Connect with us

News

Study finds slightly higher risk of autism diagnosis in areas with more lithium in drinking water, but experts say more research is needed | CNN

Published

on

Study finds slightly higher risk of autism diagnosis in areas with more lithium in drinking water, but experts say more research is needed | CNN



CNN
 — 

A brand new examine discovered a reasonably larger threat of autism spectrum dysfunction in youngsters born to pregnant folks uncovered to faucet water with larger ranges of lithium, however consultants warning that this affiliation doesn’t present a direct hyperlink between the 2.

About 1 in 36 youngsters within the US is identified with autism spectrum dysfunction (ASD) every year, in accordance with knowledge from the US Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention.

Scientists nonetheless don’t know the precise reason behind autism, a developmental dysfunction. Genetics could also be an element, however some have been potential environmental causes, too.

Advertisement

Circumstances could also be on the rise, however that can be unclear. One examine revealed this 12 months on circumstances within the New York-New Jersey space discovered that autism analysis charges tripled amongst sure age teams between 2000 and 2016. A 2021 report discovered related will increase in circumstances, however the CDC says the elevated variety of circumstances is probably linked to extra docs screening for the situation.

Lithium is an alkali metallic that may be discovered naturally in some meals and floor water. It’s utilized in batteries, grease and air conditioners, in addition to within the therapy of bipolar dysfunction and a few blood problems. Its ranges in US ingesting water aren’t regulated, in accordance with the US Geological Survey.

A brand new examine, revealed Monday within the journal JAMA Pediatrics, discovered a small affiliation between lithium and autism analysis in Denmark, the place the researchers say the extent of lithium in ingesting water is just like that in American water techniques.

The researchers checked a database of individuals with psychiatric problems for kids born between 2000 and 2013 to search out data on 8,842 circumstances of ASD and 43,864 members who didn’t have ASD. They then measured the focus of lithium in 151 public waterworks that served greater than half of the Danish inhabitants and mapped out the place pregnant folks lived in relation.

As lithium ranges in water elevated, there was a modest elevated threat of an ASD analysis. Particularly, in contrast with folks on the lowest publicity degree, those that had the second and third highest publicity throughout being pregnant had a 24% to 26% larger threat of ASD identified in youngsters. The group with the best publicity had a 46% larger threat than these on the lowest degree of publicity.

Advertisement

The researchers couldn’t inform how a lot water the pregnant folks drank, however they picked Denmark partly as a result of residents there eat a few of the lowest quantities of bottled water in Europe.

Consultants say it’s necessary to notice that the analysis can’t present that lithium publicity leads on to an autism analysis.

Additional examine is required, mentioned examine co-author Dr. Beate Ritz, a professor of neurology within the David Geffen Faculty of Drugs at UCLA, and a professor of epidemiology and environmental well being on the UCLA Fielding Faculty of Public Well being.

“Any ingesting water contaminants which will have an effect on the growing human mind deserve intense scrutiny,” Ritz mentioned in a information launch. She added that the analysis would must be replicated in different nations to look for the same connection.

The implications of the findings are advanced so far as public well being coverage is anxious, in accordance with an editorial revealed alongside the examine. Lithium ranges in water, at concentrations that the examine related to a possible ASD threat, have additionally been linked with well being advantages resembling decrease charges of hospitalization for psychiatric problems and suicide.

Advertisement

“If all these of associations are legitimate, the knowledge of Solomon will probably be required to develop pointers for lithium in ingesting water which might be maximally protecting of all the inhabitants,” wrote Dr. David C. Bellinger, a professor of neurology and psychology at Harvard Medical Faculty. “Till the fundamental biology of ASD is healthier understood, will probably be troublesome to differentiate causal from spurious associations.”

Dr. Max Wiznitzer, director of the Rainbow Autism Middle at College Hospitals Rainbow Infants and Kids’s Hospital in Cleveland, factors to different analysis on the results of lithium on pregnant individuals who take it for psychological well being problems. These research – which take a look at folks uncovered to a lot larger ranges than are present in ingesting water – don’t present a reference to autism spectrum dysfunction.

“It’s an fascinating affiliation, however causation is unquestionably not confirmed,” mentioned Wiznitzer, who was not concerned within the new analysis. “We have now to see if there’s a viable and biologically believable mechanism by which a small quantity of lithium within the water provide can one way or the other do that, but pharmacologic dosing of lithium in girls with bipolar dysfunction has not been reported to be inflicting elevated threat of ASD.”

Different research have additionally advised connections between ASD and environmental exposures to issues like pesticides, air air pollution and phthalates. However none of them factors to any of those elements as a direct reason behind the dysfunction.

A hyperlink between environmental publicity and ASD is difficult to show, Wiznitzer mentioned. With analysis displaying that elevated publicity to air air pollution raises the chance of giving delivery to a baby with ASD, for instance, he typically wonders whether or not air pollution is the figuring out issue or if it’s simply the populations who dwell in additional polluted areas.

Advertisement

“There’s loads of hypothesis about about environmental elements, however what number of of them are actually causally related?” Wiznitzer mentioned. “We’re bombarded with quite a lot of environmental stressors in our on a regular basis lives. We have now to determine how one can principally safely navigate them, and that is most likely not one which’s excessive on our listing.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Taliban Frees an American, George Glezmann, Held in Afghanistan Since 2022

Published

on

Taliban Frees an American, George Glezmann, Held in Afghanistan Since 2022

The Taliban on Thursday released George Glezmann, an American held since 2022 in Afghanistan, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.

Mr. Glezmann, an Atlanta native, was a Delta Air Lines mechanic who was detained while visiting Afghanistan as a tourist in December 2022. The State Department had officially designated him a wrongful detainee.

Mr. Glezmann boarded a Qatari aircraft in Kabul, the Afghan capital, to fly to Doha, Qatar, with U.S. and Qatari officials on Thursday. Qatar maintains close ties with the ruling Taliban government in Afghanistan and has hosted talks between it and U.S. officials. Negotiations between the first Trump administration and Taliban insurgents for a U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan occurred in Doha.

In his announcement of Mr. Glezmann’s release, Mr. Rubio thanked the Qatari government for its help. Adam Boehler, who had been President Trump’s pick for special envoy for hostage affairs, took part in the negotiations with the Taliban.

The meeting in Kabul between American and Taliban officials was the first known in-person contact of any significance between the two governments since Mr. Trump took office in January. Mr. Boehler was accompanied on the trip by Zalmay Khalilzad, the special envoy for Afghanistan reconciliation in the first Trump administration and a former ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq and the United Nations.

Advertisement

Mr. Boehler arrived at the meeting in Kabul dressed in a gray jacket, black sweater and black baseball cap. Mr. Khalilzad wore a navy suit and purple-and-red floral tie. They sat at a wooden table across from Amir Khan Muttaqi, the foreign minister of Afghanistan, and other Afghan officials, photographs of the meeting showed.

The Taliban toppled a U.S.-backed Afghan government in August 2021 and returned to power after President Joseph R. Biden Jr. executed the troop withdrawal that Mr. Trump had negotiated in his first term. The United States does not have diplomatic relations with the Taliban and has imposed sanctions on its officials. Moderate Taliban officials are seeking to normalize relations with the United States.

The United States does not maintain a presence in Kabul, unlike European countries, which have been more successful in negotiating releases of their citizens with the Taliban.

Mr. Rubio said on Thursday that Mr. Glezmann’s release was “also a reminder that other Americans are still detained in Afghanistan.”

The State Department said it was still seeking the return of six American detainees in Afghanistan and the remains of one U.S. citizen. The agency has not labeled them wrongfully detained, although one State Department official said the Americans were unjustly detained.

Advertisement

A wrongful detention designation means the U.S. government tries to prioritize freeing that citizen.

The department has focused on Mahmood Shah Habibi, an Afghan American businessman who was taken from his vehicle near his home in Kabul in August 2022, according to an F.B.I. report. Mr. Habibi worked for the Asia Consultancy Group, a telecommunications company based in Kabul.

The Taliban government released two Americans, Ryan Corbett and William Wallace McKenty, in late January in a prisoner swap arranged by the Biden administration. U.S. officials released Khan Mohammed, a member of the Taliban who had been imprisoned for life in California on charges of drug trafficking and terrorism. Mr. Biden gave a conditional commutation to Mr. Mohammed before he left office.

Christina Goldbaum contributed reporting from Damascus, Syria.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

The promise of the fifth estate is being squeezed

Published

on

The promise of the fifth estate is being squeezed

JD Vance told a funny story at the American Dynamism Summit in Washington this week. He recalled a Silicon Valley dinner he and his wife Usha attended, before he became vice-president, where the talk had been of machines replacing humans in the workforce. According to Vance, an unnamed chief executive from one giant tech company said that the jobless of the future could still find purpose in fully immersive digital gaming. “We have to get the hell out of here. These people are effing crazy,” Usha texted him under the table.

Why Vance thought it a good idea to tell this story is puzzling, given it contradicted the central theme of his speech — but at least it got a laugh. As Usha Vance colourfully implied, the worldview of the techno-libertarians and ordinary workers appears antagonistic. But her husband’s main message was the opposite: that the tech sector and ordinary workers had a shared interest in promoting the “great American industrial renaissance”.

Vance’s speech was a clear attempt to reconcile the two warring wings of President Donald Trump’s political movement: the tech bro oligarchy — or broligarchy — led by Elon Musk, and the Maga nationalists animated by Steve Bannon. Bannon has denounced globalist tech leaders as anti-American and described Musk as a “truly evil person” and a “parasitic illegal immigrant”.

Vance declared himself a “proud member of both tribes”. He may be right that Musk and Bannon have much in common in spite of their pungent differences. They are both elitist anti-elitists with a shared mission to overturn the power of the administrative state and the mainstream press.

Historians once described the three ancient estates of power as the clergy, nobility and commoners. A fourth estate — the press — was later added. And a fifth estate — social media — has since emerged. But the fifth estate could be seen as a software update of the third one: commoners armed with smartphones. In that view, Bannon may be a tribune of the third estate while Musk is a champion of the fifth. In the Trump movement, the two have fused.

Advertisement

In his book The Fifth Estate, William Dutton argued that social media represented a new and mostly positive form of power allowing individuals to access alternative sources of information and mobilise collective action. He sees Greta Thunberg, the Swedish schoolgirl who emerged as a global environmental campaigner, as its poster child. “It is the scale of the technology that changes the role of the individual in politics and society,” he tells me.

Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s chief executive, has also declared the fifth estate to be a global public good giving voice to the once-voiceless. “People having the power to express themselves at scale is a new kind of force in the world,” he said in 2019.

That all sounds great in theory. But the negative effects of social media have become increasingly striking: misinformation, incitement to hatred and the emergence of an “anxious generation” of teenagers. Social media has mutated from a technology of liberation to one of manipulation. It has corroded the political process and been hijacked by anti-establishment populists. 

One study of 840,537 individuals across 116 countries from 2008 to 2017 found that the global expansion of the mobile internet tended to reduce approval of government. This trend was especially marked in Europe, undermining support for incumbent governments and boosting anti-establishment populists. “The spread of the mobile internet leads to a decline in confidence in the government. When the government is corrupt people are more likely to understand that the government is corrupt,” one of the co-authors of the paper Sergei Guriev, now dean of London Business School, tells me.

Populist politicians have been quick to exploit voter dissatisfaction aroused by social media and use the same technology to mobilise support in cheap and interactive ways. “It is normal for anti-elite politicians to use new technologies that are not yet embraced by the elites,” Guriev says. 

Advertisement

The fifth estate has certainly rattled the old gatekeepers of information in politics and the media. But new digital gatekeepers have emerged who control who sees what on the internet. Trump’s “first buddy” Musk bought Twitter, now X, which promotes or demotes posts in unaccountable ways. The free-speech absolutists who denounce moderation and government “censorship” are often providing cover for more insidious forms of algorithmic control.

Progressive campaigners acknowledge they are on the back foot on social media but they have not abandoned hope. “It is more important than ever to fight for the future. We need to use these tools as well as we can,” says Bert Wander, chief executive of Avaaz, a crowdfunded global campaigning platform. With 70mn members in 194 countries, Avaaz mobilises action against corruption and campaigns for algorithmic accountability, as included in the EU’s Digital Services Act. “We need to communicate in technicolour with all the emotion and resonance that the nationalist populists use,” Wander says.

For such progressives, three bracing truths emerge from this debate. The power of the fifth estate is a disruptive force that is not going away. Populists have been particularly smart in their use of it. And to compete, progressives drastically need to up their game.

john.thornhill@ft.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

‘See you in court’: Teachers union vows to fight Trump’s Education Department order

Published

on

‘See you in court’: Teachers union vows to fight Trump’s Education Department order


The president plans to sign an executive order on Thursday attempting to dismantle the Education Department. A leading teachers union is already preparing to challenge him.

play

WASHINGTON – “See you in court.”

Advertisement

That was the one-sentence retort from a leading teachers union Wednesday following news that President Donald Trump planned to sign an executive order Thursday aimed at eliminating the U.S. Department of Education.

Randi Weingarten, the head of the American Federation of Teachers, vowed to sue the administration if it moved forward with a mandate to obliterate the agency’s limited federal role in the nation’s schools.

The action is unlawful, she and others have argued, because only Congress has the power to close federal agencies. Still, the Trump administration has slashed the Education Department’s workforce in half, which is prompting widespread concern from students and schools about reductions in vital services. Democratic state attorneys general and advocates for students with disabilities sued last week to stave off those cuts.

Advertisement

Multiple polls have shown that the idea of abolishing the Education Department is unpopular among Americans.

Teachers unions have been at the forefront of litigation against the Trump administration’s education policies in recent weeks and months. The AFT filed a separate suit this week accusing the Education Department under Trump of “effectively breaking the student loan system.”

The president plans to sign his much-touted executive order alongside Republican governors Thursday afternoon at the White House. Lawsuits will likely follow once the full text of the order has been released.

Advertisement

Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@usatoday.com. Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @zachschermele.bsky.social.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending