Connect with us

Politics

Civil rights groups file lawsuit to block Newsom’s plan for treating people with mental illness

Published

on

Civil rights groups file lawsuit to block Newsom’s plan for treating people with mental illness

A coalition of incapacity and civil rights advocates filed a lawsuit Thursday asking the California Supreme Courtroom to dam the rollout of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s far-reaching new plan to deal with extreme psychological sickness by compelling remedy for 1000’s of individuals.

Of their submitting, representatives from three organizations — Incapacity Rights California, Western Middle on Regulation and Poverty and the Public Curiosity Regulation Venture — requested the state’s excessive courtroom to strike down as unconstitutional this system often known as CARE Courtroom (for Neighborhood Help, Restoration and Empowerment). The teams argue that the sweeping new courtroom system will violate due course of and equal safety rights beneath the state structure, whereas “needlessly burdening elementary rights to privateness, autonomy and liberty.”

Newsom introduced CARE Courtroom in March as a brand new technique to assist an estimated 7,000 to 12,000 Californians fighting extreme psychological well being issues like schizophrenia entry housing, remedy and psychological well being providers. It was signed into legislation in September as Senate Invoice 1338.

Advertisement

In a press release, Newsom’s deputy communications director Daniel Lopez mentioned efforts to delay or block the legislation’s implementation “would needlessly prolong the struggling of those that desperately want our assist.”

“The governor — together with nearly all of Californians — are past pissed off by the circumstances seen day by day on our streets. There’s nothing compassionate about permitting people with extreme, untreated psychological well being and substance use issues to undergo in our alleyways, in our felony justice system, or worse — face demise,” Lopez mentioned. “Whereas some teams wish to delay progress with arguments in favor of the failing established order, the remainder of us are coping with the chilly, exhausting actuality that one thing should urgently be accomplished to deal with this disaster.”

CARE Courtroom is scheduled to be rolled out in two phases: Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Stanislaus, Glenn and Tuolumne Counties have till Oct. 1 of this 12 months to start implementation, with Los Angeles County on observe to affix two months later. The remainder of the state has till December 2024.

A funding measure for CARE Courtroom initially put aside $88 million to start implementation. Newsom included an extra $52 million in his funds proposal this 12 months to assist counties and courts kick begin this system, with the eventual plan to ramp up funding to $215 million by fiscal 12 months 2025-2026.

The governor’s workplace has additionally pointed to billions of {dollars} extra obtainable in present state spending accounts for housing, homelessness, behavioral and psychological well being packages, although counties have lengthy questioned whether or not that will probably be sufficient.

Advertisement

Dozens of cities and mayors supported the plan, together with enterprise organizations and teams representing households of affected family members who mentioned CARE Courtroom may lastly supply them another choice for assist.

The brand new legislation will permit members of the family, first responders, medical professionals and behavioral well being suppliers, amongst others, to petition a decide to order an analysis of an grownup with a recognized psychotic dysfunction. If an individual qualifies, a CARE plan may embody remedy and remedy providers and housing if wanted. Newsom has been cautious to tell apart CARE Courtroom from the extra restrictive conservatorship, as a result of those that qualify may nonetheless technically refuse to take part.

However these caveats have accomplished little to assuage sturdy opposition from the coalition that filed the lawsuit, which joined the ACLU and a number of other different racial and civil rights teams, homeless advocates and reasonably priced housing organizations in making an attempt to dam the measure final 12 months. Critics argued that CARE Courtroom was a misguided method for fixing a problem that wanted extra important investments in everlasting housing and voluntary remedy providers.

“The proposed answer is courtroom orders that rob unhoused Californians of their autonomy to decide on their very own psychological well being remedy and housing and threatens their liberty,” the submitting said. “This ‘answer’ is not going to work and can deprive 1000’s of individuals of their constitutional rights.”

The coalition mentioned they filed the lawsuit on to the state Supreme Courtroom in an effort to expedite timing for a choice. Lawsuits initially filed in decrease courts can take extra time provided that rulings are sometimes appealed.

Advertisement

However the teams may nonetheless refile their petition in a decrease courtroom ought to the Supreme Courtroom resolve to not take the case, mentioned Sarah Gregory, senior legal professional at Incapacity Rights California.

“[Disability Rights California] has thought of all choices on the desk for the reason that starting,” Gregory mentioned, “and it’ll proceed to contemplate all choices relying on what the Supreme Courtroom decides.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Violence in liberal state's schools nearly doubled as parents push for more police

Published

on

Violence in liberal state's schools nearly doubled as parents push for more police

Some Los Angeles parents are putting up a fight against the city’s most progressive activist groups, with violence in the school district nearly doubling since police were removed from school campuses following the riots over George Floyd’s murder in 2020.

Maria Luisa Palma, a member of the Parents Advisory Committee in Los Angeles, organized an independent petition in February calling for the return of police on school campuses as district data revealed that violent incidents rose from 2,315 in the 2018-2019 school year to 4,569 in 2022-2023.

“We’ve seen a huge increase from our kids,” Palma told Fox News Digital in an interview. “We hear constantly how there are fights and open drug use in the bathrooms. We see the proof in the data … so we have more clear information. This is out of control as we hear from our kids.”

Palma’s petition has gotten more than 2,500 signatures so far from parents from over 300 schools and all seven board districts. She said “the more, the better.” There is no cap on signatures.

POLICE DEPARTMENTS WARN HIGH SCHOOLERS’ ‘SENIOR ASSASSINS’ GAME COULD TURN DEADLY: ‘SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES’

Advertisement

LAPD officers (Jason Armond/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

In 2021, Students Deserve, a progressive grassroots student organization advocating for the abolition of police in schools, pressured the LAUSD and the school board to divest money from the Los Angeles School District Police. 

The group argued the presence of police officers on school campuses often led to the criminalization of students, particularly those from Black and brown communities, and contributed to a hostile and intimidating environment that hindered learning.

“We want schools to divest from criminalization and policing,” the Students Deserve website states. “We want schools to invest in us as Black, Muslim, undocumented, indigenous, and queer youth in poor and working class communities of color. We follow the lead of Black Lives Matter in demanding that our schools defund the police and defend Black life.”

Students Deserve, closely partnered with Black Lives Matter-Los Angeles and the California Teacher’s Association, was successful in getting the school district to reevaluate its budget priorities and reallocate $25 million from school police to alternative support services, such as counselors, mental health professionals and restorative justice programs.

Advertisement

ACTIVISTS ARRESTED OUTSIDE LAUSD OFFICES AFTER PARENTAL RIGHTS AND LGBTQ+ GROUPS CLASH IN DOWNTOWN LA

Defund the police logo projected onto the Oakland Police headquarters

A BLM protester projects a “defund the police” message on an Oakland Police Department wall Jan. 29, 2023.  (Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

Many Students Deserve representatives will appear at board meetings, Palma said, and urge members not to invest funds in the school’s police department. 

“They were the group that helped to create the situation in the first place,” Palma said. “They are the group that the board listens to, and so they continue to oppose what the parents want.”

The school board voted unanimously in February 2021 to do away with officers stationed in schools and already rejected a resolution in September 2021 that would have reinstated police.

FRUSTRATED PARENTS, TEACHERS DEMAND SCHOOLS BRING BACK POLICE TO CURB VIOLENCE: 911 CALLS ‘ALMOST EVERY DAY’

Advertisement
Los Angeles County Sheriff squad car

A Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department vehicle (Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department)

“This is not a question of whether or not the district has funds to fully fund a functioning police department to safely patrol our schools and to have officers assigned on our campuses,” Palma said. “It is a political statement to appease the defund the police movement.”

The LAUSD school board is developing a new safety plan. However, the board hasn’t indicated whether the plan includes a return of police officers to schools.

Continue Reading

Politics

Opinion: Why L.A. County's 'Jane Fonda Day' declaration was so astoundingly insensitive

Published

on

Opinion: Why L.A. County's 'Jane Fonda Day' declaration was so astoundingly insensitive

As a proud member of the Vietnamese American community and the California Assembly, I was deeply disappointed by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors’ designation of April 30 as “Jane Fonda Day” last week. This decision on a day that holds sacred significance for much of the Vietnamese community was insensitive and hurtful.

April 30 is widely recognized as the painful anniversary of the 1975 fall of Saigon, a day that marks the emotional closing chapter of the Vietnam War. Known in the Vietnamese community as “Black April,” it is a day of remembrance when we honor the sacrifices of some 250,000 South Vietnamese and 60,000 American soldiers who gave everything to their cause.

After the fall of Saigon, hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese fled the brutal communist regime, many resorting to risky boat journeys and ultimately finding sanctuary and a new home in Southern California. Many settled just across the border from Los Angeles County in Orange County’s Little Saigon community, which has grown to become the largest Vietnamese population outside Vietnam.

Each year, the Little Saigon community gathers on April 30 to commemorate the fall of Saigon. The city of Westminster held a solemn ceremony last week to reflect on the 49th anniversary of Black April and the enduring effects of the Vietnam War. A wreath was laid at the city’s Vietnamese-American War Memorial to honor American, Vietnamese and allied soldiers and the resilience of the Vietnamese people in the face of horrible trials.

While Vietnamese and American soldiers fought bravely, Jane Fonda actively participated in North Vietnamese government propaganda. Called “Hanoi Jane” for her controversial activities during the war, the actress infamously posed on a North Vietnamese antiaircraft gun that was used to target American pilots. This was deeply offensive to those who fled persecution and lost loved ones seeking freedom and democracy.

Advertisement

By honoring Fonda on Black April, the supervisors disregarded the Vietnamese American community, America’s Vietnam veterans and countless others, aggravating wounds that have yet to heal. To have this solemn day overshadowed by the celebration of an individual who openly sympathized with the regime responsible for so much suffering is an insult to the memory of those who perished and those who continue to live with the scars of war. This decision demonstrates a lack of empathy for the Vietnamese diaspora and highlights a need for greater cultural awareness.

I urge the supervisors to reconsider this decision, work closely with the Vietnamese American community to understand the pain they’ve caused, and remember this day with the solemnity and respect it deserves.

Tri Ta is a Republican Assembly member representing Orange County.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Has Long Been Known as a Micromanager. Prosecutors Are Using It Against Him.

Published

on

Witnesses have described the former president monitoring the minutiae of his business, a portrait prosecutors are drawing to help convince the jury that he couldn’t have helped but oversee a hush-money payment to avoid a damaging story.

Continue Reading

Trending