Connect with us

News

Takeaways from the third night of the Republican National Convention | CNN Politics

Published

on

Takeaways from the third night of the Republican National Convention | CNN Politics


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
CNN
 — 

Two days after being tapped as Donald Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance introduced himself to voters in a speech that highlighted the populist direction the two aim to take the Republican Party — and the nation.

Vance’s Republican National Convention speech capped a night Republicans spent prosecuting what they see as President Joe Biden’s biggest foreign policy failures and their consequences.

Gold Star families hammered Biden’s handling of the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal. The parents of a Hamas kidnapping victim led chants of “Bring them home.” A Jewish Harvard University graduate who is suing the school over claims of antisemitism, said that “the far left-wing tide of antisemitism is rising.”

“America is still worth fighting for,” said Sgt. William Pekrul, a World War II veteran nearing the age of 100 and recipient of two Bronze Stars and a Silver Star. “With President Trump as the commander-in-chief, I would go back and re-enlist today.”

Advertisement

Republicans also spent much of their prime-time lineup attempting to show Trump’s human side — including remarks by his 17-year-old granddaughter Kai Trump, who described the former president bragging that she had made the honor roll and peppering her with questions about her golf game.

Here are seven takeaways from the Republican National Convention’s third night:

Vance introduces himself – and hits Biden

Vance, perhaps best-known for his memoir “Hillbilly Ellegy,” is a freshman senator with a relatively little following outside Trump’s MAGA-verse prior to his selection this week.

Republicans used Wednesday night to introduce Vance and his life story to the nation.

Raised in a rural Ohio town that he said is “a place that had been cast aside and forgotten by America’s ruling class in Washington,” Vance said he watched factories close and addictions rip through families, including his own. He joined the Marines and ultimately attended Yale Law School, where he met his wife, Usha.

Advertisement

“There is still so much talent and grit in the American heartland. But for these places to thrive, we need a leader who fights for the people who built this country,” Vance said.

Vance’s political leanings — populist and isolationist — more closely match Trump than the Republican Party of years past.

Vance connected those beliefs to his upbringing, and turned them into an attack on Biden’s record.

He said when he was in fourth grade, then-Sen. Biden backed the North American Free Trade Agreement — a deal passed with Republican support at the time. He called it “a bad trade deal that sent countless good American manufacturing jobs to Mexico.”

When he was in high school, Vance said, Biden backed a China trade deal and the US invasion of Iraq.

Advertisement

“And at each step of the way, in small towns like mine in Ohio, or next door in Pennsylvania, or in Michigan and other states across our country, jobs were sent overseas and children were sent to war,” he said.

What’s been clear since Vance became the GOP vice presidential pick is that the Trump campaign wants to make sure the Ohio senator did not come onto the national stage as a hard right Republican with conservative positions on abortion, social issues and isolationism.

Vance’s speech on Wednesday night followed that. Even before he took the stage, Vance’s wife Usha described him as a puppy loving, down-to-earth, self-made family man with degrees from a popular public university and posh Ivy league law school.

Later throughout his speech, the senator kept hitting on softer topics – like saying the Ohio State University chant before noting, “Gotta chill with that Ohio love. We gotta win Michigan, too.”

To be sure, there were bits of Vance’s speech that were Trumpian, such as attacking Biden for giving China “a sweetheart trade deal that destroyed even more good middle class jobs” and saying that Trump “didn’t need politics but the country needed him.”

Advertisement

Still, for every line similar to Trump’s 2016 argument that he alone could save the country, there were everyman lines that fall in line with his “Hillbilly Elegy” bio, from giving a shoutout to his mom being in the audience for being “10 years clean and sober” to talking about his family’s cemetery plot.

What he didn’t mention: His past critical comments about Trump or his stances on abortion and Ukraine. The speech overall was less a new version of the Trumpian braggadocio of hardline immigration politics and more an attempt to win over poor and middle-class voters across the political spectrum.

Wednesday wasn’t just JD Vance’s introduction to the American public. It was Usha Vance’s, too.

For years, JD has described his wife – whom he met while they attended Yale Law School – as a key part of his success. During his 2022 Senate campaign, she used her media appearances to help humanize him and defend him for criticisms that he’d changed his views for political expediency.

On stage in Milwaukee, Usha Vance laid out her husband’s biography and compared it to her own. Unlike her husband, she shared that she was raised in a middle class home in suburban San Diego by two loving parents who are Indian immigrants.

Advertisement

But, as she noted in a humanizing moment, JD adapted to the differences between them.

“When JD met me, he approached our differences with curiosity and enthusiasm,” she shared. “That JD and I could meet at all, let alone fall in love and marry, is a testament to this great country.”

But the nation’s full introduction to the Vance family will have to come later. At a convention dedicated to Trump, there wasn’t room for Usha to delve deeply into her own background, including the fact that she graduated summa cum laude from Yale University; attended Yale Law School; and clerked for both Brett Kavanaugh when he served on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and Chief Justice John Roberts.

She also didn’t touch on her own reservations about stepping into the spotlight. Just last month, she told Fox News that she wasn’t “raring” to completely upend their lives, but she believed in her husband.

Former Trump White House official Peter Navarro began his day in the Florida prison where he’s spent the last four months, jailed for refusing to cooperate with the House investigation into the January 6, 2021, insurrection.

Advertisement

Navarro ended it onstage at the RNC in Milwaukee, where he received a standing ovation – and cheers of “Welcome home!” – from Republicans who, just a night earlier, promised to restore “law and order” to America.

“What these lawfare jackals don’t understand,” a defiant Navarro said, “when they put people like me in prison and fire figurative and now literal bullets at Donald Trump, they also assault our families.”

The motives of the alleged gunman in Pennsylvania are not yet clear. He was a registered Republican who also gave a small donation years ago to a liberal cause.

The tone of Navarro’s rhetoric, including a declaration that he “went to prison so you won’t have to” and a warning that Democrats will put “a whole army of illiterate illegal aliens” on “your front doorstep,” was a notable departure to the unusually reserved language used by many speakers on the first two nights of the convention.

Navarro was not the only controversial figure on the convention floor in Milwaukee. Trump’s 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who was convicted and pleaded guilty to a variety of crimes and spent nearly two years in prison, was also present. After losing the 2020 election, Trump pardoned Manafort “from convictions prosecuted in the course of Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation, which was premised on the Russian collusion hoax.”

Advertisement

Trump himself, of course, was found guilty on all 34 charges of falsifying business records earlier this year, making him the first former president in US history to be convicted of a felony.

Peter Navarro brings his fiancée onstage at the RNC

Advertisement

Perhaps the most poignant moment of the convention so far came when the families of some of the 13 service members who were killed in a suicide bombing at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul during the United States’ August 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan sharply criticized Biden’s actions, then and now.

“Look at our faces. Look at our pain and heartbreak,” said Cheryl Juels, the aunt of Marine Sgt. Nicole Gee.

“That was not an ‘extraordinary success,’” she added, using the same words Biden did weeks after the withdrawal to describe it.

“Joe Biden owes the men and women who served in Afghanistan a debt of gratitude and an apology,” Juels said.

Herman Lopez, the father of Marine Col. Hunter Lopez, said that when Biden met the families of the 13 service members killed, the president “made the occasion more about his son, lost to cancer, than our sons and daughters.”

Advertisement

He then said Biden had lied in the June CNN debate with Trump that on his watch, there haven’t been “any troops dying anywhere in the world.”

Col. Lopez’s mother, Alicia Lopez, said in the three years since those 13 service members were killed, “there has been a deafening silence from the Biden and Harris administration. Despite our pleas for answers and accountability, they have pushed us away and tried to silence us.”

Herman Lopez then said the names of all 13 service members who were killed in the suicide bombing.

It was an emotional moment, and one reminiscent of Gold Star parents Khizr and Ghazala Khan at the 2016 Democratic National Convention. “You have sacrificed nothing — and no one,” Khizr Khan said.

A stunning scene played out far from television screens in Milwaukee, as Republican senators confronted Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle and chased her through Fiserv Forum, demanding answers to questions about Saturday’s assassination attempt.

Advertisement

“This was an assassination attempt! You owe the people answers. You owe President Trump answers!” Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn shouted at Cheatle, who continued to walk with her head down and ignore the senators’ criticism.

“It’s stonewalling!” Sen. John Barrasso, the No. 3 Senate Republican, said.

Blackburn later posted a video of the encounter to X, writing: “The American people deserve answers from the Secret Service.”

In another video posted by Blackburn, she is joined by Sens. James Lankford and Kevin Cramer, as well as Barrasso, as the group confronted Cheatle.

In the full video, Barrasso demanded Cheatle’s “resignation or full explanation to us, right now.”

Advertisement

When pressed by Blackburn why Trump was still able to go on stage when they had already been made aware of a threat, Cheatle replied, “I don’t think that this is the forum to have this discussion.”

Cheatle indicated she’ll address their questions at another time and moved to leave. At that point, the senators said, “We’re going with you,” and began following her.

As they walked, Barrasso accused her of having “no shame, no concern.”

“You’re supposed to protect the president of the United States!” he said.

“You answer to us!” added Cramer.

Advertisement

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum’s speech was notable not only for its awkwardness – he stumbled through a joke referencing his torn Achilles tendon shortly before his first presidential primary debate performance in the same arena where the convention is now taking place – but also for its emphasis on energy policy.

That’s by design. When Burgum ran a longshot bid for president this cycle, rumors surfaced that he was really positioning himself to be energy secretary for a future Republican administration. Energy security and energy policy are in the governor’s comfort zone and that was on full display Wednesday night.

In his speech, Burgum argued the Biden administration’s “war on energy hurts every American” and a new Trump administration would unleash “American energy dominance” that would be a “path to prosperity and peace through strength.” At another point, Burgum said innovation “has always been the source of American greatness and President Trump champions innovation over regulation.”

The speech will further fuel speculation that Burgum is headed for some future post in Washington, should Trump return to the White House. Burgum was a finalist to be Trump’s vice presidential running mate and found himself just a few days ago waiting in a hotel near the site of the Republican National Convention for final word. When Trump finally did call Burgum, the former president told Burgum he would not be his running mate. But, in a possible allusion to the future, Trump started the call by saying, “Hey, Mr. Secretary.”

CNN’s Alayna Treene and Morgan Rimmer contributed to this story.

Advertisement

News

Satellite images show Iran school strike hit more buildings than earlier reported

Published

on

Satellite images show Iran school strike hit more buildings than earlier reported

The bombing of an Iranian elementary school that killed some 165 people, many of them schoolgirls, included more targets near the school than has been initially reported, a review of commercial satellite imagery by NPR has found.

The images suggest that the school was hit on Saturday as part of a precision airstrike on a neighboring Iranian military complex — and that it may have been struck as a result of outdated targeting information.

The new images come from the company Planet and are of the city of Minab, located in southeastern Iran. They show that a health clinic and other buildings near the school were also struck. Three independent experts confirmed NPR’s analysis of the additional strike points.

Advertisement

The strike points “look like pretty clean detonation centroids,” said Corey Scher, a postdoctoral researcher at the Conflict Ecology laboratory at Oregon State University.

“These certainly appear like detonation sites,” agreed Scher’s colleague, Oregon State associate professor Jamon Van Den Hoek.

Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at Middlebury College who specializes in satellite imagery, said the imagery was consistent with a precision airstrike.

The images show “very precise targeting,” Lewis told NPR. “Almost all the buildings [in the compound] are hit.”

A satellite image of an Iranian Revolutionary Guard compound taken on March 4.

A satellite image of an Iranian Revolutionary Guard compound taken on March 4, several days after an airstrike destroyed a school on the edge of the compound. The image reveals that half a dozen other buildings in addition to the school were struck.

Planet Labs PBC

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Planet Labs PBC

Advertisement

Iranian state media said 165 people died in the bombing, which struck a girls’ school. The school was located within less than 100 yards of the perimeter of an Iranian Revolutionary Guard naval base, according to satellite images and publicly available information. The clinic was also located within the base perimeter, although both facilities had been walled off from the base.

Israel has denied involvement. “We are not aware at the moment of any IDF operation in that area,” Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Nadav Shoshani told NPR on Monday. “I don’t know who’s responsible for the bombing.”

At a press conference Wednesday morning, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the U.S. is looking into what happened at the school. “All I know, all I can say, is that we’re investigating that,” Hegseth said. “We, of course, never target civilian targets.”

Given Minab’s location in the southeastern part of Iran, Lewis believes it’s more likely the U.S. would have conducted the strike than Israel. As one gets farther south and east in Iran, “a strike is much more likely to be a U.S. strike than an Israeli strike because of the type of munitions and the geographic location,” he said.

Esmail Baghaei, the spokesman for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, called the strike “deliberate” and said that the U.S. and Israel bombed the school in part to tie up Iranian forces in the region with rescue efforts. “To call the attack on the girls school merely a ‘war crime’ does not capture the sheer evil and depravity of such a crime,” he said.

Advertisement

But Lewis said it’s more likely that the strike was the result of an error. Satellite images show that the school and clinic buildings were both once part of the base. The school was separated from the base by a wall between 2013 and 2016. The clinic was walled off between 2022 and 2024.

Lewis believes it’s possible American military planners had not updated their target sets.

“There are thousands of targets across Iran, and so there will be teams in the United States and Israel that are responsible for tracking those targets and updating them,” he said. “It’s possible that the target didn’t get updated.”

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to NPR’s request for additional information about the strike.

NPR’s Arezou Rezvani and NPR’s RAD team contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Mojtaba Khamenei, son of former supreme leader, tipped to become Iran’s next head of state

Published

on

Mojtaba Khamenei, son of former supreme leader, tipped to become Iran’s next head of state

Mojtaba Khamenei, the second son of the assassinated Ali Khamenei, is being heavily tipped to succeed his father as supreme leader of Iran, which would pitch a hardliner into the task of steering the Islamic republic through the most turbulent period in its 48-year history and offer a powerful signal that, for now, it has no intention of changing course.

No official confirmation has been given and the announcement may be delayed until after the funeral of Ali Khamenei, which was on Wednesday postponed.

His son is believed to have been the choice of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Israeli defence minister, Gideon Saar, has warned he will be assassinated.

Ayatollah Seyed Khatani, a member of the Assembly of Experts, the body that chooses the new supreme leader, said the assembly was close to selecting a leader.

Rigid in his anti-western views, Mojtaba Khamenei is not the candidate Donald Trump would have wanted. Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said on Tuesday that Iran was run by “religious fanatic lunatics” – and Khamenei’s appointment is hardly likely to dispel that opinion.

Advertisement
‘They were going to attack first’: Trump gives update on Iran – video

The choice of supreme leader is made by the 88-strong Assembly of Experts, who in this case are picking from a field of six possible candidates. His election would be a powerful if unsurprising symbol that the government is not looking to find an accommodation with America.

Trump has said the worst-case scenario would be if Khamenei’s successor was “as bad as the previous person”.

There has been speculation for more than a decade that he would be his father’s successor, which grew when Ebrahim Raisi, the elected president and favourite of Khamenei, was killed in a helicopter crash.

Mojtaba Khamenei was born in 1969 and studied theology after graduating from high school. At the age of 17, he went to serve in the Iran-Iraq war, but it was not until the late 1990s that he came to be recognised as a public figure in his own right.

Advertisement

After the landslide defeat of Khamenei’s preferred candidate, Ali Akbar Nategh Nuri, in the 1997 presidential election, where he won only 25% of the final vote, various conservative Iranian groups realised the need to make changes to their structures and Mojtaba Khamenei was central to that project.

He was also seen as instrumental by reformists in suppressing the protests in 2009 that came after allegations the presidential election had been rigged, with his name chanted in the streets as one of those responsible. Mostafa Tajzadeh, a senior member of Iran’s reformist parties who was imprisoned after the vote, alleged that his and his wife, Fakhr al-Sadat Mohtashamipour’s, legal case was under the direct supervision of Mojtaba Khamenei.

In 2022 he was given the title of ayatollah – essential to his promotion. By then he was a regular figure by his father’s side at political meetings, as well as playing an influential role in the Islamic Republic’s Broadcasting Corporation, the government’s official media outlet often criticised for churning out dull political propaganda that many Iranians reject in favour of overseas satellite channels. He has also played a central role in the administration of his father’s substantial financial empire.

His closest political allies are Ahmad Vahidi, the newly appointed IRGC commander; Hossein Taeb, a former head of the IRGC’s intelligence organisation; and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the current speaker of the parliament.

His rumoured appointment and its hereditary nature has long been resisted by reformists. The former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi, referring to the long history of rumours about Mojtaba Khamenei succeeding his father as leader, wrote in 2022: “News of this conspiracy have been heard for 13 years. If they are not truly pursuing it, why don’t they deny such an intention once and for all?”

Advertisement

The Assembly of Experts, in response, denounced “meaninglessness of doubts” and said the assembly would select only “the most qualified and the most suitable”.

Israel on Tuesday struck the building in the Iranian city of Qom, one of Shia Islam’s main seats of power, where the assembly was scheduled, but the building was empty, according to IRGC-affiliated media.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Senators Question Kristi Noem on ICE Immigration Tactics

Published

on

Video: Senators Question Kristi Noem on ICE Immigration Tactics

new video loaded: Senators Question Kristi Noem on ICE Immigration Tactics

transcript

transcript

Senators Question Kristi Noem on ICE Immigration Tactics

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem repeatedly refused to apologize for suggesting that Alex Pretti and Renee Good, two U.S. citizens shot and killed by agents, were domestic terrorists.

What we’ve seen is a disaster under your leadership, Ms. Noem. A disaster. What we’ve seen is innocent people getting detained that turn out are American citizens. I could talk about the culture that’s been created here. After the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, when I spoke to Alex’s parents, they told me that you calling him a domestic terrorist — this was directly from them — the day after he was killed, a nurse in our V.A., Alex — one of the most hurtful things they could ever imagine was said by you about their son. Do you have anything you want to say to Alex Pretti’s parents? Ma’am, I did not call him a domestic terrorist. I said It appeared to be an incident of — I think the parents saw it for what it was. In a hearing — recent hearing before the HSGAC committee, C.B.P. and ICE officials testified under oath that their agencies did not inform you that Pretti was a domestic terrorist — during that hearing, stated during that hearing, I was getting reports from the ground, from agents at the scene, and I would say that it was a chaotic scene. How did you think that calling them domestic terrorists at that scene was somehow going to calm the situation? The fact that you can’t admit to a mistake, which looks like under investigation, it’s going to prove that Ms. Good and Mr. Pretti probably should not have been shot in the face and in the back. Law enforcement needs to learn from that. You don’t protect them by not looking after the facts.

Advertisement
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem repeatedly refused to apologize for suggesting that Alex Pretti and Renee Good, two U.S. citizens shot and killed by agents, were domestic terrorists.

By Christina Kelso and Jackeline Luna

March 3, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending