writings and discussions should be more accessible for “regular people.”

Thomas, who spent most of his working life in Washington D.C., also discussed his dislike of it.

Advertisement

“I think what you are going to find and especially in Washington, people pride themselves on being awful. It is a hideous place as far as I’m concerned,” Thomas said. Thomas said that it is one of the reasons he and his wife “like RVing.”

“You get to be around regular people who don’t pride themselves in doing harmful things, merely because they have the capacity to do it or because they disagree,” Thomas said.

A recreational vehicle used by Thomas also became a source of controversy. Senate Democrats in October issued a report saying that most of the $267,000 loan obtained by Thomas to buy a high-end motorcoach appears to have been forgiven.

Thomas did not discuss the court’s high-profile caseload.

The justice said he believed it is important to use language in court rulings so that the law is accessible to the average person.

Advertisement

“The regular people I think are being disenfranchised sometimes by the way that we talk about cases,” Thomas said.

Thomas wasn’t the only justice making a speaking appearance Friday.

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said Friday that U.S. history shows court decisions unpopular in their time later can become part of the “fabric of American constitutional law.”

Kavanaugh spoke Friday at a conference attended by judges, attorneys and other court personnel in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi and is one of the most conservative circuits.

__

Advertisement

Jim Vertuno contributed to this report from Austin.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

U.S. Senate in FAA bill adds flights at Washington National, bucking Md. opponents – Maryland Matters

Published

on

U.S. Senate in FAA bill adds flights at Washington National, bucking Md. opponents – Maryland Matters


Terminal at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, the closest of three large international airports to, Washington, D.C. Photo by Carol Highsmith/Library of Congress.

After hours of uncertainty Thursday, the U.S. Senate struck a deal to reauthorize several Federal Aviation Authority programs for the next five years, though Maryland and Virginia senators were vehemently opposed and lawmakers hoping to attach unrelated provisions lost out.

The bill heads to the House next week for final approval. Lawmakers from the lower chamber left Wednesday after approving a one-week extension for the FAA programs that expire Friday night. The Senate also passed the extension.

The late night vote, 88-4, drew resistance from the Democratic senators representing Maryland and Virginia. They held up speedier passage of the bill over objections to a provision that would allow more flights in and out of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, just over the Virginia border from Washington, D.C.

In a joint statement after the vote, Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner of Virginia said the Senate “abdicated its responsibility to protect the safety of the 25 million people” who annually fly through Reagan airport, known as DCA.

Advertisement

The airport, a favorite for lawmakers as it’s closest to the Capitol, is limited by federal regulation on the number of “slots,” or flights that can take off and land per day.

“Just weeks after two aircraft nearly crashed into one another at DCA, this body refused to take up our commonsense amendment to remove a dangerous provision that would have crammed more flights onto the busiest runway in America,” the statement from Kaine and Warner continued, referring to an April 18 near-miss when two planes cleared to take off came within 400 feet of crashing.

The Virginia senators, as well as Democratic Sens. Ben Cardin and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, held out for hours Thursday as they negotiated a vote for an amendment to strike or tighten a provision that would increase slots at DCA to five more landings and five more take-offs.

‘Over 200 member priorities’

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) agreed to bring what the senators described as a “compromise” amendment to the floor Thursday evening. The amendment proposed giving the final say on slots to the U.S. Transportation secretary after considering delays and safety.

Advertisement

But GOP Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, one of the bill’s managers, objected, saying that the bill already “contains over 200 member priorities.”

Cruz, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, managed the bill with the committee’s chair, Democrat Maria Cantwell of Washington.

Cruz is a proponent of increasing slots at DCA, particularly for a direct flight from San Antonio.

Others support the increase as well: Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia had originally proposed adding 28 new slots per day. That idea was scrapped and replaced with Cruz’s amendment to allow five new daily flights in and out.

On the floor Thursday evening, Cruz pushed back on the safety argument, saying that “the FAA experts have recently clarified that this near miss (on April 18) had absolutely nothing to do with traffic on the runway.” He also blamed opposition on a lobbying effort from United Airlines, which operates a massive hub at Dulles International Airport in Virginia and wants to thwart competition.

Advertisement

Cruz said the final bill addresses safety issues by “ensuring we have sufficient air traffic controllers to monitor the traffic and protect safety.”

Late Thursday night after the bill’s passage, Cantwell took the floor to praise provisions that she said expand the aviation workforce, enhance pilot training and protect consumers.

Among its many provisions, the roughly 1,000-page legislation:

  • Directs the FAA to increase air traffic controller hiring targets;
  • Raises the commercial pilot retirement age to 67 from 65;
  • Prohibits mask-wearing and COVID-19 vaccine policies for passengers or employees;
  • Directs the FAA to update drone testing and operating rules;
  • Requires the Department of Transportation to create a seating policy to allow children to sit next to parents or guardians at no extra charge; and
  • Requires airlines to automatically refund customers after three hours of delay for domestic flights and after six hours for international flights.

“These statutory rights are a big win for consumers,” Cantwell said.

Last flight out of the airport

Many lawmakers view the FAA reauthorization bill as the last major vehicle to which they can attach their priorities before November elections and the close of the 118th Congress.

Advertisement

That opportunity disappeared Thursday when the legislation’s managers decided against allowing non-germane amendments to ride on the bill.

Among the proposals lawmakers were eyeing as additions was Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden’s bipartisan tax bill that would expand the child tax credit and revive corporate tax breaks. Another included Sen. Josh Hawley’s Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, or RECA, which would reauthorize a fund for victims of U.S. radiation testing exposure. The fund expires June 7.

Hawley said Thursday afternoon that he wouldn’t object to the FAA bill, even if RECA wasn’t added on.

“I have no desire to tank the FAA reauthorization,” Hawley, a Missouri Republican, told reporters outside the Senate chamber. “I think we should have a reasonable process around it. But, if we’re not going to, we’re not going to.”

“At least we got automatic refunds for consumers out of this deal, which was good,” Hawley added, referring to his amendment with Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts that senators agreed to Tuesday.

Advertisement

Maryland legislators had hoped to add funding to rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge outside Baltimore to the FAA package, but congressional Republicans had rejected that idea late last month.

Jacob Fischler and Josh Kurtz contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Spotlight: Thousands tour DC embassies during open house | Washington Diplomat

Published

on

Spotlight: Thousands tour DC embassies during open house | Washington Diplomat



Spotlight: Thousands tour DC embassies during open house | Washington Diplomat



















Advertisement

Advertisement

Home Culture Art Spotlight: Thousands tour DC embassies during open house
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending