Connect with us

News

Trump vows to sack SEC boss and end ‘persecution’ of crypto industry

Published

on

Trump vows to sack SEC boss and end ‘persecution’ of crypto industry

Donald Trump said he would end the “persecution” of the crypto industry, sack the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and free a convict the community views as a martyr.

In a direct pitch to cryptocurrency devotees at the Bitcoin 2024 conference in Nashville, Tennessee, on Saturday, the Republican candidate promised to end the Biden administration’s “crusade” against bitcoin.

“I pledge to the bitcoin community, that the day I take the oath of office, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’ anti-crypto crusade will be over,” said Trump.

“On day one, I will fire Gary Gensler,” Trump said to a massive roar from the roughly 5,000 people seated in the audience.

Crypto’s embrace of Trump comes against the backdrop of a difficult few years for the industry, which has faced an aggressive clampdown from the SEC. Crypto is “a field that has been rife with fraud and manipulation”, Gensler said earlier this year.

Advertisement

The SEC has pursued numerous crypto companies and executives, helping put FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and Binance founder Changpeng Zhao behind bars, and launched lawsuits against exchanges Coinbase, Kraken and Gemini, payments provider Ripple Labs and blockchain software company Consensys.

Trump on Saturday promised to end the “repression”, saying rules should be “written by people who love your industry, not by people who hate your industry”.

He also said he would instruct the Department of Treasury to abandon the creation of a central bank digital currency, and appoint a bitcoin and crypto advisory council.

The pitch was a dramatic reversal for Trump, who has previously claimed the value of cryptocurrencies was “based on thin air”, calling it “potentially a disaster waiting to happen.” He has described bitcoin as “a scam”.

But now both presidential candidates are courting the vote of ‘crypto bros’. Members of Kamala Harris’ campaign have met with people close to crypto companies in recent days in a bid to “reset” a relationship which soured during the Biden administration.

Advertisement

Trump, meanwhile, is the first major party candidate to accept donations in cryptocurrencies — and claimed on Saturday his campaign had raised $25mn in crypto donations. His running mate, JD Vance, at one point owned up to $250,000 in bitcoin in a Coinbase account, according to his 2022 financial disclosure form.

The support for Trump was obvious all over the conference centre. Trumpers in branded gear sporting “Make Money Great Again” slogans mixed with attendees in Satoshi T-shirts, orange cowboy hats, dresses and high heels. Trump spoke on “Nakamoto” stage,” in reference to Satoshi, the pseudonymous developer of bitcoin.

Some attendees wore T-shirts calling to free Ross Ulbricht, who was given a life sentence in 2015 for creating the online black market Silk Road, by voting for Trump. The GOP presidential nominee’s promise to commute his sentence caused the second biggest cheer of the speech, after the call to fire Gensler.

“They slander you as criminals but that happened to me, too, because I said the election was rigged,” said Trump.

Earlier at the conference, Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick, who has given pro-Trump Pacs over $1.4mn this election cycle and will host a fundraiser for the ex-president next month, announced an initial $2bn lending program financing bitcoin. He added that his firm owns a “shitload of bitcoin”.

Advertisement

Some attendees said that Trump’s presence alone could flip their vote, hoping that they will have for the first time an ally in the White House.

Investor and attendee Nick Smith said he did not vote for Trump in 2020 but would choose him today over Harris.

“I think they like his F-U attitude towards the establishment,” said Smith of Trump fans.

The price of bitcoin has jumped 10 per cent to over $68,000 since Trump survived an assassination attempt on July 13. “I’m plugging for bitcoin to go over 70 — and even higher when the president speaks,” said David McIntosh, President of the Club for Growth, who is a Trump ally.

“Trump is a businessman and an entrepreneur — and he sees the opportunity that bitcoin affords the US and himself,” conference chief of staff Brandon Green said. “Over the past four years, you’ve seen a very hostile [Biden-Harris] administration towards the industry.”

Advertisement

“Bitcoin is on the ballot,” Green later said on stage.

At the conference on Friday, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr promised to direct the US Treasury to buy 4mn bitcoins, make transactions between the digital currency and the dollar “unreportable” and “nontaxable.”

Among the guest speakers was Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor who leaked a tremendous amount of information about US government surveillance. He told the crowd: “Cast a vote, but don’t join a cult.”

North Carolina Democratic lawmaker Wiley Nickel called for Harris to lead a party “reset” on crypto. Nickel, Ro Khanna and other Democrats in Congress sent a letter to the Democratic National Committee on Saturday calling for the next administration to “select a pro-innovation SEC chair”. He got a smattering of applause — but then was shouted down when he read on stage past Trump tweets critical of cryptocurrencies.

“I want to say this as politely and respectfully as I can. Donald Trump was president for four years. He did nothing on this issue,” said Nickel. “Right now, I can tell you: He is totally full of shit.”

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Nikou Asgari

News

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Published

on

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Trump says US stockpiles mean “wars can be fought ‘forever’”

In a late night post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said that the US munitions stockpiles “at the medium and upper medium grade, never been higher or better”.

He added that the US has a “virtually unlimited supply of these weapons”, meaning that “wars can be fought ‘forever’”.

This comes after Trump said that the US-Israel war on Iran could go beyond the four-five weeks that the administration initially predicted. The president also did not rule out the possibility of US boots on the ground in Iran during an interview with the New York Post on Monday.

Advertisement

“I rebuilt the military in my first term, and continue to do so. The United States is stocked, and ready to WIN, BIG!!!,” he wrote.

Share

Key events

During his opening remarks, Senate judicicary committee chairman, Chuck Grassley, blamed Democrats for the ongoing shutdown Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but highlighted four agencies: the Secret Service, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and the Coast Guard.

Democrats are demanding tighter guardrails for federal immigration enforcement, but a sweeping tax bill signed into law last year conferred $75bn for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which means the agency is still functional amid the wider department shuttering.

Share
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending