Connect with us

Missouri

Missouri State president responds to federal lawsuit over ‘vulgar’ incident at Utah Tech

Published

on

Missouri State president responds to federal lawsuit over ‘vulgar’ incident at Utah Tech


The new president of Missouri State University was accused in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday of arranging vegetables in the shape of a penis and testicles on the front porch of a cabinet-level coworker during his time as president of Utah Tech University.

As part of the apparent practical joke, Williams left a note referring to the display of two eggplant and one zucchini − referred to as a “zuweenie” − but signed with the name of three of university colleagues, rather than his own.

Th falsely named colleagues — Rebecca Broadbent, Jared Rasband and Hazel Sainsbury — filed the lawsuit Thursday against former president Richard “Biff” Williams along with Utah Tech, members of Williams’ former leadership team, as well as higher education officials and institutions in Utah.

At the time of the November 2023 incident, Broadbent was general counsel, Rasband was senior associate general counsel, and Sainsbury was director of equity compliance and Title IX coordinator. Broadbent, who reportedly directly to Williams, and Rasband were also involved in enforcing nondiscrimination and harassment laws at Utah Tech.

Advertisement

They alleged in the suit that the incident was part of a toxic, hostile and “poison well” work environment.

Williams was president of Utah Tech from mid-2014 through January 2024. He resigned less than two months after the vegetable incident, saying he wanted to pursue career advancement elsewhere.

In an email Saturday, Williams provided a response to the lawsuit and media coverage of the incident toward the end of his presidency at Utah Tech.

“While I was there, I initiated what I intended to be a humorous gesture toward a member of our staff,” he wrote.

Advertisement

“I have since come to realize that the prank was not appropriate. This was a mistake. I regret my lapse in judgment and I accept this as a learning moment.”

He added: “This incident is now included in a lawsuit that was shared with the media. I apologize for the undue attention this has brought to the university.”

Williams said his statement was prompted by recent media coverage. A lengthy story was published Friday by the Salt Lake Tribune.

“This experience continues to remind me how important it is to always strive to foster a campus environment that is safe and welcoming to all students, faculty and staff,” he wrote.

Advertisement

The MSU Board of Governors issued a statement Saturday that they were aware of the lawsuit. The board said it “continues to have confidence in President Williams’ ability to lead Missouri State University. We are committed to working alongside him to ensure that the university is a safe and welcoming environment to all students, faculty and staff.

The News-Leader asked the university if the board was aware of the incident and subsequent investigation as part of the hiring process.

Williams was one of three publicly named finalists for the job and emerged as the unanimous choice to serve as the 12th president and succeed the institution’s longtime leader, Clif Smart.

Missouri State has not provided an answer and said Williams will not be available for an interview.

They allege the following in a 42-page lawsuit:

Advertisement
  • Utah Tech openly flouted the protections of Title IX and plaintiffs faced resistance, intimidation, harassment and retaliation from the university’s top leaders as they worked to establish an environment free or harassment and discrimination;
  • Then-president Williams was involved in the practical joke, which they described as sexual and obscene, at the home of a university vice president;
  • A “sham” investigation was completed, as part of a cover-up, by the university’s governing bodies, the Utah System of Higher Education, the Utah Board of Higher Education; and the Office of the Commissioner of Higher Education;
  • The incident and subsequent investigation undermined the plaintiffs and the work they were doing in Title IX and equity compliance.

The lawsuit alleged that on Nov. 8., 2023, Williams left a display of vegetables shaped as male genitalia — including a long zucchini referred to as a “zuweenie — on the front porch of a university vice president who was recovering from a vasectomy that day.

In a printed note left with the display, was attributed to Broadbent, Rasband and Sainsbury — two of the names were misspelled — without their knowledge or consent.

Williams, who did not broadly acknowledge that he left the display in the days following the surgery, reportedly told his chief of staff about the gift before he dropped it off, adding he thought it would trigger a laugh.

The university vice president did not immediately know who left the display and messaged colleagues at Utah Tech with a photo of the display along with RING doorbell footage showing a man − later identified as Williams − with a hoodie cinched up to disguise his face making the delivery.

According to the suit, the image and the note falsely signed by the three university officials was widely shared among top officials and others.

Advertisement

The day after the display was left, Williams allegedly showed the images of the display and note to his chief of staff and admitted he left the vegetables. However, the chief of staff did not report the incident to the expected channels on campus.

The suit argued Williams and others should have recognized the gravity of falsely signing the names of other university officials, including two female administrators with responsibilities for ensuring Title IX compliance.

In the suit, plaintiffs alleged the “zuweenie” incident was part of a pattern.

They allege that for at least four years, there were posts to a quote board in a public break room on campus that containing obscene and vulgar sexual comments with names attributed.

The plaintiffs said concerns raised about this quote wall was minimized by Williams and others, creating a hostile work environment.

Advertisement

Sainsbury, who is Black, said the university sought to leverage her race to enhance its image in marketing videos and in meetings with athletes, freshmen and their families. She served as a central figure in a rebranding effort for the university in 2022, when it changed its name from Dixie State University.

She alleged in the suit that despite using her voice and image in the videos distributed nationally, she faced a pattern of marginalization and her input was either not sought or wanted in key matters pertaining to her role.

The plaintiffs said they experienced verbal threats, physical intimidation and harassment from university officials, which made it harder to ensure Utah Tech employees and students complied with nondiscrimination and harassment laws and policies.

Sainsbury said her work was undermined in other ways. For example, deans were involved in a “Title IX mocking party,” where she was given gag gifts including the “Title IX for Dummies” book.

In the suit, Sainsbury said the university failed to protect or support her when a high-ranking official was upset with the outcome of his case.

Advertisement

(This story was updated to include new information).



Source link

Missouri

Missouri State vs. FIU: Week 10 College Football Betting Odds, Prediction, Pick

Published

on

Missouri State vs. FIU: Week 10 College Football Betting Odds, Prediction, Pick


Week 10 of the 2025 college football season continues on Wednesday night when the Missouri State Bears host the FIU Panthers in a Conference USA battle.

The Bears come into Wednesday on a two-game winning streak, and it has pushed their record to 4-3 overall and 2-1 in the CUSA. They are near the top of the conference in their first year in the FBS.

The Panthers have been going the other direction as they have lost three of their last four games and it has dropped them to 3-4 overall and 1-2 in the conference.

Stream Missouri State vs. FIU

Advertisement

If you’re looking to get back in the swing of football season and need some betting advice for Wednesday’s matchup in Springfield, we’ve got you covered. Here are the latest odds for the game, courtesy of BetMGM.

Missouri State vs FIU game odds:

All college football odds via BetMGM

  • Spread: Missouri State -3.5 (-115), FIU +3.5 (-105)
  • Money Line: Missouri State -190, FIU +155
  • Over-Under: Over 50.5 (-110), Under 50.5 (-110)

Missouri State vs FIU prediction, pick:

The Bears have been finding ways to win over the last two weeks, while the Panthers have been getting blown out. The Panthers have been struggling on defense, giving up 28 or more points in five of their last six games. The Bears haven’t exactly been putting up a ton of points, but their defense has played well. They are also at home, and that will make the difference. They hold down the Panthers and do enough offensively to cover and get their third straight win.

Prediction: Missouri State 27, FIU 17

Best Bet: Missouri State -3.5, Under 50.5

Missouri State vs FIU channel, start time, streaming:

Time: 8 p.m. ET

Advertisement

TV Channel: CBS Sports Network

Live Stream: Paramount+

Get more betting analysis and predictions at Sportsbook Wire.

Contact/Follow @College_Wire on X and @College_Wires on Threads. Like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of college sports news, notes, and opinions.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri traffic deaths this year could surpass 2024 numbers, MoDOT warns

Published

on

Missouri traffic deaths this year could surpass 2024 numbers, MoDOT warns





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri sports betting update ahead of Chiefs vs. Commanders on Monday Night Football

Published

on

Missouri sports betting update ahead of Chiefs vs. Commanders on Monday Night Football


It’s another prime time NFL game, which means the Chiefs are playing. That’s what happens when a team has appeared in five of the past six Super Bowls and now has a player dating the most famous singer in the world.

Tonight, Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelce and company host the Washington Commanders. Soon enough, bettors in Missouri will be legal wagering on a Chiefs primetime game.

Missouri sports betting is set to launch at 12:00 am CT on December 1. The Monday Night Football game that day is Patriots vs. Giants, but the following Sunday the Chiefs host the Texans on Sunday Night Football.

Bettors who are 21+ in Missouri don’t need to wait to get a demo of the DraftKings Missouri app. Just click below and take it for a test run. You won’t be able to deposit or wager until 12:00 am CT on December 1, but you’ll get to see why bettors in 39 states love DraftKings.

Advertisement

Missouri online sports betting overview

The Missouri Gaming Commission recently approved temporary sports betting licenses for nine sportsbooks looking to start taking bets at 12:00 am CT on December 1. Pre-registration can start on Nov. 17 at 12:00 CT. Let’s take a look at the players in Missouri:

The two names that standout the most on this list are Circa and Underdog. Circa scored a massive upset when it was awarded an “untethered” license over FanDuel in August.

What that means is neither DraftKings, nor Circa need partners to launch in Missouri (hence they can keep all the profits for themselves).

DraftKings and FanDuel poured in more than $40 into the ballot initiative that paved the way to legalize Missouri sports betting, so it was eye-brow raising that it did not prevail over Circa.

FanDuel quickly recovered from the sting of losing out to Circa by partnering with St. Louis CITY SC of the MLS.

Advertisement

Underdog, meanwhile, was one of the first to apply for a license in Missouri. The DFS and now sports betting operator has partnered with the Kansas City Royals.

BetMGM partnered with Century Casinos and Fanatics is launching through a deal with Boyd Gaming. Two other future Missouri sportsbook operators, Caesars and ESPN BET, do not need a partner because both have land-based casino interests in the state.

Missouri sports betting pro teams have ‘skin’ in the game

One of the biggest reasons Amendment 2 passed can be attributed to the groundswell of support from Missouri’s pro sports teams. As a result, six pro teams have sports betting licenses. Here’s a look at those partnerships:

  • St. Louis Cardinals (bet365)
  • Kansas City Royals (Underdog)
  • St. Louis CITY SC of MLS (FanDuel)
  • Kansas City Chiefs (BetMGM, existing from Kansas launch)
  • St. Louis Blues (Underdog)
  • Kansas City Current of NWSL (TBD)

There can be up to 19 retail sports betting licenses (stadiums, casinos). A few casino/sportsbook partnerships have already been established. Here’s a brief overview of those:

Where to bet in person in Missouri on December 1

  • Horseshoe St. Louis: Caesars Sportsbook
  • Harrah’s Kansas City: Caesars Sportsbook
  • Isle of Capri Casino Boonville: Caesars Sportsbook
  • Hollywood Casino St. Louis: ESPN BET
  • Argosy Riverside Casino: ESPN BET
  • River City Casino: ESPN BET
  • Century Casino Cape Girardeau: BetMGM
  • Ameristar Casino Kansas City: Fanatics Sportsbook

The six pro teams with licenses can also have a retail sportsbook in or around their stadiums.

Learn more about our gaming editorial staff.

If you or a loved one has questions and needs to talk to a professional about gambling, call the Ohio Problem Gambling Helpline at 1-800-589-9966 or the National Council on Program Gambling Helpline (NCPG) at 1-800-522-4700 or visit 1800gambler.net for more information. 21+ and present in Ohio. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.

Advertisement

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending