Connect with us

News

Marine Le Pen goes on trial over EU expenses scandal

Published

on

Marine Le Pen goes on trial over EU expenses scandal

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen goes on trial on Monday for allegedly embezzling EU funds, in a politically charged case that could lead to fines and a ban from elected office.

Prosecutors accuse the three-time presidential candidate and former member of the European parliament of misusing EU funds to pay staff hired in Brussels for work they were doing for the party in France.

Also on trial are 24 others, including elected officials and staffers, as well as Le Pen’s far-right party itself.

Advertisement

They allegedly siphoned off roughly €3.2mn from 2004 to 2016 at a time when their party, then called Front National, was cash-strapped, according to Patrick Maisonneuve, the lawyer for the EU parliament at the trial.

If proven true, such practices would fall foul of rules that govern how MEPs can spend money allocated to them to cover their expenses.

Le Pen and the other defendants have said they committed no wrongdoing. The founder of the party, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who is Marine Le Pen’s father and a former member of the EU assembly for 25 years, was also supposed to stand trial, but judges decided the 96-year-old was too frail.

If convicted, judges could impose a prison sentence on Marine Le Pen of up to 10 years, €1mn in fines and a maximum ban on holding elected office of five years.

Such a verdict would cause political shockwaves in France, as her party, now rebranded as Rassemblement National, has emerged as a powerful force in the fractured French parliament following snap elections this summer.

Advertisement

The vote was called by President Emmanuel Macron after RN scooped up the largest share of the vote in elections for the EU parliament in June. Le Pen is expected to run for president again in 2027 when Macron’s second and final term ends.

With opposition parties threatening no-confidence votes against the fragile new government led by Prime Minister Michel Barnier, RN has emerged as a kingmaker since its votes would be needed for such a motion to pass.

Police and prosecutors in France began investigating the alleged fraud in 2014 after the EU parliament submitted evidence that Le Pen’s party was misusing funds.

To secure a conviction, prosecutors will have to prove that Le Pen and other defendants intentionally redirected their staff in Brussels to pursue tasks that were not related to their EU parliamentary work.

Maisonneuve, the lawyer for the EU parliament, said officials in Brussels initially noticed that “a large majority of the assistants” on RN’s organisational chart appeared to be based in France and not doing work in the EU assembly.

Advertisement

“We had an obligation to notify the French authorities to ensure that EU taxpayers’ money was not being misused,” he said.

Le Pen has called the charges “deeply unfair” and vowed that the trial would not disrupt RN’s work. Asked by La Tribune newspaper in early September if she feared a verdict that would bar her from elected office, she said she believed that she and her co-defendants would be cleared. “I am very sure of our innocence,” she said.

Several French political parties have been accused of similar crimes involving EU parliamentary assistants.

One of Macron’s allies, the centrist politician François Bayrou, was cleared earlier this year but his MoDem party was declared guilty of misappropriating EU funds. In 2018, an investigation was opened into the far-left party France Unbowed, but no charges have been filed.

“It can be difficult to draw a line between work done for the MEP and work done for the party,” said Francis Teitgen, the lawyer who represented the MoDem party in a similar trial.

Advertisement

“Compared to the case involving the Modem, which is very pro-Europe, the atmosphere of the RN one will be different since they are Eurosceptics.”

News

Graham Platner makes it official in Maine, submitting paperwork to leave Senate race

Published

on

Graham Platner makes it official in Maine, submitting paperwork to leave Senate race

Now-former Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner speaks at his primary election night event on June 9 in Blue Hill, Maine. Platner officially dropped out of the race July 10 following rape allegations from a former romantic partner that he denies.

CJ Gunther/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

CJ Gunther/Getty Images

Graham Platner, Maine’s Democratic nominee for Senate, is officially out of the race.

The Maine Secretary of State said Platner filed the necessary paperwork to withdraw his candidacy two days after he announced he planned to do so following an accusation of rape by a former romantic partner. Platner denies the allegation.

The Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to pick Platner’s replacement.

Advertisement

In his withdrawal notice, Platner said “people are desperate for change” and that’s why they voted “for a new kind of politics” by making him the Democratic nominee. He expressed gratitude for those who supported his campaign and said that he will continue to fight for “the movement we have built together and the future we believe in.”

He ended his notice with a strong statement aligned with the progressive platform.

“F*ck ICE. Free Palestine. Up the Hearts.”

Platner announced his plan to withdraw from the race in an 11-minute video he posted to social media on July 8. He said he had no choice but to suspend his campaign, citing it was no longer viable financially.

Advertisement

“We are going to lose our ability to fundraise. We are going to lose our ability to access voter data. We are going to lose all of the things that any campaign needs on the basic level simply to function,” he said.

Platner added that dropping out was not an admission of guilt. Rather, the decision, he said, is to keep the progressive movement in Maine alive to defeat Republican Sen. Susan Collins in November. Platner blamed the “political establishment” for his downfall and argued the goal was to force him out of the race.

“We built a campaign. We engaged in electoral politics. We motivated people. We banded together. We did it the way that we were told we are supposed to make change and we won. And now they are not going to let us have it. Not if it’s me,” he said.

Continue Reading

News

Waymo called the cops on teen riders, raising privacy concerns

Published

on

Waymo called the cops on teen riders, raising privacy concerns

A Waymo robotaxi drives in San Francisco’s North Beach neighborhood this week.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Heather Diehl/Getty Images

Police in San Mateo, Calif., posted Monday on social media that they had apprehended a pair of teenagers from a Waymo driverless robotaxi after the company alerted authorities to suspected criminal activity. It’s the latest incident involving video surveillance of passengers and others by autonomous vehicles — raising questions about the limits of privacy in such vehicles.

The Facebook post by the San Mateo County Police said: “Parents do you know where your teens are? @waymo does!”

The 15-year-olds were allegedly drinking alcohol and shooting toy guns from the car, according to the police. They said Waymo’s systems detected behavior that then triggered a safety response, after which the company disabled the vehicle and contacted police.

Advertisement

Waymo’s cars, equipped with an array of cameras, microphones and other sensors to monitor passengers and other nearby vehicles, are becoming more common in cities across the United States. Experts say the detention of the two teens in San Mateo highlights a potential — but not inevitable — trade-off between privacy and convenience. It also questions the extent to which companies similar to Waymo are required to hand over private data, including audio and video of passengers, in situations where a crime is suspected.

NPR reached out to Waymo, which is owned by Alphabet, the parent company of Google, for comment on the details of the San Mateo incident and how the company responded, but did not hear back. But on its website, the company says that as many as 29 cameras in its autonomous cars provide an all-around view and “are designed with high dynamic range and thermal stability, to see in both daylight and low-light conditions, and tackle more complex environments.”

“There already exist laws that govern duty to report or even duty to protect” for carriers such as Waymo, according to Alessandro Acquisti, a professor of information technology at the MIT Sloan School of Management. “The privacy problems arise when and if driverless carrier companies used such laws or ethical obligations as a pretext for blanket, indiscriminate accumulation of identifiable data for unspecified future purposes.”

That includes not just monitoring people inside the cars, but outside too. Take, for example, a hit-and-run investigation last year in Los Angeles. Media reported that the police inquiry was aided by video captured by a Waymo taxi that had a clear view of the crime. Critics suggested at the time that authorities were using the company’s vehicles as a mobile surveillance platform. And during 2025 protests in Los Angeles against Immigration and Customs Enforcement crackdowns, demonstrators vandalized Waymos, apparently angry that video recorded by the vehicles could be used by police, although there is no evidence that happened.

Continue Reading

News

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Published

on

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Donald Trump has terminated the remaining members of the independent, federal commission that assists election administration officials nationwide just a few months before the midterm elections, multiple outlets reported Thursday.

The remaining three commissioners of the four-member bipartisan commission ⁠were forced out on Thursday in different ways. The one Republican appointee resigned and the other ⁠two, Democratic appointees were notified of their terminations via email from ​the White House presidential personnel office.

“On ‌behalf of President ‌Donald J Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position ‌as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” the email, seen by Reuters, said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Election Assistance Commission serves as a “national clearinghouse of information on election ‌administration”, accredits testing laboratories and certifies voting systems, and maintains the national mail-voter registration form developed by the National ​Voter Registration Act of 1993, according to the commission’s website. The terminations follow Trump and top administration officials’ advocacy to change vote-by-mail requirements and investigations into the 2020 election outcome, which Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Advertisement

“It is ⁠irresponsible and dangerous that this Administration remains dead set on ​causing chaos for ​our election officials across this ​country,” Arizona secretary of state Adrian Fontes said in a ​Thursday statement. “This ‌move undermines the integrity ​of nonpartisan ​election administration.”

The 2002 law that established the commission, the Help America Vote Act, states the president can appoint replacements to the commission.

It is unclear how Trump will move ahead with the commission.

Reuters contributed reporting

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending