Connect with us

Education

Opinion | Disaster-Ravaged Families Are Begging: Put Schools First

Published

on

Opinion | Disaster-Ravaged Families Are Begging: Put Schools First

I could feel the anger in Erin Kyle’s voice when I spoke to her last week. She was in the harried process of moving from a hotel to an apartment in the Marina del Rey section of Los Angeles because her family’s townhouse was destroyed in the Palisades fire. Her daughter, who will be 16 on Friday, was a sophomore at Palisades Charter High School, a beloved local institution of 2,900 students where “about 40 percent of the campus was damaged or destroyed,” the principal told The Los Angeles Times. Pali High is providing virtual instruction while school leaders try to find a temporary location for their students, who come from all over the city.

Kyle was especially furious and bereft because her daughter — like other Los Angeles high schoolers affected by the fire — has already had so much disruption to her young life. During Covid, Los Angeles schools stayed closed to in-person instruction longer than those of many other cities across the country. She talked about how much online learning harmed her daughter, a social butterfly, in fifth and sixth grade. “These kids suffered so much during that time period,” she said. I have heard this complaint from many parents over the past few years: California opened up hair salons and restaurants but kept schools closed, and that said everything about how the state values children and families.

“Just to have to do this again, it’s terrible,” Kyle said. “I mean, she’s traumatized from what we went through. We were stuck on the road for 45 minutes with fire on both sides of us trying to get out.” Even though her daughter was so happy at Pali — she was a cheerleader and had lots of friends — Kyle decided to enroll her at a public school in Manhattan Beach, where she will start next week. “She needs to be in school in person,” she told me.

School disruption from natural disasters is becoming more common because of climate change, and America is not ready for it. In 2023, Jonathan T. Overpeck, dean of the School for Environment and Sustainability at the University of Michigan, told The Times, “Pretty much anywhere in the United States you’re going to have to be more careful about this and perhaps change how we run our schools in order to accommodate climate change.”

More than a year later, I don’t think we’ve changed much. I spent the past week talking to parents, teachers and teenagers who experienced major climate-related school disruptions — not just from the fires in California but also from Hurricane Helene, which caused billions of dollars of damage in the Southeast in September and kept some schools closed for weeks.

Advertisement

These extreme weather events are fast-moving, and it would have been very difficult to anticipate the extent of their damage. “Having lived in California during drought and then wildfire, having lived in New York and seeing what happens with the hurricanes and things like that along the coast, I was like, maybe the mountains will be better,” said Jim Ray, who grew up in Asheville, N.C., and said he and his family moved back there in part because they thought it would be safer from climate-related disruption. They were not expecting a hundred-year flood triggered by a hurricane.

Speaking to recently dislocated parents, it was clear that the disruptions brought on by Covid still loomed large in their minds — a symbol that they, their children and their schools remain an afterthought.

In North Carolina, Buncombe County, where Asheville is situated, voted earlier this month to cut nearly $5 million — or 4 percent — from the school budget, despite protests. The local ABC station reported that the chair of the county board of commissioners said she would replenish the school budget once state and federal disaster funding came in. But considering the fact that President Trump proposed potentially eliminating the Federal Emergency Management Agency when he visited North Carolina last week, arguing that if disaster funding were left to the states, fixing problems would be “a lot less expensive,” it’s not looking good for those coffers to be refilled as much as they need to be.

Stephanie Forshee, who lives in Asheville and has two children who are 9 and 6 and who were out of school for a month because of Helene, told me she feels like “the town is in limbo and the news cycle has obviously moved on.” She’s concerned about how the next few years are going to play out because of the school budget cuts and because her county is not a wealthy area to begin with. “Currently, kids don’t seem to be the priority,” she said.

Beyond public K-12 budget cuts, preschool and child care programs are possibly more vulnerable in the aftermath of disasters because they’re so sensitive to enrollment changes. According to The Los Angeles Times, more than 300 child care facilities are still closed, and the damage is so extensive, there’s no telling when they might reopen. Furthermore, the child care industry already took a hit during the pandemic, when “California lost about 12 percent of its licensed child care capacity. The industry already struggles with such low profit margins — despite high prices for families — that any additional costs can destabilize providers and lead to closures.”

Advertisement

I spoke to Estela Maldonado, who has worked in a variety of roles at Methodist Preschool of Pacific Palisades for 11 years, and whose son also attends the preschool. She told me that the school building burned in the fires and lost half of its student body because so many families were displaced from their homes. The preschool is currently operating out of a temporary location in Santa Monica. Without funding from the students to keep the school afloat, staff members have had their hours cut, and now Maldonado is worried about supporting her family while the school looks for a permanent home.

Maldonado would like to see the government supporting early childhood educators financially in this moment of crisis with direct funding to make sure they can make it until they find a more permanent home and recoup their student body, but she is not optimistic. “To be honest, I don’t think any of us are really expecting it,” Maldonado said. But that does not mean she has lost hope. “You won’t find us giving up because it’s a job that we don’t see as a job. We see as the passion of our lives to serve the children and to serve their families,” she added.

Despite the heartbreak and despair that came through in these conversations, I was touched by the fierce love that people — especially the kids — had for their school communities. Moksha Bruno and her son Lincoln, a freshman at Pali High, both told me that even though they’re unhappy with virtual learning, Lincoln has no desire to leave Pali. Bruno said she and Lincoln’s father gave him the option to find another school, but “there was no question in his mind he wants to help rebuild it.”

She means that literally. Lincoln described the makerspace classes (a modern version of shop class, with woodworking, metalwork and arts and crafts) at Pali. He reached out to his makerspace teacher after the fire and asked if he and his fellow students could help with the rebuilding efforts. Lincoln is also a member of the school’s marching band, and he talked about how they’re working to source instruments and get together this week to practice at a park. “I’m a very social guy, and I need to see my friends and talk and hang out to be happy,” he told me.

What heartens Bruno is the number of people who want to help. “People want to help and are willing to give and do whatever it takes,” she said. I agree it is a blessing. I just wish that these individual efforts were better supported by our government.

Advertisement

Most critically, we can no longer greet national disasters of this scale as surprises. We can’t GoFundMe our way out of future climate disasters for our children. We need careful planning, and we need to recognize that kids only get one shot at an education — and that there is real mourning when they miss their first homecoming dance or their fifth grade graduation, when they don’t get to experience the normal and imperfect passage of each season.

When people lose everything, the communities that parents, teachers and children form around schools are even more vital. Rebuilding these bonds needs to be a national effort, and it should start now.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Video: Suspect In Custody For the Shooting of Charlie Kirk

Published

on

Video: Suspect In Custody For the Shooting of Charlie Kirk

new video loaded: Suspect In Custody For the Shooting of Charlie Kirk

transcript

transcript

Suspect In Custody For the Shooting of Charlie Kirk

Gov. Spencer Cox of Utah identified the suspect in the Charlie Kirk shooting in a Friday morning news conference.

We got him. On the evening of Sept. 11, a family member of Tyler Robinson reached out to a family friend who contacted the Washington County Sheriff’s Office with information that Robinson had confessed to them or implied that he had committed the incident. Investigators interviewed a family member of Robinson, who stated that Robinson had become more political in recent years. Investigators identified an individual as the roommate of Robinson. Investigators interviewed that roommate. Investigators asked if he would show them the messages on Discord. The content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact Tyler stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point, leaving the rifle in a bush. Investigators noted inscriptions that had been engraved on casings found with the rifle. Inscriptions on the three unfired casings read, “Hey, fascist!” Exclamation point. “Catch!” exclamation point.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Education

Video: Ukrainian Students Start New School Year in Underground Classrooms

Published

on

Video: Ukrainian Students Start New School Year in Underground Classrooms

new video loaded: Ukrainian Students Start New School Year in Underground Classrooms

By Jiawei Wang

With Russian attacks ongoing and peace talks stalled, some students in Ukraine are attending classes underground. For some, it is their first in-person learning in more than three years of war.

Continue Reading

Education

What Has the Trump Administration Gotten From Law Firms and Universities?

Published

on

What Has the Trump Administration Gotten From Law Firms and Universities?

Section IV of Columbia University’s July agreement with the Trump administration

Advertisement

Harvard University claimed a victory in its legal case against the Trump administration on Wednesday, when a federal judge ruled that the government broke the law by freezing billions of dollars in research funding. The ruling, which the administration has pledged to appeal, potentially gave Harvard new leverage in its battle toward a settlement to restore funding, in exchange for payments demanded by President Trump.

About a dozen other universities and major law firms have struck deals with the government in recent months — instead of taking cases to court — to unfreeze funding or avoid restrictive executive orders.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump has used the full force of the federal government — opening civil rights investigations, freezing federal funding and threatening to cancel government contracts — to push for these agreements. These deals have reverberated across the legal industry and academia, and they could shape how other institutions respond to Mr. Trump’s methods.

Most of the deals involve paying millions of dollars, either in cash or legal services, to the administration. But the deals also include other concessions, like commitments to redefine discrimination, acquiesce to more government oversight and assess ideology.

Below, we break down what these deals have in common.

Advertisement

1. Money or legal services

Much of the focus around these deals has been around the money that Mr. Trump has demanded from each entity, payable either to his administration, or to state or compensation funds.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

Brown University $50 million
over 10 years
Rhode Island work force development organizations
Columbia University $200 million
over 3 years
The U.S. Treasury
$21 million A compensation fund to resolve alleged civil rights violations against Jewish Columbia employees
Nine major law firms Legal services worth:
$940 million
The Trump administration,
for causes like assisting veterans and law enforcement, ensuring fairness in the justice system and combating antisemitism
Paul Weiss $40 million
Skadden $100 million
Willkie $100 million
Milbank $100 million
Cadwalader $100 million
Kirkland & Ellis $125 million
Latham & Watkins $125 million
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett $125 million
A&O Shearman $125 million

The universities have taken varied approaches to their payments. Columbia agreed to pay a fine to the federal government. Brown’s payment will go to Rhode Island work force development programs, which the university’s president has said are aligned with their service and community engagement missions.

Advertisement

Critics have likened Mr. Trump’s methods of extracting money from these entities to extortion.

The law firms have faced internal backlash and external criticism for promising to pour resources into causes favored by the president. Shortly after the deals with them were signed, Mr. Trump publicly suggested that he might use their labor to achieve more of his own goals, including in the negotiations of trade deals or even representing him personally.

Advertisement

Other businesses, including Nvidia and Intel, have been drawn into making financial deals with the Trump administration in order to continue doing business or to sell their products to China. The specific details of most of those deals have not been made public.

2. Redefining discrimination

On his first day in office, Mr. Trump signed executive orders gutting racial equity policies and protections for transgender people. Those themes, along with addressing antisemitism and targeting international students, were evident in many of these agreements.

Advertisement

No “unlawful D.E.I. goals”: Columbia and Brown agreed to eliminate programs that aim to achieve diversity goals. (Both universities had already eliminated race-conscious affirmative action following a June 2023 Supreme Court decision outlawing it.) They promised to rely more on quantitative measures, instead of demographics, in their admissions practices.

Advertisement

Columbia University

Advertisement

… shall maintain merit-based admissions policies. Columbia may not, by any means, unlawfully preference applicants based on race, color, or national origin in admissions throughout its programs. No proxy for racial admission will be implemented or maintained.

Experts say relying on test scores and grades in admissions could result in wealthier, less diverse student populations at these elite institutions.

Law firms were similarly subject to these rules in their hiring practices.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Skadden | Cadwalader | Kirkland & Ellis | Latham & Watkins | A&O Shearman | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Milbank | Willkie

… affirms its commitment to merit-based hiring, promotion, and retention. Accordingly, the Firm will not engage in illegal DEI discrimination and preferences.

Advertisement

Transgender students: The University of Pennsylvania has been central in the debate around transgender athletes, specifically because of Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer who graduated in 2022 and held several of Penn’s swimming records. The school’s deal with Mr. Trump revoked her records and limited how transgender students may participate in its athletic programs.

Advertisement

University of Pennsylvania

… will not allow male students to compete in any athletic program restricted to women, ensuring that only female students are eligible to compete as a member of women’s athletics.

Advertisement

In this way, the university bowed to the administration’s new interpretation of Title IX, a law that until recently protected transgender athletes from sex discrimination in education.

Penn and the other universities also agreed to additional rules around single-sex facilities and medical services for transgender students.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Columbia University

… will uphold its commitment to Title IX … by providing safe and fair opportunities for women including single-sex housing for women who request such housing and all-female sports, locker rooms, and showering facilities

Advertisement

Brown University

Advertisement

will not perform gender reassignment surgery or prescribe puberty blockers or hormones to any minor child for the purpose of aligning the child’s appearance with an identity that differs from his or her sex.

According to Brown, the number of minors enrolled at the university is typically less than 10 percent of all first-year undergraduates; the campus does not have surgical facilities; and its doctors do not typically prescribe puberty blockers.

Advertisement

Fighting antisemitism: Columbia agreed to pay $21 million to a compensation fund to resolve alleged civil rights violations against its Jewish employees. It also agreed to a review of its regional studies programs, starting with the Middle East, to ensure that they are “comprehensive and balanced.” The agreement does not define how those terms will be applied.

The school will also appoint new faculty members who will have joint positions in both the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies and other departments, and add a student liaison to coordinate and advise on antisemitism issues.

Both Columbia’s and Brown’s agreements have provisions outlining support for Jewish life on campus.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Brown University

… is committed to taking significant, proactive, effective steps to combat antisemitism and ensure a campus environment free from harassment and discrimination. These shall include actions to support a thriving Jewish community, research and education about Israel, and a robust Program in Judaic Studies, through outreach to Jewish Day School students to provide information about applying to Brown, resources for religiously observant Jewish community members, renewed partnerships with Israeli academics and national Jewish organizations, support for enhanced security at the Brown-RISD Hillel, and a convening of alumni, students, and faculty to celebrate 130 years of Jewish life at Brown in the 2025-2026 academic year.

Advertisement

International students: Columbia’s agreement with the Trump administration outlines provisions on international students, including asking them their reasons for wanting to study in the United States and reducing the school’s reliance on international student enrollment. (Columbia has about 13,700 international students, about 38 percent of its total student body.)

Advertisement

Columbia University

… will examine its business model and take steps to decrease financial dependence on international student enrollment. The reforms should be made durable by adoption of any necessary organizational and personnel changes.

Advertisement

3. Government oversight

Through the deals with Columbia and Brown, the Trump administration also gained access to information about their applicants, including details on race, grades and test scores.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Columbia University | Brown University

… shall provide … the United States with admissions data … showing both rejected and admitted students broken down by race, color, grade point average, and performance on standardized tests, in a form permitting appropriate statistical analyses by October 1 of each year …

Both schools are also required to make anonymized information on enrolled students available to the public, including demographics and grade point averages of each class.

Advertisement

Columbia also agreed to pay for a monitor, approved by the school and the government, to ensure that both sides abide by their commitments. It must now also inform the Department of Homeland Security when an international student is arrested. (Universities were already required to inform Homeland Security when an international student was suspended or expelled.)

Brown agreed to hire an external organization to conduct a campus survey by the end of the year on the school’s climate for Jewish students.

Advertisement

Similarly, the law firms also agreed to hire outside counsel to ensure adherence.

Advertisement

Paul Weiss

… will engage experts, to be mutually agreed upon within 14 days, to conduct a comprehensive audit of all of its employment practices …

Advertisement

Advertisement

Willkie

… will engage independent outside counsel to advise the Firm in confirming that employment practices are fully compliant with Law …

Advertisement

4. Assessing ideology

Some of the law firms targeted by Mr. Trump were associated with lawyers who have previously investigated him, or who have worked closely with those who did. Other firms had prominent Democrats on staff, or employed people who frequently criticized the president.

To that end, in each of their agreements, the law firms agreed to work on a wider range of cases, regardless of the political affiliation of the lawyer or prospective client.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Paul Weiss

… will take on a wide range of pro bono matters that represent the full spectrum of political viewpoints of our society, whether ‘conservative’ or ‘liberal.’

Advertisement
Advertisement

Milbank

… shall not deny representation to any clients on the basis of the political affiliation of the prospective client, or because of the opposition of any Government Official.

Advertisement

Kirkland & Ellis | Latham & Watkins | A&O Shearman | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett

Advertisement

… will not deny representation to clients … because of the personal political views of individual lawyers.

In return for the concessions, Mr. Trump revoked his executive order against the law firm Paul Weiss that would have suspended its security clearances, restricted its access to federal buildings and threatened its contracts with the government. The eight other law firms struck deals pre-emptively to avoid being subject to similar executive orders.

Advertisement

For most of the universities, the administration restored hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding that it had previously frozen. It also closed pending investigations into the schools of antisemitism or alleged violations of civil rights. Both the presidents of Columbia and Brown have publicly stated that these deals preserve the schools’ academic freedom.

Advertisement

Concessions in deals with the Trump administration

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Brown University

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

No

Columbia University

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

University of Pennsylvania

Advertisement

No

Yes

Advertisement

No

No

Nine major law firms

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

What’s next

Like Harvard, four major law firms have fought back against the president instead of striking a deal. Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Susman Godfrey, and Jenner & Block all filed lawsuits, which resulted in federal judges temporarily blocking Mr. Trump’s executive orders targeting them. The administration has recently begun to appeal these rulings.

Several other law firms have been questioned by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on their hiring practices and potential discrimination against white candidates, raising concerns of threats from the White House.

Advertisement

The Trump administration has vowed to appeal the court’s ruling that its funding cuts against Harvard were illegal. It remains unclear whether the school will receive its money. Mr. Trump has also frozen federal funding to other universities, including Princeton, Cornell, Duke, Northwestern and the University of California, Los Angeles, setting the stage for potential negotiations. In August, the administration proposed that U.C.L.A. pay more than $1 billion to reach a settlement. This month, after a difficult tenure that included attacks from Republicans in Congress and funding cuts, the president of Northwestern resigned.

Several other schools are watching for funding cuts as they come under the scrutiny of the Department of Education and a government task force that says it is devoted to rooting out antisemitism.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sources

This analysis is based on publicly available text pertaining to the agreements between the Trump administration and Brown University, Columbia University, University of Pennsylvania, A&O Shearman, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Cadwalader, Latham & Watkins, Kirkland & Ellis, Milbank, Willkie, Skadden and Paul Weiss.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending