Connect with us

Movie Reviews

So Unreal Uses Movies To Illuminate Our Tech-Driven Lives

Published

on

So Unreal Uses Movies To Illuminate Our Tech-Driven Lives

Before the world premiere of So Unreal at Fantastic Fest 2023, the programmer said one of the reasons they loved this particular movie was because they love movies about movies. That got my attention. I too enjoy movies about movies and so, right away, I was excited about what was in store. Even then, what followed blew away those expectations. So Unreal is a fast-paced history lesson filled with warming nostalgia, kick-ass film recommendations, and heady ideas, all sprinkled with just a dash of fear and inevitability.

Directed by Amanda Kramer, So Unreal is a documentary showing how the evolution of modern technology has been viewed in movies. Not the technologies that make movies, our technologies. Computers, internet, cell phones, Wi-Fi, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, the film dives into all of it. It shows how the movies we’ve watched react to what is happening in reality. Sometimes the movies got it wrong, sometimes the movies got it right; sometimes they were early, and sometimes they were late. By using clips from some of your favorite tech-centric movies (and plenty you haven’t heard of too), Kramer captures a snapshot of movie history most of us lived through, and makes us think about it in all new ways.

Told through voiceover by Blondie’s Debbie Harry, So Unreal tracks how cinema has reacted to and used human technology as a plot device, going back as far as the 1950s. It starts with simpler things, like the bugs of The Conversation, before jumping into more modern tech and blasting off from there. The film posits that Hollywood has been very fast to latch onto modern technologies as storytelling devices, but rarely cohesive in its interpretations. We see how some films are fearful and prophetic, while others are pessimistic and silly. All the while, Kramer gives us this huge meal to digest, illustrating the history from all different angles.

Footage from hundreds of films tells the tale with some, such as The Matrix, Tron, The Terminator, and Hackers, getting more extended sequences. Others have shorter but still crucial sequences, such as Sneakers, The Net, Virtuosity, and The Lawnmower Man, and even more are peppered throughout (Basically if you can think of a movie that has a hacker, VR, AI, or a computer in it, it’s in here). And while seeing footage from movies you know is always fun, especially when accompanied by interesting new context and insight, it’s even more exciting to discover weirder smaller films that maybe you haven’t heard of.

Advertisement

Now, everyone’s film-watching experience is different, and no one has seen or heard of all the same things. Me personally, I worked in a video store from 1994-2000 and I thought I’d heard (or at least been aware) of basically everything. I had not. Some of the sort of deeper cuts I knew, like D.A.R.Y.L. But others, like Arcade and Nirvana, escaped me. That was half the fun, though: seeing footage from new movies inspired me to make a mental note to check them out.

Plus, in that huge variety of films, you glean all sorts of knowledge. It’s fascinating to see what films of the 1970s and 1980s thought technology would be. It’s equally hilarious to see films of the 1990s and 2000s get things incredibly wrong. Then in cases like The Matrix of The Terminator, it’s terrifying to see not only how right the movies seem, but that we maybe haven’t seen the worst of it yet. Viewed altogether, So Unreal makes us consider how much the movies have influenced our views on technology, as well as the opposite, and what that all means.

A few sequences of the film come off a little too dense, while others are a little too surface. But for the most part, So Unreal hits a happy medium between educational, entertaining, and enlightening. If you love movies about movies, you’re certainly going to like it.

So Unreal had its world premiere at Fantastic Fest 2023 but does not yet have a release plan.


Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’ movie review: Return to Southport fails to reel you in

Published

on

‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’ movie review: Return to Southport fails to reel you in

A still from ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’
| Photo Credit: Sony Pictures

The best slasher films offer a particular gory comfort, with the chase, deaths and a kind of twisted logic. I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997) based on Lois Duncan’s 1973 young adult novel was immense fun and spawned two sequels, I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998) and I’ll Always Know What You Did Last Summer (2006), a series in 2021 and countless headline options to sub-editors.

The latest reboot after the show was cancelled, is a sequel to I Still Know What You Did Last Summer and features the two survivors of the 1997 Southport massacre, Julie (Jennifer Love Hewitt) and Ray (Freddie Prinze Jr.).

I Know What You Did Last Summer (English)

Director: Jennifer Kaytin Robinson

Cast: Madelyn Cline, Chase Sui Wonders, Jonah Hauer-King, Tyriq Withers, Sarah Pidgeon, Billy Campbell, Gabbriette Bechtel, Austin Nichols, Freddie Prinze Jr., Jennifer Love Hewitt

Runtime: 111 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: Five friends are haunted by a death they were responsible for a year ago

Southport has a new bunch of terrorised friends — Danica (Madelyn Cline), Ava (Chase Sui Wonders), Milo (Jonah Hauer-King), Teddy (Tyriq Withers) and Stevie (Sarah Pidgeon).

After Danica and Teddy’s engagement party, the five friends go for a drive on the winding cliff road where a terrible accident occurs. Stevie, who had a problem with substance abuse, just got cleaned up and was working at Ray’s bar when she joined the friends on the fateful cliff road drive. The five friends decide to keep quiet about their involvement and go their separate ways.

A year later, Ava returns to Southport for Danica’s bridal shower. The events of the previous year naturally have affected the friends. Teddy, whose father, Grant, (Billy Campbell) a wealthy real estate mogul who “scrubbed the internet” of all mentions of the earlier killings, spirals out of control prompting Danica to break their engagement. Danica is now engaged to sweet Wyatt (Joshua Orpin).

A still from ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’

A still from ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’
| Photo Credit:
Sony Pictures

On her flight to Southport, Ava meets Tyler (Gabbriette Bechtel) who hosts a true crime podcast called Live, Laugh, Slaughter (one wonders how slaughter is a laughing matter) and is coming to North Carolina to follow up on the 1997 Southport killings.

Advertisement

Soon enough Danica gets an anonymous note saying, yes, “I Know What You Did Last Summer,” and it all starts again — the hook, slicker, hat, blood and bodies. The kills are not particularly imaginative, the chases are on the wrong side of thrilling and the final reveal will have your eyes roll right out of their sockets.

While it was nice to see Prinze Jr. and Hewitt reprise their roles, I Know What You Did Last Summer offers nothing new by way of plot, character or dialogue. The young cast act for all they are worth and the effort shows. The movie provides unintentional laughs with memories of Keenen Ivory Wayans’ Scary Movie (2000). Unless, one can come up with radically new twists to the slasher formula, it is probably time to lay the hooks and ghostface to rest. Sigh.

I Know What You Did Last Summer is currently running in theatres

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Murderbaad Movie Review: A wobbly yet watchable debut by teen director Arnab Chatterjee

Published

on

Murderbaad Movie Review: A wobbly yet watchable debut by teen director Arnab Chatterjee
Story: A Jaipur tour guide’s romance with an NRI unravels after a tourist from their group goes missing. When he becomes the prime suspect and vanishes, a nationwide hunt ensues—unearthing secrets that upend the truth and shatter every assumption.Review:

Murderbaad

sets out with the ambition of being a layered whodunit, offering an intriguing mix of romance, mystery, and suspense. Helmed by debutant teenage director Arnab Chatterjee, the film revolves around Jaish Madnani (Nakul Roshan Sahdev), a recent migrant to Jaipur who lands a job as a tour guide and quickly finds himself entangled in a web of suspicion when a tourist from his first group suddenly goes missing. With the beautiful backdrops of Jaipur and a premise rich with potential,

Murderbaad

opens promisingly but falters under the weight of its own ambition. The film’s strength lies in its performances. Nakul Roshan Sahdev delivers a compelling portrayal of Jaish, walking the fine line between vulnerability and duplicity. His on-screen chemistry with Kanikka Kapur (Issabelle) feels natural, even if the romantic track occasionally sidelines the thriller narrative. Sharib Hashmi is a standout, bringing both heart and tension to his role, especially in his brief but powerful moments with Saloni Batra. Unfortunately, the writing doesn’t give Batra or Manish Chaudhari, who plays the investigating officer, enough material to elevate their otherwise competent performances. Visually, the contrast between Jaipur’s regal charm and the quieter tones of West Bengal adds a layer of aesthetic depth, but the film is let down by uneven camerawork. The shaky frames during key scenes distract more than they immerse. Similarly, while the second half does pick up pace with some genuine twists, the storytelling suffers from loose ends, predictable reveals, and a lack of narrative sharpness that could have elevated the film to a tighter, more impactful crime drama.

Advertisement

Murderbaad

is an earnest attempt from a first-time director, and Arnab Chatterjee deserves credit for crafting a story that, despite its flaws, keeps the viewer curious. However, the film ultimately feels like a missed opportunity—a story with potential that needed more polish, a stronger edit, and tighter writing to truly stand out in the crowded crime thriller space. One hopes this is just the beginning for Chatterjee, and that with experience, his storytelling will mature into something more gripping and refined.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: New 'Superman' From Director James Gunn | Seven Days

Published

on

Movie Review: New 'Superman' From Director James Gunn | Seven Days

click to enlarge

  • Courtesy of Warner Bros.
  • David Corenswet and Rachel Brosnahan are a likable enough Superman and Lois to make the comic-book reboot seem almost necessary.

So, yes, the discourse is out of control. It started when Superman writer-director James Gunn suggested to interviewers that the beloved DC Comics hero was an “immigrant.” (Superman is, after all, a refugee from another planet.) The right-wing media sphere riposted by deriding Gunn’s reboot as “woke.” The White House posted a doctored version of the movie poster with the president’s face on the Man of Steel. People spread an unfounded rumor that Gunn was suing over the appropriation. Superman made a lot of money over the weekend, which didn’t silence the naysayers.

It would be absurd to decry the “politicization” of Superman — fiction and politics have always been overlapping spheres. But does the hero’s second full cinematic reboot have a reason to exist beyond offering the latest excuse for online hullabaloo?

The deal

Forget about origin stories. Everybody already knows how Superman reached Earth and was raised by kindhearted Ma and Pa Kent (Neva Howell and Pruitt Taylor Vince). This tale opens in medias res, with young Superman (David Corenswet) already well known in Metropolis, masquerading as Daily Planet reporter Clark Kent and dating fellow newshound Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan). Superman isn’t the only “metahuman” in this world, but he is the strongest, and he’s made powerful enemies by foiling the invasion plans of a dictator. (There’s no single glaring analogue to real-world events here, which hasn’t stopped the speculation.)

While the State Department frets over Superman’s unilateral foreign interventions, billionaire Lex Luthor (a wonderfully smug Nicholas Hoult) takes matters into his own hands. Eager to protect his economic interests, he crafts new metahumans to attack Superman.

Advertisement

But Lex’s real coup is a PR smear. Having infiltrated Superman’s Fortress of Solitude, he reconstructs the fragmentary message that Superman’s alien parents (Bradley Cooper and Angela Sarafyan) sent with him to Earth. Turns out the Kryptonians intended Kal-El to rule humanity and not just be our protector, as he’s always assumed. Once the news leaks, the world decides Superman is a wannabe tyrant with a “secret harem.”

It’s a shock to a gee-whiz guy who has only ever wanted to help people. When Lex kidnaps the Superdog, Krypto, Superman gets really pissed off.

Will you like it?

Much has been made of the vibe shift from Zack Snyder’s “gritty,” tormented 2013 version of the Man of Steel to this one. Without a doubt, Gunn’s Superman returns to the sunnier, cornier tone of the 1978 Richard Donner film. Corenswet’s Superman is almost comically good — he rescues kids, dogs, even unwary squirrels — and he isn’t afraid to be uncool. When Lois accuses him of being naïve, he suggests that trust and kindness to others are “the real punk rock.”

It’s the mission statement of an uncynical hero who has been very knowingly designed for an ultra-cynical era. Superman is often a silly movie, much like Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy films, yet there’s nothing pandering or sanitized about it.

Advertisement

Indeed, it has one telling resemblance to Man of Steel: Both take place in a 24-7 news culture where everyone is expecting Superman to make a fascist heel turn. The 21st century doesn’t know how to comprehend someone so strong and so decent, but that’s just who this guy is.

The movie manages to make goodness interesting, in large part because its star radiates old-fashioned charisma. Corenswet deploys a slightly dorky charm to play the character as confident without being arrogant, just like original Superman Christopher Reeve. Brosnahan matches him with a tight-wound nerviness reminiscent of Margot Kidder. This Lois already knows Clark’s secret identity, so we get to watch them work out the growing pains of their relationship without secrets. In one deftly written scene, she challenges both his geopolitical savvy and his journalistic ethics — Superman has a questionable habit of interviewing himself.

Somehow this adult romance coexists just fine with the kid-friendly shenanigans of Krypto (who is not a very good boy). Most of the long roster of wacky supporting characters make strong impressions, from a lady-killer Jimmy Olsen (Skyler Gisondo) to a fatuous Green Lantern (Nathan Fillion) to Mr. Terrific (Edi Gathegi), who’s so fearsomely competent that he regards everyone else with a touch of serene disdain. It’s easier to forgive the dullness of the requisite city-wrecking CGI battles with such amusing company.

If you want a more “realistic” Superman or just hate comic-book movies, this Superman isn’t for you. The primary colors, chaotic world-building and goofy, self-referential humor all work in synergy. It’s the kind of movie where the sneering villain has a lair that doubles as an escape vehicle.

But if you’re weary of comic-book movies that take themselves ultra-seriously, Gunn’s Superman delivers. Sure, maybe it’s political, if you think there’s something radical about a Superman who just wants to save people, regardless of their nationality, color or creed. Also, it’s fun.

Advertisement

If you like this, try…

Super (2010; AMC+, Philo, Pluto TV, Roku Channel, YouTube Primetime, rentable): Back when Gunn was a low-budget indie filmmaker, he made this comedy that deconstructs the whole superhero mythos, with Rainn Wilson as a jilted husband homicidally determined to fight evil. It’s equally disturbing and funny.

Man of Steel (2013; HBO Max, YouTube Primetime, rentable): There’s been endless debate over whether Snyder’s edgy version of Superman (Henry Cavill) is the superior one.

Superman (1978; HBO Max, YouTube Primetime, rentable): But most people seem to acknowledge the classic status of Donner’s version, which predated the comic-book conquest of cinema.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending