Entertainment
Sam Rubin, KTLA journalist and longtime entertainment anchor, dies at 64
Sam Rubin, a veteran journalist who anchored KTLA’s entertainment coverage for more than 30 years, died Friday in Los Angeles. He was 64.
KTLA news anchor Frank Buckley confirmed Rubin’s death early Friday afternoon. Fighting back tears as he announced the news on the air, Buckley called his colleague’s death “shocking” and “hard to comprehend in the moment.”
“Quite simply, Sam was KTLA,” he said, adding later, “The newsroom is in tears right now.”
Rubin was on the air Thursday, interviewing actor Jane Seymour, but had called in sick Friday, with film critic Scott Mantz filling in. The channel did not share additional details about Rubin’s death, but a source familiar with the incident told The Times that he had suffered cardiac arrest at his West Valley home Friday morning and was transported to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
“Sam was a giant in the local news industry and the entertainment world, and a fixture of Los Angeles morning television for decades,” KTLA said of Rubin in a statement shared on social media. “His laugh, charm and caring personality touched all who knew him.”
Mantz wrote on social media that he was in “absolute shock” to learn about his colleague’s sudden death. “I always called him ‘The Godfather of Entertainment News,’ and that was true. An absolute legend [and] a generous person.”
Rubin was born Feb. 16, 1960, in San Diego, went to high school in L.A. and attended Occidental College, where he was awarded a degree in American studies and rhetoric.
He joined KTLA’s “Morning News” program in 1991, earning a reputation for his disarming interviews and warm personality on and off the air. According to founding co-anchor Carlos Amezcua, Rubin contributed a sense of Los Angeles authenticity that the fledgling show needed.
Amezcua, 70, described Rubin as “the connective tissue” that helped him, weather forecaster Mark Kriski and co-anchor Barbara Beck reach their intended audience.
“What can always be said about Sam is that he helped the ‘KTLA Morning News’ connect to Los Angeles as a native Angeleno who loved L.A. and knew the city better than anyone else on set,” said Amezcua, who joined KTLA the same year as Rubin. “We had L.A. in our call letters, and Sam always said that we knew L.A. and L.A. knew us.”
What impressed him most was Rubin’s depth of knowledge. “He knew Hollywood and what was important to the entertainment industry,” said Amezcua, co-founder of digital streaming service Beond TV.
Over time, Amezcua said, viewers and even some within the industry began to regard Rubin himself as a celebrity.
“We used to make fun of him all the time about that,” Amezcua said. “I used to tell him, ‘You’re as big as the celebrities you’re interviewing.’ He would just laugh and say, ‘C’mon,’ but I think deep down he knew that.”
But that level of local fame sometimes found Rubin in situations that pushed the boundaries of journalistic ethics, like in 1992, when he accepted a bit part on “The Jackie Thomas Show” just weeks after helping publicize the sitcom by interviewing star Tom Arnold and his then-wife, Roseanne Barr — between the sheets in their bed.
“I can understand the objection to it, but I have been critical of the Arnolds in the past and I will be in future,” Rubin told The Times that December. “And it’s just a two-line walk-on. I’m not making big money for this. I could make a lot more selling a nasty article on the Arnolds somewhere.”
For his work as Reporter No. 1 on the sitcom, Rubin said he was paid scale — then $466 a day.
Beloved by his colleagues and many others in Tinseltown, Rubin also had a history with The Times that included several contentious back-and-forths between him and various writers for the newspaper.
Rubin wrote a piece for The Times in February 1999, firing back at Brian Lowry, who was then a TV columnist for the outlet and is now a senior entertainment writer for CNN. In the buildup to that year’s Academy Awards, Lowry had listed Rubin as one of a new breed of local TV reporters “that places so much emphasis on entertaining, the reporting has become a bit of a joke.”
“Brian Lowry displays such vitriol and rancor in his recent diatribe against me and the expansion of broadcast entertainment journalism that perhaps he just needs a little lesson in how those of us who are successful in this line of work actually do our jobs,” Rubin wrote in his response. “I have never attended ‘Clown College,’ but since Mr. Lowry insists I am the P.T. Barnum of my generation, here are a few tips.”
Rubin went on to advise Lowry to find a “genuine appreciation” for his audience and, most importantly, learn “the importance of tone.”
“I have to run now and put on my clown suit; there’s another kid’s birthday party I will be entertaining at,” Rubin said in closing. “My clown costume, of course, is hanging in my closet, right below the shelf containing my three local Emmy Awards.”
Two years later, again around Oscars time, The Times’ TV critic Howard Rosenberg wrote a story about competition between morning news shows in which he mentioned “weathercaster Mark Kriski, who seems to live for being the kind of fun guy you’d see hanging from a chandelier with a lampshade on his head at a cocktail party. And also … the show’s beanbag with lips, show-biz groupie Sam Rubin.”
Rosenberg, now retired, noted that Rubin and Kriski had torn up a copy of The Times containing a story about the battle between KTLA and rival KTTV, home of No. 2 morning show “Good Day L.A.” They didn’t like that the story reported that while KTLA was No. 1 in the morning, its overall audience was down from the year before.
Still, in the same column, Rosenberg called Rubin “someone who has become the one thing, more than any other, that ‘Good Day L.A.’ is unable to match.”
In return, Rubin penned a story in which he proposed a job swap with Rosenberg.
“I can envision my week as the television critic for the Los Angeles Times. ‘Honey, could you adjust the La-Z-Boy? This massage feature isn’t working. And sweetie, could you pop in another video from some obscure cable channel? Now, let me see, where in the world am I going to find the time to write the occasional review and my two scheduled columns for the entire week?’” Rubin wrote.
“Howard is going to be in for a real change of pace. He can use my alarm clock — the one that is set for 4 a.m. Howard can choose what stories to report on, write every word of his report himself, order the videotape he needs, select all the graphics, get made up and come up with one or two gags that poke fun at his bosses at the L.A. Times. Of course, he will have to do this for five days in a row.”
Away from the TV cameras and media sparring, Rubin’s life revolved around his family, former colleague Amezcua said.
“I have five children and they all knew Sam and his family, and Sam was just so generous with his time,” Amezcua said. “He was a good family man and they loved him. We all loved him.”
Former news director Jason Ball, who worked at KTLA from 2008 to 2021 before retiring, called Rubin “bigger than life” and “a lion” who “deserves to be memorialized.”
Ball said he occasionally butted heads with Rubin on show ideas but didn’t mind it when his colleague “pushed him outside his comfort zone.”
“Sometimes you didn’t know what he was going to do, which could be a challenge for me,” Ball said. “But I always knew he had the show’s heart in mind and I don’t really know how KTLA is going to function without him.”
As the face of KTLA’s entertainment coverage, Rubin won over Angeleno audiences, including celebrity viewers Tom Hanks and Henry Winkler.
“He made you feel special every single time,” Winkler said in a call to KTLA on Friday. “He made every human being feel so special and got them to open up like a flower.”
He also had a way of turning chaff into wheat. “There are a lot of stupid, boring celebrities out there,” “Alias” actor Greg Grunberg said via phone on the broadcast Friday. “And man, did he make them all seem interesting.”
The San Diego-born reporter also brought his industry knowledge to platforms overseas. He regularly appeared on BBC Television and contributed regularly to Australia’s Triple M radio and Channel 9 Television, according to KTLA’s website.
The author of biographies on former first lady Jacqueline Onassis and “Rosemary’s Baby” star Mia Farrow, Rubin won multiple Local Emmy Awards for his entertainment coverage. He also received a Golden Mike Award for entertainment reporting and an Associated Press Television and Radio prize for his work. Other accolades included honors from the Southern California Broadcasters Assn., the Los Angeles Press Club and the National Hispanic Media Coalition.
“He was born to be a broadcaster. He was the best broadcaster that there is,” Eric Spillman, KTLA reporter and Rubin’s longtime colleague, said during Friday’s broadcast.
Outside of his on-air work, Rubin was a founding member of the Broadcast Film Critics Assn., owned a self-named television production company and supported several nonprofits.
Rubin is survived by his wife, Leslie Gale Shuman, and four children.
Movie Reviews
Miyamoto says he was surprised Mario Galaxy Movie reviews were even harsher than the first | VGC
Nintendo’s Shigeru Miyamoto says he’s surprised at the negative critical reception to the Super Mario Galaxy Movie.
As reported by Famitsu, Miyamoto conducted a group interview with Japanese media to mark the local release of The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.
During the interview, Miyamoto was asked for his views on the critical reception to the film in the West, where critics’ reviews have been mostly negative.
Miyamoto replied that while he understood some of the negative points aimed at The Super Mario Bros Movie, he thought the reception would be better for the sequel.
“It’s true: the situation is indeed very similar,” he said. “Actually, regarding the previous film, I felt that the critics’ opinions did hold some validity. “However, I thought things would be different this time around—only to find that the criticism is even harsher than it was before.
“It really is quite baffling: here we are—having crossed over from a different field—working hard with the specific aim of helping to revitalize the film industry, yet the very people who ought to be championing that cause seem to be the ones taking a passive stance.”
As was the case with the first film, opinion is divided between critics and the public on The Super Mario Galaxy Movie. On review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, the film currently has a critics’ score of 43% , while its audience score is 89%.
While this is down from the first film’s scores (which were 59% critics and 95% public) it does still appear to imply that the film’s target audience is generally enjoying it despite critical negativity.
The negative reception is unlikely to bother Universal and Illumination too much, considering the film currently has a global box office of $752 million before even releasing in Japan, meaning a $1 billion global gross is becoming increasingly likely.
Elsewhere in the interview, Miyamoto said he hoped the film would perform well in Japan, especially because it has a unique script rather than a simple localization as in other regions.
“The Japanese version is a bit unique,” he said. “Normally, we create an English version and then localize it for each country, but for the first film, we developed the English and Japanese scripts simultaneously. For this film, we didn’t simply localize the completed English version – instead, we rewrote it entirely in Japanese to create a special Japanese version.
“So, if this doesn’t become a hit in Japan, I feel a sense of pressure – as the person in charge of the Japanese version – to not let [Illumination CEO and film co-producer] Chris [Meledandri] down.
“However, judging by the reactions of the audience members who’ve seen it, I feel that Mario fans are really embracing it. I also believe we’ve created a film that people can enjoy even if they haven’t seen the previous one, so I’m hopeful about that as well.”
Entertainment
Review: Monica Lewinsky, a saint? This devastatingly smart romance goes there
Book Review
Dear Monica Lewinsky
By Julia Langbein
Doubleday: 320 pages, $30
If you buy books linked on our site, The Times may earn a commission from Bookshop.org, whose fees support independent bookstores.
First loves can be beautiful or traumatic, sometimes both. They are almost always intense, with emotions on speed dial and hormones running amok. Nothing like the durable consolations of late-life romance, but headier, more exciting and, in the worst cases, far more damaging.
Even decades later, Jean Dornan, the protagonist of Julia Langbein’s smart, poignant and involving novel “Dear Monica Lewinsky,” can’t recollect her own first love in tranquility. Its after-effects have derailed her life, and an unexpected email invitation to attend a retirement party in France honoring her former lover sends her into a tailspin.
An agitated Jean finds herself praying to none other than Monica Lewinsky, the patron saint of bad romantic choices, or as Langbein puts it, “of those who suffer venal public shaming and patriarchal cruelty.” In Langbein’s comic, but also deadly serious, imagination, this is no mere metaphor. The martyred Monica has literally been transfigured into a saint. And why not? Surely, she has suffered enough to qualify.
Jean and Monica have in common a disastrous liaison with an attractive, powerful, married older man. Monica was humiliated, reviled, then merely defined by her missteps. Meanwhile, her arguably more culpable sexual partner survived impeachment, retained both his political popularity and his marriage and enjoyed a lucrative post-presidency.
Jean’s brief fling during the summer of 1998 coincided with the public airing of Monica’s doomed romance. Jean’s passion took a more private toll, but she still lives with what Monica calls “this deepening suspicion that your existence is a remnant of an event long since concluded.”
Though framed by a fantastical conceit, “Dear Monica Lewinsky” is at its core a realist novel, influenced by the feminism of #MeToo and precise in its delineation of character and place. Langbein’s Monica — having finally transcended her past and ascended to spiritual omniscience — becomes Jean’s interlocutor. Together, they relive the fateful weeks that Jean spent studying the Romanesque churches of medieval France and charming David Harwell, the Rutgers University medieval art professor co-leading the summer program.
Every now and again, Monica, as much savvy therapist as all-knowing seer, interrupts Jean’s first-person account to offer guidance. Threaded through the narrative, as contrast and commentary, is a martyrology of female saints. These colloquially rendered portraits, reflecting a punitive, patriarchal morality, describe girls and women who would rather endure torture or even death than sully their sexual purity — stories so extreme that they seem satirical.
The portraits play off the novel’s milieu: a series of churches, as well as the medieval French castle that is home to an eccentric and mostly absent prince. The utility of religious doctrine and practice is another of the book’s themes. One graduate student, Patrick, is a devoted Roman Catholic, unquestioning in his faith. Others are merely devout enthusiasts of medieval architecture. Judith, a doctoral candidate at Harvard, has an addiction of her own: an eating disorder that threatens to disable her.
A rising junior at Rutgers, Jean is one of just two undergraduates in the program. Her initial dull, daunting task involves measuring and otherwise assessing the churches’ “apertures” — windows and doors. Later, she is assigned to collaborate on a guidebook and write a term paper.
A language major unversed in art, architecture or medieval history, Jean feels overwhelmed at times. But she does have useful talents: fluent French and the ability to conjure delicious Sunday dinners for her bedazzled colleagues. (The author of the 2023 novel “American Mermaid,” Langbein has both a doctorate in art history and a James Beard Foundation Journalism Award for food writing, and her expertise in both fields is evident.)
As the summer wanes, Jean’s fixation on David grows. Langbein excels at depicting the obsessive nature of illicit, unfulfilled desire — how it swamps judgment and just about everything else. A quarter-century Jean’s senior, David is trying to finish a stalled book project, laboring in the shadow of his more prolific and successful wife, Ann. An expert on the erotically charged religious life of nuns and the art it produced, she shows up briefly in the story and then conveniently disappears.
David is smooth, seductive and, to 19-year-old Jean, far more appealing than the fumbling schoolboys she has known. But he turns out to be no more grown-up or emotionally mature. After the flirtation and its consummation, David beats a hasty (and unsurprising) retreat. Then he does something worse: He allows his guilt to shred his integrity.
In the aftermath of that summer, a wounded Jean stumbles through her last two years of college, “berserk, unfocused, humiliating.” She abandons her academic and career ambitions, takes a job as a court interpreter, and marries Michael, an affable nurse who has little idea of her emotional burdens.
Then that invitation, inspiring “a racy heat,” arrives, and Jean must decide whether to confront her past or keep running from it. Is there really much of a choice? Fortunately, she has the saintly Monica as her guide. More clear-eyed now, Jean must reject her martyrdom and reclaim her own truth and agency. If she does, David, at least in the realm of the imagination, may finally get his comeuppance.
Klein, a three-time finalist for the National Book Critics Circle’s Nona Balakian Citation for Excellence in Reviewing, is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia.
Movie Reviews
‘I Swear’ Review – Heart Sans Sap, Cursing Aplenty
The sixth outing in the director’s chair for filmmaker Kirk Jones, I Swear dramatizes the real-life story of touretter John Davidson (played by Robert Aramayo). Tourette’s Syndrome, for those unfamiliar with the condition, is a nervous system disorder that causes various tics, the most prolific being erratic and explicit language. However, as I Swear expertly showcases, the syndrome is far more than ill-timed outbursts of curse words. Davidson’s story is one of societal frustration, finding your people (both with and without the condition), and using your voice to help others rise. The subject and subject matter are handled with absolute care and understanding under Kirk’s measured vision and Robert Aramayo’s BAFTA-winning performance.
The film kicks off with the greatest exclamation to democracy ever uttered (*%#! the Queen!), as a nervous John Davidson prepares himself before entering an awards ceremony hosted by Britain’s royal family. Right away, the film tells us what it is: a triumph over adversity that blends humor and human drama with education. It’s an important setup, as the film flashes back to Davidson’s 1980s youth, where we see his time as a star soccer recruit flatline as his condition takes hold. Davidson’s life spirals from there. Some aspects, like school bullying and accidental run-ins with authority figures, are expected but important to empathizing with young Davidson’s (young version, played with heart by Scott Ellis Watson) new everyday life. The more tragic, a complete meltdown of his family system, is unsettling if quick. His father (Steven Cree) is never given enough screen time to explore his alcohol coping tendencies. However, his mother Heather’s descent into easy fixes and blaming is crushing and convincing. Harry Potter series actress Shirley Henderson (Moaning Myrtle) gives a layered performance as Heather. Someone who loves her son, but also feels cursed by him as the entire family exits the picture. It’s bitter, she’s tired, and fills each conversation with ‘only medication and your mother can save you’ energy.
From there, the viewer and Davidson find refuge in a host of characters. Maxine Peake plays Dottie, the mother of a childhood friend and a retired mental health nurse. Screen vet Peter Mullan plays maintenance man Tommy Trotter. Together, they help Davidson build a life and an understanding of himself that carries the film forward into its second half. After that, the film is primarily a 3-actor show as director Kirk fills the screen with these tour-de-force performances. Peake and Mullan are great vessels to get the film’s main message across: patience, love, and a shared responsibility between the diagnosed and those who understand their struggle can help change the path for people quickly left behind by a normative world. Together, they are the soul of the movie, with the filmmakers clearly hoping the audience will follow their lead after they exit the theater (in my case, the beautiful Oriental Theater for the Milwaukee Film Festival). Both performances are perfectly warm and reflective and shouldn’t be left out in discussions of I Swear.
I say this because the movie is anchored by The Rings of Power actor Robert Aramayo, who leaves Elrond’s elf ears behind to bring an acute naturalism to his performance of main character John Davidson. Aramayo’s physicality and timing of the fitful Tourettes Syndrome never feel out of place or overplayed. In fact, the movie as a whole does an amazing job of never veering into sentimentality. While many moviegoers left with tissues dabbing their eyes, the filmmaking never felt like it was forcing that reaction out of audiences. It straddles the line between feel-good and reality with every story beat and lands squarely on the side of letting the real inform our feelings. Anyone with an ounce of empathy will grasp the film’s message and hopefully take it with them into life.
I Swear continues at the Milwaukee Film Festival on Tuesday, April 21st, and releases nationwide April 24th, 2026, courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.
-
Boston, MA4 minutes agoMBTA Green Line trains out from Kenmore to Boston College on B branch through April 30
-
Denver, CO10 minutes agoNuggets vs. Timberwolves | 3 keys to a Denver win in Game 3
-
Seattle, WA16 minutes agoThe Honorable Brandon Lee Gowton Picks for Seattle at #32 | Field Gulls
-
San Diego, CA22 minutes agoPerson struck, killed by train in Encinitas
-
Milwaukee, WI28 minutes agoFatal opioid overdoses decline in Milwaukee County
-
Atlanta, GA34 minutes ago‘Rich and Unemployed’ podcaster sentenced for $3.8M scheme
-
Minneapolis, MN40 minutes agoEdina shooting leaves 1 dead, suspects on run
-
Indianapolis, IN46 minutes agoStreet signs unveiled in Indianapolis with preparations underway for Indy 500
