Connect with us

Vermont

Investigation probes truck driver's alleged inhumane treatment of pigs at North Springfield slaughterhouse – VTDigger

Published

on

Investigation probes truck driver's alleged inhumane treatment of pigs at North Springfield slaughterhouse – VTDigger


Hanging sides of beef in a refrigerated storage facility with overhead rails and metal ceiling.
Steam rises from carcasses in a cooler at the Vermont Packinghouse in Springfield on February 5, 2021. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Local police are investigating an incident last summer at a North Springfield slaughterhouse in which a federal investigator witnessed what it described as “inhumane” animal handling. 

On June 3, a U.S. Department of Agriculture inspector reported observing a truck driver at Vermont Packinghouse unloading pigs, kicking them in the head and neck, and shoving them off the back of a trailer. The pigs appeared to be suffering heat stroke after an eight-hour journey from a New York farm in the summer sun, according to the inspector’s findings. 

After the incident came to light in a quarterly USDA report of noncompliance records, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals last month called for a criminal probe. The organization, known as PETA, sent a letter to Windsor County State’s Attorney Ward Goodenough on Nov. 26 urging him to take action.

A USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service spokesperson wrote in an email to VTDigger that the agency assesses a variety of factors to determine recourse after a humane handling violation. Those factors include the severity of the violation, the facility’s history of violations and whether the facility has a “robust systematic approach to humane handling.” The federal agency does not have plans for further action in this case, according to the spokesperson.

“The issuance of noncompliance reports and conversations with the establishment enabled the agency to address the incident,” the spokesperson wrote in an email.

Advertisement

Officer Gabriel Freeman of the Springfield Police Department told VTDigger that the case is under investigation but declined to discuss the alleged incident. He added that animal cruelty investigations take time to process and said his department is assessing resources and jurisdictional issues related to the case. He also questioned whether the case would fall within federal jurisdiction. 

Goodenough, the Windsor County prosecutor, said his office was aware of PETA’s demand but could not comment because Springfield police were investigating.

Nick Paschkov, chief operating officer of Vermont Packinghouse, said in an email last week that the truck driver responsible for the alleged incident was a “third-party hauler” and not an employee of Vermont Packinghouse. The driver has since been permanently banned from the facility, he said.

The USDA report noted, however, that Vermont Packinghouse employees witnessed the incident and failed to take action to stop what it referred to as an “immediate animal welfare concern.”

Paschkov wrote that his company had taken measures since the June incident to prevent further harm, such as adding a ramp for unloading livestock and changing unloading hours to before 9 a.m. to prevent animals from overheating. Vermont Packinghouse has also increased employee supervision and instituted mandatory training for staff by the start of next year, according to Paschkov.

Advertisement

“We fully recognize the gravity of this situation and remain dedicated to preventing future occurrences. Vermont Packinghouse continues to uphold its commitment to humane animal handling as a cornerstone of our operations and values,” Paschkov said in the email.

Colin Henstock, associate director of project strategy for PETA, said the USDA documentation of the incident carries no civil or criminal penalties and pointed to a 2012 case, Nat’l. Meat Assoc. V. Harris, that found states can impose civil or criminal charges for animal cruelty that also violates federal law. 

Local authorities have the power to bring “some small measure of justice” for the animals that were allegedly abused — and it’s their responsibility to pursue that, said Henstock.

Vermont’s animal cruelty statute describes it, in part, as overworking, overloading, torturing or tormenting animals and is punishable by a sentence of no more than one year in prison or a fine of no more than $2,000, or both.

However, just what agency has ultimate jurisdiction over animal cruelty cases in Vermont has been a murky question — one that lawmakers have wrestled with over time. 

Advertisement

The Legislature took a step toward addressing what agency should be responsible for animal cruelty cases earlier this year by creating an animal cruelty division within the Department of Public Safety. 

Scott Waterman, a spokesperson for the state Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets, wrote in an email that the enforcement of criminal laws regarding animal cruelty and protecting animal welfare lie outside his agency’s purview, but it can work with law enforcement on investigations into cruelty against livestock upon request. 

“It is important that all federal and state facilities comply with humane handling requirements,” Waterman wrote. “The agency supports good investigations and subsequent criminal prosecution whenever the facts warrant it.”

Henstock noted that Vermont Packinghouse came under scrutiny seven years ago after workers improperly restrained and stunned pigs before slaughter. The USDA temporarily suspended operations at Vermont Packinghouse several times over six months due to the botched slaughter practices. 

In that case, the state agriculture agency charged Vermont Packinghouse with six counts of violating Vermont humane slaughter laws and proposed a $1,500 fee in 2017. At that time, the USDA documented 15 noncompliance violations for Vermont Packinghouse over two years. 

Advertisement

Arion Thiboumery, who was then serving as general manager of Vermont Packinghouse, responded in a commentary published by VTDigger in 2017 that the company had paid the fine to the state and upgraded handling equipment and updated procedures to “reduce the chance of future incidents.” While not refuting the violations, Thiboumery said the company strives for transparency and humane handling. 

A year later, an inspector observed that a worker improperly stunned sheep, leading the USDA to issue a suspension to Vermont Packinghouse and order the company to stop slaughtering sheep. After the company filed a plan to prevent future “mis-stuns,” the USDA lifted the suspension, but the incident still led to a hearing overseen by the state agriculture agency over three alleged violations of the state’s humane handling laws. 

“At a bare minimum,” Henstock said, PETA expects facilities to follow “the letter of the law in Vermont.”

“This facility, in particular, seems to have a persistent problem, and we hope that if charges are brought in this instance, that that will change things,” Henstock said.

Advertisement





Source link

Vermont

Vermont knocks off Western New England 75-68

Published

on

Vermont knocks off Western New England 75-68





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

These Vermonters are about to lose their Medicare Advantage plans and they’re scrambling

Published

on

These Vermonters are about to lose their Medicare Advantage plans and they’re scrambling


Angela Myers doesn’t know what she’s going to do. 

The 54-year-old from Chittenden County lives with a disability. When she needed better health insurance, she said her doctors recommended Vermont Blue Advantage, a type of Medicare provided by Blue Cross Blue Shield that could offer her extra benefits and reduced costs.  

She’s been on the plan for five years, she said, and it covers all her frequent doctor visits and monthly prescriptions. 

But she’s going to lose that insurance soon. 

Advertisement

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont announced Oct. 1 that it would drop Medicare Advantage coverage in 2026, leaving the thousands of Vermonters like Meyers scrambling to secure new plans before the turn of the year. Vermont Blue Advantage covers over 26,000 people in Vermont, the company told the Burlington Free Press, and has more complete coverage than traditional Medicare, including dental work and prescriptions.  

The company, which is paid by the government to run the program, says it costs too much. The “Vermont Medicare Advantage market is unsustainable for Vermont Blue Advantage to be able to offer reasonably priced and affordable products to serve as an alternative to traditional Medicare coverage,” Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont said when announcing the plan.  

That’s been the national trend, with Medicare Advantage plans whittled down across many states. But for a low-population place like Vermont, the disruption for people is magnified. 

A big problem with choosing a new Medicare Advantage plan is that there just aren’t many offered in Vermont. The same day Vermont Blue Advantage announced its cut, UnitedHealthcare did the same. United, itself one of the largest purveyors of Medicare Advantage plans across the country, serves almost 8,000 Vermonters, the company told the Free Press.   

Advertisement

Medicare Advantage plans in Vermont

As of September, over 51,600 Vermonters were insured by a Medicare Advantage plan, and over 168,000 people were eligible, government data shows.   

Advantage plans are run by private companies but funded by the federal government. They are for people 65 and older or who have a disability. More than half of U.S. residents eligible for Medicare Advantage are insured under it, according to KFF, a national health care reporting and research outfit.  

Vermonters skew under that trend at 34% for 2024, KFF reported. But the number has been rising. A decade prior, only 7% of eligible Vermonters used an Advantage plan.  

Even so, the options are slimming. Insurance plans shuttering has become almost an annual tradition in Vermont. Two Advantage plans — operated by MVP and WellCare — folded this past January.  

Advertisement

Come next year, the only option for those seeking an individual Medicare Advantage plan is Humana, which serves Bennington, Caledonia, Essex, Orange, Windam and Windsor counties, or less than half the counties in Vermont.  

People losing health insurance feel ‘abandoned’

Larry Mindell of Williston said he and his wife signed up with Vermont Blue Advantage after MVP cancelled its coverage. He said they feel “abandoned” by the companies and worry this may only be the beginning of a sharper downturn.  

“I say ‘abandon’ because that’s what it feels like, and it’s happening to us for the second year in a row,” Mindell said. 

Mindell has been working with an insurance broker to find a new plan, but that’s not an option everyone has.  

Some were able to be proactive in changing their plans. The Vermont Treasurer’s Office announced Sept. 11 that starting next year, retired teachers receiving health insurance from Vermont Blue Advantage will be covered by equivalent plans from HealthSpring.   

Advertisement

The change will impact over 7,000 retirees and beneficiaries in Vermont, says the Treasurer’s Office. The decision came after Vermont Blue Advantage proposed a 50% premium increase in July, and it proved to be a good one as Blue Cross Blue Shield pulled the plan altogether just a few months later.   

Other people were not prepared to lose their insurance.  

Frankin County resident Barb Fichter has been living in Vermont since 2022 and said it took her a few years to find an Advantage plan she was happy with before choosing Blue Cross Blue Shield’s offering in January 2024.  

Now, she’s back to where she started. 

“It’s so disconcerting to wade through alternatives, and I fear I may just be on regular Medicare with no prescription drug coverage or dental coverage,” Fichter said. “I’m going to have to weigh out which things I’m going to have to give up because I can’t afford the costs or co-pays.”

Advertisement

When is Medicare open enrollment? Special enrollment if you’re losing coverage?

The annual open enrollment period for choosing new Medicare plans runs from Oct. 15 through Dec. 7. There is a special enrollment period for those who will be losing coverage, allowing them until March 4 to find a new plan. 

But as the current plans end by Jan. 1, 2026, people will have a gap in coverage if they wait to sign up for a new one.   

Sydney P. Hakes is the Burlington city reporter. Contact her at SHakes@gannett.com. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Yankee will be ’99 percent demolished’ by the end of the year

Published

on

Vermont Yankee will be ’99 percent demolished’ by the end of the year


VERNON — The demolition of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant will be “99 percent complete” by the end of the year, according to a recent estimate from the chief executive officer of Yankee’s owner, NorthStar Group Services.

Scott State, in a telephone interview from his home in Arizona, said that crews have been making good progress in this fall’s good weather, and the reactor building’s wall and interior would be down to the ground by Thanksgiving.

According to recent photographs of the reactor building, there are still concrete walls standing. At one point this fall, two large excavators, which had to be hoisted to the top of the reactor building by a super-large crane, were tearing the building apart, from the top down.

Advertisement

“We plan to have it down to ground level within the next four weeks,” he said.

According to the memorandum of understanding NorthStar has with the state of Vermont, it must remove all structures that are within four feet of ground level, and that will take until Christmas, State said.

The concrete is very thick in the foundation, about two to three feet thick. He estimated the foundation goes 40 to 50 feet into the ground, but the vast majority of it would be left in place.

The company has until 2030 to complete the decommissioning of the Yankee site, and has long said the job would be complete by the end of 2026, but that most work would be done by 2025.

State said all the concrete rubble from the reactor building is being stored on site, but will eventually be shipped to west Texas, at the low-level radioactive waste facility run by NorthStar’s partner, Waste Services.

Advertisement

After the reactor building’s demolition is complete, the concrete will be shipped over a six-month period, State said. He said there is only room for two rail cars at a time to be loaded at the Yankee site.

“Mid-summer, next fall, all that stuff will be gone,” he said.

NorthStar, which bought the Vermont Yankee plant from former owner Entergy Nuclear in January 2019, actually started decommissioning several months before the sale was completed and approved by state and federal regulators.

NorthStar’s plans called for immediately demolition, rather than putting the plant into what essentially is cold storage, the plan adopted by Entergy. Under that plan, no work would have been done at Yankee for decades.

State said that additional field work, site assessments, sampling, studies and reports will take up the rest of 2026, when the company will seek final approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Advertisement

With the government shut down and continued understaffing at the NRC, State said that approval could take longer than originally expected.

Recent soil testing near the reactor building revealed contamination of PFAS or “forever chemicals,” at significantly above Vermont standards. That contamination is believed to have come from a fire at the plant’s electrical transformer in 2004, on the non-nuclear side of the plant.

The reactor building, which is the last major building left at the 140-acre site, was almost as big underground as it was above ground, State said. The reactor building, which housed the reactor core plus the spent fuel pool, was about five stories high.

The reactor building is located next to the storage site of the radioactive spent fuel from the 42 years the plant operated. The spent fuel is stored in giant concrete and steel casks, and it will remain after decommissioning is completed.

According to the state memorandum, the deep foundation may be left in place after testing shows it is clear of any radioactivity.

Advertisement

NorthStar agreed that the reactor foundation hole would not be filled with the rubbleized concrete from the demolition, but “clean fill,” State said, which will be trucked in to the Vernon site.

He said the other nuclear decommissioning project NorthStar is doing, Crystal River 3 in Florida, will use its rubble-ized concrete for fill, which State said is standard practice – but not in Vermont.

“We will not backfill until the NRC releases the site,” he said.

There are two large trust funds paying for the demolition and clean up work. The second, smaller fund will pay for site restoration. The larger $600 million fund was paid for by the utility customers of the original owner of Vermont Yankee, the Vermont Nuclear Power Corp.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending