Connect with us

Boston, MA

Four Questions Boston needs to answer in order to win against the Maple Leafs

Published

on

Four Questions Boston needs to answer in order to win against the Maple Leafs


Oh Toronto. Our old friend. Our erstwhile foe.

How I love to hate you. How I hate to see you and your absolutely apoplectic fanbase that cannot fathom hockey being something their team being willing participants in. How I enjoy watching you fail and refuse to learn the lessons over and over and over.

So I guess I enjoy watching the Bruins play them. Weird how that works.

The Bruins and the Leafs matchup once again to potentially end each other’s season for the 4th time over the past two decades, and the B’s have triumphed every time so far. It’s been a war, however; Game 7 seems inevitable at this point; no matter how dominantly either side wins Game 1. Further, in spite of the records, the Bruins are about as mortal as any team who threatened to win the division this year can be, and the Leafs decided they were going to play some of their best hockey in the 2nd half of the year. So what do they have to do to get past these Blue and White Bloviators? How can they break their wills once again?

Advertisement

Simple; they just have to answer some questions about themselves, and their opponent.

Is Quality over Quantity going to work again?

I think I’ve made it abundantly clear over our check-ins that the Boston Bruins are, to put it lightly, picking their spots. That said, it seems like this year is more of an exaggeration than years past in that regard; the loss of their centers etc. etc. you know this bit by now. They don’t shoot a lot but they make those shots count. This is backed up by the math. They’re down in the bottom half of the league in shots attempts taken and unblocked shot attempts taken per 60 and are middle to slightly above average of the pack in quality. That isn’t news. It also shouldn’t shock you to learn that the Leafs have been better at that than Boston for most of the year.

If there’s any solace you can take from the regular season matchup between these two teams, it’s that Boston seems to find a way to hard counter the Leafs. Sure, the Leafs since January have been numerically a bit better than the Bruins (by the counts, anyway), but that was always kind of…true no matter what series they were in? 2018 was probably your year to beat them and then the Bruins just kinda…pulled it out there, Toronto. You sure on paper you’re actually all that and a bag of all-dressed?

This time, while the B’s are unquestionably going to be fighting uphill no matter what when it comes to offense, they’re facing a large but ultimately pretty weak defense that their forward corps can take advantage of if they’re willing to attack the middle of the ice and do what they did an awful lot of during the regular season; force Woll/Samsonov to make saves in tight.

Can you get the power play working again?

The Bruins power play has been kind of grim for a little over a month now. If there’s any opponent that could create some momentum towards fixing that; it’s the Leafs.

Advertisement

Toronto’s PK has been gruesome, no matter who’s in the lineup, all season long. As the playoffs sort of morphs you into your final form; the apotheosis of everything your game is, was, and ever will be, it means that a power play that isn’t awful could become a serious X-factor towards beating the Leafs. They do need to get there, though. And that means forcing that particular PK to commit to bad decisions early and often. Puck movement needs to get these guys panicking and quickly. It needs to force space to open up, and decisions made from the point cannot end up going the other way, because it’s likely a golden opportunity for the other team if they manage to split the defense.

Further, the Boston Bruins are in a unique position to get multiple penalties off of these guys, because the Toronto Maple Leafs have, at least in their minds of their fans and probably more worryingly the man in charge of the team, been losing to the same team for the past five years uninterrupted. It is very likely the Boston Bruins can suck these guys into making extremely stupid decisions just by existing because they both dislike them that badly and have an idea of what they are that may not necessarily reflect reality. The Bruins’ reputation for extracurricular hockey precedes them, and the Leafs think they are prepared.

The Bruins need to show them that it’s not only untrue, it was actively a bad idea to think that was true in the first place.

Can you shut down Matthews and Marner again?

I need to make it clear the engine that keeps the Toronto Maple Leafs moving is Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner. Whatever else I say about these players after this point is mostly fan-brain taking over. They are immensely talented hockey players that are by and large worth the money.

The issue over their money however, extends to a reality that the Leafs have had to face time and time again; the Boston Bruins seem to find a way to make their most useful players seemingly worthless when it becomes Best of 7 with the season on the line. While some of it may in fact be because they aren’t built for this (and at least in Marner’s case, I think that’s true.), the reality is that the coaching staff, whether it’s under Bruce Cassidy or Jim Montgomery, have found ways to mitigate their impact. Brandon Carlo has often been stapled to Auston Matthews, as has Hampus Lindholm.

Advertisement

It should work, we know that for certain, but with transition, specifically zone exits, being such a big issue for the Bruins this season it behooves them to figure out a way to make a very flawed defense into a bear trap for the two most dangerous players in blue and white. Charlie McAvoy has actually had a very rough time with Matthews in particular, and so he may be better served locking down the Tavares line so that Lindholm and Carlo can be better put to work stymying the Leafs attack where it often starts.

No but really, what are you going to do with the Goaltending

Boston’s been a bit coy about how they’re gonna deploy the goalies.

Jim Montgomery and Don Sweeney have insinuated they might actually go with platooning the goaltenders…or making a firm decision and not wavering from it.

I don’t envy either one of them right now.

They’re in a weird place with it; waiting way too long to replace your goalie when they were very obviously injured sank last year’s playoff run (Among a litany of all-timer gruesome performances. Hi Derek and Connor Clifton in Game 6.), and so doing the thing that everyone and their mother wants to see, which seems to be “Platoon the Goalies because that worked all season”, is very much on the table. If both guys are putting up the kind of .930 SV% expected of both of them, then that’s totally understandable to have such complete faith in your goaltenders.

Advertisement

The only downside is…is if it doesn’t work. If the series is artificially inflated by one player obviously playing better than the other and making him wait to come in to save his buddy. As of the last few games, the answer if you looked at their results, you’d probably want to put that particular experiment on ice for a series or two because Ullmark is clearly playing better than Swayman by a significant amount. The answer should be Linus Ullmark. He’s playing .920+ SV% games to Swayman’s .900 SV%, at least over the past five games. Ullmark played nearly the entire season against the Leafs and they beat them convincingly over the long term, so why shouldn’t it be him? He’s clearly the answer!

At least until he wasn’t.

So…what do you do?

Maybe you don’t wait to find out.

We’ll have to see how Coach Monty handles this tonight.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Boston, MA

Trendspotting: Biglaw's Boston Office Bonanza – Above the Law

Published

on

Trendspotting: Biglaw's Boston Office Bonanza – Above the Law


(Photo by Paul Marotta/Getty Images)

Biglaw firms must be really eager to “pahk the car in Hahvahd Yahd,” because there’s currently a rush on opening new offices in Boston. In a little more than a week, three Am Law 100 firms have announced their plans for new Boston locations, and one firm even initiated a massive group lateral move to get a Boston legal team in place. We’re got more than a feeling that this is a trend in the making.

Simpson Thacher will open its Boston office “later this year,” and Kenneth Burdon, a registered funds partner from Skadden, will help the firm throw open its doors. Nathan Somogie, an STB partner in New York, will also head to Massachusetts to assist. As noted by the American Lawyer, the firm plans to advise clients in asset management and other financial institutions, health care, biotechnology, life sciences, and technology on their transactional, disputes, regulatory, and enforcement needs.

Paul Hastings is also planning to open up shop in Beantown through the hiring of Sidley Austin private equity co-leader, Alexander Temel. Joining him will be Sidley private equity partner William Schwab. “[W]e believe Boston provides fertile ground in private equity, life sciences, funds formation, litigation, capital markets, and other areas that are synergistic across many of our strengths,” Paul Hastings chair Frank Lopez said of the firm’s expansion.

Advertisement

Last, but certainly not least, Blank Rome recently picked off a 25-lawyer team of corporate and cannabis lawyers from Burns & Levinson to get its footprint in Boston, making it the firm’s 16th office. “We have considered adding a cannabis industry team for a number of years,” said Grant Palmer, Blank Rome’s chair and managing partner. “We have clients who have invested in the cannabis industry or provide services in the cannabis space… We’ve been looking at Boston for some time because we have a number of clients there.”

Back in 2023, three Biglaw firms — Covington & Burling, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, and Akin Gump — all opened offices in Boston. Now, three more Biglaw firms will be joining them. Who will be next? If you’ve got any information on which firms will be the next in the rush to become Massholes, please let us know.

Simpson Thacher Plans Boston Office, Hires Skadden Funds Partner [American Lawyer]
Paul Hastings Lands Co-Leader of Sidley’s PE Practice in 2-Partner Move [American Lawyer]
Blank Rome Recruits 25 Burns & Levinson Lawyers to Launch Boston Office [American Lawyer]


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on X/Twitter and Threads or connect with her on LinkedIn.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Downtown Crossing was once the busiest T station. Now there's a new No. 1.

Published

on

Downtown Crossing was once the busiest T station. Now there's a new No. 1.


Downtown Crossing’s traffic was down 56% last year compared to five years earlier, according to a Boston Business Journal analysis of T data. For the past couple of years, the honor of the busiest station went to another Red Line stop a half-mile away.



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

No charges in Massachusetts after 4 newborns found frozen, wrapped in tin foil inside Boston apartment: DA

Published

on

No charges in Massachusetts after 4 newborns found frozen, wrapped in tin foil inside Boston apartment: DA


Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

Please enter a valid email address.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Having trouble? Click here.

In a shocking move, the Suffolk District Attorney in Massachusetts announced on Tuesday that there will be no criminal charges filed in connection to the investigation involving the disturbing discovery of four newborn babies found wrapped in tin foil inside a freezer in the home of a Boston woman who “concealed her pregnancies.”

Advertisement

“This investigation, which is one of the most complex, unusual and perplexing that this office has ever encountered, is now complete. While we have some answers, there are many elements of this case that will likely never be answered,” DA Kevin Hayden said in a press release.

On the afternoon of Nov. 17, 2022, Boston police responded to a home for a 911 call about a possible baby located inside a freezer. The call was later updated to involve multiple babies, according to officials. The caller explained that he and his wife made the grisly discovery while cleaning out his sister’s South Boston apartment.

Investigators determined that the apartment was owned and occupied by 69-year-old Alexis Aldamir. 

DEAD BABY DISCOVERED AT UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA IN FLORIDA

Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden on Tuesday released the final investigative report regarding four babies found in a freezer in an apartment in South Boston in November 2022, and announced that the investigation will result in no charges being filed.   (Boston 25 News)

Advertisement

In all, four babies were discovered that day. Investigators said all four were frozen solid in shoe boxes wrapped in foil. Two were male and two were female, and DNA tests determined that they were all siblings. They were also believed to be between 37 and 40 weeks.

The medical examiner reported that there was no scientific method to determine how long the babies had been frozen. The autopsy found no signs of internal or external trauma and no evidence of obvious injuries. The report also noted that there were no signs of food, or milk, or formula inside the babies’ stomachs.

The medical examiner also found the cause of death for all the babies to be “undetermined” and that it could not definitively determine whether the babies had been born alive.

Investigators were able to locate Aldamir in a residential healthcare facility, and eventually gained a court order to obtain a DNA sample. The results confirmed she was the mother of the four babies.

GEORGIA BEAUTY QUEEN ACCUSED OF MURDER IN DEATH OF BOYFRIEND’S TODDLER SON

Advertisement
Boston police car

The grisly discovery was made while cleaning out a woman’s South Boston apartment. (Stuart Cahill/Boston Herald)

Co-workers of Aldamir, who was employed by an accounting firm in Boston from March 1980 to October 2021, described her as a “heavy-set woman who had a penchant for wearing loose-fitting clothing regardless of the season.” They also told investigators that they had no idea she was pregnant. 

Additional DNA testing revealed that the father of all four babies had died in 2011 and that Aldamir had given birth to one baby girl in April 1982.

Investigators also found two parental rights surrender forms, one signed by Aldamir and the other signed by the individual determined to be the father of the four frozen babies.

Through their investigation, officials determined that Aldamir had five children with the same man and that they gave one of their children up for adoption. The other four were found dead in Aldamir’s apartment in November 2022.

Investigators stated that they ran into several challenges when working to determine if any crimes could be proved. 

Advertisement

First, to charge any homicide, investigators said there must be evidence that the victims were alive. There must also be a cause of death determined by the medical examiner.

KIDNAPPED BABY HALO BRANTON FOUND AT NEW YORK ELECTRIC PLANT DIES AT HOSPITAL; NO ARRESTS ANNOUNCED

Boston police officers

When investigators questioned Alexis Aldamir about what they found, she “appeared confused and demonstrated a lack of understanding about where she was and who she was speaking to.” (Jonathan Wiggs/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

In this case, investigators cannot prove that the babies were ever alive, and they have no cause or manner of death.

Second, investigators said the autopsy found no signs of internal or external trauma to the babies and no evidence of obvious injuries.

Third, since the father is now deceased, investigators said he cannot not be charged with any crimes.

Advertisement

Lastly, investigators stated that Aldamir’s ability to stand trial was also in question. 

When Aldamir was later questioned about the babies found in her apartment, she “appeared confused and demonstrated a lack of understanding about where she was and who she was speaking to,” according to investigators.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“A prosecutor’s office cannot ethically move forward with a case that, in good faith, it believes it cannot bring to trial. Here, based on the evidence obtained throughout the investigation, including the many unanswered questions about the cause of death of the four babies, prosecutors have made the determination that they will not be able to bring this case to trial. Therefore, this investigation will not result in criminal charges,” Hayden concluded. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending