Connect with us

Finance

Daniel Kahneman’s ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ teaches 4 valuable investing lessons

Published

on

Daniel Kahneman’s ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ teaches 4 valuable investing lessons
  • System 1 operates swiftly, relying on intuition and emotions. It employs mental shortcuts (heuristics) and leans on readily available information to facilitate rapid decision-making.
  • System 2 functions at a slower pace, prioritising logic and deliberate thought. It demands effort and focused attention to thoroughly analyse information and engage in careful reasoning.

The investing implications of these systems include:

  • Biases originating from System 1 can result in suboptimal investment decisions. Kahneman highlights multiple cognitive biases, including overconfidence, framing effects, and loss aversion, that can distort our judgment. These biases may contribute to impulsive decision-making, the pursuit of past successes, and panicking amid market downturns.
  • Activate System 2 for improved results. Intentionally engaging System 2 can assist in mitigating these biases. Thoughtfully evaluating risk-reward scenarios, incorporating diverse perspectives, and leveraging long-term historical data can contribute to more rational and well-informed investment decisions.

Embracing humility within the financial sphere can yield tangible advantages for your finances. Kahneman outlines several ways in which adopting a humble approach can result in cost savings. Some of his famous quotes that underline some necessary investing lessons include:

The best we can do is a compromise: Learn to recognise situations in which mistakes are likely and try harder to avoid significant mistakes when the stakes are high.”

This statement encapsulates the essence of navigating life with an acknowledgment of both our cognitive strengths and limitations. Recognising that errors are an inherent part of the human experience marks a crucial initial stride toward becoming a more insightful and efficient individual.

Moreover, comprehending the vulnerabilities of our minds, such as overconfidence, anchoring, and loss aversion, empowers us to steer clear of succumbing to these pitfalls in critical situations. Additionally, the significance of context cannot be overlooked. Identifying circumstances characterised by stress, time constraints, or limited information serves as a signal for heightened awareness and a shift toward slower, more deliberate decision-making.

Drawing lessons from past missteps is equally essential. Reflecting on our previous errors and discerning the contributing factors provides us with valuable insights, enabling us to navigate similar situations more adeptly in the future.

There is general agreement among researchers that nearly all stock pickers, whether they know it or not – and few of them do – are playing a game of chance.

Advertisement

Kahneman harbours skepticism regarding the consistent ability of individual investors to outperform the market. This skepticism is grounded in various pivotal factors.

  • Market efficiency, as proposed by the Efficient Markets Hypothesis, asserts that all relevant information is already incorporated into stock prices. This poses a formidable challenge to consistently forecast future price movements and to consistently outperform the market through attempts to ‘outsmart’ it. Over the last five decades, research overwhelmingly aligns with this hypothesis. Numerous studies indicate that a significant majority of active mutual funds exhibit underperformance when accounting for fees and expenses, implying that their endeavours in stock selection do not consistently contribute value.
  • Investors are prone to a range of cognitive biases such as overconfidence, loss aversion, and anchoring, which can result in irrational decisions and unfavourable investment outcomes. These biases have the potential to skew our evaluations of risk and reward, resulting in behaviours like chasing previous winners, prematurely selling successful investments, and persistently holding onto underperforming assets.
  • Seasoned investors equipped with superior information, resources, and analytical tools may hold an advantage over individual investors. This dynamic can establish an unequal playing field, amplifying the challenge of consistently outperforming the market.

The research suggests a surprising conclusion: to maximize predictive accuracy, final decisions should be left to formulas, especially in low-validity environments.

At the core of Kahneman’s doubtfulness regarding the consistent outperformance of individual investors in the market lies his characterisation of stock picking as a ‘low-validity environment’.

This feeling of unsurety arises because predicting future outcomes in low-validity environments is inherently challenging. The factors influencing stock prices are intricate and varied, often involving unpredictable news, market psychology, and external events. Identifying consistently profitable investment opportunities becomes a significant challenge under such circumstances.

Moreover, an inconsistent investing process in this environment further compounds the difficulty. Shifting between different strategies, pursuing hot tips, or making emotionally driven decisions based on short-term market fluctuations can intensify the inherent unpredictability and contribute to suboptimal performance.

In low-validity environments, investors should recognise the crucial role of consistency. Adhering to a clearly defined, objective investment process grounded in sound principles and long-term goals serves to mitigate the impact of emotions and biases. This entails aspects such as asset allocation, diversification, rebalancing, and adhering to disciplined entry and exit points. Through minimising impulsive decisions and responding to short-term fluctuations, consistency enhances the likelihood of navigating the inherent uncertainty of the market and attaining long-term success.

Advertisement

Success = talent + luck; Great Success = a little more talent + a lot of luck.

This formula underscores the importance of luck in achieving success, especially in the context of investing. It emphasises the substantial influence of chance events on outcomes, even for individuals possessing considerable skill.

Acknowledging the role of luck can cultivate humility, promote caution, and foster realistic expectations for future performance. This awareness can ultimately enhance the prospects of sustainable long-term success by combining skillful decision-making with a prudent acknowledgment of the unpredictable nature of markets. Disregarding the role of chance may result in overconfidence, risky behaviour, and underestimating the potential impact of unforeseen events in the future.

Despite the substantial role luck plays, it remains crucial to cultivate skills. Foundational elements such as investing knowledge, disciplined behaviour, and sound strategies provide the basis for navigating market fluctuations and making informed decisions. It is essential to concentrate on what can be controlled. Instead of fixating on luck, investors should prioritise managing their emotions, controlling risk, and implementing thoroughly researched investment strategies.

The author’s viewpoint on luck serves as a valuable reminder for investors to uphold humility, manage expectations, and approach the market with a balanced understanding that incorporates both skill and the inherent element of chance.

Advertisement

Although Kahneman’s book may not adhere to the conventional format of a typical investing guide with specific strategies or financial advice, it undeniably provides valuable insights for investors. Outperforming the market proves to be a formidable challenge, and the majority of investors find it beyond their capability. Nevertheless, delving into this book imparts investors with crucial perspectives on investing, addressing aspects such as risks, luck, and the essential talent required for successful wealth creation in the stock market.

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it’s all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Check all the latest action on Budget 2024 here.
Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

More
Less

Advertisement

Published: 13 Jan 2024, 11:34 AM IST

Finance

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Published

on

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Cornell University administrator Warren Petrofsky will serve as the Faculty of Arts and Sciences’ new dean of administration and finance, charged with spearheading efforts to shore up the school’s finances as it faces a hefty budget deficit.

Petrofsky’s appointment, announced in a Friday email from FAS Dean Hopi E. Hoekstra to FAS affiliates, will begin April 20 — nearly a year after former FAS dean of administration and finance Scott A. Jordan stepped down. Petrofsky will replace interim dean Mary Ann Bradley, who helped shape the early stages of FAS cost-cutting initiatives.

Petrofsky currently serves as associate dean of administration at Cornell University’s College of Arts and Sciences.

As dean, he oversaw a budget cut of nearly $11 million to the institution’s College of Arts and Sciences after the federal government slashed at least $250 million in stop-work orders and frozen grants, according to the Cornell Daily Sun.

He also serves on a work group established in November 2025 to streamline the school’s administrative systems.

Advertisement

Earlier, at the University of Pennsylvania, Petrofsky managed capital initiatives and organizational redesigns in a number of administrative roles.

Petrofsky is poised to lead similar efforts at the FAS, which relaunched its Resources Committee in spring 2025 and created a committee to consolidate staff positions amid massive federal funding cuts.

As part of its planning process, the committee has quietly brought on external help. Over several months, consultants from McKinsey & Company have been interviewing dozens of administrators and staff across the FAS.

Petrofsky will also likely have a hand in other cost-cutting measures across the FAS, which is facing a $365 million budget deficit. The school has already announced it will keep spending flat for the 2026 fiscal year, and it has dramatically reduced Ph.D. admissions.

In her email, Hoekstra praised Petrofsky’s performance across his career.

Advertisement

“Warren has emphasized transparency, clarity in communication, and investment in staff development,” she wrote. “He approaches change with steadiness and purpose, and with deep respect for the mission that unites our faculty, researchers, staff, and students. I am confident that he will be a strong partner to me and to our community.”

—Staff writer Amann S. Mahajan can be reached at [email protected] and on Signal at amannsm.38. Follow her on X @amannmahajan.

Continue Reading

Finance

Where in California are people feeling the most financial distress?

Published

on

Where in California are people feeling the most financial distress?

Inland California’s relative affordability cannot always relieve financial stress.

My spreadsheet reviewed a WalletHub ranking of financial distress for the residents of 100 U.S. cities, including 17 in California. The analysis compared local credit scores, late bill payments, bankruptcy filings and online searches for debt or loans to quantify where individuals had the largest money challenges.

When California cities were divided into three geographic regions – Southern California, the Bay Area, and anything inland – the most challenges were often found far from the coast.

The average national ranking of the six inland cities was 39th worst for distress, the most troubled grade among the state’s slices.

Bakersfield received the inland region’s worst score, ranking No. 24 highest nationally for financial distress. That was followed by Sacramento (30th), San Bernardino (39th), Stockton (43rd), Fresno (45th), and Riverside (52nd).

Advertisement

Southern California’s seven cities overall fared better, with an average national ranking of 56th largest financial problems.

However, Los Angeles had the state’s ugliest grade, ranking fifth-worst nationally for monetary distress. Then came San Diego at 22nd-worst, then Long Beach (48th), Irvine (70th), Anaheim (71st), Santa Ana (85th), and Chula Vista (89th).

Monetary challenges were limited in the Bay Area. Its four cities average rank was 69th worst nationally.

San Jose had the region’s most distressed finances, with a No. 50 worst ranking. That was followed by Oakland (69th), San Francisco (72nd), and Fremont (83rd).

The results remind us that inland California’s affordability – it’s home to the state’s cheapest housing, for example – doesn’t fully compensate for wages that typically decline the farther one works from the Pacific Ocean.

Advertisement

A peek inside the scorecard’s grades shows where trouble exists within California.

Credit scores were the lowest inland, with little difference elsewhere. Late payments were also more common inland. Tardy bills were most difficult to find in Northern California.

Bankruptcy problems also were bubbling inland, but grew the slowest in Southern California. And worrisome online searches were more frequent inland, while varying only slightly closer to the Pacific.

Note: Across the state’s 17 cities in the study, the No. 53 average rank is a middle-of-the-pack grade on the 100-city national scale for monetary woes.

Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Why Chime Financial Stock Surged Nearly 14% Higher Today | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Why Chime Financial Stock Surged Nearly 14% Higher Today | The Motley Fool

The up-and-coming fintech scored a pair of fourth-quarter beats.

Diversified fintech Chime Financial (CHYM +12.88%) was playing a satisfying tune to investors on Thursday. The company’s stock flew almost 14% higher that trading session, thanks mostly to a fourth quarter that featured notably higher-than-expected revenue guidance.

Sweet music

Chime published its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results just after market close on Wednesday. For the former period, the company’s revenue was $596 million, bettering the same quarter of 2024 by 25%. The company’s strongest revenue stream, payments, rose 17% to $396 million. Its take from platform-related activity rose more precipitously, advancing 47% to $200 million.

Image source: Getty Images.

Meanwhile, Chime’s net loss under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) more than doubled. It was $45 million, or $0.12 per share, compared with a fourth-quarter 2024 deficit of $19.6 million.

Advertisement

On average, analysts tracking the stock were modeling revenue below $578 million and a deeper bottom-line loss of $0.20 per share.

In its earnings release, Chime pointed to the take-up of its Chime Card as a particular catalyst for growth. Regarding the product, the company said, “Among new member cohorts, over half are adopting Chime Card, and those members are putting over 70% of their Chime spend on the product, which earns materially higher take rates compared to debit.”

Chime Financial Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(12.88%) $2.72

Current Price

$23.83

Advertisement

Double-digit growth expected

Chime management proffered revenue and non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) guidance for full-year 2026. The company expects to post a top line of $627 million to $637 million, which would represent at least 21% growth over the 2024 result. Adjusted EBITDA should be $380 million to $400 million. No net income forecasts were provided in the earnings release.

It isn’t easy to find a niche in the financial industry, which is crowded with companies offering every imaginable type of service to clients. Yet Chime seems to be achieving that, as the Chime Card is clearly a hit among the company’s target demographic of clientele underserved by mainstream banks. This growth stock is definitely worth considering as a buy.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending