Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Longlegs (2024) Horror Movie Review | The Film Magazine

Published

on

Longlegs (2024) Horror Movie Review | The Film Magazine

Longlegs (2024)
Director: Osgood Perkins
Screenwriter: Osgood Perkins
Starring: Maika Monroe, Nicolas Cage, Blair Underwood, Alicia Witt, Michelle Choi-Lee, Dakota Daulby

One would be remiss to ignore the pervasive presence of evil in humanity. The digital age bombards us with stark reminders of malevolence through social media feeds and news coverage, while many also confront the harsh realities of cruelty and violence in their own lives. Within this context, the serial killer genre in film and media emerges as a curious phenomenon. These stories take the grim realities of human cruelty and transform them into fictional narratives, aiming to capture and explore the nature of evil. Oftentimes these portrayals are hauntingly effective, drawing us into the darkest corners of the human psyche; other times, they provoke questions about our fascination with such macabre subjects and whether these stories offer anything more than mere spectacle. 

This conundrum lies at the center of Osgood Perkins’s latest horror film Longlegs (2024), where depictions of the human capacity for evil are plentiful. The film follows Lee Harker, a painfully anti-social FBI agent whose strange sense of psychic intuition lands her a role in solving the unresolved case of a local serial killer known as Longlegs. Although the presence of Longlegs at any of these brutal killings cannot be proven, mysterious letters reminiscent of the ones in David Fincher’s Zodiac are left as a sort of signature at each scene. Longlegs is known to conduct each murder in a systematic way, where the father of a family is seemingly coerced or convinced into killing his own. Through the investigation of each murder case, Harker uncovers a rather personal connection to Longlegs himself and is forced to race against time in order to stop him from taking more victims. 

There is an overarching tension that suffocates the film, partly due to its stellarly ambiguous marketing campaign. For the months leading up to Longlegs’ release, potential fans were teased with neck down depictions of Nicolas Cage in his role as the deranged killer. There were even teasers for the film that featured the recorded heartbeat of actress Maika Monroe as she first laid eyes on Cage’s unrecognizable bodily transformation, which only added to the speculation that this film would be regarded as one of the most frightening of the year. Perkins is indeed successful in transferring this sort of tension from the marketing to the screen, as we don’t truly get a look at the unnerving presentation of Cage’s character until further into the film than may be expected. This careful withholding of Longlegs’ true visage creates a poetic form of dread towards the fear of the unknown. It is this fear, the darkened void where the mind fills in the blanks with its own terrors, that often holds a more profound menace than what is eventually revealed. The anticipation builds like a slow-burning fuse, and though the film’s later scenes deliver genuine shocks, they are tempered by the eerie suspense that preceded them. The true horror lies not in the face we eventually see, but in the shadows of our imagination where the most sinister fears are born. 

That is not to say that both Maika Monroe and Nicolas Cage’s respective performances are unsuccessful in living up to the expectations set in anticipation of the film’s release, as both actors deliver truly career-defining work. In fact, in an alternate universe where The Academy Awards have not completely outlawed (in theory not in actuality) the inclusion of the horror genre, Monroe would certainly be in the running for her first Best Actress nomination. Her performance is as awkward as it is intriguing, where she is able to keep the audience’s attention even when placed in a scene with one of the most visually disturbing depictions of a villain in recent cinematic history. Nicolas Cage’s performance as Longlegs takes on an almost otherworldly intensity, creating a portrayal so deeply unsettling that it leaves a lasting impression long after the film concludes. His physical transformation into his ghostly character is so profound that he becomes nearly unrecognizable, and at times even becomes quite comedic in the pathetic characterization of him. This willingness of Cage to lean into the rather “silly” aspects of his character may remove some audience members from the drowning sense of fear the film intends to create, but it certainly does not take away from the terrifying depth and intensity he brings to the role. 

Advertisement

A sense of cold emptiness is quickly established in the visual language of the film, hearkening back to Perkins’ 2015 winter-toned film The Blackcoat’s Daughter. Wide shots of rather bland rural settings become menacing in their details, as devilish shadow figures appear at the very edge of frames in such a quiet manner that many audience members may miss them. The film opens with perhaps its most stunning composition, a 4:3 shot of Lee’s childhood home that feels like something pulled straight out of her family’s home video collection. Cinematographer Andres Arochi skilfully shifts between aspect ratios to denote flashbacks, enhancing the storytelling and drawing us deeper into the haunting memories and psychological depths of the characters. Arochi’s work is a huge asset to the film’s intention of unnerving as many people as possible and ultimately creates an aesthetic that fits perfectly into the large cinematic world of Osgood Perkins. 

Obvious comparisons to classic serial killer horror films like Jonathon Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs and David Fincher’s Se7en are valid up until the film’s final act. It is, unfortunately, in this act where the film loses its chance to reach the iconic status of its inspirations. Although the ending seeks to reveal profound themes, it ultimately leaves us with unanswered questions and a lingering sense of dissatisfaction. 

Despite its occasional missteps and series of unresolved narrative threads, Longlegs emerges as Osgood Perkins’ most audacious vision; a haunting exploration of fear and darkness. The film, in its best moments, crafts an experience that lingers in the shadows of the mind. Perkins’ work suggests that the true face of darkness is not a distant nightmare but an omnipresent force, a reminder that the horrors we seek in fiction are often reflections of the fears we harbor in reality. In its evocative imagery and unsettling narrative, Longlegs both frightens and enlightens.

Score: 19/24


























Rating: 3 out of 5.

Recommended for you: 10 Times Nicolas Cage Went “Full Cage”

Advertisement

Written by Jake Fittipaldi


You can support Jake Fittipaldi in the following places:

Instagram: @jakefittipaldi
Letterboxd: /jakefittipaldi


Advertisement

Movie Reviews

‘Are We Having Fun Yet?’

Published

on

‘Are We Having Fun Yet?’

Photo: Universal/Everett Collection

Like being asphyxiated in a ball pit filled with candy, the experience of watching The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is at once kaleidoscopic and nerve-wracking. It pantomimes the hallmarks of a good time, with a fast, forced cheeriness; the flashing lights, bright colors, sparkly design, and subplot-happy narrative are there to hold our attention and charm us, but they accomplish the opposite, instead making us worry about what we’re missing. At one point there’s a throwaway bit involving a roller coaster that dives into a pit of lava, eventually emerging with all its passengers transformed into happy skeletons; maybe we are supposed to be those happy skeletons, drained of life and loving it. The good news (or is it the bad news?) is that this is a kids’ movie and nobody cares what “we” think. Its predecessor, 2023’s Super Mario Bros. Movie, made more than $1.3 billion worldwide, and no one should be surprised if this one does something similar.

That first movie wasn’t particularly accomplished either, but it had a slick simplicity that one could sort of lose oneself in and some clever bits involving our heroes, Brooklyn plumber brothers Mario (Chris Pratt) and Luigi (Charlie Day), as well as a lively turn by Jack Black as the bloviating turtle-demon Bowser. The sequel, by contrast, is turbo-loaded with character, incident, themes, never pausing to let us appreciate anything. Though directors Aaron Horvath and Michael Jelenic do apparently want us to care: The Super Mario Galaxy Movie centers around families destroyed and reclaimed, a sentence I can’t believe I just typed. The film’s chief villain, the spasmodic Bowser Jr. (voiced by Benny Safdie), seeks to save his father, the now-docile Bowser, from neutered captivity. As part of his devious plan (I think?), Junior kidnaps Princess Rosalina (Brie Larson) from her space-faring observatory dominion, where she plays mother to a race of puffy, colorful star children known as Lumas. Rosalina loves to read her kids heroic stories about Princess Peach (Anya Taylor-Joy), her long-lost sister, ruler of the Mushroom Kingdom and Mario’s main object of desire. Such attempts to infuse depth into the film’s carnivalesque cacophony could have been something, but corporate flatness consumes all. The ideas about family aren’t explored or developed, merely repeated.

Advertisement

But like I said, it’s a kids’ film, and younger children will be distracted by the aforementioned cute little star-baby things, by the cute little mushroom-head guys, by the frantic speed at which everything comes at us, and by the film’s vision of the universe as a series of amusement parks, with each world in this galaxy seemingly its own funfair. If only all this chaos didn’t feel so strained, so polished and programmed, so, so … unchaotic. The movie is also filled with Easter eggs from many decades’ worth of Mario video games, which will surely reassure devoted fans of those games that all is right with the world and someone loves them. (Full disclosure: I haven’t played any of them. Back when I was a kid and had to cold turkey myself from video games entirely, I’m pretty sure Donkey Kong was as far as I got in the incipient Mario universe.) The best of these aforementioned callouts is the appearance of the Han Solo–like Star Fox (voiced by Glen Powell), a character from a different set of Nintendo games, who arrives accompanied by his own hand-animated, hyper credit sequence. More of that, please.

Of the rest of the star-laden voice cast, Safdie and Black are the only others who make an impression. As before, Bowser has been realized with an eye (and an ear) for Black’s own grandiose, mock-operatic mannerisms, and Safdie seems to have appropriated them for the character’s offspring. Black, of course, was also the star of last year’s entertaining hit A Minecraft Movie, which got a ton of mileage out of the actor’s unique mix of irony and roaring sincerity, using him to hold together its ramshackle, faux-DIY vibe. That film was a good example of this type of material handled with something resembling charm. We could also point to something older like The LEGO Movie as a model of a brand-management enterprise that managed to be irreverent and thoughtful (and, indeed, brilliant) at the same time. All The Super Mario Galaxy Movie has, unfortunately, is the messianic fervor with which it throws everything at us. Well, that, and the mountains of money it will surely make. Me, I’ll take my travel stipend and go home.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Blaming Reviews Won’t Save a Film – Gulte

Published

on

Blaming Reviews Won’t Save a Film – Gulte

At the success meet of Band Melam last night, several actors and the director voiced strong complaints about film reviews. Some said reviews are damaging films badly, while other actor even questioned producer satirically why reviewers were not “managed.” One speaker even suggested that critics should wait a few days before sharing their opinions.

However, the bigger issue seems to be something else. The team successfully brought back the hit “Court” pair, expecting that their previous popularity would automatically pull audiences to theatres. While the chemistry between the lead pair still works to an extent, that alone cannot guarantee success. Audiences today expect a strong story and engaging narration, not just familiar faces.

This argument about reviews also misses a basic point. Reviews, whether positive or negative, are usually based on how the film actually feels to the viewer. Audiences along with reviews, They also check trailers, songs, and public talk before making a decision.

If a film truly connects with people, no amount of negative reviews can stop it. Social media quickly reflects genuine audience reactions, and strong content always finds support.

When a film fails to create that impact, blaming reviews becomes an easy excuse. Instead of targeting critics, filmmakers need to focus on delivering better content.

Advertisement

At the same event, producer Bekkem Venugopal made a sensible point that everyone should do their own job. Filmmakers should focus on making good films, and critics should share honest opinions.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie First Reviews: Flashy, Fun, and Made For Fans

Published

on

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie First Reviews: Flashy, Fun, and Made For Fans

Mario, Luigi, Princess Peach, Toad, Bowser, and more Nintendo favorites are back in The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, which opens in theaters this week. The first reviews of the animated video game adaptation are now online and mixed. Some say it’s even better than the previous feature, 2023’s The Super Mario Bros. Movie, while others say it’s so much worse. Of course, either way, the fans will still eat it up, and it’s made specifically for them.

Here’s what critics are saying about The Super Mario Galaxy Movie:


Does it live up to expectations?

If the first film got you on the train, just know this sequel isn’t losing any passengers anytime soon; it’s simply picking up speed.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

I was surprised, like anyone, to enjoy The Super Mario Galaxy Movie…The sequel levels up.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film

It never stops feeling like the product of someone mashing lifeless action figures together.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire

It’s more a loud, overstuffed reel of loosely connected comedy and action beats presented in mind-boggling onslaughts of color and detail.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine


How does it compare to the first movie?

It’s a far superior sequel to The Super Mario Bros. Movie.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film

The operative word for this sequel to 2023’s smash hit The Super Mario Bros. Movie is “more,” as in more action, more characters, more Easter eggs, more everything.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie offers a similar mind-numbing experience.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire

The first movie… was one of the best animated films in years. The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is one of the worst.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety


(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)

Is it mostly for the fans?

The sequel hits the sweet spot in terms of what its target audience wants.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

It may feel like more of the same to some, but anything that takes me back to a CRT TV and SNES is a feeling I’ll take 100 out of 100 times.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

While the film leans into “newer” character tendencies to attract younger viewers, it honors the original enough to embrace both the old and the new with enjoyable results.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film


Will anyone else enjoy it?

Adult non-aficionados will find little of interest other than the starry vocal cast.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

This isn’t a film that’s going to win over its skeptics.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel


How is the animation and world-building?

This may be one of the studio’s best-looking efforts yet, with The Super Mario Galaxy Movie feeling even more visually alive than its already stunning predecessor.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

Featuring some of the most beautiful and dazzling animation you will ever see, it is, at times, truly jaw-dropping.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film

There’s no sense of discovery when it comes to these planets, meticulously created to resemble the games without nary a wrinkle of surprise to be found.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire


Image from The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (2026)
(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)

Are there plenty of Easter eggs?

Even though the Star Fox character is nothing more than a way to introduce a sequel, the other supporting characters and easter eggs throughout are richly rewarding.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film

It’s as if it exists only for us to pick out the game-referencing background details in panoramic action shots… and to threaten us with us with a Super Smash Bros. cinematic universe, given the multiversal cameos by non-Super Mario Nintendo characters.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine

The film keeps throwing things at you. It’s an orgy of video-game Easter eggs.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety


Is the action worthy of the source material?

The action is exciting and inventive.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film

The film’s surplus of action and chase scenes follows the same rigid formula of swooping camera movements and game power-up deus ex machinas that no sequence ever proves particularly exciting.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire


Does the movie’s pace seem to have gotten a mushroom boost?

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doesn’t leave you time to catch your breath.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

Most of the time, the film exists to speed-shuttle audiences to the next visually overwhelming set piece.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine

If anything, the film only loses energy as it goes on, with the final confrontation proving particularly anemic and rushed, as if the film is hurrying along to avoid having to delve into its storylines with more than a surface skim.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire


Image from The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (2026)
(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)

How is the script?

Matthew Fogel’s screenplay, which mostly pays lavish fan service to its inspiration, also weaves in a few emotional elements.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

It isn’t aiming to be a grand, life-affirming story, but pure escapism. That approach doesn’t always land, but when it does, it delivers a charming, whimsical ride.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

The sequel’s plot is unusually heartfelt, with the villains being three-dimensional, which is welcome.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doesn’t have a story to tell or themes to express so much as stick to a mandate of audience boxes to check.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine


Does it do a good job adapting the game?

It has a story that embraces the simplicity of the original game.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

While [it’s] all clearly designed to appeal to young gamers, I don’t mean that the film replicates the experience of playing one of the Super Mario Bros. games. The first movie actually did.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety

Somehow on screen, it all registers as flat, imagination packaged into the most cleanly corporate and focus-group approved form possible.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire


Image from The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (2026)
(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)

Is it funny?

Most of the jokes land, ranging from cute to amusing to downright funny.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film

There’s a funny visual gag revolving around Mario’s inability to draw. And there are some amusing lines that seem designed to make us feel like we’re in on the jokes.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

One of the most successful gags in the movie is essentially a reskin of the famous Sloth DMV bit in Zootopia.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire


How’s the voice cast?

The voice cast delivers across the board.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

It’s an embarrassment of vocal riches… Many of the stars’ contributions here, especially those of Black and Glover, are outstanding.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter


Is Yoshi a great addition?

Donald Glover taps into a Groot-like tone for Yoshi, and it works surprisingly well.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

Don’t expect him to get that much to do, though: he’s here because he’s an iconic character rather than as a part of the story.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire


Image from The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (2026)
(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)

Are the villains still the best characters?

I found myself relating to the bratty Bowser Jr. way more than the lead heroes.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire

The real standout is Jack Black and Bennie Safdie as Bowser and Bowser Jr.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

Somehow, two Bowsers add up to less of a wowser than one.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety


Does it have any other major problems?

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doesn’t necessarily fix the frustrations that held the first film back. The story still leans thin, certain characters feel underutilized, and those looking for something deeper won’t suddenly find it here.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel

Charlie Day offers nothing to the Luigi character other than, to put it politely, a distinct voice that brings a beloved character down, which is grating.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film


Will it leave us wanting more?

There’s a distinct romantic vibe between Mario and Princess Peach (which I can’t wait to be explored in the next installment).
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is a fun placeholder while we wait for a Super Mario Bros. film worthy of the titular characters that fans deserve.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film


The Super Mario Galaxy Movie opens in theaters on April 1, 2026.

Advertisement

Thumbnail image by ©Amazon MGM Studios
Find Something Fresh! Discover What to Watch, Read Reviews, Leave Ratings and Build Watchlists. Download the Rotten Tomatoes App.

Continue Reading

Trending