TEL AVIV, Israel — What will it take for Israel to declare mission accomplished in Gaza and end the war?
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has promised Israeli citizens that the military offensive in Gaza will press on until reaching a “definitive victory over Hamas” following its deadly Oct. 7 attack that killed more than 1,200 people in southern Israel.
But skepticism is growing in Israel about the kind of military victory that can really be achieved.
Almost 100 days of Israel’s air-and-ground offensive have destroyed much of the Gaza Strip and killed more than 23,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s health ministry. The Israeli military says its troops have killed and arrested thousands of militants, rounded up weapons and destroyed Hamas rocket launchers and tunnels.But the Palestinian militant group is still killing Israeli ground troops, firing rockets at Israel and holding more than 130 hostages captured on Oct. 7.
Advertisement
“There is no way this will end when Israel can say we are victorious,” says Eyal Hulata, who was Israel’s national security adviser from 2021-2023. “Israel lost this war [on] the 7th of October. The only question now is if we are able to remove from Hamas the ability to do this again. And we might succeed, and we might not.”
/ Tamir Kalifa for NPR
/
Tamir Kalifa for NPR
Advertisement
A man touches a wall with images of people who were kidnapped on Oct. 7, some of whom have been released from captivity, at a rally calling for the release of the remaining hostages in Tel Aviv, Israel, on Dec. 2.
“A ladder to climb down”
The most prominent group of Israelis pushing to change Israel’s war strategy is made up of citizens whose relatives were taken hostage by militants.
Israel’s government says the military campaign will pressure Hamas to eventually free more than 130 remaining hostages in Gaza. Families of hostages are among the voices from Israel’s center-left calling to put combat on hold and strike an immediate deal with Hamas to free the hostages. A similar deal in late November freed some Israeli hostages and Palestinian detainees.
In recent weeks, the Israeli families and their supporters have blocked the entrance to Israel’s military headquarters in downtown Tel Aviv for several minutes once every hour, holding signs while one holds up a megaphone and reads out the names of hostages still held in Gaza.
One of the relatives protesting is Udi Goren, whose cousin, Tal Chaimi, was killed in the Oct. 7 attack; Chaimi’s body is being held in Gaza.
“The slogan of destroying Hamas, it’s an empty slogan,” Goren told NPR. He cited Hamas’ extensive network of tunnels and ranks of fighters still remaining.
Advertisement
“We’re talking about a war that’s now going on in an urban area that has about 2 million refugees and hostages,” he said. “The [Israeli military] is fighting with his hand tied behind its back. It’s very clear that we need to find a ladder to climb down.”
Redefining victory
Prominent figures in Israel’s security establishment are also searching for ways to redefine victory.
The former spymaster of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, Yossi Cohen, told Israeli Army Radio that a victory over Hamas would be killing or capturing the group’s leaders. A senior Hamas leader in Lebanon was killed in a blast this month attributed to Israel, but Israel’s most wanted man, Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’ top leader in Gaza, is still at large.
A former head of Palestinian affairs in Israeli military intelligence, Michael Milshtein, says Israel’s campaign in Gaza can achieve “prominent results” if it deters regional enemies.
That would include Hezbollah, the powerful Iranian-backed militia next door to Israel in Lebanon, as well as other militant groups around the Middle East, he says.
Advertisement
“If, for example, the final results of this war will be occupation of Gaza — huge, broad destruction of this place, killing thousands of Hamas members, and, of course, killing the head of the snake — it will have a very dramatic impact on enemies like Hezbollah, like the Iranians, like Syria, that, no, you cannot promote such brutal, violent moves against Israel without any payment.”
How long Israel can maintain high-intensity combat
Week by week, Israel announces more Hamas tunnels destroyed and more Hamas fighters killed. But as a high number of Israeli soldiers killed and wounded continues to rise, according to a daily Israeli military tally, Hamas is still putting up a fight, and the country faces increasing international pressure to wind down its offensive.
As the United States has called for, Israel is slowly transitioning to lower-intensity fighting in northern Gaza, withdrawing thousands of reservists. But fighting is escalating with Lebanese militants on Israel’s northern border.
“I’ll be surprised if Israel can maintain this intensity for many more months ahead,” said Hulata, the former Israeli national security adviser.
Advertisement
/ Tamir Kalifa for NPR
/
Tamir Kalifa for NPR
The casket bearing the body of Israeli Sgt. Amit Hod Ziv, 19, who was killed in a Hezbollah rocket attack near the border with Lebanon in northern Israel, is carried at his funeral in Rosh Haayin, Israel, on Dec. 24.
In an op-ed Tuesday, leading Israeli columnist Nahum Barnea called on Israel to adjust its objective of dismantling Hamas in Gaza.
“In the last three weeks the war has not changed reality. It has cost the lives of soldiers, has increased the risk of a humanitarian disaster that Israel will be responsible for, has hurt Israel in the world and hasn’t brought us any closer to a victory which does not exist,” Barnea wrote in Yediot Ahronot newspaper.
Advertisement
On the other end of the political spectrum, voices on Israel’s right say the country’s leaders aren’t willing to hammer Gaza hard enough.
“There will only be 50% victory in Gaza,” saysTal Usach, 19, waiting for a bus outside Israeli military headquarters. He thinks complete victory would require Israel to permanently rule Gaza and ensure the territory’s entire Palestinian population is relocated to neighboring countries.
Several right-wing and far-right ministers in Netanyahu’s government have called for the resettlement of Palestinians outside Gaza,a position that has drawn strong international rebuke and that is opposed by the U.S., Israel’s closest ally.
“Palestinian civilians must be able to return home as soon as conditions allow. They must not be pressed to leave Gaza,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Tuesday in a news conference after meeting Israeli leaders in Tel Aviv. “The prime minister reaffirmed to me today that this is not the policy of Israel’s government.”
Still, Netanyahu faces criticism from politicians in his own governing coalition who accuse Israel’s military of being too soft on the Palestinians.
Advertisement
Netanyahu’s political calculations for continuing the war
Domestic politics may play a role in how Netanyahu wages the war in Gaza.
Israel’s military has appointed a team to investigate the security failures that resulted in the Oct. 7 Hamas attack, and Netanyahu is expected to face questions about his own responsibility. Netanyahu’s corruption trial will convene at a quicker pace beginning this month, and polls show his government has lost between a third and a fourth of its public support during the war.
“If it was up to Netanyahu, this would continue for quite some time,” says Reuven Hazan, who teaches politics at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. “For Netanyahu to end the war in Gaza, even with a victory, means he has to start dealing with the political issues at home and the legal issues, which he does not want to.”
Israel’s Supreme Court this month struck down Netanyahu’s government’s signature legislation that tried to curtail the court’s own powers, a judicial overhaul that had fueled massive protests in the months leading up to the war. The court has also pushed back on the government’s attempts to make it harder to remove Netanyahu from office amid his ongoing corruption trial.
“If the war drags on, and Netanyahu’s onslaught on the judicial branch returns, then you will see Israelis back in the streets, but this time, it won’t be half the population,” Hazan says. “It’ll be significantly more than half the population, and the government cannot survive that for too long.”
Advertisement
Eve Guterman contributed to this story from Tel Aviv.
Copyright 2024 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.
A sign taped to a window at the Palace Diner in Biddeford shares the diner’s hours and reminds customers it accepts cash only. The restaurant was open 24/7 during the city’s heyday as a mill town but now only opens for breakfast and lunch. (Teddy Almond/Staff Writer)
For decades, Dysart’s Restaurant and Truck Stop was the kind of spot where night didn’t really end.
Truckers came off long-haul drives looking for coffee and a hot meal. Hospital workers stopped in after overnight shifts. When the bars closed, late-night crowds spilled through the doors, still awake and hungry. At any hour, someone could sit down just outside Bangor and be served a hot meal.
But in 2019, Dysart’s ended its around-the-clock restaurant service, marking what felt like the end of an era for Maine’s late-night dining scene.
Advertisement
Once, a handful of diners and roadside restaurants across the state stayed open through the night, serving the workers, travelers and night owls who kept Maine moving after dark. Today, those options have all but disappeared.
What remains is mostly convenience-store food and a handful of 24/7 Burger King locations.
Restaurant industry veterans and experts say a host of combining factors have made 24/7 restaurants harder to sustain, including Maine’s demographics and changes to the way people work.
Norman O’Reilly, dean of the University of New England’s College of Business, says Maine’s status as the nation’s oldest state is likely a key factor.
“Most of those people are retired, or semi-retired, or doing consulting work,” he said. “They’re not out looking for a Becky’s late-night coffee and meals, right?”
Advertisement
O’Reilly also said the seasonal, tourist-centric nature of Maine’s economy creates inconsistency, making it potentially harder for businesses to maintain 24/7 service year-round.
Maine’s not alone in having fewer all-night options: A Yelp survey found that 24/7 restaurants declined nationwide by 11% from 2020 to 2025. Even New York City, “the City that Never Sleeps,” has seen a decrease; the New York Times attributed that to rising costs and changing sleep schedules.
Until 2019, Dysart’s Restaurant in Hermon was one of the last 24/7 restaurants that’s not a major chain in Maine. (Teddy Almond/Staff Writer)
THE LAST BASTION
Dysart’s, founded in 1967 in Hermon, was one of the last true 24/7 restaurants in the state.
“Either in 2016 or 2017, we started noticing a significant difference,” said Carol Brooks, a manager with more than 20 years of experience at the restaurant.
Advertisement
Brooks attributes the decline in late-night diners to two trends: changes in the trucking industry and a downturn in local nightlife.
“When they started making the truck drivers stop for a full eight hours, they (would just) come in and sleep,” she said. “They don’t eat anymore at night because they don’t have to keep on the road.”
O’Reilly also noted the advent of remote work in recent years has meant fewer people stopping for a meal on their way home.
Brooks reminisced about how Dysart’s used to often see an influx of late-night partiers after the bars closed — everyone from the patrons of the local strip club, Diamonds, to hospital shift workers coming off duty.
But soon, it got to the point where Dysart’s was spending more money staying open at all night than it was they were making. By then, the restaurant only had one cook and one server for the overnight shift.
Advertisement
O’Reilly noted that there’s been a national decline in nightlife, with fewer Americans going out to bars and restaurants late at night, making around-the-clock dining less profitable for businesses.
Although Dysart’s restaurant is no longer 24/7, its adjacent truck stop is. It’s stocked with premade hot meals like pot pies and hot dogs. While nothing compared to the menu once offered all night, sales of the premade meals are steady, Brooks says, with a lot of late-night construction workers stopping by to grab a bite.
WHAT ABOUT THE OTHERS?
It’s not clear exactly how many 24/7 joints once operated in Maine, but many Mainers can recall at least one they frequented in the past.
Biddeford’s popular Palace Diner used to serve patrons 24/7 in the 1960s, said co-owner Chad Conley. Although now the diner closes at 2 p.m. each day, back when Biddeford was a bustling mill town, Palace Diner served workers as they got off shifts throughout the night.
Advertisement
In Maine’s industrial heyday, the 15-seater railcar diner was a bustling center of activity.
“The shifts were happening around the clock, and people needed to stop in and have a quick meal,” Conley said. “It just made sense for the business to be open 24 hours a day when there was a constant stream of workers coming in and out of the mills.”
Conley is the sixth owner of the restaurant since it opened in 1927. To celebrate five years of their ownership, he and his business partner Greg Mitchell kept the restaurant open 24 hours for a single day in 2019.
One of the cooks cleans up after closing at the Palace Diner in Biddeford in June. (Teddy Almond/Staff Writer)
“People really showed up,” Conley said. “I remember this one moment that was really special: At 3 in the morning, like three or four cops came in and (they said), ‘This is awesome that you guys are doing this, because we work at night, and we can’t come to your restaurant unless you’re open at 3 in the morning.”
Advertisement
While Conley wishes he could do that every night, he understands that it’s not realistic.
“Maybe if we do it once every five years, we can fill the seats in the middle of the night, because people are willing to stay up for the novelty of it,” he said.
Dan Beck, the third-generation owner of Moody’s Diner in Waldoboro, shared a similar experience. Late-night business was good when truckers used U.S. Route 1, but as Interstate 95 became the preferred route, the nighttime customer base dwindled. Eventually, in March 2000, Moody’s decided to end 24/7 service.
“I just think times change,” Beck said. “The main trucking route changed, the way goods are transported changes, so, the need for something like that wasn’t as great. And then you add the advent of 24-hour convenience stores where people can get a cup of coffee or a snack.”
Beck also says the COVID-19 pandemic played a role in a further reduction of late-night hours, which he said was typical of many restaurants along the Midcoast.
Advertisement
LAST OPTIONS STANDING
So what are we left with? Not much. There are four 24/7 Burger Kings, all of them in southern Maine. Portland’s only Denny’s — the diner chain synonymous with late-night meals — closed its doors in 2022.
The 24/7 Burger King location at 375 Gorham Road in South Portland, one of four round-the-clock locations the burger chain has in Maine. (Teddy Almond/Staff Writer)
Burger King’s South Portland location actually transitioned to 24/7 after the start of the pandemic, in 2021. The store’s general manager, Tracy Fairbrother, said rising sales since 2015 prompted the restaurant to keep extending its hours. She said she was inspired by the burger chain’s Forest Avenue location, which was already open around the clock.
“Just seeing them continue to grow and grow and grow made us realize, ‘Why don’t we try and steal from that pool a little bit?’” she said.
Fairbrother says lots of shift workers frequent the restaurant late at night. For those whose days are ending during the morning, she’s found that many don’t want breakfast food and would rather get a cheeseburger.
Advertisement
She also believes being located in the Portland area plays a role in the move’s success, since more people means more potential customers.
Asked how the company felt about its apparent status as the last 24/7 restaurant standing in Maine, a Burger King corporate spokesperson responded: “We know that access to delicious meals for a great value is important to many Guests, and we’re glad to be able to provide a reliable option for those looking to enjoy Burger King whenever it’s most convenient for them.”
The all-night diner booth may be harder to find, but the lights are still on somewhere — even if these days, they’re glowing above a Burger King drive-thru.
A view into the kitchen at Palace Diner in Biddeford. (Teddy Almond/Staff Writer)
I am amazed by the beauty and rich history of Maine. There is so much to be shared with all the people from away. The citizens of our special state work hard and know how to play hard in all the beautiful seasons: snow sports, camping, hiking, our immense wilderness, all of this must be shared with the world.
Think of Maine’s abundant natural resources, from blueberries, apples, potatoes, lobsters and wood products to the great shipbuilding legacy. Every Mainer, regardless of party affiliation, can agree on the things that set our state apart from others.
That’s why I was so dismayed that Maine was one of a few other states opting out of the Great American Fair, the event celebrating our nation’s 250th anniversary on the National Mall.
As the only true political peers of Gov. Janet Mills, Sens. Collins and King and Reps. Pingree and Golden need to let Mills know that this was not a good thing to do to our state, our industries and our people.
Advertisement
This arbitrary decision was shameful. There are times in life when we have to rise above the fray, take the high and right road and not let negative emotions drive our actions. This was a doable project if delegated to groups with interests on the line to plan, organize and secure funds for exhibition costs. What a missed opportunity for us here in Maine.