News
Trump Halts Billions in Grants for Democratic Districts During Shutdown
Two weeks into the government shutdown, the Trump administration has frozen or canceled nearly $28 billion that had been reserved for more than 200 projects primarily located in Democratic-led cities, congressional districts and states, according to an analysis by The New York Times.
By congressional district of grant recipient
Total amount of affected funding
Each of these infrastructure projects had received federal aid, sometimes after officials spent years pleading in Washington — only to see that money halted as President Trump has looked to punish Democrats over the course of the fiscal stalemate.
The Times conducted its analysis by examining federal funding records, which include details about the city and state where each grant recipient is based. The projects include new investments in clean energy, upgrades to the electric grid and fixes to the nation’s transportation infrastructure, primarily in Democratic strongholds, such as New York and California.
Ala.
Ariz.
Ark.
Calif.
Colo.
Del.
Fla.
Ga.
Idaho
Ill.
Ind.
Iowa
Kan.
Ky.
La.
Maine
Md.
Mass.
Mich.
Minn.
Miss.
Mo.
Mont.
Neb.
Nev.
N.H.
N.J.
N.M.
N.Y.
N.C.
N.D.
Ohio
Okla.
Ore.
Pa.
S.C.
S.D.
Tenn.
Texas
Utah
Vt.
Va.
Wash.
W.Va.
Wis.
Wyo.
Circles sized by total amount of affected grant funding
Total affected funding, by congressional district
In some cases, recipients had started to receive portions of the federal aid, only to become casualties in a funding battle that has no end in sight.
Mr. Trump’s aides have offered a series of explanations for the administration’s decision to pause or terminate grants, claiming in some cases that the spending would have been wasteful or in conflict with the president’s priorities. Since returning to office, Mr. Trump has been particularly aggressive in cutting federal investments to combat climate change.
But the budgetary moves coincide with the president’s public pledges to use the shutdown to slash spending favored by Democrats. He has described the federal stoppage as an “unprecedented opportunity” to make some cuts permanent.
Many Democrats said that the announcements fit a broader pattern at the White House, where Mr. Trump has claimed vast authority to reprogram the nation’s budget, even though the Constitution gives that power to Congress.
In doing so, Democratic lawmakers said the result could harm their cities and states, upending work that would have helped residents regardless of their political party.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment.
N.Y. 10th Dan Goldman Ill. 7th
Danny Davis Calif. 12th
Lateefah Simon Wash. 10th
Marilyn Strickland Calif. 7th
Doris Matsui Calif. 32th Brad Sherman Minn. 4th
Betty McCollum Ill. 3rd
Delia Ramirez Colo. 2nd
Joe Neguse Mass. 2nd
James McGovern Ore. 2nd Cliff Bentz Mass. 7th
Ayanna Pressley Mass. 5th
Katherine Clark Mo. 2nd
Ann Wagner N.Y. 20th
Paul Tonko Md. 7th Kweisi Mfume Calif. 2nd
Jared Huffman Calif. 16th
Sam Liccardo Colo. 7th
Brittany Pettersen Calif. 17th
Ro Khanna Minn. 5th Ilhan Omar Calif. 5th
Tom McClintock Ore. 1st
Suzanne Bonamici Wash. 2nd
Rick Larsen Calif. 28th
Judy Chu N.M. 3rd Teresa Leger Fernandez Calif. 34th
Jimmy Gomez Colo. 1st
Diana DeGette N.M. 2nd
Gabe Vasquez N.M. 1st
Melanie Stansbury Minn. 8th Pete Stauber Calif. 6th
Ami Bera Wash. 3rd
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez Calif. 47th
Dave Min Calif. 19th
Jimmy Panetta Mass. 3rd Lori Trahan Calif. 15th
Kevin Mullin Colo. 8th
Gabe Evans Ill. 13th
Nikki Budzinski Mich. 6th
Debbie Dingell Ore. 3rd Maxine Dexter Hawaii 1st
Ed Case N.Y. 23th
Nicholas Langworthy N.Y. 17th
Michael Lawler Conn. 5th
Jahana Hayes Mass. 6th Seth Moulton N.Y. 16th
George Latimer Minn. 7th
Michelle Fischbach Calif. 25th
Raul Ruiz Calif. 4th
Mike Thompson Del. Sarah McBride Mass. 9th
Bill Keating Conn. 1st
John Larson N.Y. 19th
Josh Riley Md. 4th
Glenn Ivey R.I. 1st Gabe Amo N.Y. 3rd
Thomas Suozzi Calif. 49th
Mike Levin Mass. 8th
Stephen Lynch Calif. 42th
Robert Garcia Wash. 5th Michael Baumgartner Md. 3rd
Sarah Elfreth Conn. 2nd
Joe Courtney Calif. 50th
Scott Peters S.C. 4th
William Timmons Calif. 43th Maxine Waters Calif. 39th
Mark Takano Wash. 7th
Pramila Jayapal Vt.
Becca Balint N.Y. 22th
John Mannion Calif. 37th Sydney Kamlager-Dove N.H. 1st
Chris Pappas N.Y. 25th
Joseph Morelle Conn. 3rd
Rosa DeLauro Md. 1st
Andy Harris N.J. 6th Frank Pallone Calif. 14th
Eric Swalwell Calif. 9th
Josh Harder N.Y. 12th
Jerrold Nadler Ill. 16th
Darin LaHood Conn. 4th Jim Himes Ill. 10th
Bradley Schneider Ill. 5th
Mike Quigley Calif. 20th
Vince Fong Calif. 36th
Ted Lieu Md. 5th Steny Hoyer Ill. 9th
Janice Schakowsky Ore. 4th
Valerie Hoyle R.I. 2nd
Seth Magaziner Calif. 10th
Mark DeSaulnier N.Y. 26th Timothy Kennedy Ill. 17th
Eric Sorensen Calif. 24th
Salud Carbajal Calif. 11th
Nancy Pelosi N.J. 12th
Bonnie Watson Coleman N.Y. 13th Adriano Espaillat N.Y. 9th
Yvette Clarke N.Y. 6th
Grace Meng Ga. 5th
Nikema Williams Ill. 11th
Bill Foster Calif. 22th David Valadao Total affected funding, by congressional district
12
$17.84 bil.
9
$2.37 bil.
10
$1.40 bil.
1
$995.1 mil.
4
$655.3 mil.
1
$499.5 mil.
2
$465.9 mil.
14
$365.4 mil.
15
$352.5 mil.
3
$114.6 mil.
5
$294.3 mil.
9
$207.6 mil.
9
$180.3 mil.
1
$189.2 mil.
25
$129.3 mil.
3
$158.9 mil.
4
$129.1 mil.
16
$75.2 mil.
13
$74.2 mil.
6
$25.9 mil.
5
$76.5 mil.
2
$79 mil.
11
$73.6 mil.
3
$47.8 mil.
5
$53 mil.
2
$65.4 mil.
3
$60.3 mil.
4
$57.6 mil.
4
$56.1 mil.
3
$52.3 mil.
1
$49.8 mil.
1
$50 mil.
1
$46 mil.
3
$41.7 mil.
3
$30.8 mil.
3
$39.7 mil.
5
$31.6 mil.
2
$32.9 mil.
7
$27.6 mil.
1
$30.7 mil.
2
$15 mil.
5
$24.5 mil.
2
$27.4 mil.
2
$26.2 mil.
3
$20.1 mil.
3
$17.5 mil.
1
$20.4 mil.
1
$19.6 mil.
1
$18.4 mil.
2
$16.6 mil.
3
$15.3 mil.
3
$6.4 mil.
4
$8.2 mil.
5
$10.4 mil.
4
$11 mil.
2
$11.5 mil.
1
$11.2 mil.
2
$10.5 mil.
2
$8.8 mil.
1
$9.7 mil.
4
$8 mil.
4
$6.8 mil.
3
$7.8 mil.
1
$6.3 mil.
1
$1.7 mil.
1
$6.3 mil.
1
$6 mil.
1
$2.9 mil.
2
$2.8 mil.
1
$5 mil.
1
$3.4 mil.
1
$4.7 mil.
1
$4.8 mil.
1
$4.4 mil.
1
$4.5 mil.
2
$4.7 mil.
2
$3 mil.
2
$4.2 mil.
2
$3.8 mil.
1
$2.9 mil.
1
$3 mil.
1
$2.9 mil.
1
$2.7 mil.
1
$2.1 mil.
2
$2.4 mil.
1
$2.5 mil.
1
$2.5 mil.
1
$1.7 mil.
1
$1.9 mil.
1
$2.1 mil.
1
$1.8 mil.
1
$1.8 mil.
1
$1.3 mil.
1
$1.9 mil.
1
$2 mil.
1
$1.2 mil.
1
$1.1 mil.
1
$1.5 mil.
1
$1.1 mil.
1
$1.1 mil.
1
$1 mil.
New delays in transportation aid
So far, the administration has targeted essentially two broad tranches of federal aid. First, the White House has held up billions of dollars in previously approved transportation funding for New York and Chicago.
In New York, the administration stopped the delivery of about $18 billion in pledged investments for two major projects: the Second Avenue subway, which traverses the east side of Manhattan, and the Hudson River tunnel, which serves as the primary rail route through New York City and along the northeast corridor. Funding for the tunnel, in particular, came only after years of wrangling, as New York officials and their counterparts in New Jersey looked to repair a roughly 115-year-old passage from damage wrought by Hurricane Sandy while improving rail capacity.
In Chicago, the Trump administration said it paused about $2.1 billion in money pledged for the city’s own transit upgrades, including an extension of its rail system into the South Side. Groundbreaking was expected to begin in 2026 after years of work to shore up federal funding for the expansion.
In both cases, the White House said it was pausing the delivery of federal dollars so that it could review the cities’ contracting policies. The administration sought to determine if leaders had made construction-related decisions on the basis of race, diversity or inclusion.
The moves came at a moment when the president was at war with key leaders from those states. Mr. Trump has frequently attacked Representative Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Chuck Schumer, two New York Democrats who lead their party in the House and Senate, for refusing to bow to his demands on spending. The Transportation Department claimed that the two men were to blame for the slowdown in aid, since the agency could not complete its review quickly during the shutdown.
Separately, federal officials have repeatedly tried to withhold security and counterterrorism funding from New York, though the state won back some of the money.
Mr. Trump has similarly gone after Chicago and its Democratic mayor, Brandon Johnson, along with the Democratic governor of Illinois, JB Pritzker, saying this month that both should be jailed.
Deep cuts to energy funding
The Trump administration also moved to terminate another tranche of money outright. Two days into the shutdown, it announced it would end roughly $7.6 billion in previously approved grants for 223 energy-related projects in 16 states, 14 of which are led by Democrats. Those cuts were later expanded.
The cancellations were the latest attempt by Mr. Trump and his top aides to revoke climate- and infrastructure-related funding adopted under President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a series of actions that have been challenged in court. The Energy Department said that it made its decision because the projects were “not economically viable” or did not advance Mr. Trump’s energy policy agenda.
Many of the projects are located in Democratic-led congressional districts, prompting lawmakers to question in recent days if there might be political motivations behind the administration’s actions.
The cuts targeted a vast range of projects, including efforts to prevent power outages and modernize energy grids — a bipartisan goal — as well as investments in newer energy sources, like hydrogen. The Trump administration revoked its plan to provide up to $1.2 billion for the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems, known as ARCHES, which aimed to help develop a clean-burning power source for heavy-duty trucks, port operators and other major drivers of harmful emissions.
The Biden administration announced the award in 2023, nearly two years after Democrats and Republicans adopted a bipartisan package to improve the nation’s infrastructure.
More cuts to come
As the shutdown enters its third week, Mr. Trump and his aides have threatened additional cuts. The president in recent days has described the closure as an opportunity “handed to us on a silver platter” to lay off federal workers, slash federal agencies and reduce other funding, perhaps in permanent ways.
One potential target is Portland, Ore. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, signaled this month that the Trump administration could block some unspecified federal aid to the city, which is led by a Democrat, because of ongoing protests of the president’s immigration crackdown.
Methodology
To analyze the impact of cancelled and paused grants, The Times began by compiling a list of affected grants. The list was then cross-referenced against data from USAspending.gov, where detailed information about each grant was collected. The figures shown on the page reflect the total amount of known funding that has not yet been outlaid.
To determine the impact by congressional district, each grant was grouped into the district where the grantee is located. In some cases, the work being funded by the grant may not occur in the same district, or could occur across multiple districts and states. The exact monetary allocation across those work sites is not known. Grants where the recipient could not be matched to a congressional district are not shown.
For some large projects, government data only shows currently allocated funds, instead of the entire cost of the project. In cases where this is known, the grant data was supplemented by additional reporting to better reflect the amount of affected funding.
News
ICE should do traffic stops despite recent shootings, Trump says, seeming to oppose new suspension
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency should continue vehicle stops after recent fatal shootings, President Donald Trump said on Wednesday, seeming to oppose a new suspension of the practice used as part of his immigration crackdown.
ICE is “doing a GREAT job, one that has to be done,” Trump wrote on his social media site.
The Republican president said that to remove criminals he claims were let into the country under the previous Democratic administration “we must be strong, tough, and smart, and we CANNOT give up one of ICE’s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!” Trump said, “Once we do, we are playing right into the criminal’s hands.”
Trump administration officials have told Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to suspend most vehicle stops after two deadly shootings within a week, people familiar with the decision said Tuesday.
The suspension was ordered after an ICE officer shot and killed a Colombian driver Monday in Maine and a week after another officer shot and killed a motorist in Houston, renewing criticism of the agency’s enforcement tactics that were widely condemned last winter after the killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good in Minnesota.
In Florida on Tuesday, a third man in roughly a week died during an encounter with immigration officers. This time, a 28-year-old man was killed after he was hit by a tractor trailer while running from immigration and other federal officers, authorities said.
It’s a narrative that has been repeated again and again since the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown began, with federal officers confronting drivers and then saying they opened fire when the drivers’ vehicles became a danger. That’s despite decades of warnings from policing experts that shooting into moving cars presents a danger of its own and should almost always be avoided.
There have been at least 10 deaths involving encounters with immigration agents since Trump launched his deportation campaign. At least four of those deaths involved people in vehicles, including the one last week in Houston, a trend so troubling that U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said Tuesday that she had urged Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin “to cease all non-urgent vehicle stops.”
John Sandweg, who was acting director at ICE, which is part of DHS, during President Barack Obama’s Democratic administration, estimated recently that there have been roughly 18 traffic stop shootings during the Trump immigration crackdown.
The office of Maine Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, was told by DHS that ICE was suspending traffic stops, office spokesperson Matthew Felling said.
ICE, which has been under pressure to beef up arrest and deportation numbers, often says people it’s trying to arrest are increasingly resistant to leaving their homes. ICE officers blame immigration advocates who advise immigrants to stay in their homes unless ICE produces a warrant signed by an independent judge instead of the administrative warrants the agency generally uses that are signed by another ICE officer. So, ICE officers say, they’re forced to find other areas in which to make arrests.
Shooting angers Maine
Hundreds of people in Maine protested Tuesday over the fatal shooting of Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a 25-year-old Colombian national. Advocacy groups said Guerrero, who had a wife and a young daughter, was authorized to work in the United States.
DHS said Monday that an officer, “fearing for public safety,” shot and killed Durán Guerrero while officers were watching the home of someone they believed was in the U.S. illegally and facing a final order of removal from the country. It said in a post on X that when ICE tried to stop a car driven by someone who came from the home, the person attempted to flee in the vehicle and the officer fired.
That was a shift from how King earlier described the encounter, when he said Mullin told him the officer opened fire after the man tried to use his vehicle as a weapon. King said Mullin told him the officers were trying to serve an arrest warrant but not for the man who was shot.
In a scathing post on X, outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro called the shooting a targeted killing “at the hands of the U.S. government.”
Petro, who has openly quarreled with Trump, urged Trump to provide an explanation and accused ICE officers of treating Durán Guerrero as “an inferior being without rights.”
In Wednesday’s social media post, Trump told ICE to be “judicious, fair and smart, and go back and do your very important job.”
Maine’s congressional delegation on Tuesday demanded a “comprehensive, transparent, and expedited investigation.”
Questions surround the shooting
Photos showed bullet holes in Durán Guerrero’s car windshield, but the officers involved in the shooting didn’t have body cameras, leaving many questions. Among them are how close the officer was to the vehicle when shooting, whether officers told Durán Guerrero to stop and why ICE believes he had put the public in danger.
Border czar Tom Homan told reporters Tuesday that the investigation needs to play out and that officers will be held accountable if they are found to have acted inappropriately or illegally.
Maine’s attorney general’s office, which said it is working with federal agencies to investigate, said initial statements suggest the driver was trying to flee in the direction of the officer, whose name hasn’t been released and who was placed on leave.
Collins said Mullin told her the DHS inspector general is investigating in cooperation with the FBI.
Democrats seeking to unseat Collins in November have sought to connect her with ICE’s methods, which have drawn public scrutiny and derision. Collins later said in a statement that although ICE needs to improve, eliminating the agency would make the nation less safe.
Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat who is vying for Collins’ seat, called the ICE officers at the shooting “thugs” during a vigil Tuesday in Lewiston.
___
Whittle contributed from Biddeford, Maine; Brook from New Orleans; and Sisak from New York.
News
Supreme Court Justices give chilling accounts of threats to their safety
Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett testify before the House Appropriations Committee on Capitol Hill on July 14, 2026 in Washington, D.C.
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
The Supreme Court did something Tuesday that it has not done in seven years. It sent two of the justices to Capitol Hill to testify about the court’s budget request for the coming year. The budget has grown dramatically in recent years because of the equally dramatic rise in the number and intensity of threats to the justices’ safety.
Designated as the court’s representatives were Justice Elena Kagan, appointed by President Obama, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, appointed by President Trump.
As Kagan pointed out in her testimony, it was Republican Darrell Issa and Democrat Elijah Cummings who insisted that the court beef up its security ten years ago after Justice Antonin Scalia died in his sleep on a hunting trip, with no security anywhere nearby to respond quickly.

“They said, kind of like, we think you’re crazy, you know, that that you have less security than director of the Office of Personnel Management does,” she recounted the Congressmen as telling the Court, “and we think that you have to do better.”
Before that, the justices basically had little to no security. They drove their own cars to work; went to the movies and shopped at supermarkets unaccompanied, and did their private travel on their own. And frankly, they liked it that way, because having security is personally invasive.
In recent years, however, the court has undertaken major changes, including continually expanding the court police force to protect the justices and their homes at all times, and funding additional cybersecurity measures.
And yet, as Justice Kagan pointed out, the Court’s $207 million budget request is less than one tenth of one percent of the entire federal budget.
The justices spoke at length Tuesday about how rising threats impacted their lives. Justice Barrett came prepared with two harrowing stories. First was the day she brought home a bullet-proof vest.
“My 12-year-old son was standing in the doorway of my bedroom and he wanted to know what it was,” she testified, “and I didn’t know how to respond. I didn’t expect that performing this service was going to put me in the position of explaining to my children what a bulletproof vest was and why I had to wear one.”
She also described how just six weeks ago, her house was swatted, with local police responding to a fake emergency call. Local police could have stormed her home, but for the fact that her own security detail was there to prevent it.
Indeed, threats have deeply affected judges across America. After U.S. District Court Judge Esther Salas’s 20-year old son was murdered by a gunman seeking to kill her, many federal judges have reported receiving packages bearing the name of her slain son. Those threats, Justice Barrett testified, “are meant to intimidate and they’re meant to harass.”
Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), asked questions about President Trump’s furious response to adverse rulings in the tariff and birthright citizenship cases, and whether Trump’s heaping insults on the court could play a role in jeopardizing the safety of some justices. Kagan had a two-part reply.
“Criticism is fair game. I mean, go for it. You know, life in the big city is that you’re subject to all kinds of criticism. But intimidation is a different thing entirely. And when political figures of any stripe are trying to intimidate judges,” she said, “that’s where we really have crossed the line.”
The hearings were not confined to issues of safety. Congresswoman Rosa De Lauro (D-Conn.) asked about the Supreme Court’s ethics requirements, noting that members of Congress and the executive branch are limited to gifts under $50, while the Supreme Court has no such limit.
She is supporting a bill that would impose upon the Supreme Court the same restrictions on receiving gifts that apply to Congress. And she called for an enforcement mechanism for the ethics rules adopted by the Supreme Court itself.
But Justice Kagan, who said she favors an enforcement mechanism, added that creating such a system is “hard.” After all, as she noted, “you wouldn’t want either the President or Congress” imposing a system on the court because that could well lead to compromising the independence of the judiciary.
One idea that Kagan seemed to like would be to create a panel of distinguished retired judges to enforce the court’s ethics code. But Justice Barrett seemed unpersuaded.
“Who selects the judges? How is the panel composed? There’s just a lot of complexity,” that hasn’t been worked out, she said. The disagreement between the two was, if anything, illustrative of just how hard it was to get the court to finally agree on even the relatively porous ethics code it voluntarily adopted in 2023.
The Justices were also questioned about the court’s emergency docket, dubbed by critics “the shadow docket.” These cases were extremely rare until the Trump administrations.
The critical difference between the emergency docket and the so-called merits docket is that emergency docket appeals often leapfrog over the lower courts, allowing the high court to decide cases without full briefing and argument, and inevitably without much, if any, explanation.
Critics, including Justice Kagan, have often criticized these unsigned and unexplained emergency docket orders for making it difficult for lower courts to know what the law is. Some have in fact accused the court of inviting the Trump administration to treat the docket like a fast-pass to getting policy rubber-stamped.
Questioned by Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Kagan observed that part of the reason for the Court’s increasing use of the emergency docket comes from the fact that “we’ve granted a number of these…And when people know that relief is available, there are a lot of smart lawyers out there in the world who are going to say, ‘Why don’t we take our shot at that?’” In other words, the court’s own behavior may have invited the existing problem to metastasize.
News
Mexico files criminal complaints in US over migrant deaths in custody
Mexico has begun filing criminal complaints with state prosecutors in the United States over the deaths of its citizens in U.S. immigration custody and during enforcement operations, the foreign mini
Maine ICE shooting caught on security camera
Surveillance footage from two local businesses shows a white car driving in circles at a street intersection.
MEXICO CITY, July 13 (Reuters) – Mexico has begun filing criminal complaints with state prosecutors in the United States over the deaths of its citizens in U.S. immigration custody and during enforcement operations, the foreign ministry said on Tuesday.
Mexico’s government has also sent cease-and-desist letters to U.S. detention centers where Mexican nationals have died, the ministry added in a statement.
The filings follow the deaths of at least 14 Mexican nationals in ICE custody and several others during arrest operations, including the recent fatal shooting of a Mexican citizen by an ICE agent in Houston.
President Claudia Sheinbaum announced Mexico’s intention to escalate its response to the deaths last Friday, as she claimed that the government “cannot turn a blind eye to the Mexicans who have died.”
In addition to the measures in the U.S., Mexico’s foreign minister also contacted the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights regarding the deaths of Mexican nationals in ICE custody.
Mexico expects the U.N. office to gather information from U.S. authorities, analyze the events and “refer the case to the relevant special procedures of the Human Rights Council,” the statement added.
-
Los Angeles, Ca1 hour agoRemains of murder victim identified as missing Southern California millionaire
-
Detroit, MI2 hours ago4Warn Weather Alert: Wildfire smoke leading to ‘unhealthy’ air quality in Metro Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoSan Francisco fishermen recount harrowing rescue after boat capsizes near Alcatraz
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoTimothée Chalamet ‘Starstruck’ by Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoWives of detained men allege inhumane conditions at federal detention center in Miami
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoDriver charged in Norwood pedestrian crash that left man seriously injured
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoBoys, 12 and 14, arrested in deadly shooting in Denver’s Sunnyside neighborhood
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoOutreach groups respond to the reported relocation cycle of Ballard’s homeless population