Connect with us

News

Protests break out in Venezuela after Nicolás Maduro’s disputed election win

Published

on

Protests break out in Venezuela after Nicolás Maduro’s disputed election win

Protests broke out across Venezuela against authoritarian President Nicolás Maduro’s disputed re-election, as the government threatened to crack down on opposition leaders and the international community called for a breakdown of poll results.

Maduro’s victory, which was announced on Monday, has been challenged by the opposition’s candidate Edmundo González. González, a retired diplomat, led Maduro by at least 20 points in independent polls and had a clear lead in exit surveys and quick counts on Sunday.

By the afternoon, people in a number of neighbourhoods across Caracas were shouting “Fraud!” and banging pots and pans from their windows in protest. Disturbances were reported in poorer neighbourhoods as well as middle-class areas, while demonstrators set up a roadblock of burning tyres on the edge of the city on the road to the airport in nearby La Guaira.

Protesters marched across the city towards the centre and the Miraflores presidential palace. Many were carrying Venezuelan flags and some had their faces masked and were carrying large wooden sticks. Police responded by firing tear gas in some areas. In Santa Capilla, a few blocks from the palace, men in plain clothes were firing pistols towards demonstrators, according to videos shared on social media.

“We’re fed up. We want a change,” said Leydis Mojares, 33, one of the marchers. “We want a better life for our children. Maduro isn’t our president any more. The result last night was such a disappointment . . . I cried, I screamed. I saw my daughter, who is 13, crying. I said to her, ‘How long is this going to go on for?’”

Advertisement

Video shared on social media showed protesters in the town of Coro, in north-western Venezuela, toppling a statue of Maduro’s predecessor and mentor, Hugo Chávez, as crowds cheered them on. Maduro had called Sunday’s election on what would have been Chávez’s 70th birthday.

The dispute over the election has divided the international community, with Maduro’s close allies Russia, China, Iran and Cuba hailing his victory while the US, the EU and the UK demanded to see a detailed breakdown of voting.

The National Electoral Council (CNE) said Maduro had won with 51.2 per cent of the vote compared with González’s 44.2 per cent, with 80 per cent counted. It ignored calls to publish a detailed tally and instead organised a ceremony to proclaim him president until 2031.

After his victory was certified, Maduro, a former bus driver and union activist, delivered a pugnacious 90-minute speech. “Yesterday Venezuela fought and definitively defeated fascism, hatred and demons in these lands,” he said.

The opposition said its parallel count showed González winning. Opposition representatives said in many polling stations, soldiers had removed ballot boxes and tallies of results, instead of providing copies to party witnesses, as required by law. The CNE website, where results are usually published, was down, which officials said was the result of an ongoing cyber attack.

Advertisement

González stood in the place of María Corina Machado, who was disqualified in January from running in the election by the Supreme Court. She campaigned on González’s behalf, holding rallies across the country.

On Monday, Venezuelan attorney-general Tarek William Saab accused Machado of involvement in an alleged cyber attack on the country’s electoral system, alongside two opposition leaders living in exile. He also warned that “acts of violence and calls that challenge electoral results” are punishable with imprisonment of three to six years.

Maduro’s disputed election victory poses a dilemma for the Biden administration, which had negotiated with Maduro to run a competitive election and temporarily relaxed sanctions on state-owned oil company PDVSA in October. 

The US reimposed the oil sanctions in April, though it has granted licences giving exemptions to individual companies, including Chevron, Maurel & Prom and Repsol, to continue operating in Venezuela.

Senior US administration officials said on Monday afternoon that Washington was yet to make a decision on possible sanctions in response. “It is not currently under consideration that we would retroactively alter licences that have previously been given,” one official said.

Advertisement

Another senior official balked at the suggestion that Washington’s Venezuela policy had been a failure, citing the release of US nationals from Venezuelan jails and the fact that the election was held at all. “We’re in a much better position now than we were three years ago,” he said.

Eric Farnsworth, vice-president of the Council of Americas, a business lobby, said there were not many good options for the US as Washington was preoccupied with its own election and “loath to take on another messy global crisis”.

Maduro’s disputed re-election is likely to complicate the oil-rich country’s economy, which, buoyed by a relaxation of price and currency controls, has seen a slight recovery after contracting by three-quarters between 2013 and 2021. The country has faced hyperinflation, regular power outages and shortages of food and medicines. Some 7.7mn Venezuelans — about a quarter of the population — have fled.

Venezuela’s debt slipped by more than a cent in secondary market trading on Monday as investors expressed concerns that the result would complicate efforts to restructure about $160bn of bonds.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: What the Texas Primary Battle Means for the Midterms

Published

on

Video: What the Texas Primary Battle Means for the Midterms

new video loaded: What the Texas Primary Battle Means for the Midterms

The first battle of the midterm elections will be the U.S. Senate primary in Texas. Our Texas bureau chief, David Goodman, explains why Democrats and Republicans across the U.S. are watching closely to see what happens in the state.

By J. David Goodman, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, June Kim and Luke Piotrowski

March 1, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Mass shooting at Austin, Texas bar leaves at least 3 dead, 14 wounded, authorities say

Published

on

Mass shooting at Austin, Texas bar leaves at least 3 dead, 14 wounded, authorities say

Gunfire rang out at a bar in Austin, Texas, early Sunday and at least three people were killed, the city’s police chief said.

Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis told reporters the shooter was killed by officers at the scene. 

Fourteen others were hospitalized and three were in critical condition, Austin-Travis County EMS Chief Robert Luckritz said.

“We received a call at 1:39 a.m. and within 57 seconds, the first paramedics and officers were on scene actively treating the patients,” Luckritz said.

Advertisement

There was no initial word on the shooter’s identity or motive.

An Austin police officer guards the scene on West 6th Street at West Avenue after a shooting on Sunday, March 1, 2026, in Austin, Texas.

Jay Janner/Austin American-Statesman via AP


Davis noted how fortunate it was that there was a heavy police presence in Austin’s entertainment district at the time, enabling officers to respond quickly as bars were closing.

Advertisement

“Officers immediately transitioned … and were faced with the individual with a gun,” Davis said. “Three of our officers returned fire, killing the suspect.”

She called the shooting a “tragic, tragic” incident.

Texas Bar Shooting

Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis provides a briefing after a shooting on Sunday, March 1, 2026, near West Sixth Street and Nueces in downtown Austin, Texas.

Ricardo B. Brazziell/Austin American-Statesman via AP


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson said his heart goes out to the victims, and he praised the swift response of first responders.

Advertisement

“They definitely saved lives,” he said.

Davis said federal law enforcement is aiding the investigation.

Continue Reading

News

A long-buried recording and the Supreme Court of old (CT+) : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

A long-buried recording and the Supreme Court of old (CT+) : Consider This from NPR
Recently, movie critic Bob Mondello brought us a story about how he found a 63-year-old recording of his father arguing a case before the Supreme Court. The next day, he bumped into Nina Totenberg, NPR’s legal affairs correspondent, in the newsroom. They were talking so animatedly that we ushered them into a studio to continue the conversation.To unlock this and other bonus content — and listen to every episode sponsor-free — sign up for NPR+ at plus.npr.org. Regular episodes haven’t changed and remain available every weekday.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.
Continue Reading

Trending