Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont prosecutors rarely have secured hate crime convictions. A recent legislative change might make it easier

Published

on

Vermont prosecutors rarely have secured hate crime convictions. A recent legislative change might make it easier


The killing of a transgender girl in Morristown final week has spurred calls to cost the alleged assassin with a hate crime. However regulation enforcement officers say for now, they don’t have proof to assist that cost.

Judicial information present that Vermont prosecutors have not often secured hate crime convictions previously 5 years, although a latest legislative change was designed to make it simpler for them to win such instances.

Police say 29-year previous Fern Feather, of Hinesburg, was stabbed to dying by Seth Brunell final Tuesday. Brunell, 43, has pleaded not responsible to second-degree homicide. If convicted, he faces a life sentence. He’s presently being held with out bail at Northeast Correctional Complicated in St. Johnsbury.

Brunell’s lawyer didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Advertisement

Extra from VPR: Pals mourn Fern Feather, lover of crops and birds, after killing in Morristown

Based on court docket information, Feather, who grew up within the Northeast Kingdom city of Albany, picked up Brunell hitchhiking, and the 2 spent a number of days collectively. Round 10:20 a.m. on April 12, Morristown police responded to a name a couple of man standing subsequent to a physique at an intersection on the town. Police discovered Brunell close to Feather’s physique after they arrived. Feather had been stabbed within the chest, police mentioned in an affidavit.

Brunell, based on court docket information, instructed police that Feather attacked him after he rejected a sexual advance. “I used to be simply defending myself,” Brunell allegedly mentioned to the officers.

Police mentioned they didn’t see any indicators that Brunell had been attacked, based on court docket information.

As police proceed to analyze the case, a web based petition asking prosecutors so as to add a hate crimes cost has been signed by 9,117 folks.

Advertisement

“It could be sufficient to indicate that one of many causes that the defendant dedicated the act was due to this particular person’s standing in a kind of protected classes. And that is merely a a lot simpler bar for the prosecution to fulfill.”

Jared Carter, Vermont Legislation College

Kim Jordan, director of the SafeSpace Anti-Violence Program at Satisfaction Middle of Vermont, mentioned Brunell’s justification for the alleged crime facilities round Feather’s identification.

“That claims to me, and I’d say to loads of queer and trans people that, ‘Oh, this can be a hate crime,’” Jordan mentioned.

However regulation enforcement officers aren’t able to convey a hate crime cost — but.

“We’re not going to hurry into something,” mentioned Aliena Gerhard, a deputy state’s lawyer in Lamoille County. “I believe it could be extra devastating to simply add it on as a result of it appears good, and never be capable of show it. Once we prosecute a case, we make it possible for we now have sturdy proof, in order that we will show it past an affordable doubt.”

Advertisement

Extra from VPR: What number of hate crimes occurring in Vermont? FBI statistics do not inform the entire story

Vermont regulation permits prosecutors so as to add a hate crime “enhancement” if the suspect’s actions are motivated by bias in the direction of a protected class, which embody race, gender identification and sexual orientation. The enhancement will increase the legal penalties a suspect faces, relying on the severity of the underlying crime.

However latest historical past suggests it is tough to acquire a conviction for a hate crime in Vermont, even when the info of the case counsel some stage of bias.

State prosecutors filed 66 hate crime fees between 2017 and 2021, based on the Vermont Judiciary. However there have solely been seven hate crime convictions in that point. One stemmed from a St. Albans incident the place, court docket information say, a person threatened and shouted racial slurs at his neighbors, together with the household’s 3-year-old son.

“We’re not going to hurry into something. I believe it could be extra devastating to simply add it on as a result of it appears good, and never be capable of show it. Once we prosecute a case, we make it possible for we now have sturdy proof, in order that we will show it past an affordable doubt.”

Aliena Gerhard, Lamoille County deputy state’s lawyer

Advertisement

Hate crimes have typically confirmed tough to prosecute. In 2018, the state supreme court docket narrowly overturned a disorderly conduct conviction — with a hate crime enhancement — of a person who allegedly put Ku Klux Klan recruitment flyers within the mailboxes of a Black girl and a Mexican girl in Burlington. The court docket wrote that the defendant’s conduct didn’t convey an “imminent risk of hurt.”

“To the extent it conveys a message of non-public risk to the recipient, it’s that the Klan will recruit members and inflict hurt sooner or later,” wrote former affiliate justice John Dooley within the determination.

In different latest instances, hate crime fees have been dropped as a part of plea offers. An Essex man who shouted racial slurs and waved a gun at a comfort retailer clerk pleaded responsible in 2018 to aggravated assault and reckless endangerment, however the disorderly conduct cost with a hate crime enhancement was dropped as a part of the plea deal, the Burlington Free Press reported.

In one other incident, a hate crime cost levied towards a young person accused of spray portray racial epithets on the athletic fields behind South Burlington Excessive College was dropped after he pleaded responsible to lesser fees, based on the Burlington Free Press.

Extra from Vermont Version: A Satisfaction Middle chief on supporting Vermont’s trans neighborhood

Advertisement

There have been efforts to make it simpler to prosecute hate crimes, together with a change to Vermont’s statute. Final yr, lawmakers amended the regulation to categorise hate crimes as actions “motivated in complete or partly” by a “sufferer’s precise or perceived” identification. Beforehand, the statue mentioned the crime wanted to be “maliciously motivated.”

Jared Carter, a professor at Vermont Legislation College, mentioned the brand new regulation makes it simpler for prosecutors to show hate crime allegations.

“It could be sufficient to indicate that one of many causes that the defendant dedicated the act was due to this particular person’s standing in a kind of protected classes,” Carter mentioned. “And that is merely a a lot simpler bar for the prosecution to fulfill.”

One other invoice handed by the Legislature final yr bans defendants from justifying violent actions primarily based on the precise or perceived sexual orientation or gender identification of the sufferer, a change Carter mentioned might be related in Feather’s homicide case.

Brunell, based on court docket information, instructed police his actions had been in self-defense and that he rejected a sexual advance from Feather as a result of he “wasn’t homosexual.”

Advertisement

The U.S Lawyer’s Workplace also can pursue federal hate crime fees in Vermont, which it did for the primary time in 2019. Federal authorities charged Stuart Kurt Rollins, of Barre, with intimidating and harassing his Hispanic neighbors. Rollins pleaded responsible to at least one depend of legal interference with truthful housing rights, a federal hate crime, and was sentenced to time served and three years of supervised launch.

“I do assume it could be useful and useful. However I don’t assume calling it a hate crime will forestall additional hate.”

Kim Jordan, Satisfaction Middle of Vermont

Vermont’s high federal prosecutor, who was appointed in December, has mentioned his workplace plans to deal with bias incidents and hate crimes.

“We’re dedicated to investigating these sorts of conditions which may implicate federal regulation,” U.S. Lawyer Nikolas Kerest instructed Vermont Version in January.

Jordan, with Satisfaction Middle of Vermont, thinks regulation enforcement officers ought to name Feather’s killing a hate crime, partly to make seen “what so many queer and trans folks know.”

Advertisement

“So in that respect, I do assume it could be useful and useful,” Jordan mentioned. “However I don’t assume calling it a hate crime will forestall additional hate.”

Have questions, feedback or ideas? Ship us a message or get in contact with reporter Liam Elder-Connors @lseconnors





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont takes on 'Big Oil' with groundbreaking bill: 'The stakes are too high'

Published

on

Vermont takes on 'Big Oil' with groundbreaking bill: 'The stakes are too high'


Photo Credit: Getty Images

Advertisement

Vermont will be the first state in the US to hold “Big Oil” accountable with a law requiring payment for damages from the effects of climate change, per a report by CBS News.

Taking on Big Oil 

The state’s Republican governor, Phil Scott, sent a letter to Vermont’s General Assembly clearing the way for the Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program law (S.259) to pass without his signature. 

While he says he believes in the cause, Gov. Scott shared his reservations in the letter. He indicated that Vermont could have benefited from collaborating with other major players like New York and California instead of risking a stand on its own.

“Having said that,” Gov. Scott continued, “I understand the desire to seek funding to mitigate the effects of climate change that has hurt our state in so many ways.”

One Vermont state Representative, Martin LaLonde, released a reassuring statement of his own, clarifying that legal scholars vetted the bill and that they have a solid legal case. 

Advertisement

“The stakes are too high — and the costs too steep for Vermonters — to release corporations that caused the mess from their obligation to help clean it up,” he said, per CBS News.

Major polluters should pay

The bill would require entities found to have spewed more than 2.2 trillion pounds of planet-warming gases between 1995 and 2024 to pay up, according to CBS News. Vermont would use that money to deal with the disastrous effects of an overheating planet. 

And the industry certainly has the money to pay. In 2022, the U.S. oil and gas industry’s total revenue was $332.9 billion, as Statista reported. While that’s staggering enough, it’s a massive uptick from the $211.2 billion it earned the previous year.  

The damage

The rise in global temperatures has led to various severe climate impacts, including more flooding, fires, droughts, and increasingly powerful storm systems. 

Big Oil is to blame for much of the damage, with the United Nations stating that the use of dirty fuels accounts for more than 75% of polluting gases. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has estimated that in 2023 alone, climate-related disasters caused $92.9 billion in damage across the U.S., and Vermont was not immune to this damage. 

Advertisement

Looking forward

While federal efforts like the Inflation Reduction Act have created green incentives to help address the changing climate, the states must do their part. 

The Vermont Natural Resources Council expressed support for the Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program, stating, “[It] represents a major step forward in ensuring that responsible parties, like Big Oil — companies like ExxonMobil and Shell that have known for decades that their products are disrupting the climate — be required to also pay a fair share of the cleanup costs.” 

Lawsuits are also underway, seeking to hold the dirty energy industry accountable for its actions. More are likely to follow. 

Join our free newsletter for cool news and actionable info that makes it easy to help yourself while helping the planet.


Cool Divider
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

MAP: Where Vermont school districts struggled to pass a budget

Published

on

MAP: Where Vermont school districts struggled to pass a budget


Vermont school districts struggled more than usual to convince voters to approve budgets this spring as they faced double-digit property tax increases.

The increase was estimated to be 18.5%, ultimately whittled down to 13.8%.

It all came to a head three months ago when Vermonters in nearly a third of the state’s school districts voted down their school budgets.

Two districts — Enosburgh Richford and Barre Unified Unified Union School District — still haven’t passed their budgets.

Advertisement

Because Vermont’s education funding is statewide, individual budget cuts don’t translate into comparable savings for taxpayers, putting school districts in a bind.

“For every dollar we cut from the school budget, St. Johnsbury saves about 20 cents. The state keeps the rest and uses it to lower taxes in other towns,” said St. Johnsbury School Board Vice Chair Peter VanStraten in a letter to voters before a third (successful) budget vote. “This is not a vote on what is happening in Montpelier. Please keep that for November.”

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message. Or contact the reporter directly at corey.dockser@vermontpublic.org.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont man arrested in Bristol for stolen car and firearms possession

Published

on

Vermont man arrested in Bristol for stolen car and firearms possession


BRISTOL, CT (WFSB) – Connecticut State Police arrested a Vermont man for allegedly stealing a vehicle and possessing firearms on Thursday.

Connecticut State Police Troop H Dispatch received a report of a stolen vehicle from Vermont.

The vehicle was described as a white Ford F-550 truck with a car-carrier towing a GMC SUV.

Massachusetts State Police assisted in the investigation and informed Troop H that the stolen vehicle was last seen on I-91 near Windsor Locks.

Advertisement

Troopers later spotted the described vehicle on I-91 around Exit 34 in Hartford.

The driver, identified as Shawn Carpenter, 47, of Hartford, Vermont, was taken into custody.

During the arrest, troopers discovered two handguns with ammunition and drug paraphernalia in Carpenter’s possession.

Carpenter underwent a Standardized Field Sobriety Test, which he failed.

He refused to provide any information regarding the firearms found.

Advertisement

Upon contacting the registered owner of the stolen vehicle, they denied possessing the firearms and drug paraphernalia.

Carpenter faces multiple charges, including operating under the influence of drugs or alcohol, operating without a license, failure to maintain proper lane, two counts of illegal possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle, two counts of carrying a dangerous weapon, two counts of illegal carrying of a firearm while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, three counts of first-degree larceny, use of drug paraphernalia, and two counts of carrying a pistol without a permit.

He is currently held on a $150,000 bond and has been transferred to the Connecticut Department of Correction pending his scheduled arraignment at New Britain Superior Court.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending