Business
Trump Administration Lifts Ban on Sugar Company Central Romana Over Forced Labor
The Trump administration quietly rescinded an order on Monday that had blocked a major Dominican sugar producer with political ties to President Trump from shipping sugar to the United States because of allegations of forced labor at the company.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection modified a “withhold release order” that had been issued in 2022 for raw sugar and sugar products made by the Central Romana Corporation, blocking exports to the United States from the company. The Customs website now lists the order as “inactive.”
Labor right groups expressed frustration at the change, saying that Central Romana, whose sugar had been sold in the United States under the Domino brand, had not significantly improved its labor practices.
“We haven’t seen a significant enough change to warrant modification,” said Allie Brudney, a senior staff attorney at Corporate Accountability Lab, which has been monitoring working conditions on Dominican sugar farms. “This is a disappointing outcome, but we will continue to support workers in their fight for better conditions.”
A U.S. official, who declined to be named because the person was not authorized to speak publicly, said that the decision to rescind the rule and allow the company to begin exporting had not followed established processes. The official cited Central Romana’s powerful ownership, and said that the decision was most likely made at the top levels of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Hilton Beckham, an assistant commissioner of public affairs for Customs and Border Protection, confirmed that the order had been modified, saying that the decision followed “documented improvements to labor standards, verified by independent sources.” She declined to disclose those sources, citing confidentiality reasons.
Ms. Beckham added that “Central Romana has taken action to address the concerns outlined in the initial WRO,” referring to the withhold release order, and that customs officials remained “committed to enforcing U.S. laws prohibiting forced labor and will continue to closely monitor compliance.”
Central Romana said in a statement that the company was “pleased to learn that the administration of the U.S. government has reviewed all the shared evidence and agreed that there is no basis to continue” the withhold release order. Over the past two years, it had provided U.S. officials with independent audits from outside organizations and other documentation of its practices, it said.
Central Romana, the largest landholder and private employer in the Dominican Republic, is partly owned by the Fanjul family, which has been influential in U.S. politics for decades.
In 2024, the Fanjul Corporation gave a $1 million donation to Make America Great Again, a political action committee supporting Mr. Trump, as well as a $413,000 donation to the Republican National Committee, according to OpenSecrets, a nonprofit that tracks money in politics. The corporation also made smaller donations to Democrats.
For decades, Central Romana has faced allegations from labor rights groups that it subjected its workers to poor labor conditions. The Biden administration banned imports from the company in 2022, saying that it had information indicating that the company had taken advantage of vulnerable workers, improperly withheld their wages, forced them to do excessive overtime and created abusive working and living conditions.
Civil society groups have also complained of Central Romana forcibly evicting families from homes, threatening workers who complain about working conditions and providing dilapidated housing without clean water or electricity.
Central Romana has publicly defended its practices, saying that it had been investing for years to improve the living conditions of its employees and that it provides the best conditions in the industry.
Many of the company’s employees are Haitian migrants, some of whom were born on Central Romana farms. Because the Dominican Republic does not offer these workers citizenship, they are uniquely vulnerable, unable to seek other employment and in fear of deportation, civil society groups say.
A congressional delegation that visited the Dominican Republic and met with workers last summer said that the country had made progress toward addressing some of the worst incidents, including child labor and human trafficking, but also that abuses in the sector continued.
A study put out by the Department of Labor in September found continued evidence of abusive working conditions in the sector. The study said that following the 2022 ban, other Dominican sugar farms had replaced Central Romana as a main source of exports to the United States, but that those farms most likely had similar issues with forced labor.
In a news conference Monday, the Dominican president, Luis Abinader, said that business was now “back to normal.”
“Central Romana can now export like it’s always done,” Mr. Abinader said, calling it “positive news.”
Asking about why the restrictions had been lifted, Mr. Abinader said it was “a decision of the American government. We were not involved in that decision.”
Central Romana is the largest sugar producer in the Dominican Republic, producing about 60 percent of the country’s sugar, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In the 1980s, it was acquired by members of the Fanjul family, Cuban exiles who started sugar cane farms in Florida.
The Fanjuls were prominent donors to both Democrats and Republicans, including the Bushes, the Clintons and Marco Rubio when he was a Florida senator, before becoming Mr. Trump’s secretary of state. The Fanjul family, which also founded Florida Crystals Corporation, is a part owner of American Sugar Refining, the world’s largest sugar refinery, which sells sugar under brand names including Domino and C&H Sugar.
In 2023 and 2024, Central Romana disclosed that it had paid more than $1.1 million to lobby Congress, customs officials and others on issues in the sugar sector, including the 2022 ban over the forced labor allegations.
The Fanjuls tried to leverage their political ties to get the order reversed. In an August 2023 letter to Chris Dodd, a former senator who was then a special adviser to the U.S. Department of State, Alfonso Fanjul, the chief executive of Central Romana, said the order had caused “irreparable damage” to the company and his family’s reputation and was without basis.
Mr. Fanjul wrote that the company had carried out an extensive audit and concluded that there was no forced labor in its operations.
“Chris, we have been friends for a long time,” Mr. Fanjul wrote in the letter, which was viewed by The New York Times. “I am asking for your help in requesting CBP to lift its sanctions on our company, which not only impacts it but the financial well-being of our workers who are suffering as a result of the WRO.” (There is no evidence that Mr. Dodd intervened in the process.)
In a letter to U.S. officials last March, more than 30 human and labor rights organizations expressed concern over efforts by Central Romana to avoid remediating its labor practices under the government’s forced labor ban.
Workers had reported that the company’s efforts to fix conditions were “superficial” and that some improvements Central Romana had publicly announced, like providing health insurance and electricity for company housing, had been overstated and were still unavailable to large numbers of workers, the groups said.
“Nearly every person interviewed in December 2023 stated that if they were able to leave, they would,” the letter read.
In contrast, Central Romana’s efforts to modify the order through political pressure had been “substantial” and “deeply concerning,” the groups said.
“If this strategy proves successful for Central Romana, it will not only harm and disillusion workers in this case, but it will also undermine the efficacy” of forced labor enforcement more generally, the letter read.
Business
Landmark downtown apartment tower faces foreclosure
A landmarked downtown Los Angeles apartment building designed by famed Los Angeles architect John Parkinson is on the market as its owners face foreclosure.
Residences in the Metropolitan, a 10-story tower built in 1913, are nearly filled with tenants but its ground floor retail spaces on Broadway and 5th Street are unoccupied, as are other street-level stores in downtown’s Historic Core.
The historic building was once considered one of the best in the city and is owned by the Fallas family, which operated a chain of value-priced clothing stores based in Gardena including one called Fallas Paredes in the Metropolitan.
Fallas-Paredes at 449 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90013.
(Google Maps)
Around 2011, Michael Fallas, who once worked in family’s downtown store as a stock boy, converted the upstairs floors from offices to apartments while continuing to operate Fallas Paredes. The store closed more than five years ago in the wake of a 2018 filing by its parent company for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Earlier this month in state Superior Court, a special servicer representing Fallas’ lender asked for a judicial foreclosure of the property, alleging that Fallas had stopped making payments on a $32 million loan dating to 2017. After leasing the property for years, Fallas bought the building in the 1990s.
Fallas didn’t respond to requests for comment.
The location of the Metropolitan where the buildings stands was hailed in a Times story in 1912, saying “it is regarded by many realty men as the most valuable piece of real estate in Los Angeles.”
The building today is recognized as a city historic-cultural monument because “Broadway became the commercial center of the Southland, a title it retained until well after World War II,” with its development, the city said. One of the architects who designed the Metropolitan in the Beaux-Arts style was John Parkinson, who is credited with designing such well-known local structures as City Hall, the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum and Union Station.
Notable tenants in the Metropolitan have included the Los Angeles Public Library, Owl Drug Co., variety store J.J. Newberry and real estate company Janns Investment Co., which sold the land where UCLA is built and developed Westwood Village, among other Los Angeles neighborhoods.
In recent years, the buildings around the Metropolitan have struggled to keep retail tenants after a spurt of residential conversions of historic buildings starting in the early 2000s brought commerce to the neighborhood. Many downtown businesses have struggled since the pandemic reduced occupancy in offices downtown and reduced the flow of visitors.
“The lack of bodies on the street is generally hurting downtown, and that’s one of the reasons that has building has problems,” said downtown real estate broker Hal Bastian, who lives in the Historic Core.
There are close to 1,000 residential units in historic buildings at the intersection of Broadway and 5th Street, Bastian said, but all the ground floor stores are closed. Drug stores there suffered substantial losses from shoplifting he said, and now, “our challenge on Broadway is leasing.”
The 88 apartments in the Metropolitan are 91% rented, according to a listing for the property by the Zacuto Group, which also touts its roof deck with pool, fitness center and barbecue grills. No sale price is set.
Business
January 2025 wildfire victims seek tougher penalties against State Farm over claims handling
A fire survivors’ group announced Thursday it was seeking tougher penalties against State Farm over its handling of January 2025 wildfire claims.
The Every Fire Survivor’s Network said it was petitioning to join a state enforcement action announced this year against the company to make sure the case results in meaningful changes at California’s largest home insurer.
“We’re seeking a systematic review of all their claims and penalties calibrated to the actual scale of the harm — and we’re seeking the payouts that families are owed,” said Joy Chen, executive director of the group, at a Pacific Palisades news conference joined by victims of the fires.
The Department of Insurance in May filed an administrative action against State Farm General — the subsidiary of the giant Bloomington, Ill., insurer that handles California home insurance — after completing a “market conduct” exam.
The Jan. 7, 2025, fire damaged or destroyed more than 18,000 structures and killed 31 people.
State Farm has received more January 2025 claims than any other insurer — more than 13,700 auto and homeowners claims as of May 4, with payouts totaling $5.7 billion, according to the company.
The market conduct exam looked at 220 sample claims filed by the victims and found 398 violations of state law in about half of them.
Among other alleged violations, it found that the company failed in numerous cases to pursue a “thorough, fair and objective investigation” into claims, failed to come to “prompt, fair, and equitable settlements” and made settlement offers that were “unreasonably low.”
In announcing the action, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara called the company’s claims handling “unacceptable” and said his department was taking “decisive action to hold them accountable.”
The state is seeking a “cease and desist” order to stop the insurer from engaging in unfair or deceptive practices.
It also has threatened to suspend State Farm’s license over the alleged violations, which each carry a penalty of up to $5,000 — or twice that figure if found to be willful. That could amount to a penalty of $2 million or more.
The threat to actually suspend State Farm’s license and its authority to write policies has been viewed skeptically by some, given its roughly 20% market share of the state’s home insurance market.
The company, which had an opportunity to include its responses in the exam report, denied fault in some cases and admitted fault in others. It often blamed problems on individual adjusters and denied systemic issues with its claims handling.
The petition filed by the wildfire survivor’s group criticizes the sample size of the market conduct exam as too small to capture all the alleged deficiencies in State Farm’s claims handling, which it claims are a “general business practice” of the company.
The group is seeking to conduct discovery, cross examine witnesses, present testimony from fire victims and bring more that 1,600 firsthand policyholder statements regarding State Farm’s practices into evidence, according to the petition.
It also wants State Farm to reopen cases in which claimants were paid too little, and it is seeking to participate in settlement discussions in order to increase any penalty State Farm would pay.
It calculated that a $2-million penalty would amount to a minute fraction of the assets of the State Farm Group.
“I submit to you that doesn’t defer bad conduct, it just allows you to continue to do it,” said Michelle Meyers, an attorney for Every Fire Survivor’s Network, at the news conference.
Consumer Watchdog, which has been a harsh critic of State Farm, also is providing legal support for victims’ effort.
Sevag Sarkissian, a spokesperson for State Farm, said the company was aware of the petition.
“We recognize that many wildfire survivors, including those that are State Farm General policyholders, continue to face difficult recovery challenges,” he said. “Our focus remains on helping customers recover.”
Michael Soller, a spokesperson for Lara, said the department is “acting with urgency to assist wildfire survivors in their ongoing recovery by investigating formal complaints filed by survivors and conducting the expedited market conduct exam that led to this enforcement action.”
He added that the department’s position is the state’s Administrative Procedure Act does not contemplate the commissioner or department staff authorizing intervention requests in the case.
He said that would be a hearing officer’s or administrative law judge’s decision when one is assigned to the case.
Meyers acknowledged the request was novel but said her reading of the law is that Lara can make the decision because no judge is yet assigned.
In response to the criticism, State Farm pledged earlier this year to improve its claims handling, including by providing single points of contact and improved communication so there are “fewer handoffs, fewer repeated explanations, and seamless support.”
It also named a new vice president of customer relations for State Farm General.
Business
Uber, California lawyers say deal reached to avert dueling ballot initiative showdown
The state’s trial attorneys and Uber say they have reached a last-minute deal to scrap their dueling ballot measures and avert what was gearing up to be one of most expensive battles of the November election.
The deal, which comes a day after both measures qualified for the November ballot, has Uber agreeing to bulk up safety measures, while the trial attorneys will limit how much they can claim for lien-based medical treatment of victims who get in Uber or Lyft accidents, according to spokespeople for both sides of the campaign.
“Both sides agree: Californians deserve a system that’s safe, fair, and accountable,” read a joint statement from Uber and the Consumer Attorneys of California, a powerful attorney trade group. “This agreement protects patients from unnecessary treatment or getting overcharged, ensures access to medical care and legal representation, and strengthens safety measures.”
The agreement, finalized Thursday, means the ride-share giant will kill its ballot measure to cap how much attorneys can earn in vehicle collision cases and limit medical damages to rates based on insurance. Uber has argued that the costs for medical treatment done on a lien, which allows doctors to get paid from a cut of the plaintiff’s payout, far exceed what it would cost if the victim had used their own insurance.
In return, the Consumer Attorneys of California will cancel its competing ballot measure that sought to increase legal liability for ride-share companies if a passenger is sexually assaulted by a driver. The measure followed an investigation by the New York Times into sexual assault by drivers.
Both sides had poured tens of millions into the campaigns, plastering billboards across Los Angeles.
Lawyers claimed the fight had turned existential with the measure threatening to decimate the profit margin of many personal injury cases and leave drivers with small or thorny cases unable to find an attorney willing to take their case.
Spokespeople say the deal is predicated on their agreement being codified into a bill within the next week. Otherwise, they said, each side will move forward with its ballot measure.
-
Michigan4 seconds agoWest Michigan celebrates Juneteenth
-
Massachusetts7 minutes agoMassachusetts gas prices finally hit reverse, falling back toward $4
-
Mississippi10 minutes agoPolice shooting of a 1-year-old Mississippi boy ignites tension between police and residents – WXXV News 25
-
Minnesota10 minutes agoRare tick disease poses a danger in Minnesota lakes area
-
Missouri22 minutes ago10 pounds of meth found during I-70 traffic stop, Callaway County Sheriff’s Office says
-
Montana23 minutes ago
Montana State doctoral student awarded national research service grant for gut microbiome, arsenic research
-
Nebraska30 minutes agoUnderground Railroad site reopens after 7-year closure in Nebraska City
-
Nevada37 minutes agoCaltech readies to build world’s most sensitive radio telescope in Nevada