Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie review: ‘The Whale’ wavers but ultimately pays off

Published

on

Movie review: ‘The Whale’ wavers but ultimately pays off

1/5

Brendan Fraser stars in “The Whale.” Photograph courtesy of A24

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 6 (UPI) — The Whale, in theaters Friday, is a continuing battle between Brendan Fraser’s honest efficiency and an entire caricature of a prosthetic contraption. Fraser in the end wins however the prosthetic contraption places up a great battle for 2 hours.

Charlie (Fraser) is an internet writing professor who retains his digicam off so college students do not see what he seems like. Charlie’s weight retains him principally confined to a chair, however he makes use of a walker to get to the lavatory.

Liz (Hong Chau) is a nurse who visits Charlie to convey him meals and monitor his vitals. Immediately, two new figures enter Charlie’s life.

Advertisement

Thomas (Ty Simpkins) is a missionary from the New Life church who knocks on Charlie’s door. Charlie additionally gives to assist his estranged daughter, Ellie (Sadie Sink), together with her schoolwork. Charlie even gives to pay Ellie $120,000 he is saved up simply to stay round.

Fraser clearly has compassion for Charlie and performs him as a person who understands he self-destructed by way of coping mechanisms. Charlie would not wish to go to the hospital and incur medical debt, however he would not appear to be he desires to die both.

The swimsuit is distracting to Fraser’s efficiency. The prosthetic may have been barely smaller and nonetheless conveyed Charlie’s difficulties and emotional state. The precise design seems like a computer-generated creature solely it was a bodily outfit Fraser wore.

Although it was a bodily prosthetic, the swimsuit has the identical downside many laptop animated results have. It was rendered with such real looking element that it achieves the type of uncanny valley the place it technically seems actual however you may inform one thing is off.

The digicam angles additionally exaggerate Charlie in order that he isn’t solely chubby, however towers over the opposite characters. If director Darren Aronofsky’s aim was to painting him actually because the monster he appears like, Fraser sabotaged that plan by making Charlie actual.

Advertisement

The battle between Fraser’s efficiency and the filmmakers’ portrayal of him additionally embodies the thematic battles at play within the story. The story comes from Samuel D. Hunter adapting his personal play.

Ellie is an understandably cynical teenager. Any highschool senior is rebellious, however she hasn’t seen Charlie since she was 8, when Charlie left to pursue a relationship with one other man.

That is difficult as a result of it means Charlie was closeted whereas he had a spouse and daughter. So he ought to be capable of come out, however he additionally should not abandon his daughter, however his spouse did not need him round her.

Charlie’s lover was a pupil, so a instructor/pupil romance additionally blurs the traces of consent and authority. Later, Charlie reveals that the scholar was in evening faculty, implying he was an grownup, however that does not change the ability dynamic.

That pupil was the love of Charlie’s life although. After his demise, Charlie turned to meals to manage.

Advertisement

Ellie needed a father however Charlie felt unworthy. Charlie additionally asks Ellie, and the viewers, to see her potential for good.

Charlie encourages Ellie’s cynical takes on her assignments and the world as a result of it is higher than apathy. Ellie’s most damaging actions in the end enhance different characters’ conditions.

Both Ellie is masking her altruistic intentions, as Charlie believes, or she inadvertently helped individuals. Ultimately, the movie’s perspective is that it would not matter so long as the result’s constructive.

That take could also be difficult to some viewers given the gusto with which Sink embraces Ellie’s hostility.

The Whale might be completely cynical, exhibiting that it is futile to attempt to save anyone. And it may be completely sappy with some teary exclamations that really feel written solely to be included within the Oscar clips.

Advertisement

In many of the film, it’s raining exterior Charlie’s home so the one scene through which the solar comes out feels too pat. A scene of Charlie gorging is virtually a severe model of the traditional Monty Python Mr. Creosote sketch.

This thematic confusion could also be too irritating or it might make individuals dealing with conflicting emotions really feel heard. The Whale is ambiguous sufficient to permit each cynics and optimists to really feel validated, though the cynics would simply contemplate {that a} copout.

The title comes from Charlie’s favourite essay a pupil wrote about Moby Dick, nevertheless it clearly has a double which means. Charlie is confined to the home with restricted mobility like a beached whale. Although the movie doesn’t explicitly name him a whale, characters together with Charlie himself name him disgusting.

The Whale is about characters scuffling with how they see themselves and the way the world sees them. Typically these views overlap and generally they conflict, however the movie in the end rewards giving it the advantage of the doubt.

Fred Topel, who attended movie faculty at Ithaca Faculty, is a UPI leisure author based mostly in Los Angeles. He has been an expert movie critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001 and a member of the Tv Critics Affiliation since 2012. Learn extra of his work in Leisure.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

'Cunk on Life' movie review: Laugh-out-loud mockumentary on life’s big questions

Published

on

'Cunk on Life' movie review: Laugh-out-loud mockumentary on life’s big questions

‘Cunk on Earth’ (2023), a mockumentary series on BBC, was hailed for its laugh-aloud mockery of pretentious documentaries and Morgan’s razor-sharp comedic timing — British droll at its very best.

Rashmi Vasudeva

Last Updated : 04 January 2025, 03:01 IST

Follow Us :

Comments

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Love Scam movie review & film summary (2025) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

The Love Scam movie review & film summary (2025) | Roger Ebert

Times are tough, even in the world of romantic comedies. In Umberto Carteni’s “The Love Scam,” two brothers in Naples face almost certain eviction just as Vito (Antonio Folletto) tries to secure solo custody of his son after his partner left for her home country. His brother, Antonello (Vincenzo Nemolato), a lovable but irresponsible goof, ignored bills that have now put their family’s old home in the hands of a wealthy developer. In an effort to stay in the home their grandfather built and not lose custody of Vito’s infant son Napoleon, the two men devise a scheme to woo the daughter of the developer, Marina (Laura Adriani), in order to pay off her father’s company with their own money–but only if Vito can transform into Carlo, a wealthy man-about-town looking for investors for his phony charity. 

Mistaken identity and lying to impress a potential partner is a well-tread territory in the rom-com genre. For instance, Tom Hanks tries to hide his identity from Meg Ryan in their enemies-into-lovers internet-age classic “You’ve Got Mail.” James Stewart hid his identity even though he knew Margaret Sullavan was his long-suffering pen pal in the original 1940 film version of this beloved story, “The Shop Around the Corner.” Robert Downey Jr. pretends to be someone he’s not to spend time with Marisa Tomei in Rome in Norman Jewison’s “Only You.” Even in the Disney version of “Aladdin,” our hero pretends he’s a rich suitor to get close to his love interest, Jasmine, even though the opulent act isn’t what she’s really interested in. Although this familiar trope of courting by deception might inspire horror in any real-life situation, somehow it still works because they’re still making these kinds of movies. Maybe the reveal is so innocuously satisfying that the audience knows something one of the other characters doesn’t. Then, we watch our heroes make the right choices and fall in love despite the odds–at least until the credits roll. 

Although “The Love Scam” follows these recognizable story beats, it ends up feeling deceptively charming thanks to its cast and crew. Writers Caterina Salvadori and Ciro Zecca manage to fit in a few surprises, overthrowing our expectations along the way to the anticipated ending. Director Carteni captures a nuanced view of Southern Italy, showing off its natural beauty, idyllic sunsets, and historic art and architecture, but also the struggles that some of Vito and Antonello’s neighbors endure as their home crumbles around them. Carteni leads a cast of endearing performers, all of whom work well together even when the narrative gets a little silly. 

As Vito and Carlo, Folletto juggles the duties of two different personas with a few eccentric quirks and fatherhood duties in between. He acts so effortlessly, even when his character feels self-conscious; you can see Adriani’s Marina let her guard down in real-time. Their chemistry makes this movie memorable. Her character is flustered with expectations and stress, so to watch her grow from a frightening boss to a down-to-earth character who embraces life is a thrill, allowing Adriani to show off her range. I was less enamored by the storyline that Marina’s true dream was to become a chef over a businesswoman. While that fits with the genre’s sometimes more conservative gendered expectations, the writers incorporate it by giving Vito the night cleaning shift at a restaurant he then tries to pass off as his own to entice her to cook with him, so it feels less like a lesson in returning to domesticity. Although they feature heavily in the beginning, Vito’s brother Antonello and Napoleon step aside when Carlo begins to win over Marina’s attention. Still, the odd pairing of an ill-equipped uncle and adorable baby makes for some good jokes. In addition to Marina’s initial no-nonsense personality, her suspicious boyfriend Federico (Loris De Luna) is the power-hungry foil to Folletto’s kindhearted, would-be scammer. It gives him something of an invisible enemy to fight for Marina’s love.

While “The Love Scam” isn’t breaking new rom-com ground, it sufficiently checks the expected boxes and features a formidable romantic pair with Folletto and Adriani. The scam-within-a-scam house of cards narrative is just scaffolding for the movie’s real stars. Although many recent romantic movies also use cutesy gimmicks for their backdrop, their leads lack the heat to deliver something resembling a believable yet expected happy ending. In “The Love Scam,” there are scenes where Vito longingly looks at Marina in such a way that we understand why she would give this stranger the time of day, why they bring out the best in each other, and why we want to keep watching to see what happens to them, even if we kind of already know where their story is headed. Adding just a dash more sincerity than your average streaming romantic movie goes a long way. 

Advertisement

On Netflix now.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Baby John’ Review: Varun Dhawan in a Flashy, Twisty, Exhaustingly Extravagant Hindi Actioner

Published

on

‘Baby John’ Review: Varun Dhawan in a Flashy, Twisty, Exhaustingly Extravagant Hindi Actioner

At one point in Baby John, a little girl named Khushi (Zara Zyanna) hides under a bed, screaming with fear. Outside, bad guys are pulverizing her caretakers. She can hear the mayhem and anticipate that bad things are coming her way. 

The scene made me wonder why her father, the titular Baby John (Varun Dhawan), hadn’t trained her the way that Honey instructs her young daughter Nadia in Citadel: Honey Bunny, also starring Dhawan as Nadia’s father. Nadia is such a pro at dealing with murderous attacks that when one takes place, Honey just tucks her into a trunk, puts headphones on her ears and tells her to listen to the song and not come out. 

Baby John

The Bottom Line

Relentless and joyless.

Advertisement

Release date: Wednesday, Dec. 25
Cast: Varun Dhawan, Keerthy Suresh, Jackie Shroff, Wamiqa Gabbi, Rajpal Yadav
Director: Kalees
Screenwriters: Kalees, Atlee, Sumit Arora

2 hours 44 minutes

Incidentally, both Nadia and Khushi belong to a club particular within Indian cinema — that of overtly precocious kids who speak like adults. (I think of the cancer-stricken Sexy from Cheeni Kum as the president of this club.) While it’s meant to be endearing and cute, it often comes off as annoying and manipulative.

All of this is to say that Baby John is the sort of film that pummels you with star power (including a Salman Khan cameo), extravagant visuals, ear-bleeding sound, fantastically gaudy songs and a story that twists and turns with flashbacks, double identities and assorted villains, but despite all that flash fails to hold you. At 161 minutes, it gives you plenty of headspace to wander down rabbit holes and make random associations — like that between Khushi and Nadia.  

Advertisement

This was not the case with the source material. Atlee’s 2016 blockbuster Theri was named after the Tamil word for “sparkle,” and it had plenty of it. The director’s signature combination of action, emotion and social commentary worked seamlessly. Leading man Vijay, playing DCP A. Vijay Kumar and his nonviolent alter ego Joseph Kuruvilla, was very much the slick superhero who walks in and out of frame in slow motion, but he could also cry and be tender. In Baby John, Atlee (who serves as producer along with his wife, Priya Atlee) infuses his narrative with steroids. The Hindi remake is bigger and louder, but not necessarily better.

During the promotional campaign for Baby John, we were told to remember that it would be a “Christ-Mass release” — meaning that this would be a mass commercial entertainer, or what director Prashanth Neel refers to as “anti-gravity cinema,” in which coherence, logic and the rules of physics do not apply. What is necessary is delivering what Atlee calls a “stadium moment,” that sense of collective euphoria in a theater. This is a difficult and delicate art of which Atlee is an expert; just recall Captain Vikram Rathore’s entry in Jawan.

Writer-director Kalees isn’t able to deliver these cinematic highs with the same panache, mostly because he strains too hard to create them. Each beat is underlined by music or dialogue, and exaggeration is the default mode. So Dhawan, who has delivered in features as diverse as Dishoom and October, gets multiple moments with the full hero treatment: slow motion, low angles, shades that are removed or thrown on to emphasize swag, action sequences in which he flies and kills without breaking a sweat. But in all of this, the filmmakers forget to make Satya/John distinctive or memorable.

The movie treats the cop avatar with reverence and valorizes police brutality. Satya goes on a murdering spree, torturing and castrating and burning a man alive, but his actions are presented as justified because the men he murders do terrible things — mostly to women, who serve as disposable fodder for violence. Female characters are shot, punched, raped, burnt, trafficked. At various points, young girls are smuggled in containers and even in animal carcasses. All of which only makes the hero look more heroic. In one scene, he is referred to as desh ki ladkiyon ka rakhwala, or protector of Indian women.

Kalees also insists on making the villain larger than life. In Theri, Mahendran gave an effective performance as a corrupt minister who destroys Vijay’s life. He was evil without any additional flourishes. Here, Jackie Shroff has a ball playing Babbar Sher, whose signature move is lounging in a traditional Kerala easy chair which he likes so much that he even carries it to a shipping dock for the climactic showdown. But although Shroff brings a compelling menace, I lost track beyond a certain point of Babbar’s many nefarious activities, and how often and why he is in jail. 

Advertisement

(As an aside, can filmmakers find other locations for action? This year, we’ve seen shipping docks as backdrop now in Devara: Part 1, Pushpa 2: The Rule, Singham Again and Yudhra.)

More than anything, Baby John is a showcase for Dhawan, who gets to be the quintessential masala hero. He gets to romance, to be a doting father and a loving son, to do some seriously aerobic dancing and, of course, to fight. At one point, he does a somersault on top of a horse. Appearing in nearly in every frame, he goes at it with a ferocious sincerity. Dhawan’s father, David Dhawan, was a master of masala entertainers, and there is some pleasure in watching the son act his mass-loving heart out. But little sticks because the knotty plot switches from romance to action to abducted girls to flashback so abruptly that it gives you whiplash and glazed eyes.  

The two leading ladies — Keerthy Suresh, who makes her Hindi debut, and Wamiqa Gabbi, who makes her mass film debut — don’t get enough to do. Both are fine actors but to see their talent, you’ll have to look elsewhere. I recommend the Telugu picture Mahanati for Suresh and the series Jubilee for Gabbi. 

Baby John is relentless and joyless. Christmas needed better mass. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending