Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Crime-ridden Washington DC offers 911 dispatchers $800 bonus just for showing up to work as chronic absenteeism forces fire department into drastic move: ‘It’s bonkers’

Published

on

Crime-ridden Washington DC offers 911 dispatchers 0 bonus just for showing up to work as chronic absenteeism forces fire department into drastic move: ‘It’s bonkers’


The bosses in charge of DC’s crumbling 911 dispatch system have resorted to offering their staff an extra $800 a month just to turn up to work when they are supposed to.

The desperate move came after the number of dangerously undermanned shifts jumped from 24 percent in May, to 88 percent in July.

IT failures have stopped emergency calls coming through seven times so far this year including earlier this month when a five-month-old baby died during a two-hour outage.

And the system has become so unreliable that DC Fire and EMS has now created a shadow dispatch operation for the calls they need to deal with.

Advertisement

‘Is it not wild to you that our first-responder agency has set up a workaround for our 911 call center?’ demanded DC council member Brianne Nadeau. ‘It’s bonkers.’

Dispatch chief Heather McGaffin, seen here with Mayor Muriel Bowser, has offered her staff an extra $800 a month just to turn up to work when they are supposed to

The sprawling 911 HQ on St Elizabeth's campus in the south east of the city was dangerously undermanned 88 per cent of the time in July

The sprawling 911 HQ on St Elizabeth’s campus in the south east of the city was dangerously undermanned 88 per cent of the time in July

News of the monthly bonus was revealed in an email to staff on Tuesday morning by Heather McGaffin, director of the city’s Office of Unified Communications (OUC).

‘Good morning 911 Team,’ she wrote. ‘Starting immediately all 911 employees who show up for all of their scheduled shifts will receive an $800 incentive for the month.

‘Staffing is crucial to the success of our agency. Unscheduled call outs of all kinds are up and causing a hardship for fellow employees who are continuously getting stuck, coming in early, and being asked to come in on days off.

‘The pilot is simple- show up for each shift you’re assigned and receive $800 additional for the month. We start today for August.’

Advertisement

The offer has sparked outrage in a city where 321 callers hung up on Sunday alone when their call was not answered.

‘I’m not sure if I want employees with chronic absenteeism to show-up when lives are literally on the line,’ wrote one. ‘Hire better people, increase base pay, improve training.’

The murder rate jumped 35 per cent to 274 in the city last year, and property crimes  rose by a quarter.

Levels have started to drop but the dysfunctional dispatch office has been implicated in a growing number of avoidable deaths.

A by-stander called 911 after seeing a Dodge Charger plunge into the Potomac by the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge in April last year.

Advertisement

But driver Timjuan Mundell, 46, drowned alongside his three passengers when dispatchers sent responders to a different bridge a mile upstream.

And a five-month-old in cardiac arrest died after waiting 15 minutes for a response in the Woodley Park district on August 2 when the dispatch system was floored by what was described by a botched software update.

Former 911 interim director Cleo Subido found overhead screens that were supposed to carry local news broadcasts were tuned to sports events when she was appointed in 2020

Former 911 interim director Cleo Subido found overhead screens that were supposed to carry local news broadcasts were tuned to sports events when she was appointed in 2020 

Council Member Charles Allen said the executive 'won’t even admit there’s a major problem'

Council Member Charles Allen said the executive ‘won’t even admit there’s a major problem’

Many were appalled that staff needed a bonus just to show up, bit others had some sympathy for the conditions in the

Many were appalled that staff needed a bonus just to show up, bit others had some sympathy for the conditions in the 

Council Member Charles Allen said the problems in OUC have now reached crisis levels.

‘Not a week goes by that I don’t have a constituent reach out who couldn’t get through, had to wait a long time for first responders to be dispatched in an emergency, or had the wrong – or no – response arrive on scene,’ he said.

But the system has been notoriously bad for decades in a city which makes 1.8 million emergency calls a year.

Advertisement

As far back as 2008 firefighters were publicly complaining about dispatchers telling them ‘S as in celery’ when directing to S Street and ‘Q as in cucumber’ when sending to Q Street.

A 2021 review by the city auditor Kathleen Patterson discovered a catalogue of failings.

‘We basically found a dysfunctional agency, all across the board,’ she told Washingtonian.com.

First responders would routinely be sent to the wrong addresses because call handlers would chat to callers rather than use software to pinpoint their location.

While ‘cliques, bullying, and uncorrected inappropriate behaviors’ were endemic in the workplace.

Advertisement

‘Lack of staff, lack of training, lack of use of technology, insufficient supervision, insufficient oversight of the chain of command. It might be easier to say what we didn’t find,’ she said.

Cleo Subido who was appointed interim director in December 2020 found that the huge overhead screens that were supposed to carry local news broadcasts were tuned instead to sports events.

She found supervisors playing staff off against each other, happy to tolerate poor performance, and resisting reform for fear of upsetting the office politics.

Last year she sued the city claiming in her lawsuit that city bosses ‘repeatedly sought to conceal errors and mismanagement by OUC and to downplay serious, life-threatening—and often fatal—mistakes.’

Campaigner Dave Statter says he has some sympathy with the dispatchers at the sharp end of things.

Advertisement

‘They know how desperate it is in there,’ he said.

‘Many of those people were forced to work extended overtime on their shift. They’re pretty beleaguered, and some of them have gone to other 911 operations.

‘The problems at 911 really boil down to training and most importantly, leadership.

‘They keep seeming to spend more time on covering things up rather than trying to fix them.

‘The place has been in crisis for a long period of time. It’s only getting worse.

Advertisement

‘In fact, I’ve said for a while that this recent period is maybe the worst I’ve seen it 911 in the District in the more than 40 years I’ve covered it. It’s in bad shape, and no one seems to be addressing it.’

As far back as 2008 firefighters were publicly complaining about dispatchers telling them 'S as in celery' when directing to S Street and 'Q as in cucumber' when sending to Q Street.

As far back as 2008 firefighters were publicly complaining about dispatchers telling them ‘S as in celery’ when directing to S Street and ‘Q as in cucumber’ when sending to Q Street.

The system has become so unreliable that DC Fire and EMS has resorted to setting up a shadow dispatch operation for the calls they need to deal with

The system has become so unreliable that DC Fire and EMS has resorted to setting up a shadow dispatch operation for the calls they need to deal with 

An OUC spokesperson told DC News Now: ‘We appreciate how hard our team at OUC are working and will continue to acknowledge and reward those efforts.

‘Staffing is crucial to the success of the agency, and we will continue to explore ways to enhance agency performance while being good stewards of District resources.’

Councilor Allen said responsibility for the failings ultimately lies with Murial Browser, mayor of the city since 2015.

‘The Executive won’t even admit there’s a major problem – but if it’s true they’re paying people $800 just to come to work, it’s a clear admission that we have an agency badly in need of major changes,’ he said.

Advertisement

‘DC residents are shaken and don’t trust that there’s leadership and a clear directive to turn the agency around. That’s a huge problem.’



Source link

Washington, D.C

Tax expert explains DC filing season amid Congress-District dispute

Published

on

Tax expert explains DC filing season amid Congress-District dispute


D.C. taxpayers may be confused by back-and-forth between the D.C. City Council and Congress over taxprovision. The city’s financial officer sent a letter to Mayor Muriel Bowser and D.C. Council Chair Phil Mendelson, that said the District’s tax laws will not change, despite recent actions by Congress.

7News spoke to director of Tax Policy at the Center for American Progress Corey Husak to explain the complicated tax policy.

“The short answer is, nothing changes. Filing Season can continue as it has been, continue as planned, and according to the laws as we understood them in January,” said Husak.

“If you’ve already filed your taxes, you don’t have to change anything. And if you want to file your taxes, the rules are still the same as they were on the books before,” said Husak.

Advertisement

RELATED | DC Council Chairman talks taxes, budget, bodycams, federal surge

Chief Financial Officer Glen Lee’s revenue estimate issued Friday does not include an estimated $180 million expected this fiscal year from the city’s decoupling law, “due to the uncertainty of the associated revenue as a result of Joint Resolution 142,” according to a released letter.

“The CFO was in a tough spot here. If he agreed with Congress, then businesses and overtime workers will get bigger refunds. But if he agreed with the Mayor and the Attorney General, then families with children and lower income workers would get bigger tax cuts,” said Husak.

SEE MORE | Development of new Commanders stadium scrutinized at DC oversight hearing

“We as District residents can’t control, you know what happens in the courts, what happens in, you know, what Congress does in the future,” said Husak. “But for now, the CFO has said, you know this is, this is a law as it stands, and the law that I’m going to enforce so, you know, file your legally obligated taxes, and maybe in the future, there’ll be a surprise.”

Advertisement

WATCH THE FULL INTERVIEW

7News spoke to director of Tax Policy at the Center for American Progress Corey Husak to explain the complicated tax policy (7News).{ }



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

CHERRY BLOSSOM COUNTDOWN: Peak Bloom prediction drops Thursday

Published

on

CHERRY BLOSSOM COUNTDOWN: Peak Bloom prediction drops Thursday


The nation’s capital is just about ready to be transformed into a breathtaking pastel landscape of cherry trees in bloom. The famed blossoms around the Tidal Basin are not only a symbol of spring’s arrival, but also of a long-standing friendship — a gift of more than 3,000 trees from Tokyo, Japan, to the United States in 1912.

So what is considered “Peak Bloom”?

The National Park Service (NPS) defines peak bloom as the time when at least 70% of the Yoshino cherry trees around the Tidal Basin have opened their blossoms. This is the period when the blossoms appear most full and spectacular and most ideal for photos, and soaking up spring’s beauty here in DC.

Because cherry trees respond to the cumulative effects of winter and spring weather, especially daily temperatures, it’s very difficult to predict peak bloom more than about 10 days in advance. Warm spells accelerate blooming; cold snaps slow it down.

Average Timing — What History Shows

Since 1921 overall, national data indicate peak bloom typically fell around early April (April 4), based on historical averages.

Advertisement
Average date peak bloom – cherry blossom trees Washington DC Tidal Basin

Since 1990, the average has kept shifting earlier and earlier. In fact, the last 6 years our peak has occurred in late March.

These shifts reflect how warmer springs have nudged peak bloom earlier over the decades.

Earliest & Latest Blooms on Record

Earliest peak bloom: March 15 — recorded in 1990.

Latest peak bloom: April 18 — recorded in 1958.

Of course, most years fall between those dates, with the last week of March to the first week of April historically being the most consistent window for peak bloom.

Advertisement
Earliest Peak Bloom Washington DC

Earliest Peak Bloom Washington DC

Recent peak blooms show how variable and climate-dependent the timing can be:

2025: The National Park Service predicted peak bloom between March 28–31 (and confirmed the official peak around March 28).

2024: Peak bloom arrived very early, on March 17, several days ahead of NPS projections — tied for one of the earliest peaks in decades.

These examples demonstrate not only how much each season can differ, but also a trend toward earlier spring blossoms in recent years.

Advertisement

What to Expect for Spring 2026

As of early March 2026, the cherry trees are still dormant. The buds haven’t begun significant growth yet. The weather will become more critical in the weeks leading up to the bloom will be the biggest factor in determining when peak bloom happens in 2026.

Heavy winter cold, as experienced this year, tends to delay bloom compared with recent early springs. In contrast, an early warm stretch could push peak bloom earlier — as long as it doesn’t come with subsequent frost.

Look for the green bud stage first. This is when the buds are small, tight, and green, with no sign of petals yet. Trees are still several weeks from blooming.

Cherry Blossom Stages

Tips for Cherry Blossom Visitors

Plan in the “sweet spot” — peak bloom often lasts a few days to about a week, but weather (rain, wind, heat) can shorten that window.

Visit slightly before or after the predicted peak dates for smaller crowds and extended color. Blossoms can be gorgeous even before 70% bloom or as petals begin falling.

Advertisement

Check NPS updates and First Alert Weather forecasts in late March for tweaked peak bloom dates.

The cherry blossoms of Washington, D.C. remain one of the most iconic harbingers of spring in the U.S., and while exact bloom dates vary year-to-year, history and natural patterns point to late March through early April as your best bet for seeing the Tidal Basin in full floral glory.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Fact Check Team: Iran conflict revives Washington fight over who can authorize US force

Published

on

Fact Check Team: Iran conflict revives Washington fight over who can authorize US force


As the war in Iran intensifies across the Middle East, a constitutional battle is unfolding in Washington over a fundamental question: Who has the authority to declare war, Congress or the president?

The debate focuses on the War Powers Resolution, a 1973 law designed to prevent years-long military conflicts without congressional approval. Lawmakers passed the measure in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to reclaim authority they believed had drifted too far toward the executive branch.

What Is the War Powers Resolution?

The War Powers Resolution was intended to put limits on a president’s ability to send U.S. troops into combat without Congress signing off.

Advertisement

Under the law, a president can deploy forces into hostilities only if Congress has formally declared war, passed a specific authorization for the use of military force, or the U.S. has been attacked.

The resolution also sets strict deadlines.

The president must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing U.S. forces into hostilities. From there, a 60-day clock begins. If Congress does not approve the military action within that time, troops must be withdrawn — though the law allows an additional 30-day wind-down period.

Some argue the law was crafted to prevent “never-ending wars.” While others say presidents from both parties have routinely stretched and sidestepped its requirements.

WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 14: Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) visits with Senate pages in the basement of the U.S. Capitol Police ahead of a vote on January 14, 2026 in Washington, DC. Republicans voted to block a Venezuela war powers resolution after receiving assurances from President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio of no U.S. forces remaining in Venezuela and pledges for congressional involvement in major future operations. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Advertisement

What Does the Constitution Say?

The War Powers Resolution is rooted directly in the U.S. Constitution.

Article I, Section 8 gives Congress — not the president — the power “to declare War.”

Article II, Section 2 names the president as Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy.

In simple terms, Congress decides whether the country goes to war. The president directs the military once it is engaged.

Advertisement

The framers intentionally split that authority. Their goal was to avoid concentrating too much war-making power in one person — likely a reaction to the monarchy they had just broken away from.

But how that balance plays out in real time is often a legal and political fight. At times, disputes over war powers have reached the courts, though Congress and the executive branch frequently resolve them through political pressure rather than judicial rulings.

A Pattern of Stretching the War Powers Resolution

Essentially, every president since 1973 has pushed the boundaries of the War Powers Resolution rather than fully complying with its original intent. As the Council on Foreign Relations explains, the resolution was designed to “provide presidents with the leeway to respond to attacks or other emergencies” but also to **require termination of combat after 60 to 90 days unless Congress authorizes continuation.”

For example:

Advertisement
  • Ronald Reagan ordered the U.S. invasion of Grenada in 1983 without prior congressional authorization, later reporting to Congress in a manner “consistent with” the resolution.
  • Bill Clinton directed the 1999 NATO air campaign in Kosovo after congressional authorization efforts failed, continuing U.S. engagement beyond the WPR’s typical 60-day reporting window.
  • Barack Obama oversaw U.S. participation in the 2011 Libya campaign, arguing that limited strikes did not trigger the full force of the WPR’s time limits.

In more recent years, Donald Trump’s administration has once again brought these issues to the forefront.

War Powers Arguments from the White House

The Trump administration’s principal legal rationale has centered on two points:

Short-term strikes or limited military actions do not always trigger the full 60-day clock under the War Powers Resolution, especially when described as defensive, limited in scope, or tied to national security emergencies rather than prolonged hostilities. In some cases, the White House relies on prior Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) or other statutory authorities rather than seeking new congressional approval.

Current Public Opinion on Iran Strikes

Public opinion reflects significant skepticism about the current U.S. military engagement with Iran. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that just 27% of Americans support the recent U.S. and allied strikes on Iran, while 43% disapprove and 29% remain uncertain.

Advertisement

Another national poll conducted by SSRS for CNN found that nearly 60% of U.S. citizens disapprove of the military actions, and a similar share said that President Trump should seek Congressional authorization for further action.

Beyond polling, internal deliberations in Congress have already begun. Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers have pushed for votes on war powers resolutions that would seek to limit or require authorization for further military action against Iran. Past attempts to pass similar restraints have failed, reflecting deep partisan divisions and the complexities of enforcing the War Powers Resolution.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending