Science
Martin Karplus, Chemist Who Made Early Computers a Tool, Dies at 94
Martin Karplus, a Nobel Prize-winning theoretical chemist who used computers to model how complex systems change during chemical reactions, a process that has led to advances in the understanding of biological processes, died on Dec. 28 at his home in Cambridge, Mass. He was 94.
His wife, Marci Karplus, said he died while recovering from a fall in which he broke a femur.
Over his long career, Dr. Karplus had crossed paths with some of the most important scientists of the 20th century, including Linus Pauling and J. Robert Oppenheimer.
Scientists can control the chemicals in a reaction, and they can measure and evaluate the results, but what happens in between is a mystery.
As Sven Lidin, chairman of the Nobel selection committee explained when announcing the 2013 winners in chemistry: “It’s like seeing all the actors before Hamlet and all the dead bodies after, and then you wonder what happened in the middle. And actually, there is some interesting action there, and this is what theoretical chemistry provides us with — the whole drama.”
Beginning in the 1960s, when computers were only a fraction as powerful as today’s smartphones, Dr. Karplus and his fellow Nobel laureates — Michael Levitt, originally from South Africa, and Arieh Warshel, who was born in Israel — began to build virtual models of molecules to understand what happens to them during complex reactions like photosynthesis and combustion.
The models used classical Newtonian physics to predict how multitudes of atoms and molecules move during reactions, and they used quantum physics to describe how chemical bonds are broken and formed during those reactions. This type of analysis proved particularly useful in understanding biological reactions involving enzymes, the proteins that govern chemical responses in living organisms.
There was initial resistance to the scientists’ work because it was difficult for others to accept that computer models could be accurate enough or could sufficiently account for the many variables in some reactions. But by the time the Nobel Prize was awarded in 2013, that skepticism was gone.
“Today, the computer is just as important a tool for chemists as the test tube,” the academy wrote in its announcement. “Simulations are so realistic that they predict the outcome of traditional experiments.”
At Harvard University, where Dr. Karplus spent most of his career, he and his research team in 1983 created a program for simulating molecular interaction, calling it Chemistry at Harvard Macromolecular Mechanics (CHARMM). The program is available to researchers worldwide.
In the late 1950s, Dr. Karplus made another important contribution to chemistry: He developed what is known as the Karplus equation. It makes it possible to calculate the magnitude and orientation of protons in organic compounds involved in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, allowing chemists to study the arrangements of atoms in molecules. It is now a basic part of chemistry education.
Martin Karplus was born on March 15, 1930, in Vienna into a well-off and intellectually accomplished Jewish family. He was the second son of Johann Karplus, a banker, and Isabella (Goldstern) Karplus, a hospital dietitian.
His paternal grandfather, Johann Paul Karplus, was a neurologist who discovered the functions of the hypothalamus, the crucial brain region that controls body temperature, hunger, heart rate and other vital activities. An uncle, Eduard Karplus, was an engineer and inventor. And Martin’s older brother, Robert, became a theoretical physicist at the University of California at Berkeley.
In the face of rising antisemitism in the 1930s and a few days after Nazi Germany annexed Austria in the Anschluss of March 1938, Martin, his brother, and his mother fled to Zurich and then to France, eventually arriving in Le Havre.
Martin’s father was initially imprisoned in Vienna, but he was able to join the family before they set sail for New York. They arrived on Oct. 8, 1938, and soon after moved to Newton, Mass.
At Newton High School, Martin discovered that his older brother had made such a mark there that many teachers doubted Martin’s ability to do as well, he recalled in a Nobel biography. One teacher, who was in charge of the Westinghouse Science competition, the nation’s top talent search in the sciences, told Martin that it would be a waste of his time to enter.
But he found another teacher who was willing to proctor his test for the competition. He went on to qualify as one of the country’s 40 finalists. Martin’s project on alcids, an aquatic bird, was chosen as the co-winner of the competition, after which he met President Harry S. Truman in Washington.
Accepted to Harvard University, he concentrated on chemistry and physics. As he was finishing his undergraduate degree in 1950, both the University of California at Berkeley and the California Institute of Technology, known as Caltech, accepted him for graduate studies.
Unsure where to go, he visited his brother, Robert, who by then was working at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. Robert showed him around, introducing him to Albert Einstein and J. Robert Oppenheimer, who had led the Manhattan Project that developed the atomic bomb and who had become the institute’s director. Dr. Oppenheimer recommended Caltech, where he had been a professor, calling it “a shining light in a sea of darkness,” according to Dr. Karplus’s biography. Decision made.
At Caltech he focused on biophysics, joining a graduate group led by Max Delbrück, who, along with Salvador E. Luria, had proved that Darwin’s theory of evolution also applied to bacteria. They, along with Alfred D. Hersey, would be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1969 for their work.
As Dr. Karplus wrote in his Nobel biography, a turning point in his life came two months after he started at Caltech. Dr. Delbrück suggested that Dr. Karplus present a seminar on his intended area of research: how vision works.
He began his presentation, but after 10 minutes Dr. Delbrück interrupted him to say that he did not understand what Dr. Karplus was saying. Dr. Karplus began anew, and Dr. Delbrück interrupted again, saying he still did not understand. Dr. Karplus began again, and Dr. Delbrück interrupted a third time.
At this point, Dr. Richard Feynman, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965 and who was sitting in the audience, turned around and said to Dr. Delbrück: “I can understand, Max. It is perfectly clear to me.” Dr. Delbrück turned red and stormed out. Later that day, he called Dr. Karplus to his office and told him that he could no longer work with him.
Dr. Karplus switched to chemistry.
In the chemistry department, Dr. Karplus initially worked with Prof. John Kirkwood, but then Dr. Kirkwood left for Yale University. His graduate students were given the chance to switch to working with Linus Pauling. Only Dr. Karplus accepted.
Dr. Pauling was on the short list of the greatest scientists of the 20th century. He was one of only five people to receive two Nobel Prizes: the first in 1954 for chemistry, for determining how atoms are chemically bound in molecules; and the second, the Nobel Peace Prize, in 1962, for promoting nuclear disarmament. His scientific work led to the founding of quantum chemistry and molecular biology.
Dr. Karplus’s time with Dr. Pauling proved fruitful: He finished his doctoral dissertation just before Dr. Pauling departed on a trip in late 1953. Dr. Karplus, who had received a National Science Foundation postdoctoral fellowship, then left to spend two years at Oxford University.
In 1955, he was hired by the University of Illinois, which was doing advanced work on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. It was during his five years in Illinois that he put together his Karplus equation.
In 1960, Dr. Karplus was hired to be a researcher at the IBM Watson Scientific Laboratory and to teach at Columbia University. With access to state-of-the-art computing power, he continued his research on NMR and also began to investigate creating models to explain chemical reactions.
Dr. Karplus changed jobs again in 1966, returning to Harvard. There he started to concentrate on biological reactions, which are the most complex. The work would lead to the creation of CHARMM and to his Nobel Prize.
In the 1990s, Dr. Karplus was appointed a professor at Louis Pasteur University, later renamed the University of Strasbourg, in France. He spent the next 20 years going back and forth between there and Harvard.
Dr. Karplus met Marci Hazard at Harvard, where she has worked for 51 years. They married in 1981. His first wife was Susan Karplus; their marriage ended in divorce.
In addition to his wife, he is survived by two children from the earlier marriage, Reba and Tammy; one child from his second marriage, Mischa; and one grandchild. (Susan Karplus died in 1982. His brother, Robert, died in 1990.)
In 2020, Dr. Karplus published his autobiography, “Spinach on the Ceiling: The Multifaceted Life of a Theoretical Chemist.” The title referred to the landing spot of a launched spoonful of spinach that he had been ordered to eat as a boy.
Over his career, Dr. Karplus supervised close to 250 graduate and doctoral students, most of whom have gone on to successful academic careers. They are collectively known as Karplusians.
Science
A Stargazers’ Guide to Watching the Full Moon Pass Mars and the a New Come
The first full moon of the year will glide through the sky on Monday night. For lucky stargazers in some parts of the world, it will also pass in front of the more-brilliantly-red-than-usual Mars in an event known as a lunar occultation.
But that’s not all January’s sky has to offer. A new comet, expected to be the brightest of the year, is nearing its closest approach to the sun on Monday — though spotting it, at least in northern skies, will be tricky.
What is a lunar occultation?
According to NASA, a lunar occultation occurs when the moon passes in front of an object, like a distant planet, that appears much smaller in the sky. An occultation is similar to a solar eclipse — when the moon obscures the sun — but much less grand.
Lunar occultations can happen several times a year and when the moon is in any phase. Earlier this month, a crescent moon that slipped over Saturn was visible for people in Europe, northern Africa and parts of Greenland and Russia.
What’s special about this one?
Mars has been appearing bigger and brighter in the night sky as it nears Earth. It is approaching what is known as opposition, which occurs when Mars is on the opposite side of Earth as the sun. During opposition, Mars is closer to us than usual and its face is fully lit by the sun as viewed from our world, making for spectacular views of the Red Planet.
Mars is in opposition every 26 months. This year, it reaches opposition on Jan. 15 at 9:32 p.m. Eastern time. But the planet has been steadily growing more brilliant since November.
How can I see the lunar occultation?
Only people in North America and parts of Africa will be able to see the moon occult Mars on Monday. Elsewhere, Mars will just appear close to the moon, a celestial occurrence known as a conjunction. The occultation will last for more than an hour in some places and be visible with the unaided eye, though binoculars or a telescope will enhance the view.
The event will begin at different times, depending on where you live. According to a chart published by the International Occultation Timing Association, Mars will disappear behind the moon on Monday at 6:21 p.m. in Seattle, 9:16 p.m. in Washington, D.C., and 9:21 p.m. in New York City, all local times. Observers in Montreal will see the occultation start at 9:25 p.m., and in Accra, Ghana, at 4:53 a.m., before sunrise on Tuesday.
What about the comet?
Comet ATLAS, or C/2024 G3 to astronomers, was spotted last April by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System and shares the name of many other comets discovered by the network of telescopes, including Tsuchinshan-ATLAS, which blazed through the sky last October.
Like all comets, C/2024 G3 is a frozen chunk of material left over from the formation of the solar system that has begun to melt as it approaches the sun. It will reach perihelion, or its closest approach to the sun, on Jan. 13, and come within 8.4 million miles of the solar surface.
Some comets disintegrate from the heat. But if they survive the encounter, perihelion is when they are expected to be brightest — though being so close to the sun can make them difficult to see.
How can I see Comet ATLAS?
Some observers in the Northern Hemisphere have already spotted Comet ATLAS, a fuzzy dot with a short tail, low on the eastern horizon before sunrise. Because of its altitude and the light of dawn, it is difficult to see, especially without binoculars or a telescope.
Closer to perihelion, those with an unobstructed view of the western horizon may be able to catch the comet in the evening near the setting sun. Interactive star maps like this one can help with figuring out where and when to look.
If Comet ATLAS survives perihelion, it will migrate to skies in the Southern Hemisphere in the latter half of January, and be visible there in the evenings after sunset. As the comet moves away from the sun it will climb higher in the sky, but also grow dimmer each day.
Science
Saturn's moon looked like a snowy Utah landscape in my mind. The reality is just as compelling
Twenty years ago today, I watched TV coverage of a probe descending toward the surface of Titan, a moon of Saturn, while outside my home in Utah snow dusted a rocky mountain outcrop I’d nicknamed Titan — both after the moon and a painting of it.
When the probe — named Huygens, for the 17th century Dutch astronomer Christiaan Huygens who discovered that world — transmitted its first pictures, the painted moonscape clashed with the real one. The artwork, from the 1940s, was shown to be utterly wrong.
Chesley Bonestell’s “Saturn as Seen From Titan,” appeared with other planetary scenes in Life magazine, showing what were then considered to be astronomically accurate views of the solar system for the first time. An architectural illustrator and Hollywood matte painter, Bonestell would make a career of space art. His work inspired the very scientists whose research would render many of his paintings factually obsolete.
The Titan illustration is his most famous space scene. In it, Saturn hangs over windswept snow and brown cliffs and outcroppings. The crags frame a glowing Saturn, floating huge, rings nearly edge-on, like a giant’s belt-buckle. Part of the planet is shadowed, blending into the cobalt-turquoise sky. The whole of it is weirdly grand.
What the Huygens probe revealed — a hazy, frigid, dusky-orange world — and what the ethereal painting promised could not be more different.
Released from NASA’s Cassini spacecraft, the Huygens probe descended by parachute for some 2.5 hours before surviving its landing. The European Space Agency craft remains humans’ farthest footfall, some 750 million miles away from Earth.
With a thick nitrogen-methane atmosphere, Titan’s sky is choked with organic compounds, dust and aerosols. This is a world of hydrocarbon seas and vistas of sand and icy rocks. The cold — minus-274 degrees Farenheit — is perhaps the only commonality with Bonestell’s view. (The real Titan may not be as romantic as Bonestell’s, but it is promising: In three years NASA’s Dragonfly mission will send a helicopter to explore Titan’s habitability for life.)
The Huygens-Bonestell discrepancy wasn’t the first time that our visions of the solar system were upended by data. Space exploration is, after all, a form of “ground-truthing.”
When spacecraft first reached Mars in the 1960s, the notion of canals built by Martians had to be discarded, though later images would show clear evidence of surface water. The sci-fi jungles of Venus pictured in pulp magazines? Probes showed instead a dense atmosphere and hellish-hot surface. Our own moon’s mountains, long portrayed as sharp and alpine, are instead muscular and rounded.
Yet our obsolete visions retain value.
In 1944, Bonestell’s illustration offered a compelling answer to the question, “Why explore space?” And even now, knowing it’s far from accurate, the painting’s faint path of light leads us between the cliffs and toward Saturn with this message: If we stay only where we are, then knowledge does too, in or near the frigid lavender of shadows.
Bonestell’s informed-but-imagined solar system evokes the sublime, the sense of being small then empowered in the face of the grand. The scientists who built the Huygens probe that made Titan real were, in their way, doing the same. Both endeavors are examples of the rigors of curiosity born from awe.
This is not, as critics of space exploration suggest, a form of belittling or ignoring our terrestrial challenges. Quite the opposite. The sublime strengthens our bonds with the cosmos and all it signifies: beauty and dread, imagination and fact, the thrill of discovery and fear of the unknown. Painted or transmitted, other worlds can fire the imagination and at the same time underline the value of the one we inhabit. That mountain outcrop I still think of as Titan reminds me of the painting, the probe, space “out there” and the space I occupy right here on Earth.
Christopher Cokinos is the author of “Still as Bright: An Illuminating History of the Moon from Antiquity to Tomorrow.” He lives in northern Utah.
Science
Blue Origin Scrubs New Glenn Rocket’s Debut Launch
Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket is poised upright at Launch Complex 36 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida.
Preparations began in earnest several hours before launch when liquid hydrogen started flowing into New Glenn’s propellant tanks.
At 10 minutes before liftoff time, the launch director will conduct a “go poll,” asking people whether the rocket’s systems are ready and whether the weather conditions are favorable.
The last four minutes before launch are the “terminal count” when the rocket’s computer takes over the countdown process.
The seven engines in the booster will ignite 5.6 seconds before liftoff. That gives the computer a chance to check the performance of the engines before committing to liftoff. If anything is not quite right, it will shut down the engines.
If everything is good, the clamps holding the rocket will let go, and New Glenn will rise into the sky.
A crucial moment will come one minute, 39 seconds after launch as the rocket passes through what is known as max-Q, when atmospheric pressure on the rocket is greatest.
If it passes through that moment intact, the booster during the third minute of the flight will be done pushing the rocket upward and the engines will shut down. Twelve seconds later, it will drop away, and nine seconds after that, the second-stage engine will fire up.
Not long afterward, the fairing — the two halves of the nose cone protecting the payload — will jettison. At that altitude, the atmosphere is thin enough that the fairing is no longer needed.
Over the next few minutes, the booster will light up twice as it tries to land on a floating platform named Jacklyn, after Jeff Bezos’ mother, in the Atlantic Ocean.
Meanwhile, the second-stage engine will continue to fire until nearly 13 minutes after launch and then shut down.
Blue Origin will then switch on a prototype of its Blue Ring space tug, testing the communications, power and computer systems. It will remain attached to the rocket’s second stage.
About an hour after launch, the second stage will perform another engine burn to push it into a high elliptical orbit, coming as close as 1,500 miles from Earth and swinging out as far away as 12,000 miles. That is much higher than launches to low-Earth orbit, a few hundred miles up.
In an interview on Sunday, Jeff Bezos, the founder of Blue Origin, said that orbit will allow testing of the communications systems at a wide variety of altitudes. “And it puts the vehicle in a very harsh radiation environment, which we also want to test,” he said.
Then, almost six hours after launch, the mission will be over. The systems on the rocket stage and Blue Ring will be made safe and turned off, and they will continue their elliptical orbiting. Few other satellites occupy that region, making the chances slim that it will collide with anything else.
“It gets disposed in place,” Mr. Bezos said.
-
Politics1 week ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health1 week ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
Technology5 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science3 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology6 days ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
Health1 week ago
Michael J. Fox honored with Presidential Medal of Freedom for Parkinson’s research efforts
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: Millennials try to buy-in or opt-out of the “American Meltdown”