Connect with us

New Hampshire

NH secretary of state to address Portsmouth $1.6M SchoolCare dispute

Published

on

NH secretary of state to address Portsmouth .6M SchoolCare dispute


PORTSMOUTH — New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan is expected to attend the Monday, March 16 City Council meeting in the wake of a controversy about SchoolCare’s demand for a $1.57 million payment from the city, according to Mayor Deaglan McEachern.

SchoolCare, a nonprofit risk pool that works to provide health insurance to all the city’s school employees and 90 school districts statewide, stated “if any” town or city “failed to pay the assessment, then SchoolCare may stop paying claims on insured members,” Deputy City Attorney Trevor McCourt previously told the council.

SchoolCare is overseen by the secretary of state’s office.

McEachern stressed during a March 13 interview “we need to be able to provide health care for our teachers, that’s the highest priority we have in these discussions.”

Advertisement

McEachern, in his letter, thanked Scanlan for his “willingness, expressed through our conversation … to come to Portsmouth to discuss these issues at the City Council meeting on March 16. The city’s concerns arise from the extraordinary assessment SchoolCare recently imposed on its members.”

The mayor went on to write, “SchoolCare reported approximately $29.5 million in reserves as of June 30, 2023; those reserves were depleted quickly, and SchoolCare now reports an operational deficit. … The size and timing of the assessment have had immediate and serious impacts on taxpayers.”

Portsmouth counteroffer rejected by SchoolCare

Stating “Portsmouth seeks to approach this situation constructively,” McEachern’s letter describes a counteroffer.

Advertisement

“While the city does not agree that risk pools have statutory or contractual authority to levy assessments of this nature, we want to remain part of a stable, effective pool and contribute to a reasonable solution,” McEachern said.

He wrote Portsmouth is proposing to pay $247,660.71 and the remaining $1,322,945.07 over a two-year period to avoid the “disruption” paying the full amount.

The mayor confirmed that when McCourt recently appeared before SchoolCare’s Board of Directors, Portsmouth’s counteroffer was rejected. But he stated Portsmouth remains “willing to work with SchoolCare to make sure our teachers get the health care they deserve.”

What mayor is expecting from secretary of state

McEachern said based on his conversation with Scanlan, he expects the secretary of state to “come tell us why this is legal, and answer any questions we have. I look forward to that.”

McEachern stressed Portsmouth would not be “bullied” by SchoolCare into paying an assessment it believes is not legal under state law. He added if SchoolCare were to stop paying claims filed by Portsmouth’s school employees “that would be a breach of the contract.”

Advertisement

“We’re looking at all available options,” McEachern said. “We believe we have made fair and legal offers to SchoolCare, and want to be able to have our teachers have no interruption in their health coverage. Unfortunately they’ve taken the tack that they have. It’s not a just or fair thing to do.”

He expects that after city councilors hears from Scanlan, they could have a discussion about next steps.

“ We may have to talk to our legal counsel first,” McEachern said.

McEachern says solution should be rate-setting, not billing taxpayers

McEachern maintained in his letter to Scanlan “this assessment raises broader policy concerns warranting your direct attention given your statutory responsibilities.

“It was levied contrary to state law, the membership agreements and SchoolCare Board policies, without a meaningful public process,” McEachern wrote. “By shifting costs retroactively and disproportionately onto taxpayers rather than sharing them prospectively and transparently through rate-setting, this approach undermines confidence in the public risk pool model.”

Advertisement

He told Scanlan the implications “extend well beyond Portsmouth.”

“Municipalities and school districts across New Hampshire depend on the stability and predictability of public risk pools in order to responsibly plan their budgets and manage taxpayer dollars,” he said. “When large retroactive assessments are imposed without clear authority or process, it creates uncertainty not only for local governments but for taxpayers across the state who ultimately bear the cost.”

McCourt sent out a statement from the city’s Legal Department on March 13.

It stated city officials on March 13 “affirmed that health insurance coverage for Portsmouth School Department staff remains in place and uninterrupted, while the city continues to seek a reasonable and lawful resolution of an unprecedented and disputed, mid-year assessment imposed by” SchoolCare.

In the release McCourt reported the “city has proposed multiple paths toward resolution, each of which SchoolCare has declined.”

Advertisement

McCourt added the city “will provide a public update to the City Council and School Board at the March 16, 2026 City Council meeting, following an anticipated public presentation” by the Secretary of State.

The city’s “school side employees,” have been members of SchoolCare, a risk pool that administers health insurance, “since about 2012,” he said previously.

The city has agreed to pay for SchoolCare coverage next fiscal year, even though rates are projected to increase by 26%, McCourt told the City Council previously.

“I’ve also found as of June 30 of 2023, SchoolCare had a reserve in the amount of $29.5 million, which was then paid down and extinguished and exhausted over a period of three years,” McCourt said. “This assessment again is designed to refill a portion of that reserve, with the remainder apparently to be recovered through rate setting, through the ordinary course.”

SchoolCare leader seeks agreement

Lisa Duquette, the executive director at SchoolCare, previously said she’s “absolutely” hopeful the city and SchoolCare can reach an agreement.

Advertisement

“We have 98% of our membership who either paid in full, or have entered into agreements to pay in full by July 15,” she said.

Monday’s council meeting is scheduled to start at 7 p.m. and will be held in City Council chambers.



Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

Give Back NH: The Bancroft House

Published

on

Give Back NH: The Bancroft House


Every other week on NHPR, we like to put a spotlight on people and places doing interesting things around the state on Give Back NH.

Learn more about what the Bancroft House has to offer, including volunteer and donation opportunities here.

This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.

Just across a one lane bridge over the Gale River in Franconia, New Hampshire, sits a large yellow house with a barn in the back. This is the Bancroft House, and since 1982, its mission has been to provide a secure, temporary home for women, children and families in need with compassion and respect for those they serve.

Advertisement

Executive Director Bob Gorgone has been with the Bancroft House since 1990 and lives on site at the shelter. He says that sometimes a secure, safe place is all someone needs to start to get things back on track.

Bob Gorgone: Sometimes that’s all they need is somewhere where they can sit and relax for a while, and then they can get their minds straight.

The newly remodeled kitchen in the Bancroft House.

A majority of the folks who use the Bancroft House’s services are people who are experiencing homelessness for the first time. Bob says this experience is shocking to them, and a safe space is something that can ease their anxiety.

Bob Gorgone: Some people, it’s a shock to them and they’re very anxious, and this is a place where they can get that under control and then start thinking, “What am I going to do in the future?”

Tenants at the Bancroft House are limited to a stay of 90 days, during which time they will receive reminders every 30 days that they’re meant to be looking for permanent housing.

Advertisement

Kevin Johnson is the treasurer and a member of the board of directors at the Bancroft House. He’s been with the organization since 2014 and says that this model has been hugely successful for the organization.

A desk in the Bancroft House where residents can use provided resources to look for permanent housing.
A desk in the Bancroft House where residents can use provided resources to look for permanent housing.

Kevin Johnson: That’s a model that has proven very successful in both motivating folks and making sure that we have availability for folks on a rolling basis.

A big reason for the 90 day limit, Kevin says, is because of the needs of others in the community.

Kevin Johnson: We’re quite often in a queue. We’re getting calls regularly and, you know, a space that could go to the next family or the next individual, they’re waiting.

Shelter isn’t the only thing the Bancroft House provides to its tenants. They provide food, laundry services, personal care products, and in the backyard in the new barn, there’s appliances, tools, furniture — anything that could help make a home. The Bancroft House provides all of these supplies free to the residents who move into permanent housing after their stay as a way to help them get on their feet.

Advertisement
The barn at the Bancroft House, filled with supplies, furniture, and anything one would need to get on their feet after finding permanent housing.
The barn at the Bancroft House, filled with supplies, furniture, and anything one would need to get on their feet after finding permanent housing.

One of the residents at the Bancroft House during my visit was Michele Sorrell. She came to stay there after an incident at her brother’s home. Michelle says that one of the highlights during her stay was being able to meet and connect with Kevin and Bob, as well as the fellow people living there.

Michele Sorrell: Getting to know people like I know Kevin and I’m slowly getting to know Bob. It’s always nice to get to know the people that run the place and people that are also tenants.

One key aspect of the success of the Bancroft House, both Kevin and Bob say, has been the Franconia community as a whole.

Kevin Johnson: Our efforts are privately supported from local communities, grants, businesses, church groups. When it comes to food, the local church has Wednesday night dinners and I go down there and pick up the dinners and bring them back here to the house for the residents.

Bob Gorgone: It’s been great. You know, local businesses donate to us all the time. You know, individuals donate to us all the time. When they have something that’s come to them that they don’t need, they give us a call. Yeah, they’ve been terrific.

Advertisement

Kevin says that was his goal from his first days at the organization.

Kevin Johnson: I’ve advocated to the board from the very beginning that you build a strong community of support, and the community will support your efforts, and we’ve been very successful in that.

Before I left, I asked Bob what’s kept him in the organization since 1990.

Bob Gorgone: I enjoy it, you know. I enjoy seeing the successes that we do have. And that makes me feel good that I’m being, I’m doing something that’s worthwhile.

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this story included the incorrect location of the Bancroft House.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Distant Dome: A Dark Time For the State

Published

on

Distant Dome: A Dark Time For the State


By GARRY RAYNO, Distant Dome

The political climate in New Hampshire took a dark turn this month as lawmakers were in the middle of the last year of the current two-year term.

The second year of any term is always more contentious and antagonistic as the parties ramp up the rhetoric heading into the general election in November.

Each side wants to put the other on record for the perceived hot button issues their polling tells them will drive voter turnout.

But since the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling allowing billions of dollars of dark money to flow into elections nationally, and here, the stakes are higher because the donors want a return on their investment and decidedly more partisan.

Immigration and how the Trump administration is handling it through its ICE officers who often act more like street thugs than law enforcement, as well as the Iran war have heightened the partisan divide to the point of creating two realities. 

And politically driven violence is on the upswing with no reason to think New Hampshire would escape.

Long gone are the days of the old New Hampshire Hotel where many lawmakers stayed rather than trek home through the notches in bad weather or to the geographically isolated Monadnock region or to the Seacoast with a few too many manhattans under your belt.

Advertisement

As the old timers used to say, they could fight like hell on the House floor and then share dinner, a cigar and drinks in the dining room of the hotel making lifelong friends on both sides of the aisle.

Now there are death threats over tax policy.

Attorney and longtime education funding reform advocate, Andru Volinsky and others proposed the 3 3 program to reduce property taxes for 80 percent of the state’s property owners by instituting a 3 percent income tax and $3 per $1,000 of valuation statewide property tax.

The plan also came with a handy feature that calculates how you would fare under the proposal instead of paying 70 percent of the cost of education with your property taxes.

It did not take long before Gov. Kelly Ayotte chimed in with “No income tax, no sales tax. Not now, not EVER,” followed by the House Minority Leader Alexis Simpson’s press release saying House Democrats do not support an income tax, which is not true for all of them.

Advertisement

And then an X post showed up under Libertarian Party NH which is still controlled by the Free State Project’s former executive director Jeremy Kauffman saying an income tax equated to forced labor and “under libertarian ethical theory, it is perfectly permissible to kill him.”

The Tweet has since been taken down.

But the threats didn’t stop there. In the comments Volinsky’s friend and 1st District Congressional candidate Christian Urrutia defended Volinsky on the string and the reply to him was “leave New Hampshire while it’s safe for you to do so.”
The threats were reported to police and the Attorney General’s Office acknowledged it is aware of them.

While later Simpson put out a press release saying, “This kind of rhetoric is dangerous and unacceptable. Calling for the murder because of political disagreement crosses a clear line. The Libertarian Party of New Hampshire should be ashamed to promote language that encourages violence against elected officials and others in public life,” but never mentioned Volinsky’s name which she did in a press release objecting to his proposal.

Two days later when House Majority Leader Jason Osborne offered a constitutional amendment to outlaw an income tax, she did mention the threats, but again but did not say Volinsky’s name.

Advertisement

Ayotte has yet to say anything about the threats to Volinsky or other threatening social media posts from a Republican representative targeting two female Democratic representatives one Jewish and the other a naturalized citizen from the Philippines.

State Rep. Travis Corcoran, R-Weare, known for his racist and bigoted commentary, wrote the posts.

After Rep. Jessica Grill, D-Manchester, promoted a bipartisan Karaoke Caucus meeting on X, Corcoran posed on X “We need a final solution for theater kids  in politics,” referring to the Nazi’s plan to kill all the Jews in Germany.

The week before on social media he urged the Trump administration official behind the sometimes violent and often illegal arrests and detentions of immigrants, Stephen Miller, to have Rep. Luz Bay, D-Dover, deported.

Those remarks were contested by Simpson who released a statement saying “Posting antisemitic language and references to the Holocaust is reprehensible. Rep. Corcoran’s conduct is unacceptable for anyone, and even more so for a member of the legislature. I condemn this rhetoric. I expect the Speaker to stand against it and take action to address the hate speech coming from his caucus. For far too long, Rep. Corcoran has used antisemitic and racist rhetoric without consequence. The Speaker has allowed this behavior to continue, and addressing Rep. Corcoran’s pattern of hateful comments is long overdue.”

Advertisement

House Speaker Sherman Packard, R-Londonderry, did release a statement responding to Corcoran’s tweets.

“The recent rhetoric shared by Rep. Corcoran is deeply inappropriate and has no place in the New Hampshire House. Any language that invokes violence, hate, or intolerance is unacceptable by any member. Our institution is built on respect and the responsibility to serve all Granite Staters with dignity and professionalism. Conduct that undermines that mission does not reflect our values. Members of the House are expected to uphold the standards of the body and honor the trust placed in them by their constituents.”

Missing along with the governor is the Republican Party of NH and the Democrats’ response was to release a one line statement from party head Ray Buckley to a Boston public radio station.

“We strongly condemn political violence and remain committed to treating everyone with dignity and respect.”

Lot of profiles in courage from the political hierarchy on both sides of the aisle.

Advertisement

Corcoran has a long history of racist, hateful, intolerant and violent spots and comments.

Last year when the state budget went down in the House at the end of the session, Corcoran took credit for its defeat posting on social media his “No” vote and saying it killed the budget, noting he had been fighting for five months to have the state defund the Department of Health and Human Services Refugee Resettlement Program.

“No more using tax dollars to import third worlders to NH, then giving them money and free housing,” he wrote.

Corcoran was the prime sponsor of House Bill 635, which would tax non-profit entities who settle illegal immigrants as for-profit entities and have the Revenue Administration award bounties to anyone who report non-profits settling illegal immigrants.

The refugee resettlement program is run in conjunction with International Institute of New England and Ascentria Care Alliance, both non-profits.

Advertisement

Later on X he wrote he would be switching his vote because  “I have been told that there will be MASSIVE leadership support to defund NH Office of Refugee Resettlement if I change my vote. I trust leadership.”
After the vote, Corcoran posted “we’ve got leadership saying they’re all going to cosponsor a bill to defund NH DHHS Refugee Resettlement in November.”

That bill, House Bill 1706, “Repealing the refugee resettlement program in the department of health and human services and prohibiting expenditure of state funds on refugee resettlement,” was sponsored by Corcoran and co-sponsors include Osborne and committee chairs Joe Alexander of Goffstown, Ross Berry of Weare, Kristin Noble of Bedford and James Spillaine of Deerfield.

It came out of committee with a 10-8 vote down party lines for passage and passed the House last week on a 170-164 vote and is now in the Senate.

At one time, government’s job was to help the most vulnerable among us, but that is not the case any more as you look at the bills that passed the House in just two days last week to undermine public education, education in general and local government, harm workers and transgender individuals, end the refugee resettlement program, and allow greater use of deadly force.

And there are death threats and forced deportation in the mix in a very troubling time in this country and particularly in New Hampshire where the vision of the elected leaders follow the tenets of the Free State/Libertarians who are controlling the agenda.

Advertisement

At an after conference party for the Free State’s Liberty Forum last weekend Kauffman announced a new club with the backing of a very wealthy individual is being formed to promote the ideas and tenets of the group and among those he announced were already on board were Osborne and Corcoran.

That is not reassuring.

Garry Rayno may be reached at garry.rayno@yahoo.com.

Distant Dome by veteran journalist Garry Rayno explores a broader perspective on the State House and state happenings for InDepthNH.org. Over his three-decade career, Rayno covered the NH State House for the New Hampshire Union Leader and Foster’s Daily Democrat. During his career, his coverage spanned the news spectrum, from local planning, school and select boards, to national issues such as electric industry deregulation and Presidential primaries. Rayno lives with his wife Carolyn in New London.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

After political debacle, 84 bills die in House without a vote

Published

on

After political debacle, 84 bills die in House without a vote


It’s a cherished State House maxim in New Hampshire: Every bill gets a public hearing, and every bill gets a vote on the House or Senate floor. But this week, a series of scheduling woes, time constraints, and partisan machinations upended that tradition.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending