Connect with us

News

Trump Halts Billions in Grants for Democratic Districts During Shutdown

Published

on

Trump Halts Billions in Grants for Democratic Districts During Shutdown

Two weeks into the government shutdown, the Trump administration has frozen or canceled nearly $28 billion that had been reserved for more than 200 projects primarily located in Democratic-led cities, congressional districts and states, according to an analysis by The New York Times.

Advertisement

Total amount of affected funding

By congressional district of grant recipient

Each of these infrastructure projects had received federal aid, sometimes after officials spent years pleading in Washington — only to see that money halted as President Trump has looked to punish Democrats over the course of the fiscal stalemate.

Advertisement

The Times conducted its analysis by examining federal funding records, which include details about the city and state where each grant recipient is based. The projects include new investments in clean energy, upgrades to the electric grid and fixes to the nation’s transportation infrastructure, primarily in Democratic strongholds, such as New York and California.

Advertisement

Total affected funding, by congressional district

Advertisement

Ala.

Advertisement

Ariz.

Ark.

Calif.

Advertisement

Colo.

Del.

Advertisement

Fla.

Ga.

Idaho

Advertisement

Ill.

Ind.

Advertisement

Iowa

Kan.

Ky.

Advertisement

La.

Maine

Advertisement

Md.

Mass.

Mich.

Advertisement

Minn.

Miss.

Advertisement

Mo.

Mont.

Neb.

Advertisement

Nev.

N.H.

Advertisement

N.J.

N.M.

N.Y.

Advertisement

N.C.

N.D.

Advertisement

Ohio

Okla.

Ore.

Advertisement

Pa.

S.C.

Advertisement

S.D.

Tenn.

Texas

Advertisement

Utah

Vt.

Advertisement

Va.

Wash.

W.Va.

Advertisement

Wis.

Wyo.

Advertisement

Circles sized by total amount of affected grant funding

In some cases, recipients had started to receive portions of the federal aid, only to become casualties in a funding battle that has no end in sight.

Mr. Trump’s aides have offered a series of explanations for the administration’s decision to pause or terminate grants, claiming in some cases that the spending would have been wasteful or in conflict with the president’s priorities. Since returning to office, Mr. Trump has been particularly aggressive in cutting federal investments to combat climate change.

Advertisement

But the budgetary moves coincide with the president’s public pledges to use the shutdown to slash spending favored by Democrats. He has described the federal stoppage as an “unprecedented opportunity” to make some cuts permanent.

Many Democrats said that the announcements fit a broader pattern at the White House, where Mr. Trump has claimed vast authority to reprogram the nation’s budget, even though the Constitution gives that power to Congress.

Advertisement

In doing so, Democratic lawmakers said the result could harm their cities and states, upending work that would have helped residents regardless of their political party.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

Total affected funding, by congressional district

Advertisement

N.Y. 10th

Advertisement

Dan Goldman

12 $17.84 bil.

Ill. 7th

Danny Davis

9 $2.37 bil.

Calif. 12th

Lateefah Simon

10 $1.40 bil.

Wash. 10th

Marilyn Strickland

1 $995.1 mil.

Calif. 7th

Doris Matsui

4 $655.3 mil.

Calif. 32th

Advertisement

Brad Sherman

1 $499.5 mil.

Minn. 4th

Betty McCollum

2 $465.9 mil.

Ill. 3rd

Delia Ramirez

14 $365.4 mil.

Colo. 2nd

Joe Neguse

15 $352.5 mil.

Mass. 2nd

James McGovern

3 $114.6 mil.

Ore. 2nd

Advertisement

Cliff Bentz

5 $294.3 mil.

Mass. 7th

Ayanna Pressley

9 $207.6 mil.

Mass. 5th

Katherine Clark

9 $180.3 mil.

Mo. 2nd

Ann Wagner

1 $189.2 mil.

N.Y. 20th

Paul Tonko

25 $129.3 mil.

Md. 7th

Advertisement

Kweisi Mfume

3 $158.9 mil.

Calif. 2nd

Jared Huffman

4 $129.1 mil.

Calif. 16th

Sam Liccardo

16 $75.2 mil.

Colo. 7th

Brittany Pettersen

13 $74.2 mil.

Calif. 17th

Ro Khanna

6 $25.9 mil.

Minn. 5th

Advertisement

Ilhan Omar

5 $76.5 mil.

Calif. 5th

Tom McClintock

2 $79 mil.

Ore. 1st

Suzanne Bonamici

11 $73.6 mil.

Wash. 2nd

Rick Larsen

3 $47.8 mil.

Calif. 28th

Judy Chu

5 $53 mil.

N.M. 3rd

Advertisement

Teresa Leger Fernandez

2 $65.4 mil.

Calif. 34th

Jimmy Gomez

3 $60.3 mil.

Colo. 1st

Diana DeGette

4 $57.6 mil.

N.M. 2nd

Gabe Vasquez

4 $56.1 mil.

N.M. 1st

Melanie Stansbury

3 $52.3 mil.

Minn. 8th

Advertisement

Pete Stauber

1 $49.8 mil.

Calif. 6th

Ami Bera

1 $50 mil.

Wash. 3rd

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

1 $46 mil.

Calif. 47th

Dave Min

3 $41.7 mil.

Calif. 19th

Jimmy Panetta

3 $30.8 mil.

Mass. 3rd

Advertisement

Lori Trahan

3 $39.7 mil.

Calif. 15th

Kevin Mullin

5 $31.6 mil.

Colo. 8th

Gabe Evans

2 $32.9 mil.

Ill. 13th

Nikki Budzinski

7 $27.6 mil.

Mich. 6th

Debbie Dingell

1 $30.7 mil.

Ore. 3rd

Advertisement

Maxine Dexter

2 $15 mil.

Hawaii 1st

Ed Case

5 $24.5 mil.

N.Y. 23th

Nicholas Langworthy

2 $27.4 mil.

N.Y. 17th

Michael Lawler

2 $26.2 mil.

Conn. 5th

Jahana Hayes

3 $20.1 mil.

Mass. 6th

Advertisement

Seth Moulton

3 $17.5 mil.

N.Y. 16th

George Latimer

1 $20.4 mil.

Minn. 7th

Michelle Fischbach

1 $19.6 mil.

Calif. 25th

Raul Ruiz

1 $18.4 mil.

Calif. 4th

Mike Thompson

2 $16.6 mil.

Del.

Advertisement

Sarah McBride

3 $15.3 mil.

Mass. 9th

Bill Keating

3 $6.4 mil.

Conn. 1st

John Larson

4 $8.2 mil.

N.Y. 19th

Josh Riley

5 $10.4 mil.

Md. 4th

Glenn Ivey

4 $11 mil.

R.I. 1st

Advertisement

Gabe Amo

2 $11.5 mil.

N.Y. 3rd

Thomas Suozzi

1 $11.2 mil.

Calif. 49th

Mike Levin

2 $10.5 mil.

Mass. 8th

Stephen Lynch

2 $8.8 mil.

Calif. 42th

Robert Garcia

1 $9.7 mil.

Wash. 5th

Advertisement

Michael Baumgartner

4 $8 mil.

Md. 3rd

Sarah Elfreth

4 $6.8 mil.

Conn. 2nd

Joe Courtney

3 $7.8 mil.

Calif. 50th

Scott Peters

1 $6.3 mil.

S.C. 4th

William Timmons

1 $1.7 mil.

Calif. 43th

Advertisement

Maxine Waters

1 $6.3 mil.

Calif. 39th

Mark Takano

1 $6 mil.

Wash. 7th

Pramila Jayapal

1 $2.9 mil.

Vt.

Becca Balint

2 $2.8 mil.

N.Y. 22th

John Mannion

1 $5 mil.

Calif. 37th

Advertisement

Sydney Kamlager-Dove

1 $3.4 mil.

N.H. 1st

Chris Pappas

1 $4.7 mil.

N.Y. 25th

Joseph Morelle

1 $4.8 mil.

Conn. 3rd

Rosa DeLauro

1 $4.4 mil.

Md. 1st

Andy Harris

1 $4.5 mil.

N.J. 6th

Advertisement

Frank Pallone

2 $4.7 mil.

Calif. 14th

Eric Swalwell

2 $3 mil.

Calif. 9th

Josh Harder

2 $4.2 mil.

N.Y. 12th

Jerrold Nadler

2 $3.8 mil.

Ill. 16th

Darin LaHood

1 $2.9 mil.

Conn. 4th

Advertisement

Jim Himes

1 $3 mil.

Ill. 10th

Bradley Schneider

1 $2.9 mil.

Ill. 5th

Mike Quigley

1 $2.7 mil.

Calif. 20th

Vince Fong

1 $2.1 mil.

Calif. 36th

Ted Lieu

2 $2.4 mil.

Md. 5th

Advertisement

Steny Hoyer

1 $2.5 mil.

Ill. 9th

Janice Schakowsky

1 $2.5 mil.

Ore. 4th

Valerie Hoyle

1 $1.7 mil.

R.I. 2nd

Seth Magaziner

1 $1.9 mil.

Calif. 10th

Mark DeSaulnier

1 $2.1 mil.

N.Y. 26th

Advertisement

Timothy Kennedy

1 $1.8 mil.

Ill. 17th

Eric Sorensen

1 $1.8 mil.

Calif. 24th

Salud Carbajal

1 $1.3 mil.

Calif. 11th

Nancy Pelosi

1 $1.9 mil.

N.J. 12th

Bonnie Watson Coleman

1 $2 mil.

N.Y. 13th

Advertisement

Adriano Espaillat

1 $1.2 mil.

N.Y. 9th

Yvette Clarke

1 $1.1 mil.

N.Y. 6th

Grace Meng

1 $1.5 mil.

Ga. 5th

Nikema Williams

1 $1.1 mil.

Ill. 11th

Bill Foster

1 $1.1 mil.

Calif. 22th

Advertisement

David Valadao

1 $1 mil.

New delays in transportation aid

So far, the administration has targeted essentially two broad tranches of federal aid. First, the White House has held up billions of dollars in previously approved transportation funding for New York and Chicago.

Advertisement

In New York, the administration stopped the delivery of about $18 billion in pledged investments for two major projects: the Second Avenue subway, which traverses the east side of Manhattan, and the Hudson River tunnel, which serves as the primary rail route through New York City and along the northeast corridor. Funding for the tunnel, in particular, came only after years of wrangling, as New York officials and their counterparts in New Jersey looked to repair a roughly 115-year-old passage from damage wrought by Hurricane Sandy while improving rail capacity.

In Chicago, the Trump administration said it paused about $2.1 billion in money pledged for the city’s own transit upgrades, including an extension of its rail system into the South Side. Groundbreaking was expected to begin in 2026 after years of work to shore up federal funding for the expansion.

In both cases, the White House said it was pausing the delivery of federal dollars so that it could review the cities’ contracting policies. The administration sought to determine if leaders had made construction-related decisions on the basis of race, diversity or inclusion.

Advertisement

The moves came at a moment when the president was at war with key leaders from those states. Mr. Trump has frequently attacked Representative Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Chuck Schumer, two New York Democrats who lead their party in the House and Senate, for refusing to bow to his demands on spending. The Transportation Department claimed that the two men were to blame for the slowdown in aid, since the agency could not complete its review quickly during the shutdown.

Separately, federal officials have repeatedly tried to withhold security and counterterrorism funding from New York, though the state won back some of the money.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump has similarly gone after Chicago and its Democratic mayor, Brandon Johnson, along with the Democratic governor of Illinois, JB Pritzker, saying this month that both should be jailed.

Deep cuts to energy funding

The Trump administration also moved to terminate another tranche of money outright. Two days into the shutdown, it announced it would end roughly $7.6 billion in previously approved grants for 223 energy-related projects in 16 states, 14 of which are led by Democrats. Those cuts were later expanded.

Advertisement

The cancellations were the latest attempt by Mr. Trump and his top aides to revoke climate- and infrastructure-related funding adopted under President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a series of actions that have been challenged in court. The Energy Department said that it made its decision because the projects were “not economically viable” or did not advance Mr. Trump’s energy policy agenda.

Many of the projects are located in Democratic-led congressional districts, prompting lawmakers to question in recent days if there might be political motivations behind the administration’s actions.

Advertisement

The cuts targeted a vast range of projects, including efforts to prevent power outages and modernize energy grids — a bipartisan goal — as well as investments in newer energy sources, like hydrogen. The Trump administration revoked its plan to provide up to $1.2 billion for the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems, known as ARCHES, which aimed to help develop a clean-burning power source for heavy-duty trucks, port operators and other major drivers of harmful emissions.

The Biden administration announced the award in 2023, nearly two years after Democrats and Republicans adopted a bipartisan package to improve the nation’s infrastructure.

More cuts to come

Advertisement

As the shutdown enters its third week, Mr. Trump and his aides have threatened additional cuts. The president in recent days has described the closure as an opportunity “handed to us on a silver platter” to lay off federal workers, slash federal agencies and reduce other funding, perhaps in permanent ways.

One potential target is Portland, Ore. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, signaled this month that the Trump administration could block some unspecified federal aid to the city, which is led by a Democrat, because of ongoing protests of the president’s immigration crackdown.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Methodology

To analyze the impact of cancelled and paused grants, The Times began by compiling a list of affected grants. The list was then cross-referenced against data from USAspending.gov, where detailed information about each grant was collected. The figures shown on the page reflect the total amount of known funding that has not yet been outlaid.

To determine the impact by congressional district, each grant was grouped into the district where the grantee is located. In some cases, the work being funded by the grant may not occur in the same district, or could occur across multiple districts and states. The exact monetary allocation across those work sites is not known. Grants where the recipient could not be matched to a congressional district are not shown.

Advertisement

For some large projects, government data only shows currently allocated funds, instead of the entire cost of the project. In cases where this is known, the grant data was supplemented by additional reporting to better reflect the amount of affected funding.

News

How Every Senator Voted on Passing the Bill to End the Shutdown

Published

on

How Every Senator Voted on Passing the Bill to End the Shutdown

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Measure passed with 60 “yes” votes to 40 “no” votes.
Vote Total Democrats Republicans Independents Bar chart of total votes
60 7 52 1
40 38 1 1

The Senate on Monday passed a bill to end the longest government shutdown in history after more than a month of stalemate. Seven Democrats and Senator Angus King, a Maine independent, joined almost every Republican in voting “yes.”

In voting for the bill, the Democrats broke with the rest of their party’s members, who have been insisting that any spending measure include the extension of expiring health insurance subsidies. The bill does not include any health care provisions, but Democrats did obtain some concessions, including the restoration of the jobs of federal workers who were laid off during the shutdown and guaranteed backpay for those who were furloughed.

Advertisement

The bill still needs to pass the House. Representatives are beginning to return to Washington after an extended recess, and a vote is not expected until Wednesday at the earliest.

How Every Senator Voted

Advertisement
Advertisement

Republicans

Member Answer

No

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Democrats

Advertisement

Member Answer

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

Advertisement

Yes

Yes

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

No

Advertisement

No

No

Advertisement

No

Continue Reading

News

Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa visits White House for historic Trump meeting

Published

on

Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa visits White House for historic Trump meeting

Ahmed al-Sharaa — who 20 years ago was thrown into a US detention centre in Iraq after he joined al-Qaeda militants fighting the Americans — on Monday became the first Syrian president to visit the White House since the country’s independence in 1946.

During his meeting with Donald Trump, Sharaa formally joined the 89-country coalition to defeat the militant group Isis, capping an extraordinary transformation for the erstwhile rebel leader who toppled dictator Bashar al-Assad nearly a year ago.

Trump said in the Oval Office on Monday: “He’s a very strong leader. He comes from a very tough place. And he’s a tough guy. I like him, I get along with him. We want to see Syria be successful along with the rest of the Middle East. So I have confidence that he’ll be able to do the job, absolutely.”

Since seizing power last December, Sharaa, 43, has worked hard to court friends and allies after decades of Assad family rule and 14 years of ruinous civil war left Syria internationally isolated.

His charm offensive has largely worked. Western and Arab states — spurred by Washington — have lifted most of the economic sanctions imposed in the Assad era and built closer ties with a state they had long shunned.

Advertisement

Sharaa met privately with the US president for nearly an hour and a half on Monday, after which he was expected to hold meetings with lawmakers in an effort, backed by the White House, to permanently repeal US sanctions.

Sharaa’s government has appealed to western sensibilities by touting free markets and foreign investment, political inclusion and a pluralistic society.

Top US lawmakers in both parties have broadly welcomed his message and have thrown their support behind a vote to repeal Washington’s most stringent sanctions, known as the Caesar Act.

But Sharaa’s government is dominated by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the Islamist insurgent group the Syrian leader once led, and critics say attempts at political inclusion have been superficial.

They also point to eruptions of sectarian violence in Syria over the past year, including clashes between government-backed forces and gunmen from the country’s Alawite and Druze religious minorities in which hundreds of civilians from both communities were killed. The government pledged to hold the perpetrators accountable, but many Syrians, particularly among minority groups, remain sceptical.

Advertisement

Trump in May waived most of the Assad-era sanctions on the country to give the nascent Syrian government “a chance”, after being impressed by the “tough” and “handsome” Syrian leader during a meeting in Saudi Arabia.

After Monday’s meeting, the Trump administration suspended the bulk of the Caesar Act sanctions for a further 180 days, replacing the president’s earlier waiver. The measures will still apply to “certain transactions” relating to Russia and Iran, the Treasury said.

The World Bank estimates it will take more than $200bn to rebuild the war-ravaged nation. Syria’s economic recovery has stalled amid the lingering sanctions, with foreign companies wary of investing until they are fully repealed.

Syrian companies, in turn, have found it difficult to raise funds or import goods because of concerns about complying with sanctions.

The Israeli government and its allies in Washington have warned the White House against placing its trust in Sharaa and have urged Congress not to support a full repeal.

Advertisement

Sharaa “has deep roots in the global jihad”, a pro-Israel advocacy group, the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, warned in a recent report, which called on Congress to slow its “rush to repeal the Caesar Act permanently”.

Sharaa on Sunday met Republican congressman Brian Mast, chair of the House foreign affairs committee and a key Republican holdout on lifting sanctions.

Mast, who lost both of his legs to an improvised bomb while serving as a soldier in Afghanistan, on Monday said he and Sharaa had “a long and serious conversation about how to build a future for the people of Syria free of war, Isis and extremism”.

“He and I are two former soldiers and two former enemies,” Mast said. He added Sharaa told him of his desire to “liberate from the past and have a noble pursuit for his people and his country and to be a great ally to the United States of America”.

Urged on by Washington, the UN Security Council has lifted terror-related sanctions on Sharaa and his interior minister and former al-Qaeda member Anas Khattab. The UK and US followed suit.

Advertisement

Talks between Sharaa and Trump on Monday were expected to focus on security, including Israel, Isis and Kurdish-led forces.

Syria’s formal entry into the global anti-Isis coalition helps to seal Sharaa’s partnership with Washington and strengthens his anti-jihadi credentials with sceptics. While HTS was briefly allied with Isis in the fight to oust Assad, it has fought the group since they parted ways.

Despite no longer having territorial control, Isis cells continue to carry out attacks in Syria. Sharaa’s security forces have conducted raids on the group in recent weeks.

For years, Washington’s main ally in fighting Isis has been the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, which control the country’s north-east. Talks to merge the SDF and Damascus’s security forces have stalled, despite pressure from Washington to come to a resolution.

The US military has increased its co-operation with Damascus on Isis in recent months and is said to be considering an expansion of its military presence in Syria by sending troops to an air base in the Syrian capital. This would be a boost to Sharaa’s fledgling presidency, analysts said.

Advertisement

Syrian analyst Malik al-Abdeh said: “It’s great for Sharaa, in that he will be backed up by a major power, and great for the US in terms of its footprint in the region and having decisive influence over Damascus. It’s a win-win.”

Moscow, a financial and military backer for Assad, has sought to smooth things over with Sharaa’s government over the past year in order to keep its strategically important air base and naval port in the country. Last month, Sharaa met Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Moscow in what was billed as a “reset” in relations.

Continue Reading

News

Families accuse Camp Mystic of ignoring risks in Texas lawsuit over flood deaths

Published

on

Families accuse Camp Mystic of ignoring risks in Texas lawsuit over flood deaths

An officer prays with a family as they pick up items at Camp Mystic in Hunt, Texas, on July 9.

Ashley Landis/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Ashley Landis/AP

The operators of Camp Mystic in Texas, where 25 girls and two teenage counselors died in catastrophic flooding on July 4, failed to take necessary steps to protect the campers as life-threatening floodwaters approached, families of the victims allege in a lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in state court in Austin, seeks more than $1 million in damages but does not specify an exact amount. It was filed as Camp Mystic has drawn renewed outrage from several victims’ families over plans to reopen the 100-year-old camp next summer.

Among the claims in the lawsuit is that a groundskeeper was directed to spend more than an hour evacuating equipment while girls and counselors in cabins closest to the Guadalupe River were ordered to remain there, even as floodwaters overwhelmed the property.

Advertisement

The lawsuit was filed by the families of five campers and the two counselors who died.

“These young girls died because a for-profit camp put profit over safety,” the lawsuit said. “The camp chose to house young girls in cabins sitting in flood-prone areas, despite the risk, to avoid the cost of relocating the cabins.”

The suit also alleges the operators of the camp chose not to make plans to safely evacuate campers, despite state rules requiring such plans, and instead ordered campers and counselors to remain in their cabins as a matter of policy.

A broken heart sign is displayed near Camp Mystic on July 8 after a flash flood swept through the area in Hunt, Texas.

A broken heart sign is displayed near Camp Mystic on July 8 after a flash flood swept through the area in Hunt, Texas.

Eli Hartman/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Eli Hartman/AP

Defendants named in the lawsuit include Camp Mystic, affiliated entities and its owners, including the estate of camp owner Richard Eastland, who also died in the flooding, and his family members.

Advertisement

A separate lawsuit with similar allegations was filed Monday by the family of Eloise Peck, another Camp Mystic camper who died in the flood. Both lawsuits were filed in Travis County.

Telephone and email messages left Monday with an attorney for Camp Mystic seeking comment on the lawsuit were not immediately returned.

The campers and counselors were killed when the fast-rising floodwaters roared through a low-lying area of the summer camp before dawn on the Fourth of July. All told, the destructive flooding killed at least 136 people, raising questions about how things went so terribly wrong.

County leaders were asleep or out of town. The head of Camp Mystic had been tracking the weather beforehand, but it’s now unclear whether he saw an urgent warning from the National Weather Service that had triggered an emergency alert to phones in the area, a spokesperson for the camp’s operators said in the immediate aftermath.

The camp, established in 1926, did not evacuate and was hit hard when the river rose from 14 feet (4.2 meters) to 29.5 feet (9 meters) within 60 minutes.

Advertisement

Ryan DeWitt, whose daughter Molly DeWitt was one of the campers killed in the flooding, said in a statement that the lawsuit is a step toward helping the family find peace.

“We trust that through this process, light will be shed on what happened, and our hope is that justice will pave the way for prevention and much-needed safety reform,” DeWitt said.

The deaths of the campers and counselors, and the gut-wrenching testimony from their parents to Texas lawmakers, led to a series of new laws designed to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending