Connect with us

News

China deploys record number of warplanes in drills around Taiwan

Published

on

China deploys record number of warplanes in drills around Taiwan

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

China has sent its largest ever daily deployment of warplanes into airspace close to Taiwan as part of a wider military exercise, confirming fears that Beijing would ratchet up tensions days after Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te asserted his country’s sovereignty.

The People’s Liberation Army said its forces practised “combat readiness patrols, blockade of key ports and areas, assault on maritime and ground targets and seizure of comprehensive superiority”, calling the drills “a stern warning to the separatist acts of ‘Taiwan Independence’ forces”.

Taiwan said 125 military aircraft were deployed in the PLA exercise on Monday.

Advertisement

The US said it was “seriously concerned” by the drills and condemned Beijing for threatening regional stability. China’s “response with military provocations to a routine annual speech is unwarranted and risks escalation”, said state department spokesperson Matthew Miller.

The EU said China’s military activities further increased cross-strait tensions and called on “all parties” to exercise restraint.

Lai’s office called on China to end military provocations and stop threatening Taiwan.

“There is a broad consensus among the international community on the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and the Indo-Pacific region,” Lai’s office said. “China should face the reality of the existence of the Republic of China (Taiwan) and respect the Taiwanese people’s choice of a democratic and free way of life.”

The PLA exercises followed a National Day speech by Lai last Thursday in which he asserted Taiwan’s sovereignty but also appealed to China to work with him for peace. He also highlighted the 1911 uprising that overthrew Chinese imperial rule as part of Taiwan’s history, in an overture to those Taiwanese who embrace a Chinese identity.

Advertisement

Aides of Lai described his speech as a gesture of goodwill towards Beijing, while foreign observers viewed it as restrained and moderate.

“There were times Beijing reciprocated Taipei’s restraint. This could have been one of them. But they’re choosing a different path,” Rush Doshi, who worked on China affairs in US President Joe Biden’s National Security Council until earlier this year, posted on X on Monday.

Beijing has denounced Lai, who was elected in January, as a “dangerous separatist” and sharply stepped up manoeuvres near Taiwanese waters and airspace since he took office. China claims Taiwan as part of its territory and threatens to annex it by force if Taipei refuses to submit under its control indefinitely.

Lai’s predecessor Tsai Ing-wen used a visit to Europe — which China has also opposed — to call for the EU to stand firm in its support of Taiwan.

“Taiwan’s democracy, similar to European democracies, was built on the sacrifices of those who fought against dictatorship,” she told a conference in Prague hours after Beijing started its drills. Tsai said she was making her first visit to Prague to see “friends who are not afraid of intimidation”.

Advertisement

The PLA called its drills “Joint Sword 2024 B”, framing them as a sequel to manoeuvres organised three days after Lai’s inauguration in May.

The PLA said its aircraft carrier Liaoning participated in the exercise in waters east of Taiwan to practise “vessel-aircraft co-operation, joint air control, and strikes on maritime and ground targets”.

Beijing regularly uses military manoeuvres, and propaganda about them, to try to intimidate the Taiwanese public and put a strain on the island’s armed forces.

In most past drills that China framed as responses to events in Taiwan, the PLA introduced some new operational patterns, which it then continued to use. Taiwanese and western military officials have said this has eroded the fragile status quo between the two sides.

Taiwanese officials said they did not detect such new operational steps on Monday. Moreover, the PLA declared the drill “successfully completed” on Monday night, making it shorter than previous ones. But “indeed this time with their operations both on our western and eastern sides, they are creating a certain pressure on us,” said Lieutenant-General Hsieh Jih-sheng, deputy chief of the general intelligence staff of Taiwan’s armed forces.

Advertisement

Taiwan’s defence ministry said 90 of the PLA warplanes participating in the drills entered Taiwan’s self-declared early-warning zone, also by far the most ever spotted in a single day. Seventeen Chinese warships and 17 vessels from the Chinese coastguard, which helps assert Beijing’s expansive territorial claims and is part of the military command chain, also operated around Taiwan and its outlying islands, it added.

Monday’s coastguard component was larger than in the May exercises, which involved the coastguard for the first time.

The China Coast Guard said it would practise boarding and inspection of ships in waters of Taiwan-controlled islands off the Chinese coast, but Taiwan said no vessels were boarded.

If Beijing were to attempt boarding and inspection in Taiwanese waters or anywhere on its side of the Taiwan Strait, “we would use every possible means to prevent that”, said Hsieh Ching-chin, deputy director-general of Taiwan’s Coast Guard Administration, adding such moves would be a violation of international law.

Additional reporting by Steff Chávez in Washington and Raphael Minder in Warsaw

Advertisement

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

Published

on

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

The U.S. and Israel have been conducting strikes against targets in Iran since Saturday morning, with the aim of toppling Tehran’s clerical regime. Iran has fired back, with retaliatory assaults featuring missiles and drones targeting several Gulf countries and American bases in the Middle East.

“All six aircrew ejected safely, have been safely recovered, and are in stable condition. Kuwait has acknowledged this incident, and we are grateful for the efforts of the Kuwaiti defense forces and their support in this ongoing operation,” Central Command said.

“The cause of the incident is under investigation. Additional information will be released as it becomes available,” it added.

In a separate statement later Monday, Central Command said that American forces had been killed during combat since the strikes began.

“As of 7:30 am ET, March 2, four U.S. service members have been killed in action. The fourth service member, who was seriously wounded during Iran’s initial attacks, eventually succumbed to their injuries,” it said.

Advertisement

Major combat operations continue and our response effort is ongoing. The identities of the fallen are being withheld until 24 hours after next of kin notification,” Central Command added.

This story has been updated.

Continue Reading

Trending