Connect with us

News

US elections: Trump declines another presidential debate with Harris, VP says ‘We owe it to the voters’ – Times of India

Published

on

US elections: Trump declines another presidential debate with Harris, VP says ‘We owe it to the voters’ – Times of India
Former President Donald Trump announced on Thursday that he would not participate in another debate with Vice President Kamala Harris as the two opponents focus on battleground states ahead of a tightly contested US presidential election. Harris, on the other hand, called for a second debate against Trump, saying “we owe it to the voters.”
Following their heated televised debate earlier this week, Trump took to social media to declare himself the winner, dismissing Harris’ call for another face-off.He said: “THERE WILL BE NO THIRD DEBATE!”, referring to the recent face-off with Harris and a previous debate with Joe Biden in June, which had pushed Biden out of the race.
“When a prize fighter loses a fight, the first words out of his mouth are ‘I want a rematch’,” Trump wrote.

Trump boasted about his performance, stating, “Polls clearly show that I won the Debate against Comrade Kamala Harris,” despite snap polls suggesting Harris performed better in front of an audience of over 67 million viewers.

In response, Harris reiterated her commitment to transparency. “This election and what is at stake could not be more important,” she told the Charlotte crowd, stressing that voters need another chance to compare her vision of the future with Trump’s policies.
She urged for another debate during a rally in North Carolina saying voters “deserve another debate” to see the candidates clearly.
“Two nights ago, Donald Trump and I had our first debate, and I believe we owe it to the voters to have another,” she said, emphasizing the importance of the upcoming election.

The two candidates faced off in a heated debate in Philadelphia earlier this week, hosted by ABC News. While both sides claimed victory, polling suggests Harris may have gained the upper hand. A Reuters/Ipsos poll taken after the debate shows Harris leading Trump 47% to 42% among registered voters—a five-point margin that slightly increased from her previous four-point lead in August.
However, the polls don’t entirely back up Trump’s claims. According to the Reuters poll, 53% of voters thought Harris won the debate, compared to just 24% who believed Trump performed better. A CNN flash poll showed similar results, with 60% of respondents favoring Harris’ performance.
The post-debate polls, along with Harris’ increased national support, reflect her growing momentum. In addition to the Reuters poll, a CNN poll found that about 52% of voters felt Trump faltered during the debate, leading to a stronger showing for Harris.
While Harris continues to push for a second debate, it remains uncertain if Trump will reconsider. The vice presidential debate between GOP Senator JD Vance and Democratic Governor Tim Walz is still on the calendar for October 1, but for now, the Harris-Trump debate saga seems paused.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Trump Defends Debate Performance and Calls for Ending Tax on Overtime

Published

on

Trump Defends Debate Performance and Calls for Ending Tax on Overtime

Although it had been billed as an event focused on housing and the economy, former President Donald J. Trump spent much of a meandering speech on Thursday in Tucson, Ariz., venting his grievances over his debate against Vice President Kamala Harris.

But when he eventually did turn to the section on economic issues, Mr. Trump made a new proposal as he sought to win the votes of working- and middle-class Americans: He called for eliminating taxes on overtime pay.

“The people who work overtime are among the hardest-working citizens in our country, and for too long, no one in Washington has been looking out for them,” Mr. Trump said. “Those are the people that really work. They’re police officers, nurses, factory workers, construction workers, truck drivers and machine operators.”

Mr. Trump’s speech was his first campaign event since a debate performance on Tuesday night that some of his allies have admitted fell short. Mr. Trump insisted to around 2,000 supporters in Tucson that it was a “monumental victory” for him that rendered the need for a subsequent debate unnecessary.

“Because we’ve done two debates and because they were successful, there will be no third debate,” Mr. Trump said, repeating a declaration he made earlier on his social media platform, Truth Social.

Advertisement

Even as he maintained that he had triumphed, Mr. Trump spent significant time during his speech bashing the debate’s host, ABC News, and its moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis.

Calling Ms. Davis “nasty” and mocking Mr. Muir’s hair, Mr. Trump criticized the moderators for fact-checking him in real time while not doing so for Ms. Harris. He attacked his opponent as having said little of substance and having smiled too often.

And at one point, Mr. Trump responded to negative assessments of his debate performance. “People said that I was angry at the debate,” he said, explaining that he “was angry” over immigration.

Mr. Trump has an inclination to put immigration at the center of most issues, and during the Tucson event, he blamed the surge of migrant crossings under President Biden for the country’s complex housing affordability crisis. He repeated his pledges to bar illegal immigrants from obtaining mortgages, to reduce housing costs by slashing regulation and to lower interest rates, something he would have no direct control over as president.

Making a play to win over suburban voters, Mr. Trump also vowed to protect single-family zoning in the suburbs and prevent “apartment complexes and low-income housing” in residential suburban areas. Some housing economics experts believe that restrictive zoning drives up prices because it limits construction.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump’s new campaign pledge to exempt overtime pay from taxes is one of several broad tax cuts he has promised as he tries to win over key constituencies in battleground states.

Earlier this year, he promised to eliminate taxes on tips for hospitality workers and on Social Security benefits, which on Thursday he framed as a boon for older voters. Ms. Harris has also called for eliminating taxes on tips.

Mr. Trump’s pledges have not been accompanied by formal policy proposals, and at his rallies he has not addressed the reduction in federal revenue that his plans would create. Independent policy experts have previously said that his plans would add trillions to the national debt in the next decade.

“One of our economists said, ‘I think that’s actually going to bring money into our economy,’” Mr. Trump said on Thursday of his overtime proposal, without offering more details.

Joseph Costello, a Harris campaign spokesman, accused Mr. Trump of trying to mislead voters and obscure a record of favoring billionaires and big corporations. “He is desperate and scrambling and saying whatever it takes to try to trick people into voting for him,” Mr. Costello said in a statement.

Advertisement

Much of Mr. Trump’s speech darted between a set of familiar complaints and criticisms. Though border apprehensions have dropped nationwide this year, Mr. Trump continued to stoke fear around immigration, portraying the country, as he has before, as being under attack by immigrants that he described as an invading force of criminals.

“We’re being conquered, and we are being occupied by a foreign element,” he said in Tucson.

Given Arizona’s being a border state, immigration ranks as a top concern for voters there, and Mr. Trump has tried to make the issue central to his campaign. He highlighted the influx of Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, blaming them for a wave of crime that officials have denied is taking place. He also broadly and falsely characterized them as “illegal,” though they are in the country legally with authorization to work.

And Mr. Trump once again repeated a debunked claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield were abducting pets from residents, though he did not explicitly repeat his claim that they were eating the animals. Mr. Trump and many of his allies have held to the false claim since he made it during the debate. Ahead of his speech on Thursday, Mr. Trump shared a number of digitally generated images of cats supporting him.

Mr. Trump’s event in Tucson was his first stop on a campaign swing through the West Coast. After he spoke, he was scheduled to travel to California for a fund-raiser in Los Angeles on Thursday evening and a news conference at his golf course in nearby Rancho Palos Verdes on Friday morning. He is also set to hold a rally in Las Vegas on Friday night and to attend fund-raisers in Silicon Valley and Utah.

Advertisement

He spoke on Thursday at a musical hall that was named for the singer Linda Ronstadt, who was born and raised in Tucson. That prompted Ms. Ronstadt to release a statement criticizing Mr. Trump, especially his administration’s policy of separating migrant children from their parents.

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump rules out another US presidential debate

Published

on

Donald Trump rules out another US presidential debate

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Donald Trump has ruled out another presidential debate against Kamala Harris, two days after a showdown when the Republican former US president was rattled by his Democratic opponent.

In a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform on Thursday, Trump wrote there would be “NO THIRD DEBATE!” and insisted he “clearly won” Tuesday’s face-off with the vice-president in Philadelphia.

“When a prizefighter loses a fight, the first words out of his mouth are, ‘I WANT A REMATCH,’” he said on Truth Social. “KAMALA SHOULD FOCUS ON WHAT SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE DURING THE LAST ALMOST FOUR YEAR PERIOD.”

Advertisement

Shortly after Trump’s post was published, Harris took the stage at a campaign rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, where she told supporters that she wanted the chance to debate the former president again.

“I believe we owe it to the voters to have another debate because this election and what is at stake could not be more important,” Harris said in her first campaign trail appearance since Tuesday’s showdown.

With less than two months to go until the presidential election, Trump’s comments appear to eliminate the possibility of another televised debate between the two candidates.

Harris was widely seen to have won Tuesday’s presidential debate, which was viewed by more than 67mn Americans, according to Nielsen estimates. The event marked the first time Trump and Harris had ever met, let alone sparred on the issues.

In a back-and-forth that lasted about 90 minutes, Harris appeared to get under Trump’s skin as she questioned his stance on everything from abortion to foreign policy. At one point, after the vice-president cast doubt on the size of the crowds at Trump’s campaign rallies, the former president railed about the number of illegal migrants, rehashing an internet conspiracy theory that some were stealing people’s pets to eat them.

Advertisement

A CNN poll conducted by SSRS after the debate found 63 per cent of 605 people who watched it thought Harris had won, compared with 37 per cent for Trump. Before the debate, a panel of voters was split evenly at 50-50 on which candidate would perform better.

The Trump campaign has dismissed polls suggesting Harris had won the debate. “We found that despite the best efforts of Kamala Harris and [the] media to portray the debate as some kind of overwhelming win for her, voters did not see it this way as support for her remained flat,” Trump pollsters Tony Fabrizio and Travis Tunis said in a memo published on Thursday.

Harris’s appearance in North Carolina pointed to her campaign’s hopes that the state is now increasingly a target for the Democratic candidate. The Financial Times poll tracker shows Trump with a lead of less than a single percentage point, a significant narrowing of the margin since the vice-president replaced Joe Biden on the Democratic ticket.

Trump was expected to hold his own rally in Tucson, Arizona, another crucial swing state, later on Thursday. The latest polling puts him ahead of Harris by just over 1 percentage point in the state.

Meanwhile, the Harris campaign on Thursday said it had raised $47mn in the 24 hours after the debate. By comparison, the vice-president’s team pulled in about $36mn after she announced she had selected Tim Walz as her running mate.

Advertisement

The latest haul will build upon Harris’s sizeable money advantage: her campaign said it had $404mn in cash on hand at the end of August, compared to the Trump campaign’s $295mn.

In North Carolina on Thursday, Harris criticised Trump’s debate performance, saying: “I talked about issues that I know matter to families across America . . . but that’s not what we heard from Donald Trump.”

She laughed as she repeated the former president’s debate stage claim that he had “concepts of a plan” to replace the Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare: “You heard what he said in the debate: he has no plan to replace it. He said ‘concepts of a plan’.”

Harris and Trump remain neck-and-neck in both national opinion polls and surveys of voters in swing states that are likely to determine the outcome of the election.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Berkshire vice-chair Jain sells more than half his stake in company

Published

on

Berkshire vice-chair Jain sells more than half his stake in company

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Berkshire Hathaway vice-chair Ajit Jain more than halved his stake in Warren Buffett’s sprawling investment conglomerate, following Buffett’s move to cut his own ownership in the near-$1tn business.

Jain disclosed he disposed of 200 class A common shares on Monday worth $139mn, drastically reducing his holdings in the business. The sale leaves him with direct and indirect ownership of 166 shares, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, worth about $112mn.

The remaining shares are split between Jain and trusts for his spouse, children and non-profit, the Jain Foundation. In recent years, he has donated a number of his shares to his foundation, which is focused on finding a cure for dysferlinopathy, a rare muscular dystrophy disorder that his son suffers from. The foundation estimates the orphan disease afflicts as few as eight people out of every million.

Advertisement

Jain, 73, oversees Berkshire’s insurance operations, which form the backbone of the company and has provided it with the financial firepower to buy companies and invest in publicly traded stocks. Jain has long been one of Buffett’s top lieutenants, and in 2018 he was elevated to vice-chair and joined Berkshire’s board of directors in recognition of his importance to the wider conglomerate.

“Ajit has created tens of billions of value for Berkshire shareholders,” Buffett wrote to shareholders in 2017. “If there were ever to be another Ajit and you could swap me for him, don’t hesitate. Make the trade!”

Jain was long considered by Berkshire investors as among a handful of potential successors to Buffett. But in 2021, Buffett confirmed Greg Abel, a top executive who grew up in Berkshire’s energy business, would one day take over. He told CNBC last year that Jain “never wanted to run Berkshire”.

Jain joined Berkshire in 1986 from consultancy McKinsey and used the company’s balance sheet to make it an insurer of last resort, transforming the Omaha-based investment group in the process.

Jain has been one of Berkshire’s highest-paid employees, earning $20mn last year. His wealth is nonetheless dwarfed by Buffett’s, which is largely held in Berkshire shares.

Advertisement

Buffett has also been selling down his holdings of Berkshire shares, donating the proceeds to a handful of charities. Much of that stock has ended up in friendly hands — including his children’s foundations — limiting pressure Berkshire faces from outside shareholders.

Jain declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Trending