Health
ChatGPT found to give better medical advice than real doctors in blind study: ‘This will be a game changer’
With regards to answering medical questions, can ChatGPT do a greater job than human medical doctors?
It seems to be attainable, based on the outcomes of a brand new examine revealed in JAMA Inside Medication, led by researchers from the College of California San Diego.
The researchers compiled a random pattern of almost 200 medical questions that sufferers posted on Reddit, a preferred social dialogue web site, for medical doctors to reply. Subsequent, they entered the questions into ChatGPT (OpenAI’s synthetic intelligence chatbot) and recorded its response.
A panel of well being care professionals then evaluated each units of responses for high quality and empathy.
CHATGPT FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS: CAN THE AI CHATBOT MAKE THE PROFESSIONALS’ JOBS EASIER?
For almost 80% of the solutions, the chatbots received out over the true medical doctors.
“Our panel of well being care professionals most well-liked ChatGPT 4 to 1 over physicians,” mentioned lead researcher Dr. John W. Ayers, PhD, vice chief of innovation within the Division of Infectious Ailments and World Public Well being on the College of California San Diego.
AI language fashions might assist relieve message burden, physician says
One of many largest issues going through immediately’s well being care suppliers is that they are overburdened with messages from sufferers, Ayers mentioned.
“With the rise in on-line distant care, medical doctors now see their sufferers first through their inboxes — and the messages simply maintain piling up,” he mentioned in an interview with Fox Information Digital.
The inflow of messages might result in larger ranges of supplier burnout, Ayers believes.
“Burnout is already at an all-time excessive — almost two out of each three physicians report being burned out of their jobs, and we need to resolve that drawback,” he mentioned.
But there are hundreds of thousands of sufferers who’re both getting no solutions or unsatisfactory ones, he added.
Considering of how synthetic intelligence would possibly assist, Ayers and his workforce turned to Reddit to reveal how ChatGPT might current a attainable resolution to the backlog of suppliers’ questions.
Reddit has a “medical questions” group (a “subreddit” referred to as f/AskDocs) with almost 500,000 members. Individuals submit questions — and vetted well being care professionals present public responses.
“Medical doctors now see their sufferers first through their inboxes, and the messages simply maintain piling up.”
The questions are wide-ranging, with folks asking for opinions on most cancers scans, canine bites, miscarriages, vaccines and many different medical subjects.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTH CARE: NEW PRODUCT ACTS AS ‘COPILOT FOR DOCTORS’
One poster apprehensive he would possibly die after swallowing a toothpick. One other posted express images and puzzled if she’d contracted a sexually transmitted illness. Another person sought assist with emotions of impending doom and imminent demise.
“These are actual questions from actual sufferers and actual responses from actual medical doctors,” Ayers mentioned.
“We took those self same questions and put them into ChatGPT — then put them face to face with the medical doctors’ solutions.”
Medical doctors rated responses on high quality, empathy
After randomly deciding on the questions and solutions, the researchers introduced them to actual well being care professionals — who’re actively seeing sufferers.
They weren’t advised which responses have been supplied by ChatGPT and which have been supplied by medical doctors.
First, the researchers requested them to guage the standard of the knowledge within the message.
When assessing high quality, there are a number of attributes to contemplate, Ayers mentioned. “It could possibly be accuracy, readability, comprehensiveness or responsiveness,” he advised Fox Information Digital.
STUDENTS USE AI TECHNOLOGY TO FIND NEW BRAIN TUMOR THERAPY TARGETS — WITH A GOAL OF FIGHTING DISEASE FASTER
Subsequent, the researchers have been requested to guage empathy.
“It is not simply what you say, however the way you say it,” Ayers mentioned. “Does the response have empathy and make sufferers really feel that their voice is heard?”
“Medical doctors have useful resource constraints, so … they typically zero in on probably the most possible response and transfer on.”
ChatGPT was thrice extra seemingly to present a response that was superb or good in comparison with physicians, he advised Fox Information Digital. The chatbot was 10 occasions extra seemingly to present a response that was both empathetic or very empathetic in comparison with physicians.
It’s not that the medical doctors don’t have empathy for his or her sufferers, Ayers mentioned — it’s that they’re overburdened with messages and don’t at all times have the time to speak it.
“An AI mannequin has infinite processing energy in comparison with a health care provider,” he defined. “Medical doctors have useful resource constraints, so despite the fact that they’re empathetic towards their affected person, they typically zero in on probably the most possible response and transfer on.”
ChatGPT, with its limitless time and sources, would possibly provide a holistic response of all of the concerns that medical doctors are sampling, Ayers mentioned.
Vince Lynch, AI professional and CEO of IV.AI in Los Angeles, California, reviewed the examine and was not shocked by the findings.
“The way in which AI solutions questions is usually curated in order that it presents its solutions in a extremely constructive and empathetic method,” he advised Fox Information Digital. “The AI even goes past well-written, boilerplate solutions, with sentiment evaluation being run on the reply to make sure that probably the most constructive solutions are delivered.”
AI HEALTH CARE PLATFORM PREDICTS DIABETES WITH HIGH ACCURACY BUT ‘WON’T REPLACE PATIENT CARE’
An AI system additionally makes use of one thing referred to as “reinforcement studying,” Lynch defined, which is when it assessments alternative ways of answering a query till it finds one of the best reply for its viewers.
“So, while you evaluate an AI answering a query to a medical skilled, the AI really has much more expertise than any given physician in relation to showing empathetic, when in actuality it’s simply mimicking empathetic language within the state of affairs of medical recommendation,” he mentioned.
“Individuals are going to make use of it with or with out us.”
The size of the responses might have additionally performed an element within the scores they acquired, identified Dr. Justin Norden, a digital well being and AI professional and a professor at Stanford College in California, who was not concerned within the examine.
“Size in a response is vital for folks perceiving high quality and empathy,” Norden advised Fox Information Digital. “Total, the AI responses have been virtually double in size in contrast with the doctor responses. Additional, when physicians did write longer responses, they have been most well-liked at larger charges.”
Merely requesting physicians to jot down longer responses sooner or later isn’t a sustainable possibility, Norden added.
“Affected person messaging volumes are going up, and physicians merely shouldn’t have time,” he mentioned. “This paper showcases how we’d be capable of tackle this, and it doubtlessly could possibly be very efficient.”
AI solutions could possibly be ‘elevated’ by actual medical doctors
Somewhat than changing medical doctors’ steering, Ayers is suggesting ChatGPT might act as a place to begin for physicians, serving to them subject massive volumes of messages extra rapidly.
“The AI might draft an preliminary response, then the medical workforce or doctor would consider it, appropriate any misinformation, enhance the response and [tailor it] to the affected person,” Ayers mentioned.
It’s a method that he refers to as “precision messaging.”
He mentioned, “Medical doctors will spend much less time writing and extra time coping with the guts of drugs and elevating that communication channel.”
“This will probably be a sport changer for the sufferers that we serve, serving to to enhance inhabitants well being and doubtlessly saving lives,” Ayers predicted.
Primarily based on the examine’s findings, he believes physicians ought to begin implementing AI language fashions in a method that presents minimal threat.
AI-POWERED MENTAL HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC TOOL COULD BE THE FIRST OF ITS KIND TO PREDICT, TREAT DEPRESSION
“Individuals are going to make use of it with or with out us,” he mentioned — noting that sufferers are already turning to ChatGPT on their very own to get “canned messages.”
Some gamers within the house are already transferring to implement ChatGPT-based fashions — Epic, the well being care software program firm, not too long ago introduced it’s teaming up with Microsoft to combine ChatGPT-4 into its digital well being document software program.
Potential advantages balanced by unknown dangers
Ayers mentioned he’s conscious folks will probably be involved concerning the lack of regulation within the AI house.
“We sometimes take into consideration laws when it comes to cease indicators and guard rails — sometimes, regulators step in after one thing unhealthy has occurred and attempt to stop it from occurring once more, however that does not should be the case right here,” he advised Fox Information Digital.
“I do not know what the cease indicators and guard rails essentially must be,” he mentioned. “However I do know that regulators might set what the objective line is, that means the AI must be demonstrated to enhance affected person outcomes so as to be applied.”
One potential threat Norden flagged is whether or not sufferers’ perceptions would change in the event that they knew the responses have been written or aided by AI.
“A fear I’ve is that sooner or later, folks won’t really feel any help by means of a message, as sufferers could assume will probably be written by AI.”
He cited a earlier examine targeted on psychological well being help, which discovered that AI messages have been far most well-liked to human ones.
“Curiously, as soon as the messages have been disclosed as being written by AI, the help felt by the receiver of those messages disappeared,” he mentioned.
“A fear I’ve is that sooner or later, folks won’t really feel any help by means of a message, as sufferers could assume will probably be written by AI.”
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Dr. Tinglong Dai, professor of operations administration and enterprise analytics on the Johns Hopkins Carey Enterprise College in Baltimore, Maryland, expressed concern concerning the examine’s means to characterize actual eventualities.
“The declare that AI will change medical doctors is untimely and exaggerated.”
“It is very important word that the setting of the examine could not precisely mirror real-world medical observe,” he advised Fox Information Digital.
“In actuality, physicians are paid to supply medical recommendation and have vital liabilities on account of that recommendation. The declare that AI will change medical doctors is untimely and exaggerated.”
Research highlights ‘new territory’ for AI in well being care
Whereas there are quite a few unknowns, many specialists appear to agree this can be a first-of-its-kind examine that would have far-reaching implications.
“Total, this examine highlights the brand new territory we’re transferring into for well being care — AI having the ability to carry out on the doctor stage for sure written duties,” mentioned Norden.
“When physicians are affected by document ranges of burnout, you see why Epic and companions are already planning to include these instruments into affected person messaging.”
Health
Jennifer Hudson Lost 80-Lbs Without Depriving Herself—Learn Her Secrets
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
Health
Kennedy’s Plan for the Drug Crisis: A Network of ‘Healing Farms’
Though Mr. Kennedy’s embrace of recovery farms may be novel, the concept stretches back almost a century. In 1935, the government opened the United States Narcotic Farm in Lexington, Ky., to research and treat addiction. Over the years, residents included Chet Baker and William S. Burroughs (who portrayed the institution in his novel, “Junkie: Confessions of an Unredeemed Drug Addict”). The program had high relapse rates and was tainted by drug experiments on human subjects. By 1975, as local treatment centers began to proliferate around the country, the program closed.
In America, therapeutic communities for addiction treatment became popular in the 1960s and ’70s. Some, like Synanon, became notorious for cultlike, abusive environments. There are now perhaps 3,000 worldwide, researchers estimate, including one that Mr. Kennedy has also praised — San Patrignano, an Italian program whose centerpiece is a highly regarded bakery, staffed by residents.
“If we do go down the road of large government-funded therapeutic communities, I’d want to see some oversight to ensure they live up to modern standards,” said Dr. Sabet, who is now president of the Foundation for Drug Policy Solutions. “We should get rid of the false dichotomy, too, between these approaches and medications, since we know they can work together for some people.”
Should Mr. Kennedy be confirmed, his authority to establish healing farms would be uncertain. Building federal treatment farms in “depressed rural areas,” as he said in his documentary, presumably on public land, would hit political and legal roadblocks. Fully legalizing and taxing cannabis to pay for the farms would require congressional action.
In the concluding moments of the documentary, Mr. Kennedy invoked Carl Jung, the Swiss psychiatrist whose views on spirituality influenced Alcoholics Anonymous. Dr. Jung, he said, felt that “people who believed in God got better faster and that their recovery was more durable and enduring than people who didn’t.”
Health
Children exposed to higher fluoride levels found to have lower IQs, study reveals
The debate about the benefits and risks of fluoride is ongoing, as RFK Jr. — incoming President Trump’s pick for HHS secretary — pushes to remove it from the U.S. water supply.
“Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders and thyroid disease,” RFK wrote in a post on X in November.
A new study published in JAMA Pediatrics on Jan. 6 found another correlation between fluoride exposure and children’s IQs.
RFK JR. CALLS FOR REMOVAL OF FLUORIDE FROM DRINKING WATER, SPARKING DEBATE
Study co-author Kyla Taylor, PhD, who is based in North Carolina, noted that fluoridated water has been used “for decades” to reduce dental cavities and improve oral health.
“However, there is concern that pregnant women and children are getting fluoride from many sources, including drinking water, water-added foods and beverages, teas, toothpaste, floss and mouthwash, and that their total fluoride exposure is too high and may affect fetal, infant and child neurodevelopment,” she told Fox News Digital.
The new research, led by scientists at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), analyzed 74 epidemiological studies on children’s IQ and fluoride exposure.
FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS EPA FURTHER REGULATE FLUORIDE IN DRINKING WATER DUE TO CONCERNS OVER LOWERED IQ IN KIDS
The studies measured fluoride in drinking water and urine across 10 countries, including Canada, China, Denmark, India, Iran, Mexico, Pakistan, New Zealand, Spain and Taiwan. (None were conducted in the U.S.)
The meta-analysis found a “statistically significant association” between higher fluoride exposure and lower children’s IQ scores, according to Taylor.
“[It showed] that the more fluoride a child is exposed to, the more likely that child’s IQ will be lower than if they were not exposed,” she said.
These results were consistent with six previous meta-analyses, all of which reported the same “statistically significant inverse associations” between fluoride exposure and children’s IQs, Taylor emphasized.
The research found that for every 1mg/L increase in urinary fluoride, there was a 1.63-point decrease in IQ.
‘Safe’ exposure levels
The World Health Organization (WHO) has established 1.5mg/L as the “upper safe limit” of fluoride in drinking water.
“There is concern that pregnant women and children are getting fluoride from many sources.”
Meanwhile, the U.S. Public Health Service recommends a fluoride concentration of 0.7 mg/L in drinking water.
“There was not enough data to determine if 0.7 mg/L of fluoride exposure in drinking water affected children’s IQs,” Taylor noted.
FDA BANS RED FOOD DYE DUE TO POTENTIAL CANCER RISK
Higher levels of the chemical can be found in wells and community water serving nearly three million people in the U.S., the researcher noted.
She encouraged pregnant women and parents of small children to be mindful of their total fluoride intake.
“If their water is fluoridated, they may wish to replace tap water with low-fluoride bottled water, like purified water, and limit exposure from other sources, such as dental products or black tea,” she said.
“Parents can use low-fluoride bottled water to mix with powdered infant formula and limit use of fluoridated toothpaste by young children.”
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health.
While the research did not intend to address broader public health implications of water fluoridation in the U.S., Taylor suggested that the findings could help inform future research into the impact of fluoride on children’s health.
Dental health expert shares cautions
In response to this study and other previous research, Dr. Ellie Phillips, DDS, an oral health educator based in Austin, Texas, told Fox News Digital that she does not support water fluoridation.
“I join those who vehemently oppose public water fluoridation, and I question why our water supplies are still fluoridated in the 21st century,” she wrote in an email.
“There are non-fluoridated cities and countries where the public enjoy high levels of oral health, which in some cases appear better than those that are fluoridated.”
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Phillips called the fluoride debate “confusing” even among dentists, as the American Dental Association (ADA) advocates for fluoride use for cavity prevention through water fluoridation, toothpaste and mouthwash — “sometimes in high concentrations.”
“[But] biologic (holistic) dentists generally encourage their patients to fear fluoride and avoid its use entirely, even if their teeth are ravaged by tooth decay,” she said.
“Topical fluoride is beneficial, while systemic consumption poses risks.”
Phillips encouraged the public to consider varying fluoride compounds, the effect of different concentrations and the “extreme difference” between applying fluoride topically and ingesting it.
“Topical fluoride is beneficial, while systemic consumption poses risks,” she cautioned.
“Individuals must take charge of their own oral health using natural and informed strategies.”
The study received funding from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Intramural Research Program.
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science1 week ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology7 days ago
Amazon Prime will shut down its clothing try-on program
-
News1 week ago
Mapping the Damage From the Palisades Fire
-
Technology6 days ago
L’Oréal’s new skincare gadget told me I should try retinol
-
Technology3 days ago
Super Bowl LIX will stream for free on Tubi
-
Business4 days ago
Why TikTok Users Are Downloading ‘Red Note,’ the Chinese App
-
Technology1 day ago
Nintendo omits original Donkey Kong Country Returns team from the remaster’s credits