Connect with us

New Jersey

New Jersey’s statewide plastic bag ban goes into effect this week. Are stores and shoppers ready?

Published

on

New Jersey’s statewide plastic bag ban goes into effect this week. Are stores and shoppers ready?


Bruce Millington, beer coordinator on the Wegmans liquor retailer in Cherry Hill, wonders how clients who’re unprepared for New Jersey’s statewide ban on single-use plastic baggage will handle whereas juggling heavy, free bottles of wine out to their automobiles.

As of Wednesday, cashiers on the retailer will not be bagging bottles for them, although they could provide empty packing containers when obtainable. All New Jersey retail, grocery, and pharmacy shops, together with eating places and different meals service companies, are banned from giving out single-use plastic baggage, in addition to foam containers, although there are some exceptions.

What about switching to paper baggage? Supermarkets can not present these both.

“Now we have long-term clients that also in all probability don’t know there may be going to a be a bag ban,” Millington mentioned. “So we’re making an attempt to teach all people as they arrive in. Proper now, we do a variety of baggage for wines and something we promote.”

Advertisement

Nevertheless, Millington, who occurred to be procuring on the Wegmans grocery retailer throughout the car parking zone from the liquor retailer, mentioned the ban “doesn’t trouble me in any respect.”

A survey of a dozen consumers Friday on the Wegmans and Goal, each in Cherry Hill, confirmed most are conscious of the ban however had combined reactions.

Most understood the environmental underpinning of the legislation — an try to minimize the estimated 100 billion single-use plastic carryout baggage thrown away within the U.S. yearly. The baggage, not included in municipal recycling packages, are sometimes both taken to landfills, or discovered drifting into bushes or onto streets the place they get flushed down storm drains and into waterways, together with the ocean. The baggage are additionally comprised of fossil fuels.

Not less than eight different states — California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, New York, Oregon, and Vermont — have banned single-use plastic baggage, in keeping with the Nationwide Convention of State Legislators. California was the primary in 2014. And no less than 11 cities, together with Philadelphia, have bans.

Customers, particularly these with households, are involved concerning the inconvenience and, for some, what they see as an added expense to purchasing reusable baggage when carryout baggage had been free for many years.

Advertisement

Aigner McDaniels, of Philadelphia, retailers in New Jersey to flee the town’s soda tax and “as a result of every little thing is cheaper.” She wasn’t happy when the town’s personal ban on single-use baggage went into impact April 1. In order she loaded the trunk of her automobile within the Wegmans lot off Route 70, she lamented being confronted with one other ban.

» READ MORE: Every thing you could learn about Philadelphia’s plastic bag ban

In New Jersey, if shops violate the ban, they’ll get a warning for a primary offense. They’ll face a $1,000 wonderful for a second violation and $5,000 wonderful for each violation after that. That applies to retail shops, pharmacies, eating places, and comfort shops.

All of them can promote reusable baggage to clients. A reusable bag is usually a thicker, extra sturdy sort of plastic than a single-use bag. It additionally will be made of cloth, nylon, material, hemp, or a machine cleanable material with handles.

“Typically I’m going to the market, and I neglect to deliver baggage,” McDaniels mentioned. “And so I purchase extra baggage.”

Advertisement

Close by, Etty Sims, of Cherry Hill, was loading baggage into an SUV. She has 4 youngsters and her grocery orders are massive.

“It simply makes issues extra sophisticated,” Sims mentioned. “I feel there are different issues we are able to do to guard the surroundings. I don’t suppose plastic baggage must be the very first thing to go. I perceive the difficulty with all of the plastic accumulation in our world. However we might use paper baggage. I don’t know why they’re stopping them. These are biodegradable. It’s not all or nothing, proper?”

Sims doesn’t usually store at shops akin to Aldi, or Lidl, the place consumers have lengthy needed to deliver their very own baggage. She does have some reusable baggage at residence, “however they’re by no means large enough.” And he or she wonders what’s going to occur if she forgets to deliver baggage.

Reusable baggage promote in Wegmans for 99 cents, and that may show costly when you have a well-stocked cart, Sims mentioned. “I can’t do a full procuring journey on three or 4 baggage.”

Wegmans will cost 35 cents a bag for on-line pickup orders. ShopRite will cost a single $1.50 price.

Advertisement

Karen O’Shea, a spokesperson for ShopRite, mentioned the shops are serving to educate consumers with reminders to deliver their very own baggage.

“ShopRite believes one of the best bag is a reusable bag and we proceed to work to ensure our shops are ready when the legislation takes impact Could 4,“ O’Shea mentioned.

Within the wake of all of the bans, many bigger retailers, together with Walmart, CVS, and Goal are acknowledging the environmental toll of plastic, and have joined within the Past the Bag initiative, designed “to reinvent the single-use plastic retail bag, with the objective of figuring out, testing and implementing viable design options and fashions that extra sustainably serve the aim of the present retail bag.”

For its half, Wegmans is ready for the ban and understands clients’ issues, mentioned spokesperson Tracy Van Auker. The chain has 106 shops nationally, and 9 in New Jersey.

“We take pleasure in having already eradicated plastic baggage from 61 of our shops over the previous couple of years, and we’ve discovered so much alongside the best way,” Van Auker mentioned.

Advertisement

Firm surveys present “the overwhelming majority” of consumers already owned reusable baggage. The highest causes they don’t deliver them to the shop: They left them at residence or forgot to deliver them in from the automobile.

“To assist our clients bear in mind their baggage, we created new reusable bag reminder indicators and strategically positioned them all through our parking heaps and retailer entrances,” Van Auker mentioned, including that the shop has been making an attempt to teach clients alongside the best way.

“As we’ve encountered plastic bag laws in quite a few markets, we’ve seen the impression it could have in shifting clients to reusable baggage, the most suitable choice to unravel the environmental problem of single-use bag,” Van Auker mentioned. “We’ve additionally discovered there’s extra we are able to do, and an even bigger impression we are able to make, along with our clients. Earlier this month, we introduced that we’ll remove plastic baggage companywide by the top of 2022.”

Carolyn Zehren, of West Deptford, mentioned of the ban: “I feel I’m wonderful with it … as a result of there’s a lot waste on this planet.”

At a close-by Goal, on Route 38 and throughout from the Cherry Hill Mall, Bruce and Andrea Isakoff had been a bit extra skeptical, although they are saying the ban received’t trigger them a lot of an inconvenience.

Advertisement

Bruce Isakoff mentioned there are already in all probability “billions and billions” of plastic baggage within the ocean.

“Will this actually make a distinction?” he requested. “Within the brief time period, you’re not going to see an impression. However in the long run, you may see it.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Jersey

New Jersey State Police Gave a ‘Free Pass’ to Motorists with Courtesy Cards or Ties to Police, Investigation Finds – Insider NJ

Published

on

New Jersey State Police Gave a ‘Free Pass’ to Motorists with Courtesy Cards or Ties to Police, Investigation Finds – Insider NJ


The Office of the State Comptroller found even motorists suspected of dangerous driving offenses were let go by New Jersey State Police.

TRENTON—An investigation finds that New Jersey State Police troopers routinely gave preferential treatment to certain motorists who presented a courtesy card or asserted a personal connection to law enforcement—even when motorists were suspected of dangerous offenses, like drunk driving, according to a new report by the New Jersey Office of the State Comptroller.

OSC’s Police Accountability Project reviewed body worn camera footage of 501 no-enforcement stops by New Jersey State Police–meaning stops where New Jersey State troopers did not issue tickets or make arrests. In 139 or 27 percent of these no-enforcement stops, motorists presented a courtesy card, claimed to have a friend or relative in law enforcement, or flashed a law enforcement badge and then were let go, OSC’s report said. In some cases, the trooper released the motorist immediately, offering some version of “you’re good.” The report found that courtesy cards are in wide usage and function as “accepted currency” by state troopers. (In all but one case, the troopers gave the courtesy card back to the motorist, enabling the card to be used again.)

Reviewing more than 50 hours of body worn camera footage of the stops, which took place over ten days in December 2022, OSC found that troopers regularly decided not to enforce motor vehicle laws after receiving a courtesy card or being told the driver has ties to law enforcement. For instance, one motorist, who was stopped for driving over 90 miles per hour, admitted to drinking alcohol but was let go without a sobriety test after he presented two courtesy cards. Another motorist was stopped for driving over 103 miles per hour and was released after she volunteered that her father was a lieutenant in a local police department. The most significant consequence the troopers imposed in these stops was advising the motorists that they had left a voicemail message for the law enforcement officer named on the courtesy card or invoked as a friend or relative. OSC has released video excerpts of the footage.

“Our investigation shows that some people are being given a free pass to violate serious traffic safety laws,” said Acting State Comptroller Kevin Walsh. “Law enforcement decisions should never depend on who you know, your family connections, or donations to police unions. Nepotism and favoritism undermine our laws and make our roads more dangerous.”

Advertisement

Overall, close to half of the 501 non-enforcement stops reviewed by OSC involved speeding, many for more than 20 miles per hour over the speed limit. In three stops, drivers stopped for reckless driving, careless driving, and/or speeding, also admitted to drinking alcohol, yet were released without being asked to step out of the car for a field sobriety test. Both drunk driving and speeding are major causes of traffic fatalities. According to data compiled by the New Jersey State Police Fatal Accident Investigation Unit, in 2022, New Jersey recorded 646 fatal collisions that resulted in 689 deaths or 1.89 fatalities per day. This was among the highest number of traffic-related deaths in New Jersey in the past 15 years.

OSC initiated this investigation in response to reports that law enforcement officers’ decisions not to enforce motor vehicle violations were influenced by improper factors, including courtesy cards. Courtesy cards, often referred to as PBA cards, FOP cards, or gold cards, are given out by police labor associations to law enforcement officers. They also can be purchased through “associate memberships” with police associations and are sold by private companies.

OSC’s investigation found that courtesy cards are widely used. In 87, or 17 percent, of the no-enforcement stops OSC reviewed, motorists presented courtesy cards that came from municipal police departments, county and state agencies, as well as inter-state and out-of-state law enforcement agencies. They all appeared to be equally effective at getting motorists released without enforcement.

Asserting a relationship with law enforcement appeared to carry equal weight, OSC found. In 52 or 10 percent of the no-enforcement stops reviewed, the driver or passengers did not present a courtesy card but claimed a connection to law enforcement, and the trooper decided to let them go. In 29 of those stops, the motorist or passenger identified themselves as current, retired, or in-training law enforcement officers. Other stops resulted in no enforcement when the drivers or passengers claimed a relative, friend, or neighbor worked in a law enforcement agency.

In one stop, a trooper said he stopped a motorist for driving 97 miles per hour. After an extended conversation about the “friends” they had in common, the trooper told the driver to “stay safe” and let him go. In another stop, a trooper performed a computerized look-up of the driver’s credentials and discovered the driver had an active warrant for his arrest. But when the driver’s friend introduced himself, letting the trooper know that he was also an off-duty trooper, the stopping trooper walked back to the motorist, apologized for stopping him, and let him go without even mentioning the warrant. OSC was unable to determine from the footage what the warrant was for.

Advertisement

Other findings include:

  • Providing preferential treatment to motorists who present courtesy cards or assert close personal relationships with law enforcement appears to have a discriminatory impact. Of the 87 courtesy cards observed in the sample, for instance, 69 were presented by White drivers.
  • Even when courtesy cards were not present, racial disparities were observed in the sample. New Jersey State Police policy requires troopers to request all three driving credentials (license, registration, proof of insurance) when making motor vehicle stops, but OSC found overall, White and Asian drivers were less likely to have all three of their credentials requested and verified when compared to Black and Hispanic/LatinX drivers. Additionally, troopers conducted computerized lookups of Hispanic/LatinX drivers 65 percent of the time, while looking up White drivers only 34 percent of the time.
  • In many stops, OSC was unable to ascertain why the troopers made the decision not to enforce motor vehicle violations because of the quality of the video footage or other factors. Still, OSC observed several of those stops involved dangerous offenses, underscoring the importance of reviewing no-enforcement motor vehicle stops, which are not routinely reviewed.

OSC made 11 recommendations, including that New Jersey State Police regularly review no-enforcement stops to better understand racial/ethnic trends in motor vehicle data and determine if additional training is needed. OSC also recommended that the Attorney General consider issuing a directive that would explicitly prohibit law enforcement officers from giving preferential treatment to motorists because of their ties to law enforcement or possession of courtesy cards.

Read the report. 

Watch excerpts of the body camera footage. 

Sign up now for OSC’s newsletter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

Authorities Debunk Viral Explanation for NJ Drone Sightings

Published

on

Authorities Debunk Viral Explanation for NJ Drone Sightings


U.S. News

The drones spotted over the Garden State were probably not looking for a missing shipment of radioactive material.

Newsday LLC/Newsday via Getty Images
Zachary Folk

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

N.J. weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime, but subject to a fine

Published

on

N.J. weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime, but subject to a fine


Should underage gambling no longer be a crime?

New Jersey lawmakers are considering changing the law to make gambling by people under the age of 21 no longer punishable under criminal law, making it subject to a fine.

It also would impose fines on anyone helping an underage person gamble in New Jersey.

The bill changes the penalties for underage gambling from that of a disorderly persons offense to a civil offense. Fines would be $500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second offense, and $2,000 for any subsequent offenses.

Advertisement

The money would be used for prevention, education, and treatment programs for compulsive gambling, such as those provided by the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey.

“The concern I had initially was about reducing the severity of the punishment,” said Assemblyman Don Guardian, a Republican former mayor of Atlantic City. “But the fact that all the money will go to problem gambling treatment programs changed my mind.”

Figures on underage gambling cases were not immediately available Thursday. But numerous people involved in gambling treatment and recovery say a growing number of young people are becoming involved in gambling, particularly sports betting as the activity spreads around the country.

The bill was approved by an Assembly committee and now goes to the full Assembly for a vote. It must pass both houses of the Legislature before going to the desk of the state’s Democratic governor, Phil Murphy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending