There’s nothing wrong with a movie being nice, but George Clooney‘s old-fashioned drama The Boys in the Boat is a little too sweet and tropey for its own good. Based on Daniel James Brown‘s best-selling nonfiction novel of the same name, the 1930s set tale feels as if it’s been made in that era through an emotionally manipulative score (thank you Alexandre Desplat) and the lush cinematography from Martin Ruhe, both summoning the feeling of a time that felt more distinctively black and white regarding people’s individual approaches.
As a director, Clooney has a mixed resume, and Boys… fails to further the keen eye he seemed to flex more frequently in the earlier throws of his filmmaking; recent outings such as The Tender Bar (2021) and 2017’s bizarre Suburbicon a far cry from his directorial debut, Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (2002) or such political delights as Good Night, and Good Luck (2005) or The Ides of March (2011). As written by Mark L. Smith (who has an eclectic resume, ranging from the snuff film thriller Vacancy, Alejandro G. Iñárritu’s The Revenant, and this year’s Twister follow-on, Twisters), Boys… doesn’t have much for Clooney to work with, so his keen eye for an old-fashioned aesthetic makes sense given the slush Smith presents; a real shame considering the depths of Brown’s book.
Here, if your name isn’t Joe Rantz, the film doesn’t entirely care about you. As Rantz, Callum Turner does a fine job, and given that the movie predominantly rides on his shoulders, it certainly helps us as viewers manage any type of emotional investment in his plight as a working class student, who successfully joins the University of Washington’s rowing team and guides them to representing the United States at the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin. Rantz was essentially abandoned as a youngster and has had to fend for himself ever since, and whilst the film clues us in a little on such struggles, the fact that he’s getting by enough to afford University of Washington’s tuition means he isn’t exactly the everyman we can relate to; Turner’s model-good looks also make it difficult to evoke sympathy.
But that’s not Turner’s fault, he just isn’t helped by the writing. The mundanities of rowing were never Brown’s M.O. in his book, rather the responsibilities of the crew were. The film begs to differ on this, and though the other rowers get occasional focus, the act of rowing itself is what Clooney highlights, and, really, there’s only so many ways rowing can look exciting – and this film fails to show us how. Joel Edgerton as their rowing coach, Al Ubrickson, states that rowing is “more poetry than sport”, and it would appear that line is taken far more seriously than it should, with the rowing sequences bathed in a self-importance that’s more insufferable than inspiring.
Advertisement
Though the hard work of the crew can’t be denied, Boys… submits to a more triumphant mentality regarding their trajectory. The odds working against them is what makes their story so inspiring, especially considering its set during the Depression too, but the story is structured in such a way that it’s overly saturating them in ascendancy that their actual achievements feel shortchanged.
The Boys in the Boat is undeniably attractive to watch, and it fills the undemanding, surface-level-inspiring quota with an effortlessness that I’m sure easily pleased audiences will flock to. But there’s a larger, more inspiring story to be told through Brown’s words, and Clooney, sadly, skipped many a page.
TWO STARS (OUT OF FIVE)
The Boys in the Boat is now screening in Australian theatres.
Pottel, directed by Sahith Mothkuri and starring Ajay, Yuvachandra, and Ananya Nagalla in pivotal roles, is a rural drama that delves into the socio-cultural issues of the 1970s. The movie, which captivated audiences with its intriguing title, was released in theaters in October and recently debuted on OTT platforms Amazon Prima and Aha. With music by Sekhar Chandra, the film aims to strike an emotional chord with its thought-provoking narrative.
Plot Summary: The story is set in a remote village during the 1970s, where the powerful Patel family dominates the region. Believing that education empowers people to question authority, the Patels discourage the villagers from pursuing it. Mallanna (Chatrapathi Sekhar), who recognizes the importance of education, dreams of educating his son Gangadharam (Yuvachandra). However, his efforts are thwarted when Patel (Ajay) kills him to maintain control over the village.
The villagers revere a local deity, Balamma, and Patel manipulates their beliefs to suppress dissent. Gangadharam grows up in this oppressive environment, determined to bring change. He marries Bujjamma (Ananya Nagalla), defying her brother and societal norms.
Meanwhile, the village observes a ritual every 12 years, offering a Pottel as a sacrifice to their deity. This time, Gangadharam is tasked with overseeing the ritual. The stakes are high, as failure to perform the ritual properly could have dire consequences for him. Caught between his goal of educating his daughter and empowering the villagers, and the ritualistic traditions, Gangadharam faces immense challenges from Patel. How he overcomes these obstacles forms the crux of the story.
Analysis: The film effectively portrays the socio-political dynamics and superstitions prevalent in rural India during the 1970s. The director highlights the dominance of landlords like the Patels and their efforts to maintain control by keeping the marginalized sections uneducated. The screenplay weaves these themes with clarity, emphasizing the need for education as a tool for empowerment.
Advertisement
The movie also sheds light on superstitions and rituals like animal sacrifices, which were exploited by the powerful to manipulate the weak. The village itself feels like a character in the story, with its landscapes and traditions adding depth to the narrative. The realistic portrayal of the struggles and resilience of rural communities enhances the film’s authenticity.
Performances: Yuvachandra delivers a compelling performance as Gangadharam, capturing the character’s struggle and determination effectively. Ajay excels as the antagonist Patel, portraying the role with authority and menace. Ananya Nagalla impresses with her portrayal of Bujjamma, adding emotional depth to the story. The supporting cast, including Chatrapathi Sekhar, performs within the scope of their roles, contributing to the narrative’s strength.
Technical Aspects: Cinematography by Monish Bhupathiraju stands out, beautifully capturing the rural and forest backdrops, adding an immersive visual quality. Music by Sekhar Chandra complements the narrative well, with both songs and background score enhancing the emotional impact. Editing by Karthik Srinivas ensures a cohesive flow, although some scenes feel slightly stretched. The authentic depiction of rural settings and customs adds to the film’s credibility.
Final Verdict: Pottel is a sincere attempt to address important social issues like education, empowerment, and superstition through a rural narrative. While the film’s pacing and predictability in certain areas might deter some viewers, its emotional core and relevant themes make it a worthwhile watch for those interested in rural dramas.
1 of 5 | Robbie Williams appears behind the scenes of his biopic “Better Man,” in theaters Dec. 25. Photo courtesy of Paramount
LOS ANGELES, Dec. 21 (UPI) — Robbie Williams is the latest subject of a musician biopic. Better Man, in theaters Dec. 25, takes such a wild approach that it easily stands apart from films like Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody.
Williams got the performing bug at age 9 in a school performance of The Pirates of Penzance. As a teenager, he auditioned to be in a boy band and landed a spot in Take That.
Williams went solo after friction with the band but still struggled to write original lyrics. By Better Man‘s accounts, Williams had a similar cinematic trajectory as Johnny Cash or Freddie Mercury.
However, Better Man represents Williams as a talking monkey. Director Michael Gracey explains in a pre-film video that he took Williams literally when the singer called himself a performing monkey.
Advertisement
So this is a Planet of the Apes visual effect. It’s Williams’ voice but Jonno Davies performing the reference footage, along with a few other performers for elaborate dance scenes.
The film never gets used to having a monkey as the lead character, a real-life figure who is still alive at that. It never ceases to be off-putting, especially when Williams sings and dances elaborate choreography, and that is part of the film’s power.
Now, when Williams goes through the stereotypical spiral into drugs and alcohol, watching a monkey recreate those scenes is avant-garde art. The visual effect captures Williams’ charm and emotional turmoil, so it’s not a joke.
It only becomes more shocking the more famous Williams gets. Once he starts sporting revealing dance outfits, even more fur is on display.
Advertisement
It’s not even a movie star embodying Williams. There’s neither the real Williams nor an actor’s persona to attach to the film, removing yet another layer of artifice but replacing it with an even more jarring one.
As if one monkey isn’t daring enough, Williams’ inner demons are also visualized as monkeys. So many scenes boast monkey Williams staring at disapproving monkeys too.
Other biopic traditions include a scene where Williams sings a rough demo of his future hit “Something Beautiful” and confronting his absent father (Steve Pemberton) over abandoning him. The biopic tradition of showing photos of the real Williams during the credits actually breaks the spell when audiences can see he was not an actual monkey.
The monkey is the boldest leap Better Man takes but it is not the only one. A disco ball effect lights vast outdoor locations, and the film includes a climactic action scene.
Musical numbers are dynamic, including a romp through the streets of London in an unbroken take. A duet between Williams and lover Nicole Appleton (Raechelle Banno) evokes Astaire and Rogers.
Advertisement
The film embodies Williams’ irreverent spirit, as if a drama starring a monkey could ever be reverent. In his narration, Williams is self-deprecating, and some of the dance numbers blatantly injure pedestrians in their choreography.
The new arrangements of Williams’ songs add dimensions to his hits.
Better Man is bold cinema. The audacity alone is worth celebrating, but the fact that it works is a miracle.
Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.