Connect with us

News

Jemima Kelly tries to tap her way to happiness 

Published

on

Jemima Kelly tries to tap her way to happiness 

In my day job as an FT columnist, I cast a sceptical, often irreverent eye over the world around me. I tend to be someone who challenges everything — not for the sake of it, but because I’m suspicious when a whole group of people believes the same thing. I have often been labelled a “contrarian”. I once hosted a podcast series called A Sceptic’s Guide to Crypto. I have the word “snark” in my X bio. You get the idea. 

So you might be surprised to hear of some of the things I dabble in during my free time. I use the word “synchronicity” with no sense of irony. I swear by my definitely psychic kinesiologist. I am a member of a coven called Sisters of the Sanitary Cloth (both the descriptor and our name are slightly tongue-in-cheek, though the latter more than the former). I’ve become obsessed with Co-Star, an app claiming to use Nasa data to give you “super-accurate” AI-generated horoscopes, ahem. (It was recommended to me by a senior colleague. I shan’t be naming names.) I write Morning Pages, as espoused by Julia Cameron, author of the creativity bible The Artist’s Way. I am, you know, “doing the work”. 

But how can someone who is so wary of consensus views, and so passionate about the importance of truth and objectivity, be so into what many of you might consider quackery? I think it’s quite simple: I have an open mind. And while I believe in the value of reason and empiricism, I would also argue that it is actually rational to explore alternative approaches to science and medicine and life. 

Which is how I find myself standing underneath a chandelier in a plush, Edwardian-style suite in the Savoy hotel, using the tips of my fingers to gently tap my “eyebrow points” as silent tears roll down my cheeks. “I feel like I’m on a never-ending hamster wheel of dates,” I repeat after my instructor as I tap (we have already discussed how I’m feeling; she’s not just guessing). “I’m fed up” — I move my fingertips down to tap just to the side of my eyes. “Eurgh” — below my eyes. “Bleurgh” — below my nose. “So many dates” — under my lower lip. “So many dates!” — collarbone. “But I’m prepared to stay open to love” — top of my head. “And I trust my intuition more and more each day” — back to my eyebrow points. Et cetera. 

Energy psychology practitioner Poppy Delbridge (left) with the author, at the Savoy, London, where Delbridge has a residency © Lewis Khan

My instructor is Poppy Delbridge, a former Warner Brothers executive who quit the world of entertainment TV in 2018 to dedicate herself full-time to tapping, a mainly self-administered form of therapy that combines modern psychology and ancient Chinese medicine. I came across her a few months ago, having decided it was high time to meet the love of my life. I went along to a “taster session” feeling rather dubious, spent most of our hour together in a state of deeply cathartic weeping (she has had this effect on me in all of our one-to-one sessions), and left feeling as if I was floating on air. 

Advertisement

I now tap every day. I am a tapoholic. Guided by Delbridge’s Rapid Tapping app as well as her book, Tapping In, I have tapped on park benches, in saunas, on a Greek island, in the bath. I have completed her “Pivot into Power” personal empowerment programme (fellow graduates include British Fashion Council chief executive Caroline Rush and The Royle Family co-writer Phil Mealey). I have been on one of her “rapid retreats” (our group of five included a Delevingne sister and a superfan who’d flown in from the Caribbean). And I’m now doing her “30-day Love Cleanse”, which, like all of Delbridge’s programmes, involves not just tapping but also some quite intense soul-searching and personal development work. 

How to do the two-minute tap

Jemima Kelly performs her two-minute tap
© Lewis Khan

Poppy Delbridge’s guide to “Rapid Tapping”

Getting Started

Sit or stand comfortably.

Set your intention: decide how you’d like to feel right now (calm, energised, focused).

Check your frequency level: place both hands on your chest and notice your current feeling. Rate yourself from +10 (high joy) to -10 (low energy or stress).

Take a breath.

Advertisement

Move your hands: slide them a few inches down from your collarbones and massage your “sore spots” firmly to balance and ground.

Set your intention: 

1. “I feel … ” identify your current emotion. 

2. “Because … ” acknowledge why you feel this way.

3. “But it is possible for me to … ” 

Advertisement

Rapid Tapping Sequence

Using two fingers on each hand, tap on these points while repeating your three-step answers. 

1. Between eyebrows

2. Sides of eyes

3. Under eyes

4. Under nose

Advertisement

5. Chin

6. Collarbone and heart area

7. Top of head 

Finish with a head hug and shake-it-off: rub your hands together, place one hand on your forehead, the other on the back of your head, and hold for 10 seconds. Hold and smile.  Then shake out your hands and body to recalibrate and refresh. 

The 7-Day Rapid Reset is available in the free app as a video demonstration

Advertisement

Tapping is a so-called “somatic” therapy, meaning it focuses on the connection between the mind and the body. It has roots in ancient Chinese medicine but was invented by an American psychologist in the 1980s and then simplified by one of his students in the ’90s to become “Emotional Freedom Technique”. With EFT, you tap on nine main “meridian points” — pressure points that are also used for acupuncture — in order to release trapped energy from traumatic experiences stored in the body. While some have dismissed it as pseudoscience — Gary Bakker, a clinical psychologist and lecturer at the University of Tasmania, calls tapping a “purple hat therapy” and tells me “there is no evidence whatsoever that tapping on your imaginary meridians does anything for a clinical psychological problem” — there are studies that argue that tapping can be a way of treating depression, anxiety, PTSD, food cravings and even physical pain and the symptoms of autoimmune conditions. 

And the more I’ve been tapping, the more issues I have found it helps me with — particularly around stress, lack of motivation and self-doubt. 

Delbridge’s version, “Rapid Tapping”, focuses on seven meridian points that EFT uses and also usually includes an initial massage of the “sore spots” — fleshy bits about an inch below the collarbones that feel tender to the touch — as well as a “head hug” at the end (her app includes a how-to video). She wants to use tapping to focus less on moving away from bad things in the past, as with traditional EFT, and more towards good things in the future, by “rewiring our neural pathways”. To put another way: to “manifest” the things that you desire into your life. 

If this sounds gushy, be assured there’s none of that distinctly woo-woo brand of toxic positivity. The fact that every session begins by stating out loud how you really feel and, if that’s negative, repeating it until the feeling starts to become less acute, is part of what I think makes the practice so helpful. Not only does it feel like you are releasing tension when you say your negative feelings out loud, but some of them start to feel a bit ridiculous once you do.

Delbridge at the Savoy, London
Delbridge at the Savoy, London © Lewis Khan

Most taps start by asking you to score how you’re feeling — either in general or on a particular issue — and end by asking you to score it once again. Some days my emotions only edge up; other days my mood is totally transformed in minutes. Whatever it’s doing, it does feel like something is working. I also sigh when I’m tapping, a lot. Other people yawn. “I joke that I’m the only public speaker that, when the whole audience is yawning, I’m not offended,” says Nick Ortner, who has more than 100,000 subscribers to his The Tapping Solution App.

“At the very minimum you’re resetting your nervous system into an  arasympathetic state — from fight or flight into rest and relax,” says Dr Tara Swart, a neuroscientist and one of Delbridge’s clients, who now taps most days. “People who aren’t used to being in a state of relaxed alertness can end up feeling sleepy.”

Advertisement

For my part, while I may not have yet met the love of my life, sigh, I feel I have broken down a number of barriers — or “love blocks” — since my first session with Delbridge in May. I also seem to spend much less time self-sabotaging, and am managing to regulate my emotions more successfully. I now use tapping as part of my morning routine, and sometimes at other points in the day too, and find it similar to meditation in the way that it grounds me, though it is usually more uplifting, motivating, and can be more focused if you want it to be.

I can assure you I felt like a fool — a fool! — the first time I did it, but these days tapping around my face and chest with my fingertips feels weirdly natural. Give it a try, I say. What’s the woo-woorst that could happen? 

News

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

Published

on

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

President Trump announced a three-week extension of a cease-fire between Israel and Lebanon that had been set to expire in a few days, after hosting a meeting between Israeli and Lebanese diplomats at the White House on Thursday.

Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group that has been attacking Israel from southern Lebanon, did not have representatives at the meeting and did not immediately comment on the announcement. The prime minister of Israel and the president of Lebanon also did not comment.

A successful peace agreement would hinge upon Hezbollah halting attacks, which Lebanon’s government has little power to enforce because it does not control the militia. Lebanon’s military has mostly stayed out of the fighting and is not at war with Israel.

The cease-fire, which was scheduled to end on April 26, would last until May 17 if it takes effect as Mr. Trump described it. Before the cease-fire was brokered last week, nearly 2,300 people were killed in Lebanon and 13 in Israel. Since then, the number of Israeli airstrikes and Hezbollah attacks have been dramatically reduced, though the two sides have continued exchanging fire.

The Lebanese Ambassador to the United States, Nada Hamadeh, credited Mr. Trump for extending the cease-fire, saying that “with your help and support, we can make Lebanon great again.” Mr. Trump replied, “I like that phrase, it’s a good phrase.”

Advertisement

Asked about the potential of a lasting peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon, Mr. Trump said that “I think there’s a great chance. They are friends about the same things and they are enemies on the same things.”

But Lebanon and Israel have periodically been at war since Israel’s founding in 1948. Israel has invaded Lebanon for the fifth time since 1978, incursions that have destabilized the country and the delicate balance of power between Muslim, Christian and Druze communities.

In the hours before the president’s announcement on social media, Israel and Hezbollah were trading attacks in southern Lebanon, testing the existing cease-fire.

Mr. Trump said the meeting at the White House had been attended by high-ranking U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the U.S. ambassadors to Israel and Lebanon.

Earlier on Thursday, an Israeli strike near the southern Lebanese city of Nabatieh killed three people, according to Lebanon’s health ministry. Hezbollah claimed three separate attacks on Israeli troops who are occupying southern Lebanon, though none were wounded or killed.

Advertisement

Hezbollah set off the latest round of fighting last month by attacking Israel soon after the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign in Iran. Israel responded to Hezbollah’s attacks by launching airstrikes across Lebanon and widening a ground invasion of the country’s south.

Continue Reading

News

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Published

on

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Smoke rises from Port of La Guaira in Venezuela on Jan. 3, 2026 after U.S. forces seized the country’s president, Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images

Federal prosecutors on Thursday unsealed an indictment against a U.S. Army soldier, accusing him of using his insider knowledge of the clandestine military operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January to reap more than $400,000 in profits on the popular prediction market site Polymarket.

The Justice Department says Gannon Ken Van Dyke, 38, who was stationed at Fort Bragg, in North Carolina, was part of the team that planned and carried out the predawn raid in Caracas earlier this year that resulted in the apprehension of Maduro.

The Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed the actions against Van Dyke, the first time U.S. officials have leveled criminal charges against someone over prediction market wagers.

Advertisement

According to the indictment, Van Dyke now faces counts of wire fraud, commodities fraud, misusing non-public government information and other charges.

Trading under numerous usernames including “Burdensome-Mix,” Van Dyke allegedly traded about $32,000 on the arrest of Maduro, resulting in profits exceeding $400,000.

“Prediction markets are not a haven for using misappropriated confidential or classified information for personal gain,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York. “Those entrusted to safeguard our nation’s secrets have a duty to protect them and our armed service members, and not to use that information for personal financial gain.”

Van Dyke’s defense lawyer is not yet publicly known. Polymarket did not return a request for comment.

The charges against Van Dyke come at a sensitive time for the prediction market industry, which has been growing exponentially, despite calls in Washington and among state leaders for the sites to be reined in.

Advertisement

Van Dyke is the first to be charged in the U.S. for suspected Polymarket insider trading, but Israeli authorities in February arrested several people and charged two on suspicion of using classified information to place bets about military operations in Iran on Polymarket.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

Published

on

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

The Senate early Thursday morning adopted a Republican budget blueprint that would pave the way for a $70 billion increase for immigration enforcement and the eventual reopening of the Department of Homeland Security.

Republicans pushed through the plan on a nearly party-line vote of 50 to 48. It came after an overnight marathon of rapid-fire votes, known as a vote-a-rama, in which the G.O.P. beat back a series of Democratic proposals aimed at addressing the high cost of health care, housing, food and energy. The debate put the two parties’ dueling messages on vivid display six months before the midterm elections.

Republicans, who are using the budget plan to lay the groundwork to eventually push through a filibuster-proof bill providing a multiyear funding stream for President Trump’s immigration crackdown, used the all-night session to highlight their hard-line stance on border security, seeking to portray Democrats as unwilling to safeguard the country.

Democrats tried and failed to add a series of changes aimed at addressing cost-of-living issues, seizing the opportunity to hammer Republicans as out of touch with and unwilling to act on the concerns of everyday Americans.

Here’s what to know about the budget plan and the nocturnal ritual senators engaged in before adopting it.

Advertisement

The budget blueprint is a crucial piece of Republicans’ plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security and end a shutdown that has lasted for more than two months. After Democrats refused to fund immigration enforcement without new restrictions on agents’ tactics and conduct, the G.O.P. struck a deal with them to pass a spending bill that would fund everything but ICE and the Border Patrol. Republicans said they would fund those agencies through a special budget bill that Democrats could not block.

“We can fix this with Republican votes, and we will,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and the Budget Committee chairman. “Every Democrat has opposed money for the Border Patrol and ICE at a time of great peril.”

In resorting to a new budget blueprint, Republicans laid the groundwork to deny Democrats a chance to stop the immigration enforcement funding. But they also submitted themselves to a vote-a-rama, in which any senator can propose unlimited changes to such a measure before it is adopted.

The budget measure now goes to the House, which must adopt it before lawmakers in both chambers can draft the legislation funding immigration enforcement. That bill will provide yet another opportunity for a vote-a-rama even closer to the November election.

Democrats took to the floor to criticize Republicans for supercharging funding for federal immigration enforcement rather than moving legislation that would address Americans’ concerns over affordability.

Advertisement

“This is what Republicans are fighting for,” said Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the Democratic leader. “To maintain two unchecked rogue agencies that are dreaded in all corners of this country instead of reducing your health care costs, your housing costs, your grocery costs, your gas costs.”

Democrats offered a host of amendments along those lines, all of which were defeated by Republicans — and that was the point. The proposals were meant to put the G.O.P. in a tough political spot, showcasing their opposition to helping Americans afford high living costs. Fewer than a handful of G.O.P. senators crossed party lines to support them.

The G.O.P. thwarted an effort by Mr. Schumer to require that the budget measure lower out-of-pocket health care costs for Americans. Two Republicans who are up for re-election this year, Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, voted with Democrats, but the proposal was still defeated.

Republicans also squelched a move by Senator Ben Ray Lujan, Democrat of New Mexico, to create a fund that would lower grocery costs and reverse cuts to food aid programs that Republicans enacted last year. Ms. Collins and Mr. Sullivan again joined Democrats.

Also defeated by the G.O.P.: a proposal by Senator John Hickenlooper, Democrat of Colorado, to address rising consumer prices brought on by Mr. Trump’s tariffs and the war in Iran; one by Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, to require the budget measure to address rising electricity prices, and another by Mr. Markey to create a fund to bring down housing costs.

Advertisement

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat who is up for re-election in Georgia, also sought to add language requiring the budget plan to address health insurance companies denying or delaying access to care, but that, too was blocked by Republicans.

While Republicans had fewer proposals for changes to their own budget plan, they also sought to offer measures that would underscore their aggressive stance on immigration enforcement and dare Democrats to vote against them.

Mr. Graham offered an amendment to allocate funds toward a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to the apprehension and deportation of adult immigrants convicted of rape, murder, or sexual abuse of a minor after illegally entering the United States. It passed unanimously.

Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, sought to bar Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood, which provides abortion and other services, and criticized the organization for providing transgender care to minors. Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, also attempted to tack on the G.O.P. voter identification bill, known as the SAVE America Act. Both proposals were blocked when Democrats, joined by a few Republicans, voted to strike them as unrelated to the budget plan.

The Republicans who crossed party lines to oppose their own party’s proposals for new voting requirements were Ms. Collins along with Senators Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

Advertisement

Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski also opposed the effort to block payments to Planned Parenthood.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending