Connect with us

Mississippi

A Mississippi bill will ban abortion pill prescriptions or sales

Published

on

A Mississippi bill will ban abortion pill prescriptions or sales


play

  • A Mississippi bill would make prescribing abortion-inducing medication illegal, with violators facing up to 10 years in prison.
  • The legislation was added as an amendment to a bill originally focused on trafficking illegal drugs.

A House bill is one step away from making it illegal for doctors to prescribe abortion-inducing medication to Mississippians. People who violate the provision could face up to 10 years in prison.

The bill originally focused on the trafficking of illegal drugs such as marijuana and scheduled controlled substances. It added a single phrase to existing Mississippi law, clarifying the number of dosage units of a scheduled drug that someone needs to transport in order to charge them with aggravated trafficking.

Advertisement

Rep. Celeste Hurst, R-Sandhill, seized the opportunity to add abortion-inducing drugs to the bill when it was heard on the House floor in early February. Her amendment would allow the prosecution of people who knowingly dispense, sell or prescribe the medications.

She clarified on the floor that her intention is to require an in-person visit with a patient before a doctor can issue the medication, which is most frequently prescribed when someone is going through a miscarriage. Neither the text of her amendment nor the Senate version that passed March 11 mention a doctor’s visit.

The bill cleared the hurdle of a full House vote on Feb. 11 easily, passing with support from nearly two-thirds of the chamber. It crossed the aisle to the Senate, where first a committee, then the full chamber, also approved the bill’s new language.

Unlike with all of the other drugs mentioned, the bill doesn’t specify the amount of abortion-inducing medication that would warrant prosecution, nor does it clarify how many units would classify the crime as a felony.

Advertisement

Additionally, the bill allows the Attorney General to sue a person who is accused of violating the law and recover a financial penalty. Being acquitted of the criminal charge, the bill states, is not a defense in a civil case, so someone who is determined to be innocent can still face civil litigation.

The bill joins Mississippi’s existing abortion laws, which ban the practice in nearly every circumstance, barring a proven case of rape or a situation where an abortion is needed to save someone’s life. Medical providers can also face a minimum of one year and maximum of 10 years in prison for performing an illegal abortion.

Neither the House nor the Senate bill would punish people who receive or use the abortion-inducing medication illegally. This policy is meant to protect women in vulnerable situations, said Grace Bailey, a domestic violence counselor, but the impact on their wellbeing is the same as if they could be prosecuted for abortions.

Advertisement

Bailey, who provides counseling at women’s shelters throughout Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana, said the strict abortion laws in these states have presented significant roadblocks for many women trying to leave abusive relationships.

“One of the first signs of abuse is control. We see women whose husbands or boyfriends have forced them to stop birth control or take their IUD out, and they end up pregnant, which makes them stay in the relationship way longer than they should,” she said in a March 9 interview.

Often, Bailey said, becoming pregnant is the sudden sign that makes a woman realize that she needs to leave her abusive partner.

“Women come to us at the shelter trying to get away from a man who hurt them, who took all their money, who made them feel completely out of control of their own life,” she said. “The last thing they can handle as they’re trying to make a clean break is a baby that will connect them to their abuser for the rest of their life.”

Advertisement

Some women decide that an early-stage abortion, before the point of viability around 24 weeks, is the best course of action for them, Bailey said. When Mississippi outlawed abortion in 2022, she recalled a woman at a Vicksburg domestic violence shelter who chose to go back to her estranged husband because she was pregnant.

“She told me, ‘I don’t have any money, I don’t have a job, and I have no family support,’” Bailey recounted. “She felt like she had no choice, so she went back to the man who scared her more than anyone in the world. Even worse, she brought a baby into that situation.”

Bailey clarified that she supports banning abortion after 12 weeks, as opposed to Mississippi’s near-total ban, but she thinks that laws should include an exception for victims of domestic violence.

“If you can prove that you’ve gone to a women’s shelter and gotten counseling, and you’re trying to get away from an abusive relationship,” she said, “I think the compassionate thing to do is let you get a safe abortion, especially if you’re just taking a pill.”

Advertisement



Source link

Mississippi

Measuring Mississippi State baseball’s concern level after sweep by Georgia at home

Published

on

Measuring Mississippi State baseball’s concern level after sweep by Georgia at home


STARKVILLE — Mississippi State baseball swept its previous two SEC opponents but fell on the other end against Georgia.

No. 4 MSU (25-7, 7-5 SEC) was swept by No. 5 Georgia (27-6, 10-2) at Dudy Noble Field. It was the first time MSU was swept under first-year coach Brian O’Connor.

Mississippi State lost 10-9 on April 2, 3-1 on April 3 and 8-5 in 10 innings on April 4.

Advertisement

The three straight losses created the longest losing streak of the season. Georgia’s last sweep of MSU at Dudy Noble Field was in 2004.

“I’m not concerned,” O’Connor said. “Listen, you see it all over the place in this league. People get swept and things like that. When I talk to the team, I talk about taking each game like its own individual game.

“… There were certainty plenty of bright spots, but just not enough. I believe we got away from what got us to this point for whatever reason. We have to own that; we have to stand up as men and acknowledge what happened and make the adjustments to get back on the right track and play winning Mississippi State baseball.”

Star third baseman Ace Reese launched a shot that looked like it was going to win Game 3 in the ninth inning, but it was caught at the warning track.

Advertisement

“It’s not concerning at all,” Reese said. “We’re a great ball club. I know what we can do. It was just unfortunate. We didn’t play good enough. We didn’t hit in situations well enough, and we didn’t pitch at the right time well enough.”

What Brian O’Connor wants more of from Mississippi State baseball

O’Connor said he agreed with a reporter’s observation that there was negative body language from Mississippi State players throughout the series.

“Words matter, and I met with the team before the stretch this morning and talked to them specifically about that and what a winner’s mentality looks like,” O’Connor said. “We just have to be better from that standpoint. We have to grow in that area. We showed some immaturity this weekend, and Georgia exposed that.”

Advertisement

Mississippi State fell behind 10-2 in Game 1 in the fifth inning after a poor start from Charlie Foster and relief appearance by Jack Gleason. MSU scored seven unanswered runs after that but failed to drive in the tying run in the ninth inning.

MSU got another outstanding pitching start from Tomas Valincius in Game 2, but never scored after the first inning. Game 3 was tied at 5-5 through six innings until Michael O’Shaughnessy hit a three-run home run in the 10th inning.

Mississippi State left 32 batters on base throughout the series and batted 1-for-22 in the final two games with runners in scoring position.

Georgia also scored numerous runs throughout the series because of passed balls and wild pitches.

“Just overall a tough weekend,” O’Connor said. “That can happen in this league. It’s no excuse. We don’t accept it. We just have to learn from it and play be a little bit more tough-minded and approach the game the right way.”

Advertisement

Sam Sklar is the Mississippi State beat reporter for The Clarion Ledger. Email him at ssklar@usatodayco.com and follow him on X @sklarsam_.



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

Why has Mississippi River saltwater intrusion worsened? A surprising answer emerges.

Published

on

Why has Mississippi River saltwater intrusion worsened? A surprising answer emerges.


New modeling is deepening understanding of why saltwater intrusion up the Mississippi River has worsened in recent years, pointing to a previously underestimated factor as the primary cause and raising questions over how drinking water can be protected in the future.

The study of river dynamics by Tulane University researchers shows that crevasses, or breaks in the lower Mississippi’s banks, are the main factor in the recent worsening of saltwater intrusion, which can threaten drinking water for vast areas of southeast Louisiana, including New Orleans.

Sea level rise and the deepening of the river for shipping purposes have also contributed, but the crevasses located in Plaquemines Parish south of where the main levee system ends are by far the primary cause because of the way they slow the current in the main channel, the study shows.

The findings are in line with preliminary assessments from the Army Corps of Engineers, which is engaged in its own three-year study of the phenomenon, but dealing with the problem poses a series of difficult questions related to coastal land loss, shipping and infrastructure.

Advertisement

The deepening of the lower river through large-scale dredging to accommodate bigger vessels has long been acknowledged as a factor in exacerbating saltwater intrusion, and that has spurred assumptions that those projects have been the main cause of the recent worsening. The new modeling disputes that.

“Deepening should not be considered as the main issue here,” said Ahmed Khalifa, the lead author of the new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science.

“Definitely we showed that it has some part … but not as much as, for example, sea level rise or closing any of the passes.”

Yet closing all the crevasses, or passes, is not seen as a viable option, and the Tulane research team, led by Ehab Meselhe, is also examining potential nature-based solutions.



Advertisement




NewOrleansChalmetteRiverAerial.jpg

New Orleans skyline, the Mississippi River and PBF Chalmette Refinery photographed from over Chalmette, La., Saturday, June 3, 2023. (Flight courtesy of SouthWings)(Photo by Sophia Germer, NOLA.com, The Times-Picayune)




They have presented their findings to the Corps, whose data was employed in the modeling. The Corps is taking an extensive look on its own, even building a physical model of the lower river at its Vicksburg, Mississippi, research center, said spokesman Ricky Boyett.

Advertisement

The research is vital as the region grapples with how to ensure safe drinking water and avoid the corrosion of infrastructure well into the future. Climate change-related effects, particularly sea level rise and increased drought in the Mississippi River basin, are expected to become greater factors in the future.

Complex threat

The threat is a complex one that occurs seasonally, when river flows drop in the summer and fall. That allows salt water to move upriver from the Gulf in the shape of a doorstop, its leading edge crawling along the river bottom because it is heavier.

The Corps has deepened the lower river over the years to accommodate the increasing size of oceangoing vessels, with the most recent project completed in 2022 and bringing it to a depth of 50 feet.

Because deepening worsens saltwater intrusion, the Corps developed a plan to mitigate it, constructing an underwater levee, or sill, along the river bottom to slow the salt water’s advance when it projects that it will be necessary.

The sill had initially been required about once a decade, but it has now had to be built four years in a row. In 2023, initial projections showed the salt water reaching New Orleans, setting off an emergency declaration from the White House and a scramble for a temporary solution to protect drinking water and related infrastructure.

Advertisement

The salt wedge eventually retreated before reaching New Orleans as high flows returned to the river later that year, but it served as a wake-up call for local officials. New Orleans Mayor Helena Moreno has raised the possibility of building a regional water treatment plant as one potential solution, but that comes with extremely high costs and would require multi-parish coordination.







Neptune Pass

A ship travels down the Mississippi River, past Neptune Pass near Bohemia, La., Saturday, June 3, 2023. Critics of the Corps’ efforts to fight saltwater intrusion say the agency should immediately block off Neptune Pass and other river breaches to reduce the loss of fresh water from the river. (Flight courtesy of SouthWings)(Photo by Sophia Germer, NOLA.com, The Times-Picayune)

Advertisement




The crevasses are largely the result of natural occurrences, with the Mississippi breaking its banks in a number of spots downriver, similar to how it formerly behaved before the construction of the vast levee system that keeps it in place. The slower flow of the main channel speeds the advance of the salt intrusion.

The most prominent crevasse in recent years is called Neptune Pass, which at one point expanded so much it was diverting up to 18% of the river into a nearby bay and wetlands. The Corps recently constructed a rock barrier to partially block Neptune, which is located across the river from Buras, bringing the flow down to around 8%.

It is not yet clear what effect the reduction of Neptune Pass flow will have on saltwater intrusion since the Tulane modeling used 2023 conditions as a base. Other crevasses included in the modeling are also located along the river’s east bank: Mardi Gras Pass, Bohemia Spillway, Ostrica Pass and Fort St. Phillip.

While shipping interests have long called for the closure of the crevasses because of the complications they create for vessels, the passes are also acting as natural river diversions, creating land the way the Mississippi used to do. That has led coastal advocates to argue for keeping them at least partially open.

Advertisement

Closing them could also simply lead to more crevasses being created elsewhere since the river will eventually find its level.

The main focus of the $5.5 million Corps’ study, which is in its first year, is on whether its current mitigation plans involving the sill remain sufficient to deal with the effects of the deepening, said Boyett. But the research could also lead to other types of projects that address the problem more generally.







060422 Neptune Pass crevasse map

The Tulane researchers note that the future effects of sea level rise and other climate-related changes will be important. Boyett said the Corps is incorporating future conditions such as sea level rise in its modeling.

“We’re looking at it to, first, determine what’s causing it, if we are appropriately mitigating for it and — if we are and it’s still occurring — what are the other factors and how would one go about addressing that?” said Boyett.

Advertisement

“We don’t necessarily say we’re going to have all the answers at the end of the modeling. But it may be that modeling gives us recommendations for pilot projects that we should try out.”

‘What is the potential?’

The details of the Tulane modeling are revealing.

It showed that, in 2023, sea level rise over the past three decades caused salt intrusion to advance about 4 additional miles, while the most recent channel deepening led to a 2.2-mile difference.

As for the east bank crevasses, the modeling showed that if all of them were closed — widely seen as impossible, but instructive for study purposes — the salt water would have advanced 75 fewer miles. Closing only Neptune Pass and Fort St. Philip resulted in a 47-mile difference, the modeling showed.

The study also looked at whether moving the sill to another location would improve its effectiveness in slowing the salt water’s advance. It concluded that moving it farther downriver would indeed work better.

Advertisement

Further, the study determined a river level threshold for when the New Orleans area would face a severe threat. It found that a sustained flow of 125,000 cubic feet per second in the lower Mississippi would result in salt water overtopping the sill and advancing to New Orleans. That level is an extreme low, but it does occur occasionally.

One potential solution being examined by the Tulane team as well as the Corps is whether building sand dams in front of the crevasses when the flow is low could help. The idea could potentially satisfy lots of needs since the sand would wash away once river flows increase, building land farther downstream in the passes.

A number of studies are ongoing related to the lower river and the many challenges it presents, particularly as conditions evolve under a warming climate.

The Tulane team is part of a larger project on the future of the river’s mouth, known as MissDelta and financed by the National Academy of Sciences. A separate look at how to deal with the crevasses is being studied by the Baton Rouge-based Water Institute, the University of New Orleans, Nunez Community College in Chalmette and the California Institute of Technology.

In addition to the Corps’ three-year study of salt intrusion, it is also carrying out a five-year “megastudy” of the entire lower river and how to manage it, from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, to the Gulf.

Advertisement

“We also have to look at it from a perspective of, ‘will there be more crevasses in the future? What is the potential?’” Boyett said of the Corps’ salt intrusion study.

“We’re doing it to look to make sure we’re doing what we’re supposed to be doing. But we also need to better understand what’s happening to the river down there.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

New tariff on brand name drugs could impact Mississippi pharmacies

Published

on

New tariff on brand name drugs could impact Mississippi pharmacies


JACKSON, Miss. (WJTV) – A new federal tariff on imported, brand name prescription drugs could soon impact how much Mississippians pay at pharmacies.

President Trump signed an executive order on Thursday targeting imported brand name drugs with a 100 percent tariff, citing the U.S.’s “import reliance” as reason for the decision.

“We’re concerned about those patients not being able to afford their medications. When a patient cannot afford their medication, they tend to skip their medication. And so, a little problem can lead to a large problems with hospital visits,” said Dr. Andrew Clark, owner of Northtown Pharmacy.

Pharmacists are also worried about whether medications will be available at all.

Advertisement

“If their cost increase, those supply chains will be disrupted, which can lead to back order or medication shortage. And as a pharmacist, what we’re concerned about is adherence. If there’s a shortage in medication, then those patients are not adhering to those medications,” Clark said.

While the policy aims to lower drug costs by bringing more manufacturing to the U.S., pharmacists said that relief won’t happen overnight.

“I don’t see drug manufacturers moving next month. And so, you can’t go two and three months without getting medication or can’t afford those medications,” stated Clark.

Pharmacists encouraged anyone picking up prescriptions to ask about lower-cost alternatives, generics or patient assistance programs to help manage costs.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending