Connect with us

Maine

Lawmakers, tribal leaders want to restore treaty language to printed copies of Maine Constitution

Published

on

Lawmakers, tribal leaders want to restore treaty language to printed copies of Maine Constitution


State lawmakers heard testimony Tuesday a couple of proposed constitutional modification that goals to reverse a virtually 150-year-old determination to cease printing a portion of Maine’s Structure associated to the Wabanaki nations.

55 years after Maine separated from Massachusetts in 1820, members of a particular fee charged with cleansing up the state’s structure voted to cease printing three sections of the doc. A type of sections, often known as Article X Part 5, required the state of Maine to proceed honoring the treaties between Massachusetts and tribes residing inside the boundaries of the brand new state.

There are scant historic information to elucidate the choice. However retired lawyer Judson Esty-Kendall, who researched the historical past of the lacking language for the Maine Indian Tribal-State Fee two years in the past, stated he believes it mirrored attitudes by the Maine Legislature, governor and courts towards tribal communities on the time.

“To them, the connection between the state of Maine and the Wabanaki folks was guardian-to-ward: the state was the guardian and natives their wards,” Esty-Kendall advised members of the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee. “And that could be a sorry state about what folks felt on the time. However I feel that was in all probability extra of what was occurring.”

Advertisement

Esty-Kendall was talking as a part of a listening to on a invoice from Home Speaker Rachel Talbot Ross to reverse that call. Talbot Ross’s invoice, L.D. 78, proposes to ask Maine voters whether or not they wish to amend the state’s structure to require that Article 10 Part 5 as soon as once more be included in any printed copies of the doc.

In spite of everything, Talbot Ross says that call in 1875 makes it clear that the sections stay “in full pressure” though they don’t seem to be included in print.

“My query is why are we making Maine residents bounce by hoops to seek out these phrases?” stated Talbot Ross, a Portland Democrat who tribal leaders regard as a robust ally within the Legislature. “They’re in impact. Article 10 Part 7 says so. Is not it disturbing that we lack transparency in our personal structure? My reply is sure.”

Penobscot Nation Ambassador Maulian Dana described the proposed constitutional modification as a “highly effective truth-seeking measure (for) reality that lives whether or not we acknowledge it or not.” Dana additionally put the proposal into the context of the continuing struggle for larger state recognition of the sovereignty of the Wabanaki tribes.

“We have now made some actually nice progress. So why not let these authentic treaty obligations be seen and printed?” Dana stated. “The truth that they have been hidden sends a message to the tribal nations that the agreements and the connection with the state and our persons are not vital or worthwhile. We in fact hope that that’s not the case and that we will honor this shared historical past collectively.”

Advertisement

After years of efforts, leaders of the the Passamaquoddy Tribe, the Penobscot Nation, the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians and the Mi’kmaq Nation earned the assist of the vast majority of lawmakers final yr for a sweeping overhaul of a 1980 authorized settlement between the state and the tribes. However the invoice did not earn ultimate passage within the face of a veto menace by Gov. Janet Mills, who has signaled that she is extra amenable to piecemeal revisions to the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act.

The proposed constitutional modification is one among a number of payments supported by tribal leaders pending within the present legislative session.

The 1875 fee additionally voted to chorus from printing to different parts of the state structure. However Esty-Kendall and different stated Tuesday that these sections handled the primary assembly of the Maine Legislature instantly following statehood in 1820 and are now not related or in impact. Article X Part 5 remains to be in impact, nevertheless, and states the next: “The brand new State shall, as quickly as the mandatory preparations will be made for that goal,

assume and carry out all of the duties and obligations of this Commonwealth, in the direction of the Indians inside stated District of Maine, whether or not the identical come up from treaties, or in any other case; and for this goal shall get hold of the assent of stated Indians, and their launch to this Commonwealth of claims and conditions arising underneath the treaty at current current between the stated Commonwealth and stated Indians . . .”

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, whose workplace maintains the state’s official information and re-prints the Maine Structure each decade, testified in assist of together with the tribal treaties language in future editions. And Legal professional Normal Aaron Frey stated his workplace additionally helps restoring the language to printed variations of the structure.

Advertisement

“Whereas there are totally different view of why Article X Part 5 was excluded from the printed variations of the Maine Structure, there doesn’t seem like any authorized or coverage causes for that language to stay exterior of the printed model,” Frey stated. “So to advertise transparency, and to make sure that all provisions of Maine’s Structure are accessible to the folks of Maine, Part 5 actually needs to be included in printed copies.”

Talbot Ross’s invoice should obtain assist from two-thirds of each chambers of the Legislature to be able to exit to voters for potential approval. The Judiciary Committee will maintain a piece session on the invoice on a future date.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Have you ever heard a bobcat cry? 

Published

on

Have you ever heard a bobcat cry? 


Bobcats are common in all parts of Maine except for the most northwestern corner where there normally is deep snow and colder temperatures, according to the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife.

They are versatile, which means they live in multiple types of habitats including woods, farms and close to urban and suburban areas, resulting in an increase of complaints about them. They eat rodents, making the cats important to Maine’s wildlife ecosystem, according to MDIFW.

Other foods are snowshoe hare, grouse, woodchucks, beavers, deer and turkeys. Predators looking for them include people and fishers. Predators such as eagles, great horned owls, coyotes, foxes and bears can cause injuries that may become fatal, according to the state.

They resemble the endangered lynx, but are smaller, have a longer tail and shorter ear tufts. Their feet are half the size of a lynx, making it harder for them to navigate deep snow.

Advertisement

Bobcats have several types of vocalizations, including a mating scream that sounds like a woman screaming, a cry that sounds like a baby crying, They also hiss, snarl, growl, yowl and meow like domestic cats.

You can hear one of those vocalizations in this incredible video shared by BDN contributor Colin Chase.

Bobcats usually mate from late February to late March and produce from one to five kittens in May. The babies stay with the mother for about 8 months but can stay up to a year old. The state has documented some interbreeding between bobcats and lynx and bobcat and domestic cats, according to MDIFW.

They like to hunt at dusk and dawn and seeing one in person is rare.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Man dies in propane tank explosion in northern Maine

Published

on

Man dies in propane tank explosion in northern Maine


A man died in an explosion at his home in Molunkus, Maine, Friday afternoon, fire officials said.

Kerry Holmes, 66, is believed to have died in a propane torch incident about 3 p.m. on Aroostock Road, the Maine Fire Marshal’s Office said.

The explosion took place after a propane torch Holmes was using to thaw a commercial truck’s frozen water tank went out, leading to the build-up of propane gas around the tank, officials said. It’s believed a second torch ignited the explosion.

First responders pronounced Holmes dead at the scene, officials said. The investigation was ongoing as of Friday night.

Advertisement

Molunkus is a small town about an hour north of Bangor.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: A clear solution to Maine’s youth hockey challenges

Published

on

Opinion: A clear solution to Maine’s youth hockey challenges


A recent article about the decline of youth hockey participation in Maine raised important concerns, but also overlooked key dynamics and solutions that could help the sport thrive (“Maine youth ice hockey is losing players. No one is sure how to stop it,” Jan. 10).

As the president of Midcoast Youth Hockey – Junior Polar Bears, I see a very different picture in our region. Our program experienced 146% growth last season and is approaching another 25% growth this season. These numbers paint a clear picture. The issue is not a lack of interest in hockey — it’s a lack of available ice time and modern facilities to meet growing demand.

Youth hockey programs across Maine are thriving when they have the resources and ice time to do so. The challenge isn’t that kids aren’t interested in hockey or that families can’t afford the sport — it’s that many families are forced to make difficult decisions because ice time is scarce and facilities are outdated.

In our region, competition for ice time is fierce. Every single arena is operating at or near capacity, juggling youth hockey, high school teams, clinics, camps and college programs. When rinks close or fail to modernize, the ripple effect forces players and families to drive 30 to 60 minutes — often in the early morning or late at night — to find practice and game slots. This is not sustainable. As I always say, “The only thing that could negatively impact demand for ice time is a lack of ice time.”

Advertisement

The article’s focus on high school hockey teams consolidating misses a larger reality. Many players are shifting to club hockey because it offers more ice time, better coaching and higher levels of competition. This is not about cost. Families are investing more in hockey because it brings their kids joy and growth opportunities. What’s needed is a solution to make hockey accessible and sustainable for all levels of play — not just those who can afford to travel to other regions.

The closing of several rinks over the past decade, while concerning, doesn’t signal a lack of interest in hockey. It highlights the need for better-designed facilities that can meet demand and operate sustainably. Single-sheet rinks are no longer viable — they lack the capacity to host tournaments or generate the revenue needed for long-term operations.

A dual-surface facility, strategically located in Brunswick, would be a game-changer for the Midcoast region. It would not only meet the growing demand for ice time but also provide an economic boost to the community. Dual-surface facilities have the capacity to host regional tournaments, clinics and recreational leagues, generating $1.4 million to $2.2 million annually in economic activity. This model has been proven successful in other parts of the country, where public-private partnerships have enabled towns to build and operate financially viable arenas.

A new dual-surface facility in Brunswick wouldn’t just serve youth hockey. It would also support middle and high school teams, adult recreation leagues, figure skating and adaptive skating programs. Programs like adaptive skating, especially for veterans with disabilities, honor Brunswick’s military heritage while making skating more inclusive.

This type of investment solves two problems at once. It ensures local players have access to sufficient ice time, reducing the need for long drives, and it helps prevent the consolidation of high school teams by supporting feeder programs. The numbers don’t lie — when kids have the chance to play, participation grows.

Advertisement

We need to stop thinking about hockey as a sport in decline and start addressing the real barriers to growth: limited ice time and outdated facilities. Rather than pulling back on investment in rinks, we need to move forward with smarter, community-driven solutions. A dual-surface arena in Brunswick is one such solution, and it’s time for government and business leaders to work together to make it happen.

The article noted a lack of a “plan to build hockey back up.” Here’s the plan: Build the infrastructure, and the players will come. Hockey isn’t fading — it’s waiting for the ice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending