Business
Why a Rhodes Scholar’s Ambition Led Her to a Job at Starbucks
Most weekend mornings, Jaz Brisack will get up round 5, wills her semiconscious physique right into a Toyota Prius and winds her approach via Buffalo, to the Starbucks on Elmwood Avenue. After a supervisor unlocks the door, she clocks in, checks herself for Covid signs and helps get the shop prepared for patrons.
“I’m nearly at all times on bar if I open,” stated Ms. Brisack, who has a thrift-store aesthetic and lengthy reddish-brown hair that she elements down the center. “I like steaming milk, pouring lattes.”
The Starbucks door just isn’t the one one which has been opened for her. As a College of Mississippi senior in 2018, Ms. Brisack was certainly one of 32 People who gained Rhodes scholarships, which fund examine in Oxford, England.
Many college students search the scholarship as a result of it will probably pave the best way to a profession within the prime ranks of legislation, academia, authorities or enterprise. They’re motivated by a mixture of ambition and idealism.
Ms. Brisack grew to become a barista for comparable causes: She believed it was merely essentially the most pressing declare on her time and her many abilities.
When she joined Starbucks in late 2020, not a single one of many firm’s 9,000 U.S. areas had a union. Ms. Brisack hoped to alter that by serving to to unionize its shops in Buffalo.
Improbably, she and her co-workers have far exceeded their purpose. Since December, when her retailer grew to become the one corporate-owned Starbucks in the USA with a licensed union, greater than 150 different shops have voted to unionize, and greater than 275 have filed paperwork to carry elections. Their actions come amid a rise in public help for unions, which final yr reached its highest level because the mid-Nineteen Sixties, and a rising consensus amongst center-left consultants that rising union membership may transfer hundreds of thousands of staff into the center class.
Ms. Brisack’s weekend shift represents all these tendencies, in addition to yet another: a change within the views of essentially the most privileged People. In keeping with Gallup, approval of unions amongst faculty graduates grew from 55 % within the late Nineties to 70 % final yr.
I’ve seen this primary hand in additional than seven years of reporting on unions, as a rising curiosity amongst white-collar staff has coincided with a broader enthusiasm for the labor motion.
In speaking with Ms. Brisack and her fellow Rhodes students, it grew to become clear that the change had even reached that rarefied group. The American Rhodes students I encountered from a era earlier usually stated that, whereas at Oxford, that they had been middle-of-the-road varieties who believed in a modest position for presidency. They didn’t spend a lot time fascinated by unions as college students, and what they did suppose was prone to be skeptical.
“I used to be a baby of the Nineteen Eighties and Nineties, steeped within the centrist politics of the period,” wrote Jake Sullivan, a 1998 Rhodes scholar who’s President Biden’s nationwide safety adviser and was a prime aide to Hillary Clinton.
In contrast, lots of Ms. Brisack’s Rhodes classmates categorical reservations in regards to the market-oriented insurance policies of the ’80s and ’90s and robust help for unions. A number of advised me that they had been smitten by Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who made reviving the labor motion a precedence of their 2020 presidential campaigns.
Much more so than different indicators, such a shift may foretell a comeback for unions, whose membership in the USA stands at its lowest proportion in roughly a century. That’s as a result of the varieties of people that win prestigious scholarships are the varieties who later maintain positions of energy — who make choices about whether or not to struggle unions or negotiate with them, about whether or not the legislation ought to make it simpler or more durable for staff to arrange.
Because the current union campaigns at corporations like Starbucks, Amazon and Apple present, the phrases of the struggle are nonetheless largely set by company leaders. If these persons are more and more sympathetic to labor, then among the key obstacles to unions could also be dissolving.
Then once more, Jaz Brisack isn’t ready to seek out out.
The struggle in Buffalo
Ms. Brisack moved to Buffalo after Oxford for one more job, as an organizer with the union Staff United, the place a mentor she had met in faculty additionally labored. As soon as there, she determined to take a second gig at Starbucks.
“Her philosophy was get on the job and manage. She wished to study the trade,” stated Gary Bonadonna Jr., the highest Staff United official in upstate New York. “I stated, ‘OK.’”
In its pushback towards the marketing campaign, Starbucks has typically blamed “exterior union forces” intent on harming the corporate, as its chief government, Howard Schultz, steered in April. The corporate has recognized Ms. Brisack as certainly one of these interlopers, noting that she attracts a wage from Staff United. (Mr. Bonadonna stated she was the one Starbucks worker on the union’s payroll.)
However the impression that Ms. Brisack and her fellow employee-organizers give off is certainly one of fondness for the corporate. Whilst they level out flaws — understaffing, inadequate coaching, low seniority pay, all of which they need to enhance — they embrace Starbucks and its distinctive tradition.
They discuss up their sense of camaraderie and group — many depend common clients amongst their mates — and delight of their espresso experience. On mornings when Ms. Brisack’s retailer isn’t busy, staff typically maintain tastings.
A Starbucks spokesman stated that Mr. Schultz believes staff don’t want a union in the event that they think about him and his motives, and the corporate has stated that seniority-based pay will increase will take impact this summer season.
One Friday in late February, Ms. Brisack and one other barista, Casey Moore, met on the two-bedroom rental that Ms. Brisack shares with three cats, to speak union technique over breakfast. Naturally, the dialog turned to espresso.
“Jaz has a really barista drink,” Ms. Moore stated.
Ms. Brisack elaborated: “It’s 4 blonde ristretto pictures — that’s a lighter roast of espresso — with oat milk. It’s principally an iced latte with oat milk. If we had sugar-cookie syrup, I’d get that. Now that that’s no extra, it’s normally plain.”
That afternoon, Ms. Brisack held a Zoom name from her lounge with a bunch of Starbucks staff who had been fascinated by unionizing. It’s an train that she and different organizers in Buffalo have repeated tons of of occasions since final fall, as staff across the nation sought to observe their lead. However in nearly each case, the Starbucks staff exterior Buffalo have reached out to the organizers, moderately than vice versa.
This specific body of workers, in Ms. Brisack’s faculty city of Oxford, Miss., appeared to require even much less of a tough promote than most. When Ms. Brisack stated she, too, had attended the College of Mississippi, one of many staff waved her off, as if her superstar preceded her. “Oh, yeah, we all know Jaz,” the employee gushed.
Just a few hours later, Ms. Brisack, Ms. Moore and Michelle Eisen, a longtime Starbucks worker additionally concerned within the organizing, gathered with two union attorneys on the union workplace in a onetime auto plant. The Nationwide Labor Relations Board was counting ballots for an election at a Starbucks in Mesa, Ariz. — the primary actual take a look at of whether or not the marketing campaign was taking root nationally, and never simply in a union stronghold like New York. The room was tense as the primary outcomes trickled in.
“Can you’re feeling my coronary heart beating?” Ms. Moore requested her colleagues.
Inside a couple of minutes, nevertheless, it grew to become clear that the union would win in a rout — the ultimate depend was 25 to three. Everybody turned barely punchy, as if that they had all instantly entered a dream world the place unions had been much more in style than that they had ever imagined. One of many attorneys let loose an expletive earlier than musing, “Whoever organized down there …”
Ms. Brisack appeared to seize the temper when she learn a textual content from a co-worker to the group: “I’m so blissful I’m crying and consuming a week-old ice cream cake.”
A black antifa T-shirt on the formal
Ms. Brisack as soon as seemed to be on a unique path. As a baby, she idolized Lyndon Johnson and imagined working for workplace. On the College of Mississippi, she was elected president of the school Democrats.
She had developed an curiosity in labor historical past as an adolescent, when cash was typically tight, but it surely was largely an educational curiosity. “She had learn Eugene Debs,” stated Tim Dolan, the college’s nationwide scholarship adviser on the time. “It was like, ‘Oh, gosh. Wow.’”
When Richard Bensinger, a former organizing director with the A.F.L.-C.I.O. and the United Vehicle Staff, got here to talk on campus, she realized that union organizing was greater than a historic curiosity. She talked her approach into an internship on a union marketing campaign he was concerned with at a close-by Nissan plant. It didn’t go nicely. The union accused the corporate of working a racially divisive marketing campaign, and Ms. Brisack was disillusioned by the loss.
“Nissan by no means paid a consequence for what it did,” she stated. (In response to prices of “scare ways,” the corporate stated on the time that it had sought to offer data to staff and clear up misperceptions.)
Mr. Dolan seen that she was changing into jaded about mainstream politics. “There have been occasions between her sophomore and junior yr once I’d steer her towards one thing and he or she’d say, ‘Oh, they’re approach too conservative.’ I’d ship her a New York Occasions article and he or she’d say, ‘Neoliberalism is useless.’”
In England, the place she arrived through the fall of 2019 at age 22, Ms. Brisack was an everyday at a “solidarity” movie membership that screened motion pictures about labor struggles worldwide, and wore a sweatshirt that featured a head shot of Karl Marx. She liberally reinterpreted the time period “black tie” at an annual Rhodes dinner, sporting a black dress-coat over a black antifa T-shirt.
“I went and acquired robes and all the pieces — I wished to slot in,” stated a buddy and fellow Rhodes scholar, Leah Crowder. “I at all times beloved how she by no means tried to suit into Oxford.”
However Ms. Brisack’s politics didn’t stand out the best way her formal put on did. In speaking with eight different American Rhodes students from her yr, I acquired the sense that progressive politics had been typically within the ether. Nearly all expressed some skepticism of markets and agreed that staff ought to have extra energy. The one one who questioned facets of collective bargaining advised me that few of his classmates would have agreed, and that he might need been loudly jeered for expressing reservations.
Some within the group even stated that they had integrated pro-labor views into their profession aspirations.
Claire Wang has centered on serving to fossil gas staff discover family-sustaining jobs because the world transitions to inexperienced vitality. “Unions are a important companion on this work,” she advised me. Rayan Semery-Palumbo, who’s ending a dissertation on inequality and meritocracy whereas working for a local weather know-how start-up, lamented that staff had too little leverage. “Labor unions could also be the simplest approach of implementing change going ahead for lots of people, together with myself,” he advised me. “I would discover myself in labor organizing work.”
This isn’t what speaking to Rhodes students used to sound like. At the least not in my expertise.
I used to be a Rhodes scholar in 1998, when centrist politicians like Invoice Clinton and Tony Blair had been ascendant, and earlier than “neoliberalism” grew to become such a unclean phrase. Although we had been dimly conscious of a time, a long time earlier, when radicalism and pro-labor views had been extra frequent amongst American elites — and when, not coincidentally, the U.S. labor motion was way more highly effective — these views had been far much less in proof by the point I acquired to Oxford.
A few of my classmates had been fascinated by points like race and poverty, as they jogged my memory in interviews for this text. Just a few had nuanced views of labor — that they had labored a blue-collar job, or had mother and father who belonged to a union, or had studied their Marx. Nonetheless, most of my classmates would have regarded individuals who talked at size about unions and sophistication the best way they might have regarded non secular fundamentalists: most likely earnest however barely preachy, and clearly caught prior to now.
Kris Abrams, one of many few U.S. Rhodes Students in our cohort who thought loads in regards to the working class and labor organizing, advised me lately that she felt remoted at Oxford, a minimum of amongst different People. “Actually, I didn’t really feel like there was a lot room for dialogue,” Ms. Abrams stated.
In contrast, it was frequent inside our cohort to revere enterprise and markets and globalization. As an undergraduate, my buddy and Rhodes classmate Roy Bahat led a big public-service group that periodically labored with unions. However because the “new” economic system boomed in 1999, he interned at a big company. It dawned on him {that a} profession in enterprise may be extra fascinating — a technique to make a bigger affect on the world.
“There was a serious shift in my very own mentality,” Roy advised me. “I grew to become extra open to enterprise.” It didn’t damage that the pay was good, too.
Roy would go on to work for McKinsey & Firm, the Metropolis of New York and the chief ranks of Information Corp, then begin a enterprise capital fund centered on applied sciences that change how enterprise operates. Extra lately, in an indication of the occasions, his funding portfolio has included corporations that make it simpler for staff to arrange.
On some stage, Roy Bahat and Jaz Brisack should not so totally different: Each are power overachievers; each are formidable about altering society for the higher; each are sympathetic to the underdog by the use of mind and disposition. However the world was telling Roy within the late Nineties to enter enterprise if he wished to affect occasions. The world was telling Ms. Brisack in 2020 to maneuver to Buffalo and manage staff.
Reaching Howard Schultz
The primary time I met Ms. Brisack was in October, at a Starbucks close to the Buffalo airport.
I used to be there to cowl the union election. She was there, unsolicited, to transient me. “I don’t suppose we are able to lose,” she stated of the vote at her retailer. On the time, not a single corporate-owned Starbucks within the nation was unionized. The union would go on to win there by greater than a two-to-one ratio.
It’s onerous to overstate the problem of unionizing a serious company that doesn’t need to be unionized. Employers are allowed to inundate staff with anti-union messaging, whereas unions haven’t any protected entry to staff on the job. And whereas it’s formally unlawful to threaten, self-discipline or fireplace staff who search to unionize, the results for doing so are usually minor and lengthy in coming.
At Starbucks, the Nationwide Labor Relations Board has issued complaints discovering advantage in such accusations. But the union continues to win elections — over 80 % of the greater than 175 votes through which the board has declared a winner. (Starbucks denies that it has damaged the legislation, and a federal choose lately rejected a request to reinstate pro-union staff whom the labor board stated Starbucks had pressured out illegally.)
Although Ms. Brisack was certainly one of dozens of early leaders of the union marketing campaign, the imprint of her character is seen. In retailer after retailer across the nation, staff who help the union give no floor in conferences with firm officers.
Even potential allies should not spared. In Might, after Time ran a positive piece, Ms. Brisack’s response on Twitter was: “We respect TIME journal’s protection of our union marketing campaign. TIME ought to be sure that they’re giving the identical union rights and protections that we’re combating for to the wonderful journalists, photographers, and workers who make this protection potential!”
The tweet jogged my memory of a narrative that Mr. Dolan, her scholarship adviser, had advised a couple of reception that the College of Mississippi held in her honor in 2018. Ms. Brisack had simply gained a Truman scholarship, one other prestigious award. She took the chance to induce the college’s chancellor to take away a Accomplice monument from campus. The chancellor appeared pained, in keeping with a number of attendees.
“My boss was like, ‘Wow, you couldn’t have talked her out of doing that?’” Mr. Dolan stated. “I used to be like, ‘That’s what made her win. If she wasn’t that individual, you all wouldn’t have a Truman now.’”
(Mr. Dolan’s boss on the time didn’t recall this dialog, and the previous chancellor didn’t recall any drama on the occasion.)
The problem for Ms. Brisack and her colleagues is that whereas youthful individuals, even youthful elites, are more and more pro-union, the shift has not but reached most of the nation’s strongest leaders. Or, extra to the purpose, the shift has not but reached Mr. Schultz, the 68-year-old now in his third tour as Starbucks’s chief government.
She lately spoke at an Aspen Institute panel on staff’ rights. She has even mused about utilizing her Rhodes connections to make a private enchantment to Mr. Schultz, one thing that Mr. Bensinger has pooh-poohed however that different organizers imagine she simply could pull off.
“Richard has been making enjoyable of me for considering of asking one of many Rhodes individuals to dealer a gathering with Howard Schultz,” Ms. Brisack stated in February.
“I’m certain when you met Howard Schultz, he’d be like, ‘She’s so good,” responded Ms. Moore, her co-worker. “He’d be like, ‘I get it. I’d need to be in a union with you, too.’”
Business
Cookies, Cocktails and Mushrooms on the Menu as Justices Hear Bank Fraud Case
In a lively Supreme Court argument on Tuesday that included references to cookies, cocktails and toxic mushrooms, the justices tried to find the line between misleading statements and outright lies in the case of a Chicago politician convicted of making false statements to bank regulators.
The case concerned Patrick Daley Thompson, a former Chicago alderman who is the grandson of one former mayor, Richard J. Daley, and the nephew of another, Richard M. Daley. He conceded that he had misled the regulators but said his statements fell short of the outright falsehoods he said were required to make them criminal.
The justices peppered the lawyers with colorful questions that tried to tease out the difference between false and misleading statements.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. asked whether a motorist pulled over on suspicion of driving while impaired said something false by stating that he had had one cocktail while omitting that he had also drunk four glasses of wine.
Caroline A. Flynn, a lawyer for the federal government, said that a jury could find the statement to be false because “the officer was asking for a complete account of how much the person had had to drink.”
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked about a child who admitted to eating three cookies when she had consumed 10.
Ms. Flynn said context mattered.
“If the mom had said, ‘Did you eat all the cookies,’ or ‘how many cookies did you eat,’ and the child says, ‘I ate three cookies’ when she ate 10, that’s a false statement,” Ms. Flynn said. “But, if the mom says, ‘Did you eat any cookies,’ and the child says three, that’s not an understatement in response to a specific numerical inquiry.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked whether it was false to label toxic mushrooms as “a hundred percent natural.” Ms. Flynn did not give a direct response.
The case before the court, Thompson v. United States, No. 23-1095, started when Mr. Thompson took out three loans from Washington Federal Bank for Savings between 2011 and 2014. He used the first, for $110,000, to finance a law firm. He used the next loan, for $20,000, to pay a tax bill. He used the third, for $89,000, to repay a debt to another bank.
He made a single payment on the loans, for $390 in 2012. The bank, which did not press him for further payments, went under in 2017.
When the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and a loan servicer it had hired sought repayment of the loans plus interest, amounting to about $270,000, Mr. Thompson told them he had borrowed $110,000, which was true in a narrow sense but incomplete.
After negotiations, Mr. Thompson in 2018 paid back the principal but not the interest. More than two years later, federal prosecutors charged him with violating a law making it a crime to give “any false statement or report” to influence the F.D.I.C.
He was convicted and ordered to repay the interest, amounting to about $50,000. He served four months in prison.
Chris C. Gair, a lawyer for Mr. Thompson, said his client’s statements were accurate in context, an assertion that met with skepticism. Justice Elena Kagan noted that the jury had found the statements were false and that a ruling in Mr. Thompson’s favor would require a court to rule that no reasonable juror could have come to that conclusion.
Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh said that issue was not before the court, which had agreed to decide the legal question of whether the federal law, as a general matter, covered misleading statements. Lower courts, they said, could decide whether Mr. Thompson had been properly convicted.
Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked for an example of a misleading statement that was not false. Mr. Gair, who was presenting his first Supreme Court argument, responded by talking about himself.
“If I go back and change my website and say ‘40 years of litigation experience’ and then in bold caps say ‘Supreme Court advocate,’” he said, “that would be, after today, a true statement. It would be misleading to anybody who was thinking about whether to hire me.”
Justice Alito said such a statement was, at most, mildly misleading. But Justice Kagan was impressed.
“Well, it is, though, the humblest answer I’ve ever heard from the Supreme Court podium,” she said, to laughter. “So good show on that one.”
Business
SEC probes B. Riley loan to founder, deals with franchise group
B. Riley Financial Inc. received more demands for information from federal regulators about its dealings with now-bankrupt Franchise Group as well as a personal loan for Chairman and co-founder Bryant Riley.
The Los Angeles-based investment firm and Riley each received additional subpoenas in November from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission seeking documents and information about Franchise Group, or FRG, the retail company that was once one of its biggest investments before its collapse last year, according to a long-delayed quarterly filing. The agency also wants to know more about Riley’s pledge of B. Riley shares as collateral for a personal loan, the filing shows.
B. Riley previously received SEC subpoenas in July for information about its dealings with ex-FRG chief executive Brian Kahn, part of a long-running probe that has rocked B. Riley and helped push its shares to their lowest in more than a decade. Bryant Riley, who founded the company in 1997 and built it into one of the biggest U.S. investment firms beyond Wall Street, has been forced to sell assets and raise cash to ease creditors’ concerns.
The firm and Riley “are responding to the subpoenas and are fully cooperating with the SEC,” according to the filing. The company said the subpoenas don’t mean the SEC has determined any violations of law have occurred.
Shares in B. Riley jumped more than 25% in New York trading after the company’s overdue quarterly filing gave investors their first formal look at the firm’s performance in more than half a year. The data included a net loss of more than $435 million for the three months ended June 30. The shares through Monday had plunged more than 80% in the past 12 months, trading for less than $4 each.
B. Riley and Kahn — a longstanding client and friend of Riley’s — teamed up in 2023 to take FRG private in a $2.8-billion deal. The transaction soon came under pressure when Kahn was tagged as an unindicted co-conspirator by authorities in the collapse of an unrelated hedge fund called Prophecy Asset Management, which led to a fraud conviction for one of the fund’s executives.
Kahn has said he didn’t do anything wrong, that he wasn’t aware of any fraud at Prophecy and that he was among those who lost money in the collapse. But federal investigations into his role have spilled over into his dealings with B. Riley and its chairman, who have said internal probes found they “had no involvement with, or knowledge of, any alleged misconduct concerning Mr. Kahn or any of his affiliates.”
FRG filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November, a move that led to hundreds of millions of dollars of losses for B. Riley. The collapse made Riley “personally sick,” he said at the time.
One of the biggest financial problems to arise from the FRG deal was a loan that B. Riley made to Kahn for about $200 million, which was secured against FRG shares. With that company’s collapse into bankruptcy in November wiping out equity holders, the value of the remaining collateral for this debt has now dwindled to only about $2 million, the filing shows.
Griffin writes for Bloomberg.
Business
Starbucks Reverses Its Open-Door Policy for Bathroom Use and Lounging
Starbucks will require people visiting its coffee shops to buy something in order to stay or to use its bathrooms, the company announced in a letter sent to store managers on Monday.
The new policy, outlined in a Code of Conduct, will be enacted later this month and applies to the company’s cafes, patios and bathrooms.
“Implementing a Coffeehouse Code of Conduct is something most retailers already have and is a practical step that helps us prioritize our paying customers who want to sit and enjoy our cafes or need to use the restroom during their visit,” Jaci Anderson, a Starbucks spokeswoman, said in an emailed statement.
Ms. Anderson said that by outlining expectations for customers the company “can create a better environment for everyone.”
The Code of Conduct will be displayed in every store and prohibit behaviors including discrimination, harassment, smoking and panhandling.
People who violate the rules will be asked to leave the store, and employees may call law enforcement, the policy says.
Before implementation of the new policy begins on Jan. 27, store managers will be given 40 hours to prepare stores and workers, according to the company. There will also be training sessions for staff.
This training time will be used to prepare for other new practices, too, including asking customers if they want their drink to stay or to go and offering unlimited free refills of hot or iced coffee to customers who order a drink to stay.
The changes are part of an attempt by the company to prioritize customers and make the stores more inviting, Sara Trilling, the president of Starbucks North America, said in a letter to store managers.
“We know from customers that access to comfortable seating and a clean, safe environment is critical to the Starbucks experience they love,” she wrote. “We’ve also heard from you, our partners, that there is a need to reset expectations for how our spaces should be used, and who uses them.”
The changes come as the company responds to declining sales, falling stock prices and grumbling from activist investors. In August, the company appointed a new chief executive, Brian Niccol.
Mr. Niccol outlined changes the company needed to make in a video in October. “We will simplify our overly complex menu, fix our pricing architecture and ensure that every customer feels Starbucks is worth it every single time they visit,” he said.
The new purchase requirement reverses a policy Starbucks instituted in 2018 that said people could use its cafes and bathrooms even if they had not bought something.
The earlier policy was introduced a month after two Black men were arrested in a Philadelphia Starbucks while waiting to meet another man for a business meeting.
Officials said that the men had asked to use the bathroom, but that an employee had refused the request because they had not purchased anything. An employee then called the police, and part of the ensuing encounter was recorded on video and viewed by millions of people online, prompting boycotts and protests.
In 2022, Howard Schultz, the Starbucks chief executive at the time, said that the company was reconsidering the open-bathroom policy.
-
Health1 week ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
Technology6 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science4 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
Health1 week ago
Michael J. Fox honored with Presidential Medal of Freedom for Parkinson’s research efforts
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: Millennials try to buy-in or opt-out of the “American Meltdown”
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood