Connect with us

Finance

Biden holds early cash edge, Trump’s legal bills mount and other takeaways from new campaign finance reports | CNN Politics

Published

on

Biden holds early cash edge, Trump’s legal bills mount and other takeaways from new campaign finance reports | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

President Joe Biden entered the election year with an early financial edge over Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, new filings show – a bright spot for an incumbent with low approval ratings who is girding for a bruising general election rematch with his 2020 foe.

Biden had nearly $46 million in cash on hand, compared with $33 million amassed by Trump, who is still working to dispatch his lone, remaining major rival for the GOP nomination, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley.

But the reports underscore the challenges ahead for the president: Despite facing no real threats to his nomination, Biden has not built the cash reserves that would allow him to swamp Trump’s campaign, even as the former president faces mounting legal woes and Haley’s staying power in the race.

Trump’s available cash was more than double the $14.6 million in reserves held by Haley, according to Wednesday night filings with the Federal Election Commission.

Advertisement

Haley’s consistently strong fundraising has helped sustain her long-shot bid, despite placing far behind Trump in the Iowa and New Hampshire nominating contests. She has ignored demands by Trump and his allies to exit the race, insisting she’s the Republican best positioned to unseat Biden in the fall.

Haley is currently in the midst of a multistate fundraising swing to build up the campaign dollars needed to prolong the fight until her home state primary on February 24 or possibly beyond to Super Tuesday on March 5.

Here are some takeaways from the new filings:

Although his main campaign committee entered 2024 with a cash surplus, Trump’s political operation is spending heavily – as he uses campaign donations to help underwrite his mounting legal bills.

Two of the former president’s political action committees spent nearly $29 million combined on legal fees during the last six months of 2023. In all, Save America PAC and Make America Great Again PAC spent more than $50 million of contributors’ money on legal expenses last year, according to FEC records.

Advertisement

The former president faces four separate criminal indictments, along with high-profile civil litigation.

Trump has consistently diverted 10% of the money his campaign collects from political donors through a joint fundraising committee into Save America, the primary vehicle he has used to underwrite legal bills.

Save America was once so flush with cash that Trump’s political operation used its money to seed a super PAC, MAGA Inc., that advertises in support of his presidential campaign.

But as Trump’s legal bills have grown and its cash dwindled, Save America clawed back more than $42 million in refunds from the super PAC last year.

The new reports underscore how much Haley has kept her campaign expenses in check; she spent about $14.3 million during the final three months of 2023, but took in $17.3 million.

Advertisement

The super PAC supporting her candidacy, SFA Fund, spent more freely.

Its year-end report shows that the group raised $50.2 million and spent $63.7 million between July and December. The substantial burn rate left the super PAC with just $3.5 million in cash on hand entering 2024.

In an email to CNN on Wednesday night, an SFA Fund spokesperson said: “We continue to benefit from strong fundraising, which is why we are currently spending millions in South Carolina to support Nikki’s efforts.”

The group recently launched a new ad in the Palmetto State, casting Haley as the best alternative to both Trump and Biden.

The new filings show that some of the GOP’s biggest donors gave to the pro-Haley super PAC in the second half of last year – as establishment figures within the party sought a Trump alternative. They included Ken Griffin, CEO of the hedge fund Citadel, who gave $5 million; Jan Koum, the co-founder of the WhatsApp mobile messaging device, who gave $5 million and has given $10 million to the group in total; Paul Singer, another prominent hedge fund manager, who gave $5 million; and Jim Davis, the New Balance chairman, who gave $2.5 million.

Advertisement

Griffin and Singer are among the founders of the American Opportunity Alliance, a group of Republican donors who earlier this week entertained pitches from both Haley and Trump aides about the candidates’ paths forward – a sign that some donors are weighing future support for Trump as he moves closer to clinching his party’s nod.

The latest filings show Biden has begun to ramp up his campaign operation, spending nearly $19.3 million in the fourth quarter ended December 31 – more than he had at any point in 2023 after launching his reelection bid last April.

His staff had grown to more than 70 by year’s end, according to the filings, up from 38 during the third quarter of the year, and the campaign put some $12 million into advertising in the final three months of 2023.

As CNN has reported, some leading Democrats have raised concerns that the president’s campaign was not gearing up quickly enough for the fight ahead, which is shaping up to become one of the earliest general election battles in the modern era if Trump continues to steamroll through the early-voting states.

Big-dollar contributors to Biden’s joint fundraising committee during the final three months of the year included financier George Soros, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Hollywood show runner Shonda Rhimes.

Advertisement

Three allied super PACs, two affiliated committees and Ron DeSantis’ presidential campaign combined to burn through a staggering $160 million last year to get the Florida governor a distant second-place finish in the Iowa caucuses and an early exit from the GOP race.

Never Back Down, a pro-DeSantis super PAC, racked up the bulk of those expenses, squandering an eye-popping $131 million in a little over seven months, the group’s FEC filings show.

Meanwhile, DeSantis’ own campaign spent millions more than the $6.7 million it raised in the final three months of 2023 amid his failed attempt at a late push to win Iowa, according to its year-end report.

The figures submitted Wednesday from an increasingly complex web of pro-DeSantis organizations showed the depths of the fundraising troubles within his political operation – despite an enviable advantage out of the gate. Never Back Down, operating as DeSantis’ de facto campaign, started the second half of 2023 with nearly $97 million on hand after raising about $130 million through June 30.

However, contributions slowed dramatically as DeSantis struggled to gain traction as a candidate. By the time Never Back Down brass met with wealthy Republicans in August to ask for a $50 million infusion of cash, the super PAC – which can raise unlimited sums – was bringing in less money than the campaign itself. Donors responded to the plea by contributing less than $2 million the next month.

Advertisement

In December, Never Back Down reported it brought in just $684,000 – slightly more than its bank account accrued in interest during the six-month filing period.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Google Cloud Pursues Financial Markets in FactSet Alliance | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Google Cloud Pursues Financial Markets in FactSet Alliance | PYMNTS.com

Google Cloud and FactSet, a provider of data and artificial intelligence solutions to the financial markets, plan to jointly develop AI agents designed to assist with portfolio operations, deal advisory and corporate finance.

The agents are one of three areas of focus the companies will pursue in a new partnership that will bring new AI-powered solutions to the financial industry, FactSet said in a Tuesday (June 30) press release.

The partnership brings together FactSet’s data, analytics and workflows with Google Cloud’s agentic AI capabilities and infrastructure, according to the release.

The new jointly designed agents will be built using Google Cloud’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Another area of focus will be FactSet AI enhanced with Gemini models. FactSet is embedding Google’s enterprise Search and Gemini model capabilities in the FactSet Workstation to launch the new agents for finance; leveraging Google Cloud’s AI capabilities to accelerate the development of new Workstation products with deep research functionality and multi-modal experiences; and directly integrating with Google grounding to improve FactSet’s AI-enhanced insights.

Advertisement

The partnership’s third area of focus is deeper financial intelligence in Gemini Enterprise, which is Google Cloud’s AI platform for building, governing and deploying agents. FactSet’s MCP and agent sharing functionality will deepen the platform’s financial intelligence and provide financial professionals with seamless interoperability between the FactSet Workstation and Gemini Enterprise, per the release.

FactSet CEO Sanoke Viswanathan said in the release: “AI is fundamentally shifting how financial professionals access data, derive insights and make decisions. Together with Google Cloud, we are putting trusted financial data and advanced AI capabilities to work, empowering our clients with more intuitive, connected and intelligent agents.”

Google Cloud Chief Product and Business Officer Karthik Narain said in the release: “By combining Google Cloud’s agentic AI capabilities with FactSet’s deep financial expertise, we are enabling investment professionals to surface insights faster, automate complex workflows, and realize commercial value from AI.”

The PYMNTS Intelligence report “Financial Services Pulls Ahead in the Enterprise AI Race” found that 85% of financial services and insurance firms are increasing their AI budgets over the next 12 months.

The top justifications for these investments are productivity and efficiency gains, cited by 65% of the firms, and strategic or competitive positioning, also cited by 65%, according to the report.

Advertisement

For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter.

Continue Reading

Finance

What the Supreme Court’s campaign finance ruling means for the 2026 election

Published

on

What the Supreme Court’s campaign finance ruling means for the 2026 election

Tuesday’s Supreme Court ruling changing certain federal campaign finance limits could make a big difference in the battle for control of Congress this fall, giving Republican candidates who have been getting outraised by opponents direct access to more party cash.

Continue Reading

Finance

World Bank drops climate finance target amid US pressure

Published

on

World Bank drops climate finance target amid US pressure

The World Bank is ditching its commitment to steer 45 percent of its spending toward projects with climate benefits, after facing pressure from the Trump administration.

The move, announced Monday following a meeting of the bank’s board of directors last week, marks a victory in President Donald Trump’s effort to purge climate policies from U.S. foreign policy. His administration has described the target as “distortionary” and “nonsensical.”

The bank preserved its broader Climate Change Action Plan — of which the 45 percent target was a key metric — just days before it was set to expire at the end of June. In addition to directing money toward climate projects, the plan provides technical support for helping countries reduce their greenhouse gas pollution and adapt to rising temperatures.

“We will retire the 45% climate co-benefits target,” the World Bank Group said in a statement, noting that it had “done significant work in answering client demand and needs.”

The bank’s work on climate “is and will remain firmly client driven, supporting them in delivering on their own ambitions as set out in their national plans and NDCs,” the statement added, referring to the nationally determined contributions countries submit under the Paris Agreement.

Advertisement

The decision to drop the climate finance target follows months of pressure from the Trump administration. People with knowledge of the negotiations said the U.S. was firm that the target must go despite other countries indicating their support for the bank’s climate goal. The U.S. has sway over the bank’s decisions as its largest shareholder.

Beyond the finance target, the Climate Change Action Plan also provides diagnostic reports on countries’ climate and development goals and aims to align lending with the Paris Agreement, which calls for preventing temperature rise from surpassing 2 degrees Celsius since the Industrial Revolution.

The bank said it would honor a board request to undertake an independent evaluation of the climate plan to determine if it’s helping countries grapple with rising temperatures. The decision effectively extends the plan beyond its expiration at the end of June.

The climate target was supported by many of the bank’s shareholders. It’s also been a prominent signal of the bank’s support for climate action at a time when the impacts of rising temperatures are accelerating.

“This is way, way away from where we should be for a responsible financial architecture,” said one official from a developed country who was directly involved in the negotiations and was granted anonymity to describe internal discussions.

Advertisement

The bank will continue to track and report on the amount of money going to projects with climate co-benefits. It exceeded its own target last year by directing 48 percent of its financing to climate-related projects.

Other climate targets embedded in agreements that govern different arms of the bank will remain, including one for the International Development Association, the bank’s fund for the poorest countries.

Multilateral development banks play a key role in global climate negotiations, where wealthy countries have committed to helping provide $300 billion a year for poorer countries by 2035. That no longer includes the United States, which has left the Paris Agreement and will exit the underlying United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change early next year.

“Targets send enormous signals about an institution’s direction of travel,” said Clemence Landers, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development. “At the same time, it’s a sign of the times and the World Bank is doing its level best to not rankle its largest shareholder.”

She believes the bank will continue financing renewable energy projects in countries that want them, despite having dropped its climate target.

Advertisement

“I wouldn’t be shocked if the bank continued to have an extremely robust clean pipeline with or without this target,” said Landers.

The bank says retiring the 45 percent target is part of its shift from a focus on “inputs to outcomes.” It will continue to monitor and report net greenhouse gas emissions across its projects and countries’ ability to withstand climate risks.

“We will continue to report to the Board on progress, including on climate co-benefits, and to contribute to our related joint MDB efforts,” the statement said, referring to its role as a multilateral development bank. “We will explore and discuss ways to better structure our engagement on adaptation, nature and pollution.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending