Midwest
Judge puts pause on St. Louis guaranteed income program that pays poor families $500 a month
A Missouri judge halted St. Louis’ guaranteed income program while it’s being challenged in court.
Circuit Judge Joseph P. Whyte on Thursday issued a temporary restraining order against the St. Louis Guaranteed Basic Income Project (GBI). This move will impact more than 500 families who were participating in the GBI program.
“The City of St. Louis will follow the judge’s order,” St. Louis Mayor Tishaura O. Jones said, according to a local FOX affiliate.
“We are exploring our legal options, and my administration continues to find every avenue possible to support the families of St. Louis City,” she added.
A St. Louis judge halted a guaranteed income program while it’s being challenged in court. (Raymond Boyd/Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)
CHICAGO SUBURB TO EXPAND ELIGIBILITY OF GUARANTEED INCOME PROGRAM: ‘WE ALL NEED HELP’
Jones, who signed off on the pilot program in December 2022, was listed in the plaintiff’s lawsuit along with the city’s treasurer and comptroller. Payments from the GBI program will cease until the court case is resolved.
The lawsuit, which was filed on June 13, claimed that the GBI violates both the Missouri State Constitution and the St. Louis City Charter.
According to St. Louis Public Radio, lawyers for the city countered that the program is constitutional because it is intended to “stabilize families and benefit the local economy.”
The lawsuit states that the “Missouri Constitution prohibits a county, city or other political corporation or subdivision of the state from lend[ing] its credit or grant[ing] public money or property to any private individual, association or corporation …”
Bevis Schock, the attorney involved in the lawsuit, told Fox News Digital that his legal group, the Holy Joes, is in the business of “enforcing Constitutional norms” and that the Missouri Constitution and the City of St. Louis “disallows gifts to private individuals.”
Circuit Judge Joseph P. Whyte on Thursday issued a Temporary Restraining Order against St. Louis Guaranteed Basic Income Project (GBI). This move will impact more than 500 families who were participating in the GBI program. (iStock)
“That’s what this is, and we feel that the various business subsidies are as bad as a guaranteed basic income gift,” Schock told Fox News Digital.
SAN FRANCISCO SUED OVER GUARANTEED-INCOME PROGRAMS BLASTED BY CRITICS AS RACIST
He went on to say, “I mean, both of them are bad from a policy perspective, but the Missouri Constitution actually prohibits the guaranteed basic income, and we feel like if we don’t enforce our constitutional norms, our society won’t work out very well.”
After the GBI program launched in December 2022, the first rollout of monthly payments of $500 was announced in October 2023. The funding came from $5 million in COVID relief funds and a $1 million donation from tech billionaire Jack Dorsey.
In order to qualify, participants had to make less than $53,000 and have children. The program had originally planned to support 440 participants but due to philanthropic donations, the program added 100 more.
The program was set to end in 2025.
Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit claimed that “Uplift Harris,” a guaranteed income program established in Harris County, is “unconstitutional.” (MediaNews Group/Boston Herald/Dylan Hollingsworth/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The ruling on the St. Louis GBI program comes amid similar programs becoming a trend across the U.S. in recent years with more than 100 GBI pilots launched since 2018. Several of the GBI programs stem from the efforts of a coalition of over 100 mayors pushing pilot GBI programs that offer low income participants up to $1,000 a month with no strings attached.
While some studies have shown that the pilots have produced positive results, many of these programs face funding and legal challenges.
Read the full article from Here
Detroit, MI
Where to watch Houston Astros vs Detroit Tigers: TV channel, start time, streaming for June 26
What to know about MLB’s ABS robot umpire strike zone system
MLB launches ABS challenge system as players test robot umpire calls in a groundbreaking season.
The 2026 MLB season has surpassed the quarter mark, and after each team’s first 40 games, there’s plenty of reasons to tune in all summer long.
Chicago White Sox slugger Munetaka Murakami has already proven doubters wrong by launching 17 home runs, Pittsburgh’s Paul Skenes consistently looks like the best version of himself on the mound and Milwaukee ace Jacob Misiorowski is throwing harder than any starter in the majors.
The MLB action continues on Friday as the Houston Astros visit the Detroit Tigers.
Here’s everything you need to know to tune in for the first pitch.
See USA TODAY’s sortable MLB schedule to filter by team or division.
What time is Houston Astros vs Detroit Tigers?
First pitch between the Detroit Tigers and Houston Astros is scheduled for 6:40 p.m. (ET) on Friday, June 26.
How to watch Houston Astros vs Detroit Tigers on Friday
All times Eastern and accurate as of Friday, June 26, 2026, at 6:34 a.m.
Watch MLB all season long with Fubo
MLB regional blackout restrictions apply
MLB scores, results
MLB scores for June 26 games are available on usatoday.com . Here’s how to access today’s results:
See scores, results for all of today’s games.
Milwaukee, WI
We must have answers before awarding new wastewater contract | Opinion
Milwaukee’s current wastewater treatment contract holder, Veolia Water Milwaukee, is under fire, with some calling for an audit.
A look at MMSD’s South Shore and Jones Island wastewater plants
A look at MMSD’s South Shore and Jones Island plants as leaders weigh a contested $700M, 10-year operations contract in Milwaukee.
It goes without saying that Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) is an essential community asset.
Recently, MMSD has been in the news and not in a good way. The MMSD Commission voted to approve an audit of the district’s private wastewater operator. This is less than six weeks after the community organization Common Ground launched a public campaign calling for an audit of Veolia Water Milwaukee, alleging mismanagement of the Jones Island and South Shore wastewater treatment facilities.
I was briefly on a six-member MMSD advisory committee for the 1998 United Water Services contract. Now 28 years, and 2008, 2018, contracts later, the question is what firm to hire for the 2028 contract. I read Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and Urban Milwaukee articles, whistle-blower letters and other materials and jotted down concerns listed below (there are others):
- Veolia cut corners on treatment time and process chemicals
- Veolia allowed MMSD assets — buildings and process equipment — to deteriorate
- Veolia provided inadequate staffing
- Employees, particularly those who questioned management, were treated poorly
- Reversing these conditions will be very expensive, if it is even possible to do so
Aren’t these issues sufficient to disqualify Veolia from future consideration?
MMSD has an innovative civil engineering history.
The national American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) designated the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewage Treatment Plant a National Historic Civil Engineering Landmark when they honored Milwaukee in 1974 for developing the waste-activated sludge treatment process and pioneering a beneficial reuse of biosolids (Milorganite). MMSD has also been recognized for the Deep Tunnel and many innovative infrastructure and flood management projects over the years.
Wisconsin has a strong civil engineering community, which includes the American Society of Civil Engineers-Wisconsin Section (ASCE-WI); five civil engineering university programs with three —Marquette, MSOE and UW-Milwaukee — in Milwaukee); as well as many technical school and apprenticeship programs. Civil engineering projects require many types of expertise and skills.
Is anyone asking questions such as what should be the future of wastewater treatment in Milwaukee? Or what do citizens know about wastewater treatment? Or what do citizens need to know about treatment options to make informed decisions about parameters such as feasibility, public health, environmental protection, costs and financing?
Before the next contract is decided and awarded, shouldn’t human waste generators (citizens), civil engineers and the wastewater industry be asking some of these important questions?
Carol Diggelman, PhD, Emerita Professor, Milwaukee School of Engineering, where she taught for over 30 years, has since retiring, resumed volunteer activities with the League of Women Voters and organized many programs at the intersection of infrastructure and natural resources.
Minneapolis, MN
Reform, money and trust: Council members’ key criteria for Minneapolis’ next police chief
Minneapolis leaders agree the next police chief is a critical choice, but it remains unclear whether the mayor and City Council can align on a candidate.
Mayor Jacob Frey declined an interview on the topic after announcing the hiring process and timeline earlier in the week. But 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS spoke with City Council Member and Public Health, Safety & Equity Committee Chair Jason Chavez and Council Member LaTrisha Vetaw, the prior Public Health, Safety & Equity Committee Chair.
All agree the police chief is one of the most important roles in Minneapolis.
Asked what it would take to get enough members on board with a candidate so that they can be confirmed, Council Member Vetaw said, “I think we’re figuring some of those things out, but what I hear from all council members is someone who’s strong on reform and wants to actually get reforms done right.”
Vetaw added that the next permanent chief should also have a strong record on slowing overspending.
“We need somebody who’s really going to reel that in and handle our money with care. I think those are two things that I hear from all of my colleagues,” she said.
Brian O’Hara resigns as Minneapolis police chief after report shows he interfered with investigation into his conduct
Asked the same question, Council Member Chavez agreed on key candidate criteria, but he expressed less confidence in the hiring process.
“Well, I mean, I’ve cleared out — I’ve laid out some of the things that I would like to see in a candidate,” Chavez said. “And then I want us to feel included in this process, so they can hear our feedback, and I want there to be robust community engagement. I don’t think that it’s oppositional to this plan. I guess my only thing is I want to make sure that all 13 members are included in this process.”
“I really care about community engagement, I really care about the criteria, and I want to make sure that the police chief that comes into Minneapolis is strongly committed to police accountability,” he continued.
“People want transparency and accountability. They want someone who can speak to the community, and it’s truthful,” Vetaw said.
“Like, we’re all looking for the same kind of leader.”
The question comes as Community Safety Commissioner Todd Barnette, as the head of the department overseeing MPD and nominated by Mayor Frey in April, remains without enough City Council votes to be reappointed. Vetaw supports Barnette, while Chavez does not.
Vetaw said the lack of agreement over Commissioner Barnette is not an omen for the process of hiring a new MPD chief.
“I don’t believe that what’s happening with the commissioner is a direct reflection on the process for searching for a new chief. I think this council certainly separates those two,” she said.
“Do I want to move fast? Absolutely not. I want to move at a pace where we get the best person for the job … and I think we all want that. This is one of the most important roles in the city of Minneapolis.”
Chavez said he hopes the process leads to a chief he can support.
Asked if he believes he’ll be able to put his vote behind the candidate ultimately nominated by the mayor at the end of the process, Chavez said, “I would hope so.”
“And I want to be able to vote for a chief,” he continued. “I just think that we have to make sure that there’s a robust process that includes all council members, and that ensures that the voices of our community are not being left out.”
Former Chief Brian O’Hara was unanimously confirmed in 2022, though the council had a few different members at the time.
In a statement, a spokesperson for Mayor Frey said, “Mayor Frey has been very clear that the search for a new police chief will be a collaborative process that includes community, City staff, and Council Members.”
5 EYEWITNESS NEWS will continue tracking the selection process, including its cost to taxpayers.
-
Los Angeles, Ca11 minutes agoWoman ambushed, violently attacked by robber in downtown Long Beach
-
Detroit, MI29 minutes agoWhere to watch Houston Astros vs Detroit Tigers: TV channel, start time, streaming for June 26
-
San Francisco, CA41 minutes ago
I own a Turkish Restaurant in San Francisco. Turkey’s World Cup match here has changed my business.
-
Dallas, TX44 minutes agoAustralia advances at World Cup, how to buy Australia soccer tickets
-
Miami, FL49 minutes ago2 detained after police pursuit ends with bailout, neighborhood search in NW Miami-Dade – WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale
-
Boston, MA56 minutes agoDelta flight returns to Logan after smoke scare in cockpit – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News
-
Denver, CO59 minutes agoPat Surtain II Gets More Bad News Amid Broncos’ Uncertainty
-
Seattle, WA1 hour agoThe World Cup 2026 Pride Match between Egypt and Iran that Seattle hopes can ‘unite football community’