Connect with us

Technology

America’s most-used password in 2025 revealed

Published

on

America’s most-used password in 2025 revealed

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Passwords play a huge role in how you stay safe online. They protect your accounts, devices and money. Still, many people pick logins that criminals can guess in seconds. 

The latest NordPass report shows this problem again. This year, “admin” took the top spot as the most common password in the United States.

NordPass and NordStellar, two cybersecurity companies that track leaked credentials and online threats, reviewed millions of exposed passwords to spot trends. They also examined how password habits differ across generations. The pattern is clear: many of us still rely on simple words, easy number strings and familiar keyboard patterns. These choices give attackers a quick path into countless accounts.

Advertisement

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

183 MILLION EMAIL PASSWORDS LEAKED: CHECK YOURS NOW

Weak passwords like “admin” give attackers a quick way into your accounts before you even realize it.  (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

Most common passwords in the United States

NordPass shared its top 20 list for 2025. “Admin” sits at number one. Variations of the word “password” take up five spots. Number strings appear nine times. One explicit term even made the list.

Here are the 20 most common passwords in the USA this year:

Advertisement
  • admin
  • password
  • 123456
  • 12345678
  • 123456789
  • 12345
  • Password
  • 12345678910
  • Gmail.12345
  • Password1
  • Aa123456
  • f*******t
  • 1234567890
  • abc123
  • Welcome1
  • Password1!
  • password1
  • 1234567
  • 111111
  • 123123

Weak logins remain a major problem because criminals rely on automated tools. These tools try simple words and common patterns first. When millions of people reuse the same easy passwords, attackers succeed fast.

HOW TO USE PASSKEYS TO KEEP YOUR COMPUTER SAFE

Reusing the same login across sites makes it easy for criminals to jump from one hacked account to another. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

Global trends show the same risky password behavior

The United States is not alone. Globally, “123456” ranks as the most common password. “Admin” and “12345678” follow closely behind. These patterns appear because they are easy to remember. Sadly, they are also easy to crack.

Researchers noticed one shift worth noting: more passwords now include special characters. The increase is sharp. However, most examples remain weak. Strings like P@ssw0rd and Abcd@1234 still follow predictable rules that tools can break with little effort.

The word “password” stays popular around the world. People even use it in local languages. This shows how widespread the problem is.

Advertisement

Why younger generations still make unsafe password choices

Many people assume younger adults understand digital safety. They grew up with phones and social media. Research shows that this assumption is wrong.

NordPass found that an 18-year-old often picks the same weak password patterns as an 80-year-old. Younger users favor long number sequences. Older users lean toward names. Neither group creates secure or random strings. Generations Z and Y tend to avoid names. Generations X and older use them often. Each approach carries risk because attackers expect both patterns.

AI-POWERED SCAMS TARGET KIDS WHILE PARENTS STAY SILENT

Researchers found that weak and predictable passwords still appear in leaked data again and again. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

Why weak passwords remain a big threat

Weak passwords fuel data breaches and account takeovers. Criminals run scripts that check billions of combinations every second. When your password is common, they break in fast.

Advertisement

A single stolen login can expose your email, social accounts, bank information and more. Many attacks start this way. Once criminals get inside one account, they often try the same password on others.

Steps to stay safe with your passwords 

You can improve your digital safety with a few simple habits. These steps help block common attacks and protect your accounts.

1) Create strong random passwords

Pick long passwords or short passphrases. Aim for at least 20 characters. Mix letters, numbers and special characters. Avoid patterns. 

2) Avoid password reuse

Use a unique password for each account. If one login gets hacked, the others stay safe.

3) Review and update weak passwords

Check your old logins. Replace anything short, predictable or reused. Fresh passwords lower your risk.

Advertisement

4) Use a password manager

A password manager creates secure passwords and stores them safely. It also fills them in for you, so you do not need to remember them.

Next, see if your email has been exposed in past breaches. Our No. 1 password manager pick includes a built-in breach scanner that checks whether your email address or passwords have appeared in known leaks. If you discover a match, immediately change any reused passwords and secure those accounts with new, unique credentials. 

Check out the best expert-reviewed password managers of 2025 at Cyberguy.com.

5) Turn on multi-factor authentication (MFA)

MFA adds a second check before you log in. It is one of the easiest ways to block attackers.

6) Keep your software updated

Update your phone, computer browsers and apps on a regular schedule. These updates patch security gaps that criminals try to exploit. When you fall behind on updates, weak passwords become even riskier because attackers can pair old software flaws with easy logins.

Advertisement

Pro Tip: Use a data removal service

Leaked passwords often come from old profiles on data broker sites you forgot about. A data removal service can wipe your personal info from those sites and reduce how much of your data ends up on breach lists. When less of your information is floating around online, your accounts become less tempting targets.

While no service can guarantee the complete removal of your data from the internet, a data removal service is really a smart choice. They aren’t cheap, and neither is your privacy. These services do all the work for you by actively monitoring and systematically erasing your personal information from hundreds of websites. It’s what gives me peace of mind and has proven to be the most effective way to erase your personal data from the internet. By limiting the information available, you reduce the risk of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with information they might find on the dark web, making it harder for them to target you.

Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com.

Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: Cyberguy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Kurt’s key takeaways 

Weak passwords remain a huge issue in 2025, even with new tools and better education. You have the power to improve your security with a few quick changes. When you build strong habits, you make it harder for criminals to get inside your accounts. Small steps add up fast and give you far more protection online.

What do you think keeps people stuck on weak passwords even when the risks are clear? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter. 

Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Technology

Schools are catching on to Big Tech’s playbook

Published

on

Schools are catching on to Big Tech’s playbook

It’s the hot new thing in tech, and it’s where all the jobs are. Students who don’t learn to use it fall behind. And to help them catch up in time, its creators are graciously providing the resources and curriculum for learning it, often pro bono.

That’s the narrative AI companies are pitching schools on right now, but according to New York Times education technology reporter Natasha Singer, it’s also how the tech industry has built its influence in classrooms for the past 15 years.

In a new book, Coding Kids, Singer details how tech companies took a central role in promoting computers and coding skills in education, promising computer science skills were the ticket to high-paying jobs. But by the time many of those students entered the workforce, new technologies had thrown that promise into question. Meanwhile, the companies got schools to help them create a new class of would-be workers, and trained students on using their products and software, making them likely future customers.

“I worry we have collective amnesia”

Advertisement

Now, the AI industry is pitching itself to schools with similar force. “I worry we have collective amnesia,” Singer told me on a recent episode of The Vergecast. “Have we learned any lessons from these past tech cycles in schools that are going to inform the rollout of AI, make sure that it benefits education, and put in the safeguards now — not a decade from now?” Fortunately, in some ways, she believes the answer is yes.

Singer’s book recounts how more than a decade ago, the country’s largest tech companies embedded themselves directly into school curricula through courses for Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles classes. Apple and Microsoft each created their own curricula, featuring their own tools like Apple’s Swift or Microsoft’s Minecraft. “What’s striking about this is you can imagine that parents would not want, say, Pfizer AP Biology, or Northrop Grumman AP Physics, or ExxonMobil Environmental Science AP,” Singer says. She found that those in the medical field would likely understand why — medical students who are trained by a company on how to implant their proprietary device, one expert told her as an example, rarely choose to try another.

Google has also made itself a dominant force in education through its distribution of low-cost laptops called Chromebooks. Singer tracked their ubiquitous adoption across schools through the 2010s, which she says was accelerated even further during the school shutdowns of the covid-19 pandemic. Google also introduced its Classroom app to help teachers communicate things like assignments and grades. By the time generative AI took off, Singer writes, Google was already a key platform provider for many schools, and well-positioned to promote it.

Even when companies weren’t directly involved in education, they backed nonprofit groups like Code.org. Code.org kicked off its viral education campaign with a splashy celebrity-laden video that included tech moguls like Microsoft founder Bill Gates and then-Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, urging kids to learn to code. Code.org founder Hadi Partovi took a startup-style approach to promoting computer science education, and had little planned for how to capitalize on the attention of the video once it took off, Singer writes. He ultimately funneled that attention into a similarly splashy “Hour of Code” campaign across the country, urging schools to engage in entertaining hour-long courses introducing kids to coding building blocks.

At the time, there wasn’t much pushback, Singer found — though there were some attempts at alternatives. One group of academics engaged in a more traditional, methodological approach to testing and rolling out their own computer science curriculum. It had the express goal of diversifying the kinds of students enrolled in such courses, and taught students to think about big questions around the internet and technology, and scrutinize builders’ motivations.

Advertisement

Eventually, backlash arrived. Some recent graduates say they feel let down that they were told to code their whole lives, just to find such entry-level jobs to be diminishing, Singer told me. Some schools are getting rid of ubiquitous Google Chromebooks, and research around the world is finding that adding technology to the classroom often doesn’t have a significant impact on actual learning.

“Most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech”

“I’m not arguing against tech education or tech in schools,” Singer says. “But what I am saying is most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech. They want kids to learn how to be informed citizens in a democracy, and they want kids to figure out what their passions are and who they are and what their beliefs are… And so if we let the tech industry dictate or even heavily influence what happens in schools, then the question we’re asking is, how can we get AI into schools faster? Which is a product question, and not, ‘What are the most important things we want kids to learn?’”

While the AI industry of the 2020s may be pulling from the 2010s playbook, there already appears to be one distinct difference: Parents and school districts are pushing back. Just last week, the nation’s largest school system, New York City, banned elementary and middle schools from letting students use AI in the classroom for the coming school year. A day later, Los Angeles announced an even broader restriction that included high schoolers. And unlike the few-and-far-between critiques Singer documented in the early days of tech’s coding push, there appears to be a vibrant grassroots movement fighting the screen- and AI-ification of the classroom among parents and teachers alike.

“I think schools are beginning to figure it out,” says Singer, who’s “optimistic” that teachers and students are looking for a broader kind of tech education. That curriculum could teach kids “to ask deep questions about how companies are steering us with their technology, how software and AI are designed to affect our choices, and what role students have to use the tools productively. But also to push back if they like, and to not feel like they’re in a world where AI is driving them.”

Advertisement
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading

Technology

Floating solar panels could save cities millions. Is your town next?

Published

on

Floating solar panels could save cities millions. Is your town next?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

What if your town could build a solar farm without giving up acres of valuable land? Lima, Ohio, is trying something different. The city has completed a 2-megawatt solar array that floats on the Twin Lakes Reservoir, its primary drinking water source.

More than 3,000 solar panels now sit on the water and feed electricity to the nearby water treatment plant. The city projects the system will save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over its lifetime. That kind of savings could get the attention of cities far beyond Ohio.

So, could floating solar panels eventually show up on a reservoir near you? Here’s how the technology works, why cities are interested and what it could mean for your community.

Missed CyberGuy LIVE? Watch the Protect Your Money replay

Our free CyberGuy LIVE class, Protect Your Money From Today’s Biggest Threats, has ended, but you can still watch the full replay and download our financial protection checklist. Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson walks you through five simple ways to help defend yourself against AI scams, fraud, identity theft and financial hacks. You’ll learn how to set up bank alerts, strengthen your account logins, protect your phone number, freeze your credit and help secure your retirement savings against unauthorized transfers. No technical experience is needed.

Advertisement

Get the free replay and checklist now at CyberGuyLive.com

WHO PAYS FOR US POWER BOOM? BLUE, RED STATES OFFER STARKLY DIFFERENT WAYS TO LOWER UTILITY BILLS AMID AI SURGE

An Ohio city is using floating solar panels on its drinking water reservoir to power its water treatment plant and cut millions in projected energy costs. (D3Energy)

Ohio puts 3,120 solar panels on a drinking water reservoir

Lima officially celebrated the completion of its Twin Lakes Floating Solar Project on Aug. 12. The final system includes 3,120 solar panels spread across about 3.6 acres of water, according to developer D3Energy. The 2-megawatt array sits on Lima’s primary drinking water reservoir. That reservoir serves roughly 35,000 residents.

Next door, the city’s water treatment plant processes about 14 million gallons of water each day. It also consumes more electricity than any other city facility. That makes the plant an obvious place to look for energy savings. Lima projects the floating solar system will save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over its lifetime. Earlier city estimates put first-year savings at roughly $200,000. For a city utility, that is serious money. Actual lifetime savings will depend on factors including future electricity prices and how the system performs over time.

Advertisement

How floating solar panels work

Instead of attaching panels to racks planted in the ground, engineers mount them on floating platforms. Anchors and mooring lines keep the array in position.

Lima uses Ciel & Terre’s Hydrelio floating system. Its anchoring setup connects to the banks and reservoir bottom. The design also allows the array to move as water levels change. The project uses bifacial solar panels, which can capture light on both sides.

Electricity travels from the array to eight inverters onshore. From there, the electricity helps power the water treatment plant. The result looks a bit like a traditional solar farm that traded grass for water.

Why cities may want solar panels floating on water

Here is where the idea gets particularly interesting. Land costs money. It also competes with housing, businesses, agriculture and other development. Reservoirs already occupy space. Lima’s floating array covers about four acres.

A land-based system producing the same amount of electricity would reportedly need at least 10 acres. That could make floating solar attractive to cities with limited open space. The panels can also sit near the facilities that need the electricity. In Lima, the water treatment plant sits right beside the reservoir. That reduces the need to find a distant solar site and then figure out how to move the electricity where the city needs it.

Advertisement

Researchers have also studied whether floating solar can help reduce evaporation by shading portions of the water surface. Of course, every reservoir comes with different conditions. Water depth, changing levels and recreational use can affect whether a project makes sense. Federal researchers also consider existing dam operations when evaluating potential sites.

LAWMAKERS TARGET ENERGY AFFORDABILITY THROUGH SWEEPING PERMITTING OVERHAUL IN NEW HOUSE BILL

Floating solar could help cities generate clean energy without using valuable land, but questions remain about long-term costs and water safety. (D3Energy)

What about putting solar panels on drinking water?

This was one of my first questions. These panels are floating on the same reservoir that provides drinking water to about 35,000 people. Lima’s system uses Ciel & Terre Hydrelio floats made from high-density polyethylene, or HDPE.

Ciel & Terre says its floating system complies with the BS 6920:2000 standard for nonmetallic materials that come into contact with water intended for human consumption. Still, communities considering floating solar have more to evaluate than whether the structure can float safely.

Advertisement

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has examined environmental and regulatory questions surrounding floating solar. Its research notes that projects can affect water bodies differently depending on the location. That means a system that works well on one reservoir may require a different design somewhere else.

The project cost millions before it could save millions

There is another number worth paying attention to. The Lima project cost about $5.3 million. Federal support played a substantial role in making the numbers work. The city received a $2.4 million Department of Energy grant. Combined with almost $900,000 in federal direct-pay tax credits, that support helped offset roughly half of the project’s cost.

Those incentives covered a significant share of the upfront expense. That context is important when another city looks at Lima’s projected $10 million in savings. A town considering floating solar would need to look at construction costs, financing and expected electricity production. Available incentives could change the calculation as well.

Lima began considering the project years before crews put panels on the water. City Council approved moving forward with the project in 2023. Construction began in 2025 before the system came online this August.

Could floating solar panels spread across America?

Lima may look unusual today, but floating solar has substantial room to grow. Ohio already has more than one project. D3Energy and ARP Solar completed a 1.5-megawatt floating array for Del-Co Water in Delaware, Ohio, in 2024. A 6-megawatt system in Monroeville is expected to come online before the end of 2026.

Advertisement

The bigger opportunity stretches far beyond Ohio. National Renewable Energy Laboratory researchers studied federally owned or regulated reservoirs across the U.S. They estimated those reservoirs have technical potential for 861 to 1,042 gigawatts of floating solar capacity.

That figure represents technical potential rather than a prediction that thousands of reservoirs will soon disappear under solar panels. Plenty of locations would never make sense.

Still, the scale helps explain why energy developers and local governments are taking a closer look at water. CyberGuy has covered this idea before on a much larger scale. India’s Omkareshwar project showed how enormous floating solar installations can become. We have also seen developers rethink the shape of solar installations on land. One Texas company is building vertical solar towers designed to produce more power from a smaller footprint.

AMERICA’S BROKEN PERMITTING SYSTEM IS QUIETLY RAISING YOUR COST OF LIVING

Cities across the U.S. are exploring floating solar as a way to reduce utility costs while making use of existing reservoirs. (D3Energy)

Advertisement

Will floating solar panels lower your utility bill?

Here is the part I would keep an eye on. Lima expects to save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over the project’s lifetime. But that does not mean residents will suddenly see a cheaper water bill. The city could use those savings in different ways. Lower energy costs could help cover other expenses, pay for infrastructure upgrades or ease pressure on future rate increases.

So, if a floating solar project comes to your town, there is one question worth asking: Will any of those savings eventually make their way back to you? That answer could determine how much this technology really helps the people paying the bills.

What this means to you

You probably do not spend much time thinking about how much electricity your local water plant consumes. Yet you ultimately help pay for that electricity through taxes, utility rates or both. Floating solar gives cities another way to attack that expense without buying a huge parcel of land.

It also raises questions you should ask before cheering on a project. How much will it cost? How much electricity will it realistically generate? What happens to the savings? You should also ask what testing and monitoring will protect the water supply. Those answers will tell you whether a floating solar project makes financial sense for your community.

Kurt’s key takeaways

What I like about Lima’s floating solar project is how practical the idea feels. The city already owns the reservoir, and its water treatment plant right next door uses a huge amount of electricity. So instead of finding another piece of land for solar panels, Lima put them on the water. Then there is the projected $10 million in savings. That certainly gets my attention. I want to see whether those savings hold up over time and, more importantly, whether residents eventually benefit from them. Lima also gives other cities something real to look at. We are seeing communities experiment with new ways to generate and store energy, from floating solar to massive battery projects. And who knows? The next solar project in your town may end up floating right on the water.

Advertisement

Would you be comfortable with thousands of solar panels floating on your town’s drinking water reservoir if officials said the project could save millions, or would you need to see more long-term evidence first? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

Slack can now vibe-code interactive charts and reports inside chats

Published

on

Slack can now vibe-code interactive charts and reports inside chats

A new feature coming to Slack will allow you to build interactive reports, polls, dashboards, presentations, microsites, and other tools directly inside a chat. With Slackforce Surfaces, you can describe to Slackbot what you need, and it will use AI to gather information from relevant conversations and connected apps, like Google Drive or Salesforce, to create it.

Once Slackbot creates a Surface, you can share it with colleagues and pin it to channels, allowing other people to view it, interact with it, and leave comments. In one example shared by Slack, a user asks Slackbot for help creating an arcade-themed visualization of AI token usage. The AI assistant then generates an interactive dashboard showing token usage across different divisions, such as sales, design, and engineering.

“You’re not exporting your data to some other tool to make sense of it, you’re asking Slackbot to build the dashboard, the deck, the report right where the conversation already is, and your whole team can act on it together,” Ryan Gavin, Slack’s chief marketing officer, tells The Verge in an email.

It seems like there are many other ways to use Surfaces, too, like building a live dashboard for a customer support queue that other workers can view, or creating a weather-themed financial forecast that pulls in data from connected apps. Slack notes that the feature will only pull information that you’ve given its AI tools permission to access.

Advertisement

Slackforce Surfaces is available to all customers — including those who use it for free — with Slackbot enabled in their workspace. You’ll be able to use it with live data starting in October.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending