Connect with us

Missouri

Can Kerrick Jackson Rebuild Missouri After SEC-Worst Season?

Published

on

Can Kerrick Jackson Rebuild Missouri After SEC-Worst Season?



Image credit:

Missouri head coach Kerrick Jackson (Photo courtesy of Thomas Raymond/Mizzou Athletics)

Kerrick Jackson didn’t duck the reality of the moment.

He didn’t point to Missouri’s meager budget, outdated facilities or the resource chasm that separates it from the rest of the Southeastern Conference—even if he would’ve been well within his rights to do so.

Advertisement

Instead, after Tuesday morning’s season-ending 4-1 loss to Alabama in the opening round of the SEC Tournament, the second-year Tigers coach made clear that his team’s last-place finish was his responsibility.

“Ultimately, it’s on me,” he said bluntly. “The one thing that as I look back on the year and reflect, the team should reflect who I am as an individual and how I go about my business, and there wasn’t enough of that.”

This wasn’t postgame deflection or hollow contrition. Jackson has always been direct, always embraced accountability. It’s part of why Missouri hired him in the first place, hoping he could ignite a long-stalled engine.

That turnaround hasn’t come—at least not yet. And few coaches in college baseball face a steeper climb.

Missouri hasn’t reached the NCAA Tournament since 2010 and has just one super regional appearance in its Division I history. Since joining the SEC in 2013, the Tigers have finished .500 or better in conference play only once. The Big 12 was more forgiving. But there’s no going back now.

Advertisement

In a league defined by superlatives—biggest crowds, deepest pockets, flashiest facilities—Missouri remains the outlier. Not because it wants to be. Not because it’s unwilling to try. But because the cold truth is it lacks what most others in the SEC take for granted: real, sustainable resources.

It’s no excuse. Just reality.

“We have not necessarily invested to the level that we need to, candidly,” athletic director Laird Veatch acknowledged publicly earlier this month.

While other SEC programs are spending millions to construct rosters brimming with future MLB talent, the Tigers operate without those advantages. It’s a major handicap in a sport propelled by deep pockets. 

They play in one of the conference’s smallest stadiums, with one of its smallest budgets and a limited support staff. Unsurprisingly, the program has struggled mightily to stay afloat in the nation’s most demanding baseball league.

Advertisement

That disparity came into full focus in 2025, a season that ended with Missouri at 16-39 overall and just 3-27 in SEC play. It was a brutal campaign by any measure, punctuated by a quiet, familiar exit in Hoover. Missouri didn’t just finish last—it finished historically last, winning the fewest amount of conference games in the SEC’s 30-game era.

“We’re an immature baseball club,” Jackson said Tuesday. “And I don’t mean that disrespectfully. It’s just the reality of what it is.”

Jackson understands the uphill nature of his current job and believes his experiences in other Division I rebuilds will ultimately help him succeed. 

He knows that competing in the SEC without the same financial backing or infrastructure is like entering a Formula 1 race in a pickup. But he also knows that dwelling on disadvantages won’t move the program forward. Progress, as he sees it, starts with controlling what he can and outworking everyone else.

So for all the structural drawbacks and on-field struggles, Jackson isn’t waving a white flag. Instead, he’s leaning fully into the challenge, even if that sometimes feels unfair.

Advertisement

“We got to get it done regardless,” Jackson told Baseball America. “Whatever [Missouri’s athletic department] can do to assist us is phenomenal but, in the meantime, I need to keep grinding and make sure we get it done regardless of the resources we have.”

One resource Jackson knows he can count on is time. His relationship with Veatch, who hired him at Memphis in 2023, has given him that increasingly rare commodity in college athletics.

“It’s huge because I’m not looking over my shoulder,” Jackson said. “When [Veatch] comes in, I know he’s a baseball guy. I was fortunate that the guy who hired me at Memphis got the job here. He knows what I’m capable of. That’s why he hired me at Memphis. I can do the same thing here.”

Still, there’s no illusion about what that will take, especially in this league. Jackson is acutely aware of Missouri’s current place in the SEC pecking order and knows just how different things are in Columbia, where there’s less tradition, less money, less built-in support. 

But that hasn’t changed his vision.

Advertisement

“I know this place,” he said. “I know where we’re different than the rest of the SEC. I know we have some disadvantages. That doesn’t stop me from wanting us to be one of the top programs in the country but, more importantly, to put us in position to improve and succeed.”

And despite a season that ended with just three SEC wins and more questions than answers, Jackson sees the challenge as fertile ground—not a death sentence.

“What I like about adversity is, it becomes great if you learn from it and move forward from it,” he said.

Growth won’t come overnight. But, the way Jackson sees it, acknowledging the issues is a start. And at Missouri—a place where reaching the postseason has long felt aspirational rather than expected—that start matters. 

Especially if it comes with the belief—however stubborn or unorthodox—that the climb is worth it.

Advertisement

“As we’re the biggest story for how bad we are this year,” Jackson said, “I promise you, we’ll be the biggest story for how good we’re going to be next year.”



Source link

Missouri

Missouri’s Mitchell named to men’s basketball All-SEC second-team | Jefferson City News-Tribune

Published

on

Missouri’s Mitchell named to men’s basketball All-SEC second-team | Jefferson City News-Tribune


Missouri senior forward Mark Mitchell was recognized Monday with a second-team selection to the All-Southeastern Conference teams.

Mitchell has led the Tigers all season long and tops the team in scoring (17.9 points per game), rebounding (5.2) and assists (3.6). He would be the just the second player in program to lead all the categories in one season, joining Albert White from the 1998-99 season.

Mitchell is also on pace to become the first player in program history to average at least 17 points, five rebounds and three assists since Anthony Peeler in 1992, the year he took home the Big 8 Conference Player of the Year award.

Mitchell was the only Missouri player to be recognized in SEC postseason awards.

Advertisement

Five players were named to each of the three All-SEC teams.

Darius Acuff Jr. (Arkansas), Ja’Kobi Gillespie (Tennessee), Thomas Haugh (Florida), Labaron Philon Jr. (Alabama) and Tyler Tanner (Vanderbilt) made the first team.

Acuff was named the conference’s player of the year and freshman of the year.

Joining Mitchell on the second team were Nate Ament (Tennessee), Rueben Chinyelu (Florida), Otega Oweh (Kentucky) and Dailyn Swain (Texas), while Rashaun Agee (Texas A&M), Alex Condon (Florida), Keyshawn Hall (Auburn), Aden Holloway (Alabama) and Josh Hubbard (Mississippi State) were named to the third team.

The All-SEC defensive team consisted of Chinyelu, Somto Cyril (Georgia), Felix Okpara (Tennessee), Billy Richmond III (Arkansas) and Tanner. Chinyelu was selected as the defensive player of the year.

Advertisement

Appearing on the all-freshman team were Acuff, Amari Allen (Alabama), Ament, Malachi Moreno (Kentucky) and Meleek Thomas (Arkansas).

Swain was selected as the newcomer of the year, while Urban Klavzar of Florida was named the sixth man of the year.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri (MSHSAA) High School Girls Basketball State Playoff Brackets, Matchup, Schedule – March 9, 2026

Published

on

Missouri (MSHSAA) High School Girls Basketball State Playoff Brackets, Matchup, Schedule – March 9, 2026


The 2026 Missouri high school basketball state championship brackets continue on Monday, March 9, with eight games in the sectional and quarterfinal round of the higher classifications.

High School On SI has brackets for every classification in the Missouri high school basketball playoffs. The championship games will begin on March 19.


Missouri High School Girls Basketball 2026 Playoff Brackets, Schedule (MSHSAA) – March 9, 2026

Advertisement

Sectionals

Doniphan vs. Potosi – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Advertisement

St. James vs. St. Francis Borgia – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Notre Dame de Sion vs. Oak Grove – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Smithville vs. Benton – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Cardinal Ritter College Prep vs. Clayton – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Advertisement

Orchard Farm vs. Kirksville – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Advertisement

Boonville vs. Strafford – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Reeds Spring vs. Nevada – 03/09, 6:00 PM CT

Advertisement

Quarterfinals

Festus vs. Lift for Life Academy – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT

Grandview vs. Kearney – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT

MICDS vs. St. Dominic – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT

Advertisement

Helias vs. Marshfield – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT


Advertisement

Quarterfinals

Jackson vs. Marquette – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT

Advertisement

Rock Bridge vs. Staley – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT

Incarnate Word Academy vs. Troy-Buchanan – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT

Kickapoo vs. Lee’s Summit West – 03/13, 6:00 PM CT


Advertisement

More Coverage from High School On SI



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri lawmakers advance ‘A’ through ‘F’ school grading bill

Published

on

Missouri lawmakers advance ‘A’ through ‘F’ school grading bill


Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe’s request to grade public schools on an “A” through “F” scale is pushing House lawmakers to approve legislation some think isn’t quite ready.

With approval and dissent on both sides of the aisle, the House voted a bill to create a new school accountability system through to the Senate 96-53 Thursday despite concerns the letter grades could be a “scarlet letter” for underperforming schools.

“Will this labeling system actually improve schools or will it mostly brand communities, destabilize staffing and incentivize gaming rather than learning?” asked state Rep. Kem Smith, a Democrat from Florissant, during House debate Tuesday morning, March 3.

Advertisement

She said the key metrics that determine the grade, performance and growth, are volatile.

“The label itself can become a self-fulfilling prophecy,” she said. “The bill doubles down on high stakes metrics that are known to be unstable.”

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Dane Diehl, a Republican from Butler, told lawmakers that a performance-based school report card with “A” through “F” grades is inevitable. The details, though, are negotiable.

“The governor’s executive order, it is going to happen either way,” he said. “I think we tried to make that process a little better for school districts.”

Advertisement

Kehoe’s order directs the state’s education department to draw up a plan for the report cards and present it to the State Board of Education. The board could reject the idea, but with a board with primarily new members appointed by Kehoe, lawmakers have accepted the system as fate.

State Rep. Ed Lewis, a Republican from Moberly and chair of the House’s education committee, told the committee in January that he prioritized the bill as a way to give lawmakers influence over the final outcome. He is happy with the edits the committee made, which gives the education department more leeway to determine grade thresholds and removes a provision that would raise expectations once 65% of schools achieve “A” or “B” grades.

The House also approved an amendment March 3 that would grade schools’ environment. This would be based on the rates of student suspension, seclusion and restraint incident rates and satisfaction surveys given to students, parents and teachers.

The Senate’s version, which passed out of its education committee last week, does not include those changes.

“I think (the House bill) is the best product we have in the Capitol right now,” Lewis said. “I am not saying it’s complete, but it is the best we have right now.”

Advertisement

The changes have softened some skeptics of the legislation, like state Rep. Brad Pollitt.

Pollitt, a Sedalia Republican, said he didn’t support the legislation “for a number of years.” But with the edits, he sees potential for the legislation to usher in changes to the way the state accredits public schools.

The current process, he said, “nobody seems to like,” pointing to widespread concerns with the state’s standardized test.

Some of these changes are already happening quietly. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education received a grant from the federal government to develop a state assessment based on through-year testing, which would measure student growth throughout the school year, instead of a single summative assessment.

The department is poised to pilot the new test in 14 classrooms this spring, hoping to eventually offer it statewide within a few years. But the estimated startup cost of $2 million is one of many department requests cut from the governor’s proposed budget as the state grapples with declining revenue.

Advertisement

Creating the “A” through “F” report cards is estimated to cost a similar amount, if not more, according to the state’s fiscal note. The expense is largely frontloaded, going to the programming and technology support required to create the grade cards’ interface.

When The Independent asked Kehoe’s office about the fiscal note, the governor’s communications director Gabby Picard said he would work with “associated agencies” to determine appropriate funding “while remaining mindful of the current budget constraints and maintaining fiscal responsibility.”

The House’s version of the legislation includes an incentive program for high-performing schools, giving bonuses to go toward teacher recruitment and retention, if the legislature appropriates funding for the program.

The bill originally proposed incentives of $50-100 per student to subsidize teacher pay. This had large fiscal implications, and Lewis surmised that it would violate a section of the State Constitution prohibiting bonuses for public employees.

Advertisement

Making the funding optional and directing it to the school’s teacher recruitment and retention fund remedied those concerns. The Senate Education Committee removed the incentive program in its version of the legislation.

The House’s approval Thursday does not stop discussion and possible amendments. Next, the bill will go to the Senate for consideration, and if any changes are made, it will return to the House for more discussion.

This story was first published at missouriindependent.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending