Connect with us

News

Harvard would be smart to follow Hillsdale’s playbook. Trump should avoid Biden’s. | Opinion

Published

on

Harvard would be smart to follow Hillsdale’s playbook. Trump should avoid Biden’s. | Opinion


Harvard University doesn’t get a complete free pass in its fight with President Donald Trump – as the government aid which it has welcomed is paid for by U.S. taxpayers.

play

President Donald Trump isn’t wasting any time implementing his agenda. We’re not even 100 days into his second term, and it’s been busy to say the least.

Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would fight wokeness and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in government and education, and he’s following through.

In recent weeks, the Trump administration has taken aim at some of the country’s top schools, including Columbia University and Harvard, attempting to force them to fall in line. Trump is particularly displeased – for good reason – with how these universities have failed to address antisemitism on their campuses as well as with a glaring lack of ideological diversity among faculty and programs. 

And Trump is using the cudgel of federal funding to get his way.

Advertisement

In March, Columbia made significant concessions after the administration withheld $400 million in funding. 

Trump’s latest target is Harvard, and the government has already frozen more than $2 billion in grants and contracts. Harvard, however, isn’t playing ball. 

“I think Harvard’s a disgrace,” Trump said April 17.

Even though Ivy League schools like Harvard and Columbia are private, the large sums of federal dollars that reach their campuses through student aid, grants and research funding always come with strings attached. 

Advertisement

If they don’t like what Trump is asking for, there’s an easy answer: Don’t take federal money. 

Michigan’s Hillsdale College offers a playbook other schools can follow. 

Hillsdale’s independence is tied to its freedom from government money 

Hillsdale, a small liberal arts institution, has made a big name for itself when decades ago it chose to eschew federal funding completely, including in the form of student aid, so that it didn’t have to bend to government demands and regulations. 

Grove City College in Pennsylvania has made a similar choice. 

Advertisement

And Hillsdale, my alma mater, is able to offer its students generous scholarships that make up for a lack of federal student loans. 

I know this from personal experience. I could not have afforded Hillsdale without the generosity of its donors, who believe strongly in the mission of the college. 

No doubt, Harvard, an extremely wealthy university with an enviable endowment (more than $50 billion), could find ways to supplant the federal funds if it so chose – at least until a more friendly (Democratic) president is back in the White House.

Advertisement

Harvard, however, seems defiant and unlikely to acquiesce to Trump.

In an open letter published April 14, Harvard President Alan Garber wrote that what the Trump administration wants “threatens our values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge. No government − regardless of which party is in power − should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

Yet, Harvard doesn’t get a complete free pass from federal interference – as the government aid it has welcomed is paid for by U.S. taxpayers. 

Trump shouldn’t make the same mistakes Obama and Biden did 

Trump doesn’t like to lose, and he’s not taking Harvard’s resistance well. He has threatened to withdraw the school’s tax-exempt status as well as interfere with the enrollment of international students, both of which would be a serious blow to the college’s bottom line. 

I caution the president, however, against falling into the playbooks used by his predecessors. 

Advertisement

Even though I’m sympathetic with Trump’s concerns, I’m wary of government heavy-handedness, regardless of which party it’s coming from. And free speech organizations like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression have warned against the Trump administration’s latest actions. 

FIRE raised similar concerns during both the Obama and Biden administrations when they sought to erode free speech rights and campus due process under the guise of enforcing Title IX. 

(That makes former President Barack Obama’s “concerns” over what Trump is doing now very hypocritical.)

Similarly, Trump should avoid going after Harvard’s tax-exempt status. Hillsdale faced a lawsuit recently that sought to use the nonprofit tax exemption as a way to get the college to bend to federal regulations by equating the exemption benefit with federal assistance. Luckily, the federal judge didn’t buy that argument. 

If Trump can withdraw Harvard’s tax exemption, a future president unfriendly to a conservative school like Hillsdale could similarly weaponize its tax status. 

Advertisement

It’s better not to go down that road at all.

In the meantime, if Harvard doesn’t want Trump telling it what to do, then it would be smart to follow Hillsdale’s model.

Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@usatoday.com or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques

Advertisement

News

Remains of Los Alamos National Laboratory employee missing for nearly a year found in New Mexico forest | CNN

Published

on

Remains of Los Alamos National Laboratory employee missing for nearly a year found in New Mexico forest | CNN

Human remains discovered by a hiker in a northern New Mexico national forest last week have been identified as Melissa Casias, a Los Alamos National Laboratory employee who disappeared nearly a year ago, authorities said.

The remains were found May 28, nearly 11 months after she disappeared, in the McGaffey Ridge area of Carson National Forest — nearly 15 miles from her home in Taos. A handgun was found alongside the remains, the New Mexico State Police said in a news release.

The state Office of the Medical Investigator positively identified Casias, but the cause and manner of death have not yet been determined, police said. The remains will undergo further anthropological examination by the Office of the Medical Investigator.

State police declined to comment further when reached by CNN on Monday. CNN has also reached out to the Office of the Medical Investigator and Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Casias, 54, was last seen walking along a highway near Talpa, New Mexico, in June 2025, state police said. She had left her belongings — including her purse, identification and cellphones — at her home in Taos, nearly 8 miles away. One of her phones had been factory-reset, NBC News reported at the time.

Advertisement

She was reported missing on June 26, 2025, after failing to show up for work and never returning home following a visit to her daughter’s workplace, police said. At the time, the New Mexico Department of Public Safety told CNN no foul play was suspected.

Casias’ niece and sister told CNN affiliate KOAT last year the family was desperate for answers.

“No matter what, we need to find answers,” Jazmin McMillen, her niece, told the station. “We don’t want to stop looking. I think regardless of what the situation is, if she left on her own or if there’s foul play involved, we just want to find her.”

CNN has reached out to her family.

Casias is among at least 10 people tied to sensitive US nuclear and aerospace research who have died or disappeared in recent years, raising questions and fueling online speculation about possible links between the cases.

Advertisement

Another Los Alamos National Laboratory worker, 78-year-old retiree Anthony Chavez, also disappeared in May 2025, and police have said there are no signs of foul play.

Other cases include a retired Air Force major general who has been missing since February, when he left his New Mexico home without his phone, prescription glasses or wearable devices. That same month, nearly 800 miles away in Los Angeles County, Caltech astrophysicist Carl Grillmair was fatally shot outside his home. The suspect pleaded not guilty last week to murder and related charges and remains in custody ahead of a preliminary hearing later this week.

The Republican-led House Oversight Committee announced in April it would investigate the deaths and disappearances of individuals it said had access to sensitive scientific information. The FBI has said it is also working with the Department of Energy and other federal, state and local partners to identify any potential connections.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

2026 Midterms Tracker: The Key Senate and House Races

Published

on

2026 Midterms Tracker: The Key Senate and House Races

Control of both chambers of Congress is up for grabs this fall. Democrats’ chances to seize power from the Republicans hinge on a narrow set of battleground seats and states.

There will be elections in every one of the 435 seats in the House of Representatives and 34 in the Senate in November. But only a small fraction are truly competitive. Here are the races expected to decide the midterm elections, according to the most recent ratings by the Cook Political Report.

Advertisement

House

35 competitive races

Advertisement

Advertisement

The magic number to win the majority in the House is 218 seats.

Advertisement

Right now, Democrats would need victories in 11 of the 18 races that Cook rates as tossups to clinch the majority, so long as they also secure seats leaning or likely Democratic. In order for Republicans to keep control, they need to win eight of the tossup races, plus the ones that lean in their favor.

The political environment favors Democrats. They have been winning in special elections — and won governors races last year — by wide margins. President Trump is increasingly unpopular as gas prices remain high and the Iran war drags on.

But the 2026 congressional map has been remade through the nationwide redistricting wars to favor the G.O.P. And the maps remain in flux as some Republican states, especially in the South, are pushing to erase even more Democratic districts.

Advertisement

The most competitive House races

Advertisement

Advertisement

District Incumbent Rating ▾
Ariz. 1 None Tossup Polls ›
Ariz. 6 Juan Ciscomani R Tossup Polls ›
Calif. 22 David Valadao R Tossup Polls ›
Colo. 8 Gabe Evans R Tossup Polls ›
Fla. 25 Jared Moskowitz D Tossup
Iowa 1 Mariannette Miller-Meeks R Tossup
Iowa 3 Zach Nunn R Tossup
Mich. 7 Tom Barrett R Tossup Polls ›
N.J. 7 Thomas Kean Jr. R Tossup Polls ›
N.Y. 17 Mike Lawler R Tossup Polls ›

Advertisement

Note: “None” indicates races where the current representative announced retirement or the incumbent lost their primary.

The House battleground is likely to change several times between now and November. Some House races that are less competitive now may become so this fall. And some races currently seen as competitive seats are likely to fall off the map entirely, as incumbents or challengers fade.

Advertisement

Senate

10 competitive races

Advertisement

Advertisement

Republicans currently hold 53 Senate seats. Democrats would need to flip four states, while defending their two most vulnerable seats in Michigan and Georgia, in order to win the majority.

Democrats would need to win 51 seats because in a 50-50 Senate, Vice President JD Vance would cast the tie-breaking vote for Republicans. It’s a tall task that would require Democrats to win seven of the eight races that Cook rates as tossups or leans, including at least two seats in states that Mr. Trump won by double digits in 2024 — between Alaska, Ohio and Texas.

Advertisement

The most competitive Senate races

Advertisement

Advertisement

Note: “None” indicates if a current senator announced retirement or the incumbent lost their primary.

The odds are one reason Democrats have pushed to compete for seats in states like Texas, Iowa and Nebraska, even though these races more strongly favor Republicans. In fact, in Nebraska, the party has rallied behind an independent candidate, Dan Osborn, as the best shot to unseat a Republican.

Advertisement

Senate races that could become more competitive

Advertisement

Advertisement

State Incumbent Rating ▾
Iowa None Likely R Likely Rep. Polls ›
Neb. Pete Ricketts R Likely R Likely Rep. Polls ›

Continue Reading

News

Xi’s last frontier: China’s plan to transform its west

Published

on

Xi’s last frontier: China’s plan to transform its west

Additional contributions by Haohsiang Ko, Chris Campbell and Annalee Mather.

The location and route of the tunnel system for the hydropower dam are indicative, as official designs have not been made public. While the route shown is approximate, it follows an elevation change consistent with the proposed plans for the facility.

Mehebub Sahana, an environmental geographer at Manchester University, and Ye Huang, a researcher at Global Energy Monitor, assessed possible locations for the facility and reviewed satellite imagery to determine whether recent construction activity was linked to the project.

Images of major infrastructure projects included at the top of the story, in the order in which they appear: China News Service/Getty Images; CFOTO/Sipa USA; Xinhua/Shutterstock; CFOTO/Sipa USA; Reuters; Xinhua/Shutterstock; CFOTO/Sipa USA; CHINE NOUVELLE/SIPA/Shutterstock. Videos from ski resorts in Xinjiang were sourced from China’s Xiaohongshu social media platform.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending