Louisiana
‘Point of no return’: New Orleans relocation must start now due to sea level, study finds
The process of relocating people from New Orleans should start immediately as the city has reached a “point of no return” that will see it surrounded by the ocean within decades due to the climate crisis, a stark new study has concluded.
Ongoing sea level rise and the rampant erosion of wetlands in southern Louisiana will swallow up the New Orleans area within a few generations, with the new paper estimating the city “may well be surrounded by the Gulf of Mexico before the end of this century”.
Low-lying southern Louisiana faces multiple threats, with rising sea levels driven by global heating, compounded by strengthening hurricanes, also a feature of the climate crisis, and the gradual subsidence of a coastline that has been carved apart by the oil and gas industry.
Southern Louisiana is facing 3-7 metres of sea level rise and the loss of three-quarters of its remaining coastal wetlands, which will cause the shoreline “to migrate as much as 100km (62 miles) inland”, thereby stranding New Orleans and Baton Rouge, according to the study, which compared today’s rising global temperatures with a period of similar heat 125,000 years ago that caused a rise in sea level.
This scenario makes the region the “most physically vulnerable coastal zone in the world”, the researchers state, and requires immediate action to prepare a smooth transition for people away from New Orleans, which has a population of about 360,000 people, to safer ground.
Louisiana has already experienced population loss in recent years, and this trend will accelerate in a disordered way, the paper warns, should no action be taken to confront the perils faced by its largest city and surrounding communities.
“While climate mitigation should remain the first step to prevent the worst outcomes, coastal Louisiana has evidently already crossed the point of no return,” added the perspectives paper, published in the Nature Sustainability journal. A perspectives paper is a scholarly article that provides an assessment, rather than new data.
Billions of dollars have been spent to fortify New Orleans with a vast network of levees, floodgates and pumps erected after 2005’s catastrophic Hurricane Katrina. But the growing threats to the city mean the levees, which already require hefty upgrades to remain sufficient, will not be able to save the city in the long run, the new paper warns.
“In paleo-climate terms, New Orleans is gone; the question is how long it has,” said Jesse Keenan, an expert in climate adaptation at Tulane University and one of the paper’s five co-authors.
“How long is not certain but it’s most likely decades rather than centuries. Even if you stopped climate change today, New Orleans’s days are still numbered. It will be surrounded by open water, and you can’t keep an island situated below sea level afloat. There’s no amount of money that can do that.”
City, state and federal leaders should begin work to help support people moving away from the New Orleans region in a coordinated way, starting with the most vulnerable communities, such as those in Plaquemines parish who live outside the levee system, Keenan said.
“New Orleans is in a terminal condition, and we need to be clear with the patient that it is terminal,” he said. “There is an opportunity for palliative care, we can transition people and the economy. We can get ahead of this.”
But, he added, “no politician wants to first give this terminal diagnosis. They will speak about it behind closed doors, but never in public.”
New Orleans faces obvious challenges – situated in a bowl-shaped basin below sea level, the city already has 99% of its population at major risk of severe flooding, the worst exposure of any US city according to a separate study released last week.
“Even compared to all other US cities, New Orleans really stands out, which is alarming,” said Wanyun Shao, a co-author of this study and a geographer at the University of Alabama.
“There is no specific timeline to how long New Orleans has left but we know it’s in big trouble. They are facing one of the highest sea level rises in the world and I don’t know how long human effort can fight against that tide. It’s like a timebomb.”
Shao said she concurred that relocation of people would have to take place. “I know it’s a politically and emotionally charged issue, there are people with a deep attachment to New Orleans,” she said. “But managed retreat, no matter how unappealing it may be, is the ultimate solution at some point.”
A major pressure upon this southern cultural hotspot is that its surrounding land is briskly receding. Since the 1930s, Louisiana has lost 2,000 sq miles of land to coastal erosion, equivalent to the size of Delaware, with a further 3,000 sq miles set to vanish over the next 50 years. The rate of land loss is so rapid that a football pitch-sized area is wiped out every 100 minutes.
To help counter this, Louisiana last decade settled upon a new sort of plan that eschewed building yet more flood defenses and instead sought to harness the Mississippi River’s natural ability to rebuild land. Levees and other infrastructure have, until now, straitjacketed the naturally meandering Mississippi and pushed the sediment it carries straight into the Gulf of Mexico, rather than replenish the coastal wetlands.
The so-called Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project, which broke ground in 2023, would help restore a more natural flow in the Mississippi Delta and allow sediment to build up in coastal areas where it has been lost. More than 20 sq miles of new land would be created over the next 50 years under the plan, the project estimated.
However, Jeff Landry, Louisiana’s Republican governor, scrapped the project last year, arguing its $3bn cost was too high and that it threatened the state’s fishing industry. “This level of spending is unsustainable,” Landry said at the time, adding that the project imperiled the livelihoods of “people who have sustained our state for generations”.
Proponents of the project, which was funded via a settlement from BP over the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010, decried the decision as disastrous for the state, pointing out fishing communities will need to move anyway because of worsening erosion.
Garret Graves, a Republican former Congressman who once led the state’s coastal restoration agency, said Landry was guilty of a “boneheaded decision” that will “result in one of the largest setbacks for our coast and the protection of our communities in decades”.
According to the new research paper, the loss of the sediment diversion plan “effectively means giving up on extensive portions of coastal Louisiana, including the New Orleans area”.
A legal bid to force oil and gas companies to pay for damage to Louisiana’s coastline, meanwhile, is also in doubt. This month, the US supreme court allowed the fossil fuel industry to federally contest a state jury decision that Chevron pay $740m to remedy harm caused to wetlands by dredging canals, drilling wells and dumping wastewater.
“The combination of these decisions is driving a scenario where the state has stopped trying to build land,” Keenan said. “That just accelerates the timeline. They could be buying time, but that option is foreclosed now, meaning it’s a certainty the New Orleans levees will fail again multiple times. The flood water will have nowhere else to go.”
While the US has never wholesale moved a major city before, numerous communities have relocated for economic reasons in the past, with some now being shifted due to the climate crisis, too. In Louisiana, the government could start planning and building appropriate infrastructure in safer areas on the other side of Lake Pontchartrain, the large estuary that sits to the north of New Orleans, Keenan said.
“This could be an opportunity for New Orleans to help migrate people further north, invest in long-term infrastructure and make that sustainable,” Keenan said.
“That exodus has already begun, so if nothing is done, people will just trickle out over time and it will be an uncoordinated mess. The market will speak as people won’t be able to get insurance. Louisiana has to stop the bleeding and acknowledge this is happening. But at the moment there is no plan.”
Timothy Dixon, an expert in coastal environments at the University of South Florida who was not involved in the new paper, said the study “does a nice job” of highlighting the challenge Louisiana faces with subsiding land combined with rising sea levels.
“New Orleans is not going to disappear in 10 years or anything like that, but policymakers really should’ve thought about a relocation plan a century ago,” said Dixon, whose own research has recommended a measured retreat from coastal Louisiana.
“Governments may not have the ability to just command people to leave, but people will volunteer to move and we are seeing that already. I’m not optimistic our political system is capable of dealing with this stuff, it will take leadership and unpopular decisions. Also, many people don’t want to move. They love where they are born.”
Landry’s office was contacted for comment but did not respond.
Louisiana
Louisiana baseball claims doubleheader sweep over GSU
LAFAYETTE, L. (KLFY) — Dominant pitching outings from Andrew Herrmann and Cody Brasch, along with a combined 22 hits helped Louisiana claim a doubleheader sweep of Georgia State, winning the opener, 14-1, before posting a 5-1 victory in the nightcap on Saturday at M.L. “Tigue” Moore Field at Russo Park.
Colt Brown and Donovan LaSalle belted home runs in the opener to help lead a 10-hit attack while Noah Lewis went 3-for-5 with two RBI in the nightcap to lead Louisiana (29-18, 11-12 SBC) to its fourth straight win, its seventh victory in its last eight games and its first doubleheader Sweep in SBC play since facing South Alabama in 2023.
GAME 1 – LOUISIANA 14, GEORGIA STATE 1 (7 innings)
Herrmann (6-2) scattered five hits and fanned six batters in recording his fourth complete game
of the season and moving into a tie for the national lead with Jaden Wywoda of Holy Cross. The
southpaw kept GSU off the board until the seventh when Wesley Bass hit a solo homer to help
the Panthers avoid a shutout.
Louisiana took a 3-0 lead in the second inning, beginning with Brown’s fourth home run of the
the season off GSU starter Brian Crooms (3-4) – a 411-foot blast to center. The Ragin’ Cajuns
added two more runs in the frame when Drew Markle lifted a sacrifice fly to drive in Blaze
Rodriguez before Steven Spalitta slid in under the tag of Panther’s catcher Lucas Grantham on a
double steal.
The Ragin’ Cajuns scored seven runs in the third as Brown drove in Lee Amedee with a bloop
single to left for a 4-0 lead. Spalitta added an RBI single to plate Rigoberto Hernandez and
Brown scored on a balk before Markle hit an RBI double into the left-center field gap.
Amedee drew a bases-loaded walk for an 8-0 lead before a wild throw on a pickoff led to runs
by Mark Collins and Lewis.
LaSalle increased Louisiana’s lead to 13-0 in the fourth after plastering a 0-and-1 pitch for his
eighth homer of the season – a three-run, 424-foot drive to left.
The Cajuns added their final run in the fifth as Lewis scored on a fielding error.
Crooms allowed four runs on a pair of hits in 2.0 innings of work. Bass went 2-for-3 for the
Panthers with Austin Killingworth and Cole Griffith each adding doubles.
GAME 2 – LOUISIANA 5, GEORGIA STATE 1
Brasch (4-2) notched his second straight quality start after allowing one hit, retiring 15 straight
batters and striking out three over 6.2 innings of work. Tyler Papenbrock pitched the final 2.1
innings to earn his first save of the season.
Louisiana broke open a scoreless game in the third as Markle led off with a single and scored on
Lewis’ RBI double to center. Amedee followed with an RBI single to right field off GSU starter
Michael Caruso (5-6) to give the Cajuns a 2-0 lead.
With a 2-0 lead in the seventh, Papenbrock came in to relieve Brasch after Griffith reached on a
two-out, two-base error and got Bass to ground out to second to preserve the lead
The Cajuns increased their lead to 3-0 in the bottom half of the frame as Brown drew a bases loaded walk off GSU reliever Nicholas Holbrook and scored twice in the eighth after the
Panthers cut the deficit to 3-1 in the eighth on Sam Silas drove in Killingsworth on an RBI
groundout.
LaSalle reached on a fielder’s choice and Markle was hit by a pitch before Collins singled
through the left side to drive in LaSalle for a 4-1 lead. After a GSU error moved both runners
into scoring position, Lewis chopped an RBI single up the third-base line to plate Markle.
Louisiana recorded 12 hits off four GSU pitchers with Collins, Rodriguez and Spalitta recording
two hit each. The combination of Brasch and Papenbrock produced 16 groundball outs and
allowed four base runners on the day.
Latest news
Louisiana
Louisiana Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 2, 2026
The Louisiana Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at May 2, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from May 2 drawing
25-37-42-52-65, Powerball: 14, Power Play: 3
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 2 drawing
9-3-8
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 2 drawing
6-2-0-0
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 5 numbers from May 2 drawing
6-2-4-2-6
Check Pick 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Easy 5 numbers from May 2 drawing
01-03-08-18-34
Check Easy 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Lotto numbers from May 2 drawing
17-19-21-32-36-41
Check Lotto payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
All Louisiana Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes over $600, winners can submit winning tickets through the mail or in person at Louisiana Lottery offices. Prizes of over $5,000 must be claimed at Lottery office.
By mail, follow these instructions:
- Sign and complete the information on the back of your winning ticket, ensuring all barcodes are clearly visible (remove all scratch-off material from scratch-off tickets).
- Photocopy the front and back of the ticket (except for Powerball and Mega Millions tickets, as photocopies are not accepted for these games).
- Complete the Louisiana Lottery Prize Claim Form, including your telephone number and mailing address for prize check processing.
- Photocopy your valid driver’s license or current picture identification.
Mail all of the above in a single envelope to:
Louisiana Lottery Headquarters
555 Laurel Street
Baton Rouge, LA 70801
To submit in person, visit Louisiana Lottery headquarters:
555 Laurel Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70801, (225) 297-2000.
Hours: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes of any amount.
Check previous winning numbers and payouts at Louisiana Lottery.
When are the Louisiana Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT Tuesday and Friday.
- Pick 3, Pick 4 and Pick 5: Daily at 9:59 p.m. CT.
- Easy 5: 9:59 p.m. CT Wednesday and Saturday.
- Lotto: 9:59 p.m. CT Wednesday and Saturday.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Louisiana editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Louisiana
Abortion pill dispute returns to Supreme Court
On Saturday, two companies that manufacture mifepristone came to the court in Danco Laboratories v. Louisiana, asking the justices to pause a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in a lawsuit by Louisiana that reinstated the requirement that the drug, which is used in about 60% of abortions nationwide, be dispensed only in person. Danco and GenBioPro told the justices that the 5th Circuit’s order was “unprecedented” and “injects immediate confusion and upheaval into highly time-sensitive medical decisions.”
Nearly two years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that doctors and medical groups opposed to abortion did not have a legal right to sue, known as standing, to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s expansion of access to mifepristone.
The 2024 case, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, was filed in federal court in Texas by several individual doctors who are opposed to abortion on religious or moral grounds, as well as medical groups whose members are opposed to abortion. The plaintiffs asked U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk to rescind both the FDA’s initial approval of the drug in 2000 and its 2016 and 2021 expansions of access to the drug, arguing that mifepristone is unsafe and that the process that the FDA used to approve the drug was flawed.
The FDA, as well as several leading medical groups, countered that, based on extensive evidence, mifepristone is safe and effective. Kacsmaryk, however, suspended the FDA’s approval of the drug and the agency’s later changes, made in 2016 and 2021, to the conditions on the use of the drug – which included allowing the drug to be used through the 10th week of pregnancy, allowing health-care providers who are not physicians to prescribe the drug, and permitting it to be prescribed without an in-person visit.
The FDA and Danco, which manufactures mifepristone, appealed to the 5th Circuit. The court upheld the part of Kacsmaryk’s ruling that rolled back the agency’s 2016 and 2021 changes that had expanded access to mifepristone.
In April 2023, the Supreme Court temporarily put the 5th Circuit’s ruling on hold, ensuring continued access to the drug. In June 2024, it reversed the lower court’s ruling and sent the case back to the lower courts.
In his opinion for the court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh acknowledged what he characterized as the challengers’ “sincere legal, moral, ideological, and policy objections” to elective abortion “by others” and to FDA’s 2016 and 2021 changes to the conditions on the use of the drug. But the challengers could not contest those changes, he said, because they had not shown that they would be harmed by the FDA’s mifepristone policies; under the Constitution, these kinds of objections are not enough to bring a case in federal court.
In October 2025, Louisiana filed its own lawsuit in federal court to seek the reinstatement of the in-person dispensing requirement. It emphasized that it had standing to sue because it had “incontrovertible evidence that … doctors and others are (as the Biden administration intended) sending streams of mifepristone by mail into Louisiana for the express purpose of causing thousands of abortions in Louisiana every year. That conduct directly violates Louisiana’s abortion laws, which – subject to very narrow exceptions (such as to save the life of the mother) – bar virtually all abortions, and prevents Louisiana from protecting the lives of unborn babies despite the promise of Dobbs” v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision holding that the Constitution does not confer a right to an abortion. “That conduct has directly generated medical emergencies that harm Louisiana women,” the state wrote, “and emergency room visits that harm the state.”
Rosalie Markezich, an individual plaintiff who joined the state’s lawsuit, said that in 2023 she was coerced into taking abortion drugs “that her boyfriend obtained via the U.S. Postal Service from a doctor in California.” If the in-person dispensing requirement had been in effect, she said, she “would have received the protection of a private in-person medical appointment,” during which she would “have been able to tell a doctor that she did not want an abortion.”
After a federal judge put the case on hold while the FDA conducts its own review of mifepristone’s safety, Louisiana went to the 5th Circuit, asking that court to re-impose the requirement while litigation continues. The court of appeals ruled that Louisiana has a right to sue because, by allowing mifepristone to be prescribed by telehealth and sent by mail, the “FDA ‘opened the door for mifepristone to be remotely prescribed to Louisiana women,’” even though Louisiana generally bars abortion.
In their emergency application, the drug companies tell the justices that, like the doctors and medical groups in 2024, “Louisiana is not required to ‘prescribe or use mifepristone’ or to ‘do anything or to refrain from doing anything’ as a result of FDA’s actions.” The companies argue that the 5th Circuit should have applied the same analysis that the Supreme Court used in holding that the doctors and medical groups did not have standing in 2024. They stress that the Supreme Court “has already held that claims of downstream financial harm by doctors who provide follow-up care for treating complications after a medication abortion is too attenuated” to provide standing to sue. Here, they say, “Louisiana’s theory—that it can base standing on having to pay those doctors if someone who received FDA-approved mifepristone through the mail seeks follow-up care to treat a complication—is a more attenuated version of the” theories that the court specifically rejected two years ago. And Louisiana’s claim that it is injured because of the disconnect between federal law and its own state law is not the kind of injury that courts can review, they said.
The drug companies also ask the court to issue a short-term order, known as an administrative stay, that would put the 5th Circuit’s ruling on hold while the justices consider their request.
The drug companies’ request goes initially to Justice Samuel Alito, who handles emergency requests from the 5th Circuit. Alito is likely to ask Louisiana to respond before acting on the companies’ request.
-
New York36 minutes agoHow a Hairdresser and Painter Lives on $70,000 a Year in Chelsea
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoGas prices up 84 cents in Michigan from last week, up 76 cents in metro Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoSan Francisco woman gets photographer’s old number. It changes both their lives
-
Dallas, TX1 hour agoPolice say a crash led to an attempted carjacking and a fatal shooting in Garland
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoWinners and losers of F1 Miami grand prix
-
Boston, MA2 hours ago‘Distressing’ Number of Boston’s Gen Z Residents Eye the Exit as Housing Costs Soar
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoLegacy score twice in waning minutes, beat fellow expansion side Denver for first win in franchise history
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoWhat Emmanuel Henderson Jr. says he’s bringing to Seattle Seahawks