Connect with us

Education

Opinion | Can the Meritocracy Survive Without the SAT?

Published

on

Opinion | Can the Meritocracy Survive Without the SAT?

The speedy abandonment of the SAT and ACT as necessities for faculty admissions, to the purpose the place greater than 80 % of four-year faculties didn’t require a standardized take a look at for admission within the coming fall, is a milestone within the historical past of the trendy meritocracy. What stays to be seen is whether or not it’s a marker on the highway to the meritocracy’s demise.

From the start meritocratic tradition and standardized testing have been inextricably intertwined. The transformation of America’s elite faculties in the midst of the twentieth century, from upper-class ending faculties into trendy “multiversities” supposedly open to all comers, was pushed and justified by the SAT, which was supposed to supply an equal-opportunity technique of ascent and bonafide the brand new elite with numerical proof of its brainpower.

For a very long time meritocracy’s skeptics, left and proper, have famous that the brand new system created an higher class that appears as privileged and insular because the previous one. And based on a few of the SAT’s critics, it’s exactly this criticism that’s motivating the present shift away from standardized exams — the concept that they’re inherently biased towards children from well-off households and {that a} extra holistic definition of advantage will open extra alternatives for the meritorious poor and center class.

There are causes to be uncertain of this account. First, it appears fairly clear that many faculties are actually ditching the SAT in response to the next sequence of occasions: Asian American SAT scores rose to the purpose the place elite faculties have been accused of discriminating in opposition to Asian American candidates to take care of the racial stability they desired, this led to lawsuits, and people lawsuits appear poised to yield a Supreme Court docket ruling in opposition to affirmative motion. So universities are pre-emptively abandoning a metric that is likely to be used in opposition to them in future litigation, not for the sake of widening alternative however simply within the hopes of sustaining the admissions established order.

Second, whereas SAT scores are linked to household revenue, the hyperlink will not be as tight as critics generally counsel, and standardized exams are most likely a much less class-bound metric than many issues that go into extra “holistic” assessments. Numerous children use the SAT or ACT to get a lift out of a foul faculty or show themselves regardless of missing a sophisticated résumé, and there’s little clear proof that going test-optional will increase racial range. Whereas the faculty essay (assuming it survives ChatGPT), the extracurricular-laden résumé, the fitting demeanor within the faculty interview — all of those appear extra prone to be indicators of privilege than a uncooked rating on a standardized take a look at. So the youngsters of the higher class may very well be beneficiaries of the SAT’s decline, whereas youngsters attempting to climb might lose an important ladder.

Advertisement

The primary level suggests a future the place the diminishment of the SAT received’t change all that a lot concerning the meritocracy. The second suggests a future the place the meritocracy turns into much more privileged and insular — however over time, much less related to expertise and intelligence, in a manner that steadily undermines its legitimacy and affect.

The explanation to count on the primary, status-quo state of affairs is that elite faculties just like the legitimation that comes with being seen as expertise locations, so even and not using a formal SAT requirement they’ll nonetheless discover a technique to admit the sort of less-than-privileged children who’re at the moment boosted by standardized testing. As Matt Yglesias places it, that search might make “admissions work slightly bit extra labor-intensive,” however faculties like Harvard “can simply afford to rent extra admissions officers to scrutinize functions that lack a handy abstract take a look at rating.”

The explanation to marvel concerning the second state of affairs is that elite faculties are additionally influenced by the ideological shifts inside liberalism and the cultural shifts in young-adult life. And these forces push, in varied methods, not simply in opposition to the SAT however in opposition to all makes an attempt to measure advantage and demand excellence — with one push coming from college students demanding larger grades and decrease workloads, and one other from ideological experiments like “equitable grading” and the progressive view that any measurement that reveals inequality have to be perpetuating it.

On this setting, if essentially the most well-known benchmark of meritocracy is deserted, not each faculty will essentially devise complicated heuristics that serve precisely the identical objective. Many could also be content material to only stability ethnic range with well-off college students paying full tuition, coast on their reputations and let their requirements slide a bit.

Wherein case you’d have an elite-school inhabitants that’s extra privileged and fewer academically aggressive and a bigger inhabitants of good children from nonelite backgrounds who merely aren’t recruited into the system anymore.

Advertisement

This mix is likely to be good for America in the long term — fostering a better regional dispersal of expertise, breaking the meritocracy-versus-populism stalemate, weakening the affect of the Ivy League.

However it might characterize the dying of the meritocracy as we’ve got identified it, and previous orders don’t often go down and not using a combat.

The Instances is dedicated to publishing a range of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed below are some suggestions. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.

Observe The New York Instances Opinion part on Fb, Twitter (@NYTOpinion) and Instagram.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Published

on

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

new video loaded: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

transcript

transcript

Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Police officers arrested 33 pro-Palestinian protesters and cleared a tent encampment on the campus of George Washingon University.

“The Metropolitan Police Department. If you are currently on George Washington University property, you are in violation of D.C. Code 22-3302, unlawful entry on property.” “Back up, dude, back up. You’re going to get locked up tonight — back up.” “Free, free Palestine.” “What the [expletive] are you doing?” [expletives] “I can’t stop — [expletives].”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Israel-Hamas War

Continue Reading

Education

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

Published

on

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

A satellite image of the UCLA campus.

On Tuesday night, violence erupted at an encampment that pro-Palestinian protesters had set up on April 25.

The image is annotated to show the extent of the pro-Palestinian encampment, which takes up the width of the plaza between Powell Library and Royce Hall.

Advertisement

The clashes began after counterprotesters tried to dismantle the encampment’s barricade. Pro-Palestinian protesters rushed to rebuild it, and violence ensued.

Arrows denote pro-Israeli counterprotesters moving towards the barricade at the edge of the encampment. Arrows show pro-Palestinian counterprotesters moving up against the same barricade.

Police arrived hours later, but they did not intervene immediately.

Advertisement

An arrow denotes police arriving from the same direction as the counterprotesters and moving towards the barricade.

A New York Times examination of more than 100 videos from clashes at the University of California, Los Angeles, found that violence ebbed and flowed for nearly five hours, mostly with little or no police intervention. The violence had been instigated by dozens of people who are seen in videos counterprotesting the encampment.

Advertisement

The videos showed counterprotesters attacking students in the pro-Palestinian encampment for several hours, including beating them with sticks, using chemical sprays and launching fireworks as weapons. As of Friday, no arrests had been made in connection with the attack.

To build a timeline of the events that night, The Times analyzed two livestreams, along with social media videos captured by journalists and witnesses.

The melee began when a group of counterprotesters started tearing away metal barriers that had been in place to cordon off pro-Palestinian protesters. Hours earlier, U.C.L.A. officials had declared the encampment illegal.

Security personnel hired by the university are seen in yellow vests standing to the side throughout the incident. A university spokesperson declined to comment on the security staff’s response.

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Advertisement

It is not clear how the counterprotest was organized or what allegiances people committing the violence had. The videos show many of the counterprotesters were wearing pro-Israel slogans on their clothing. Some counterprotesters blared music, including Israel’s national anthem, a Hebrew children’s song and “Harbu Darbu,” an Israeli song about the Israel Defense Forces’ campaign in Gaza.

As counterprotesters tossed away metal barricades, one of them was seen trying to strike a person near the encampment, and another threw a piece of wood into it — some of the first signs of violence.

Attacks on the encampment continued for nearly three hours before police arrived.

Counterprotesters shot fireworks toward the encampment at least six times, according to videos analyzed by The Times. One of them went off inside, causing protesters to scream. Another exploded at the edge of the encampment. One was thrown in the direction of a group of protesters who were carrying an injured person out of the encampment.

Advertisement

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Some counterprotesters sprayed chemicals both into the encampment and directly at people’s faces.

Sean Beckner-Carmitchel via Reuters

Advertisement

At times, counterprotesters swarmed individuals — sometimes a group descended on a single person. They could be seen punching, kicking and attacking people with makeshift weapons, including sticks, traffic cones and wooden boards.

StringersHub via Associated Press, Sergio Olmos/Calmatters

In one video, protesters sheltering inside the encampment can be heard yelling, “Do not engage! Hold the line!”

In some instances, protesters in the encampment are seen fighting back, using chemical spray on counterprotesters trying to tear down barricades or swiping at them with sticks.

Advertisement

Except for a brief attempt to capture a loudspeaker used by counterprotesters, and water bottles being tossed out of the encampment, none of the videos analyzed by The Times show any clear instance of encampment protesters initiating confrontations with counterprotesters beyond defending the barricades.

Shortly before 1 a.m. — more than two hours after the violence erupted — a spokesperson with the mayor’s office posted a statement that said U.C.L.A officials had called the Los Angeles Police Department for help and they were responding “immediately.”

Officers from a separate law enforcement agency — the California Highway Patrol — began assembling nearby, at about 1:45 a.m. Riot police with the L.A.P.D. joined them a few minutes later. Counterprotesters applauded their arrival, chanting “U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A.!”

Just four minutes after the officers arrived, counterprotesters attacked a man standing dozens of feet from the officers.

Twenty minutes after police arrive, a video shows a counterprotester spraying a chemical toward the encampment during a scuffle over a metal barricade. Another counterprotester can be seen punching someone in the head near the encampment after swinging a plank at barricades.

Advertisement

Fifteen minutes later, while those in the encampment chanted “Free, free Palestine,” counterprotesters organized a rush toward the barricades. During the rush, a counterprotester pulls away a metal barricade from a woman, yelling “You stand no chance, old lady.”

Throughout the intermittent violence, officers were captured on video standing about 300 feet away from the area for roughly an hour, without stepping in.

It was not until 2:42 a.m. that officers began to move toward the encampment, after which counterprotesters dispersed and the night’s violence between the two camps mostly subsided.

The L.A.P.D. and the California Highway Patrol did not answer questions from The Times about their responses on Tuesday night, deferring to U.C.L.A.

While declining to answer specific questions, a university spokesperson provided a statement to The Times from Mary Osako, U.C.L.A.’s vice chancellor of strategic communications: “We are carefully examining our security processes from that night and are grateful to U.C. President Michael Drake for also calling for an investigation. We are grateful that the fire department and medical personnel were on the scene that night.”

Advertisement

L.A.P.D. officers were seen putting on protective gear and walking toward the barricade around 2:50 a.m. They stood in between the encampment and the counterprotest group, and the counterprotesters began dispersing.

While police continued to stand outside the encampment, a video filmed at 3:32 a.m. shows a man who was walking away from the scene being attacked by a counterprotester, then dragged and pummeled by others. An editor at the U.C.L.A. student newspaper, the Daily Bruin, told The Times the man was a journalist at the paper, and that they were walking with other student journalists who had been covering the violence. The editor said she had also been punched and sprayed in the eyes with a chemical.

On Wednesday, U.C.L.A.’s chancellor, Gene Block, issued a statement calling the actions by “instigators” who attacked the encampment unacceptable. A spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized campus law enforcement’s delayed response and said it demands answers.

Los Angeles Jewish and Muslim organizations also condemned the attacks. Hussam Ayloush, the director of the Greater Los Angeles Area office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, called on the California attorney general to investigate the lack of police response. The Jewish Federation Los Angeles blamed U.C.L.A. officials for creating an unsafe environment over months and said the officials had “been systemically slow to respond when law enforcement is desperately needed.”

Fifteen people were reportedly injured in the attack, according to a letter sent by the president of the University of California system to the board of regents.

Advertisement

The night after the attack began, law enforcement warned pro-Palestinian demonstrators to leave the encampment or be arrested. By early Thursday morning, police had dismantled the encampment and arrested more than 200 people from the encampment.

Continue Reading

Education

Video: President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

Published

on

Video: President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

new video loaded: President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

transcript

transcript

President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

President Biden defended the right of demonstrators to protest peacefully, but condemned the “chaos” that has prevailed at many colleges nationwide.

Violent protest is not protected. Peaceful protest is. It’s against the law when violence occurs. Destroying property is not a peaceful protest. It’s against the law. Vandalism, trespassing, breaking windows, shutting down campuses, forcing the cancellation of classes and graduations — none of this is a peaceful protest. Threatening people, intimidating people, instilling fear in people is not peaceful protest. It’s against the law. Dissent is essential to democracy, but dissent must never lead to disorder or to denying the rights of others, so students can finish the semester and their college education. There’s the right to protest, but not the right to cause chaos. People have the right to get an education, the right to get a degree, the right to walk across the campus safely without fear of being attacked. But let’s be clear about this as well. There should be no place on any campus — no place in America — for antisemitism or threats of violence against Jewish students. There is no place for hate speech or violence of any kind, whether it’s antisemitism, Islamophobia or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans. It’s simply wrong. There’s no place for racism in America.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Politics

Continue Reading

Trending