Business
Why a Rhodes Scholar’s Ambition Led Her to a Job at Starbucks

Most weekend mornings, Jaz Brisack will get up round 5, wills her semiconscious physique right into a Toyota Prius and winds her approach via Buffalo, to the Starbucks on Elmwood Avenue. After a supervisor unlocks the door, she clocks in, checks herself for Covid signs and helps get the shop prepared for patrons.
“I’m nearly at all times on bar if I open,” stated Ms. Brisack, who has a thrift-store aesthetic and lengthy reddish-brown hair that she elements down the center. “I like steaming milk, pouring lattes.”
The Starbucks door just isn’t the one one which has been opened for her. As a College of Mississippi senior in 2018, Ms. Brisack was certainly one of 32 People who gained Rhodes scholarships, which fund examine in Oxford, England.
Many college students search the scholarship as a result of it will probably pave the best way to a profession within the prime ranks of legislation, academia, authorities or enterprise. They’re motivated by a mixture of ambition and idealism.
Ms. Brisack grew to become a barista for comparable causes: She believed it was merely essentially the most pressing declare on her time and her many abilities.
When she joined Starbucks in late 2020, not a single one of many firm’s 9,000 U.S. areas had a union. Ms. Brisack hoped to alter that by serving to to unionize its shops in Buffalo.
Improbably, she and her co-workers have far exceeded their purpose. Since December, when her retailer grew to become the one corporate-owned Starbucks in the USA with a licensed union, greater than 150 different shops have voted to unionize, and greater than 275 have filed paperwork to carry elections. Their actions come amid a rise in public help for unions, which final yr reached its highest level because the mid-Nineteen Sixties, and a rising consensus amongst center-left consultants that rising union membership may transfer hundreds of thousands of staff into the center class.
Ms. Brisack’s weekend shift represents all these tendencies, in addition to yet another: a change within the views of essentially the most privileged People. In keeping with Gallup, approval of unions amongst faculty graduates grew from 55 % within the late Nineties to 70 % final yr.
I’ve seen this primary hand in additional than seven years of reporting on unions, as a rising curiosity amongst white-collar staff has coincided with a broader enthusiasm for the labor motion.
In speaking with Ms. Brisack and her fellow Rhodes students, it grew to become clear that the change had even reached that rarefied group. The American Rhodes students I encountered from a era earlier usually stated that, whereas at Oxford, that they had been middle-of-the-road varieties who believed in a modest position for presidency. They didn’t spend a lot time fascinated by unions as college students, and what they did suppose was prone to be skeptical.
“I used to be a baby of the Nineteen Eighties and Nineties, steeped within the centrist politics of the period,” wrote Jake Sullivan, a 1998 Rhodes scholar who’s President Biden’s nationwide safety adviser and was a prime aide to Hillary Clinton.
In contrast, lots of Ms. Brisack’s Rhodes classmates categorical reservations in regards to the market-oriented insurance policies of the ’80s and ’90s and robust help for unions. A number of advised me that they had been smitten by Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who made reviving the labor motion a precedence of their 2020 presidential campaigns.
Much more so than different indicators, such a shift may foretell a comeback for unions, whose membership in the USA stands at its lowest proportion in roughly a century. That’s as a result of the varieties of people that win prestigious scholarships are the varieties who later maintain positions of energy — who make choices about whether or not to struggle unions or negotiate with them, about whether or not the legislation ought to make it simpler or more durable for staff to arrange.
Because the current union campaigns at corporations like Starbucks, Amazon and Apple present, the phrases of the struggle are nonetheless largely set by company leaders. If these persons are more and more sympathetic to labor, then among the key obstacles to unions could also be dissolving.
Then once more, Jaz Brisack isn’t ready to seek out out.
The struggle in Buffalo
Ms. Brisack moved to Buffalo after Oxford for one more job, as an organizer with the union Staff United, the place a mentor she had met in faculty additionally labored. As soon as there, she determined to take a second gig at Starbucks.
“Her philosophy was get on the job and manage. She wished to study the trade,” stated Gary Bonadonna Jr., the highest Staff United official in upstate New York. “I stated, ‘OK.’”
In its pushback towards the marketing campaign, Starbucks has typically blamed “exterior union forces” intent on harming the corporate, as its chief government, Howard Schultz, steered in April. The corporate has recognized Ms. Brisack as certainly one of these interlopers, noting that she attracts a wage from Staff United. (Mr. Bonadonna stated she was the one Starbucks worker on the union’s payroll.)
However the impression that Ms. Brisack and her fellow employee-organizers give off is certainly one of fondness for the corporate. Whilst they level out flaws — understaffing, inadequate coaching, low seniority pay, all of which they need to enhance — they embrace Starbucks and its distinctive tradition.
They discuss up their sense of camaraderie and group — many depend common clients amongst their mates — and delight of their espresso experience. On mornings when Ms. Brisack’s retailer isn’t busy, staff typically maintain tastings.
A Starbucks spokesman stated that Mr. Schultz believes staff don’t want a union in the event that they think about him and his motives, and the corporate has stated that seniority-based pay will increase will take impact this summer season.
One Friday in late February, Ms. Brisack and one other barista, Casey Moore, met on the two-bedroom rental that Ms. Brisack shares with three cats, to speak union technique over breakfast. Naturally, the dialog turned to espresso.
“Jaz has a really barista drink,” Ms. Moore stated.
Ms. Brisack elaborated: “It’s 4 blonde ristretto pictures — that’s a lighter roast of espresso — with oat milk. It’s principally an iced latte with oat milk. If we had sugar-cookie syrup, I’d get that. Now that that’s no extra, it’s normally plain.”
That afternoon, Ms. Brisack held a Zoom name from her lounge with a bunch of Starbucks staff who had been fascinated by unionizing. It’s an train that she and different organizers in Buffalo have repeated tons of of occasions since final fall, as staff across the nation sought to observe their lead. However in nearly each case, the Starbucks staff exterior Buffalo have reached out to the organizers, moderately than vice versa.
This specific body of workers, in Ms. Brisack’s faculty city of Oxford, Miss., appeared to require even much less of a tough promote than most. When Ms. Brisack stated she, too, had attended the College of Mississippi, one of many staff waved her off, as if her superstar preceded her. “Oh, yeah, we all know Jaz,” the employee gushed.
Just a few hours later, Ms. Brisack, Ms. Moore and Michelle Eisen, a longtime Starbucks worker additionally concerned within the organizing, gathered with two union attorneys on the union workplace in a onetime auto plant. The Nationwide Labor Relations Board was counting ballots for an election at a Starbucks in Mesa, Ariz. — the primary actual take a look at of whether or not the marketing campaign was taking root nationally, and never simply in a union stronghold like New York. The room was tense as the primary outcomes trickled in.
“Can you’re feeling my coronary heart beating?” Ms. Moore requested her colleagues.
Inside a couple of minutes, nevertheless, it grew to become clear that the union would win in a rout — the ultimate depend was 25 to three. Everybody turned barely punchy, as if that they had all instantly entered a dream world the place unions had been much more in style than that they had ever imagined. One of many attorneys let loose an expletive earlier than musing, “Whoever organized down there …”
Ms. Brisack appeared to seize the temper when she learn a textual content from a co-worker to the group: “I’m so blissful I’m crying and consuming a week-old ice cream cake.”
A black antifa T-shirt on the formal
Ms. Brisack as soon as seemed to be on a unique path. As a baby, she idolized Lyndon Johnson and imagined working for workplace. On the College of Mississippi, she was elected president of the school Democrats.
She had developed an curiosity in labor historical past as an adolescent, when cash was typically tight, but it surely was largely an educational curiosity. “She had learn Eugene Debs,” stated Tim Dolan, the college’s nationwide scholarship adviser on the time. “It was like, ‘Oh, gosh. Wow.’”
When Richard Bensinger, a former organizing director with the A.F.L.-C.I.O. and the United Vehicle Staff, got here to talk on campus, she realized that union organizing was greater than a historic curiosity. She talked her approach into an internship on a union marketing campaign he was concerned with at a close-by Nissan plant. It didn’t go nicely. The union accused the corporate of working a racially divisive marketing campaign, and Ms. Brisack was disillusioned by the loss.
“Nissan by no means paid a consequence for what it did,” she stated. (In response to prices of “scare ways,” the corporate stated on the time that it had sought to offer data to staff and clear up misperceptions.)
Mr. Dolan seen that she was changing into jaded about mainstream politics. “There have been occasions between her sophomore and junior yr once I’d steer her towards one thing and he or she’d say, ‘Oh, they’re approach too conservative.’ I’d ship her a New York Occasions article and he or she’d say, ‘Neoliberalism is useless.’”
In England, the place she arrived through the fall of 2019 at age 22, Ms. Brisack was an everyday at a “solidarity” movie membership that screened motion pictures about labor struggles worldwide, and wore a sweatshirt that featured a head shot of Karl Marx. She liberally reinterpreted the time period “black tie” at an annual Rhodes dinner, sporting a black dress-coat over a black antifa T-shirt.
“I went and acquired robes and all the pieces — I wished to slot in,” stated a buddy and fellow Rhodes scholar, Leah Crowder. “I at all times beloved how she by no means tried to suit into Oxford.”
However Ms. Brisack’s politics didn’t stand out the best way her formal put on did. In speaking with eight different American Rhodes students from her yr, I acquired the sense that progressive politics had been typically within the ether. Nearly all expressed some skepticism of markets and agreed that staff ought to have extra energy. The one one who questioned facets of collective bargaining advised me that few of his classmates would have agreed, and that he might need been loudly jeered for expressing reservations.
Some within the group even stated that they had integrated pro-labor views into their profession aspirations.
Claire Wang has centered on serving to fossil gas staff discover family-sustaining jobs because the world transitions to inexperienced vitality. “Unions are a important companion on this work,” she advised me. Rayan Semery-Palumbo, who’s ending a dissertation on inequality and meritocracy whereas working for a local weather know-how start-up, lamented that staff had too little leverage. “Labor unions could also be the simplest approach of implementing change going ahead for lots of people, together with myself,” he advised me. “I would discover myself in labor organizing work.”
This isn’t what speaking to Rhodes students used to sound like. At the least not in my expertise.
I used to be a Rhodes scholar in 1998, when centrist politicians like Invoice Clinton and Tony Blair had been ascendant, and earlier than “neoliberalism” grew to become such a unclean phrase. Although we had been dimly conscious of a time, a long time earlier, when radicalism and pro-labor views had been extra frequent amongst American elites — and when, not coincidentally, the U.S. labor motion was way more highly effective — these views had been far much less in proof by the point I acquired to Oxford.
A few of my classmates had been fascinated by points like race and poverty, as they jogged my memory in interviews for this text. Just a few had nuanced views of labor — that they had labored a blue-collar job, or had mother and father who belonged to a union, or had studied their Marx. Nonetheless, most of my classmates would have regarded individuals who talked at size about unions and sophistication the best way they might have regarded non secular fundamentalists: most likely earnest however barely preachy, and clearly caught prior to now.
Kris Abrams, one of many few U.S. Rhodes Students in our cohort who thought loads in regards to the working class and labor organizing, advised me lately that she felt remoted at Oxford, a minimum of amongst different People. “Actually, I didn’t really feel like there was a lot room for dialogue,” Ms. Abrams stated.
In contrast, it was frequent inside our cohort to revere enterprise and markets and globalization. As an undergraduate, my buddy and Rhodes classmate Roy Bahat led a big public-service group that periodically labored with unions. However because the “new” economic system boomed in 1999, he interned at a big company. It dawned on him {that a} profession in enterprise may be extra fascinating — a technique to make a bigger affect on the world.
“There was a serious shift in my very own mentality,” Roy advised me. “I grew to become extra open to enterprise.” It didn’t damage that the pay was good, too.
Roy would go on to work for McKinsey & Firm, the Metropolis of New York and the chief ranks of Information Corp, then begin a enterprise capital fund centered on applied sciences that change how enterprise operates. Extra lately, in an indication of the occasions, his funding portfolio has included corporations that make it simpler for staff to arrange.
On some stage, Roy Bahat and Jaz Brisack should not so totally different: Each are power overachievers; each are formidable about altering society for the higher; each are sympathetic to the underdog by the use of mind and disposition. However the world was telling Roy within the late Nineties to enter enterprise if he wished to affect occasions. The world was telling Ms. Brisack in 2020 to maneuver to Buffalo and manage staff.
Reaching Howard Schultz
The primary time I met Ms. Brisack was in October, at a Starbucks close to the Buffalo airport.
I used to be there to cowl the union election. She was there, unsolicited, to transient me. “I don’t suppose we are able to lose,” she stated of the vote at her retailer. On the time, not a single corporate-owned Starbucks within the nation was unionized. The union would go on to win there by greater than a two-to-one ratio.
It’s onerous to overstate the problem of unionizing a serious company that doesn’t need to be unionized. Employers are allowed to inundate staff with anti-union messaging, whereas unions haven’t any protected entry to staff on the job. And whereas it’s formally unlawful to threaten, self-discipline or fireplace staff who search to unionize, the results for doing so are usually minor and lengthy in coming.
At Starbucks, the Nationwide Labor Relations Board has issued complaints discovering advantage in such accusations. But the union continues to win elections — over 80 % of the greater than 175 votes through which the board has declared a winner. (Starbucks denies that it has damaged the legislation, and a federal choose lately rejected a request to reinstate pro-union staff whom the labor board stated Starbucks had pressured out illegally.)
Although Ms. Brisack was certainly one of dozens of early leaders of the union marketing campaign, the imprint of her character is seen. In retailer after retailer across the nation, staff who help the union give no floor in conferences with firm officers.
Even potential allies should not spared. In Might, after Time ran a positive piece, Ms. Brisack’s response on Twitter was: “We respect TIME journal’s protection of our union marketing campaign. TIME ought to be sure that they’re giving the identical union rights and protections that we’re combating for to the wonderful journalists, photographers, and workers who make this protection potential!”
The tweet jogged my memory of a narrative that Mr. Dolan, her scholarship adviser, had advised a couple of reception that the College of Mississippi held in her honor in 2018. Ms. Brisack had simply gained a Truman scholarship, one other prestigious award. She took the chance to induce the college’s chancellor to take away a Accomplice monument from campus. The chancellor appeared pained, in keeping with a number of attendees.
“My boss was like, ‘Wow, you couldn’t have talked her out of doing that?’” Mr. Dolan stated. “I used to be like, ‘That’s what made her win. If she wasn’t that individual, you all wouldn’t have a Truman now.’”
(Mr. Dolan’s boss on the time didn’t recall this dialog, and the previous chancellor didn’t recall any drama on the occasion.)
The problem for Ms. Brisack and her colleagues is that whereas youthful individuals, even youthful elites, are more and more pro-union, the shift has not but reached most of the nation’s strongest leaders. Or, extra to the purpose, the shift has not but reached Mr. Schultz, the 68-year-old now in his third tour as Starbucks’s chief government.
She lately spoke at an Aspen Institute panel on staff’ rights. She has even mused about utilizing her Rhodes connections to make a private enchantment to Mr. Schultz, one thing that Mr. Bensinger has pooh-poohed however that different organizers imagine she simply could pull off.
“Richard has been making enjoyable of me for considering of asking one of many Rhodes individuals to dealer a gathering with Howard Schultz,” Ms. Brisack stated in February.
“I’m certain when you met Howard Schultz, he’d be like, ‘She’s so good,” responded Ms. Moore, her co-worker. “He’d be like, ‘I get it. I’d need to be in a union with you, too.’”

Business
Inside Elon Musk’s X Feed: Trumpism, Falsehoods and Lots of Love for Elon Musk

This is what Elon Musk’s personal feed on X looks like.
He follows more than 1,000 people: right-wing influencers, conspiracy theorists, anti-transgender activists and dozens of his own superfans.
His feed represents a flattering alternate reality filled with boundless praise — for him, for Tesla, for X, for his politics.
And it mirrors his own deepening allegiances to the far-right.
In Mr. Musk’s own telling, his political views were shaped by X.
In a recent interview with Fox News, Mr. Musk said that videos circulating on X years ago depicting crowds of migrants sparked his fascination with right-wing politics and stronger border protections.
“I’ve seen videos of people streaming across the border on Twitter, now X,” he said, citing politicized and sometimes misleading videos that have spread online about migrants. “And I was like, is this real?”
It was a stark example of the power X has to politicize its own users — including the world’s richest man — using hyperpartisan opinions and far-right media.
To better understand how the information that Mr. Musk consumes on X could shape his worldview, The New York Times recreated a version of Mr. Musk’s personal feed by opening a new account on X and following the same 1,109 users that he follows. We then analyzed more than 175,000 posts from the accounts that he follows, using a service that collects data from X.
Though there is no guarantee that Mr. Musk saw all of the posts captured by The New York Times, the accounts that he follows — including world leaders and business tycoons alongside conspiracy theorists and far-right influencers — reveal the voices that Mr. Musk appears to value. (This “Following” feed is different from the main “For You” feed, which includes posts from those he follows alongside others selected by X’s algorithm.)
The resulting feed, shown in this article as a selection of posts curated from the much larger set, revealed ample praise for Mr. Musk and his various priorities, mixed with a torrent of right-wing outrage over progressive politics. It highlights the ways that social networks can create information bubbles. X declined to comment.
Step, once again, into a version of Mr. Musk’s personal X feed below.
Among the most popular topics on Mr. Musk’s feed on X? Elon Musk himself.
He follows dozens of superfans who post near-constant praise for him and his companies.
Many other users devote time to praising the executive, too — between posts about politics, memes or culture wars.
Those voices are mostly right-wing: Among tens of thousands of posts during a typical week, nearly half of them came from right-wing media figures, conservative influencers, Republican politicians or government leaders.
Those accounts included Chaya Raichik, whose X account, Libs of TikTok, has more than four million followers. Ms. Raichik’s appearances on Mr. Musk’s feed match her growing prominence offline: Her influence has exploded during the second Trump administration, and she has appeared at the White House multiple times this year, cementing her status as a top Trump advocate.
The accounts that Mr. Musk follows are also the ones he interacts with most on X, according to The Times’s analysis, giving them a valuable boost on the platform since Mr. Musk is the site’s most popular user, with more than 200 million followers.
That seems to give his followers the power to seize Mr. Musk’s attention and could even redirect his policy goals. It is something they have noticed, with some users boasting they can catch Mr. Musk’s attention with a well-timed post or question.
“Pretty amazing when the owner of a platform personally tells you he is fixing your problem in real time,” Mario Nawfal, an influencer with more than two million followers, posted after Mr. Musk said he would fix an issue on X.
Who does Mr. Musk follow?
Mr. Musk follows more than 1,100 users on X, including hundreds of right-wing personalities.
Some of the ideas that circulated on Mr. Musk’s feed later emerged on the national stage.
President Trump had claimed at an address to Congress that federal funds were used for “making mice transgender” — a misleading description of various studies that tested the effect of hormone therapy on H.I.V. infections and other other side effects of the medication. The idea had gathered steam on X two months earlier, when a conservative-led animal advocacy group posted about it. The group’s account is followed by Representative Nancy Mace, Republican of South Carolina, and by Mr. Musk. Mr. Musk had personally shared one of the posts.
Later, as Tesla vehicles and dealerships were vandalized or attacked in a violent reaction to Mr. Musk, his feed was filled with calls to charge the attackers with “domestic terrorism,” giving the perpetrators 20-year prison sentences.
Mr. Musk agreed, calling attacks on Tesla’s vehicles “extreme domestic terrorism!!” Days later, Mr. Trump repeated the idea, saying that he would enjoy seeing “the sick terrorist thugs get 20 year jail sentences.”
The content on Mr. Musk’s feed is a mirror of his own interests: As Mr. Musk’s role in the government’s cost-cuttings grew, so did praise for those plans on X.
The accounts he follows boast frequently about his supposed cuts, claiming billions in cost-savings that have often proven false or misleading under additional scrutiny.
Polling has shown that cutting government spending is popular, but that Mr. Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency are not. If Mr. Musk seemed oblivious to the criticism, his feed offers some reasons why: The users he follows praised his work and claimed Americans loved him for it.
After a right-wing news aggregator claimed, incorrectly, that DOGE had blocked a $52 million payment for the World Economic Forum, Mr. Musk replied: “True. You’re welcome.” In reality, ending the program had saved $7.8 million.
Those inaccuracies have not stopped Mr. Musk from recommending the DOGE account to others — he frequently promotes the accounts he follows to his own 219 million followers.
“Just follow @DOGE for details,” Mr. Musk wrote in February. “There is a firehouse of information.”
Business
Commentary: Crypto was already in bad odor before jumping into bed with Trump. Now it smells worse

One problem that promoters of cryptocurrencies have faced since the asset class first emerged is that its reputation stinks.
Crypto trading has become identified by regulators and in the public mind as a haven for scams, theft and other forms of sharp practice. The FBI, in its most recent annual report on cryptocurrency, found that crypto-related fraud has exploded. Criminality is “pervasive” in the field, the agency warned.
The elusive use case for crypto assets seemed to have been narrowed down to facilitating criminal fraud, ransomware attacks, drug and human trafficking.
Trump’s cryptocurrency ventures are nothing more than a fig leaf for pay offs from foreign nationals.
— Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)
Then came Donald Trump. During the presidential campaign and after his election, crypto promoters thought they were entering the nirvana of officially recognized legitimacy.
Trump signaled that he would end government regulatory initiatives on crypto, “in order to promote United States leadership in digital assets and financial technology while protecting economic liberty,” to quote the executive order he issued Jan. 23, effectively wiping out federal regulations on the class.
Things aren’t working out as they hoped. Since Trump returned to the presidency, his and his family’s involvement in crypto-related deals has critics charging that crypto has become an entirely new path for official corruption and conflicts of interest in the White House.
“Trump’s cryptocurrency ventures are nothing more than a fig leaf for payoffs from foreign nationals & foreign gov’ts,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) tweeted on May 7. Blumenthal’s target was the offer of a sit-down private dinner with Trump scheduled for May 22 at his Virginia golf club, and personal tours of the White House for the biggest buyers of $TRUMP, a “memecoin” assiduously promoted by Trump and his family.
The price of the coin soared to about $74 on Jan. 19, the day before Trump’s inauguration. It immediately fell in value, though its price has been propped up by the offer of the dinner and tours; the most recent quotes place it at about $13. The top 220 holders of the Trump coin, who are entitled to the dinner, spent nearly $148 million for the privilege, according to an estimate by Reuters.
More than half of the biggest holders appear to be foreign entities, according to an analysis by Bloomberg. That implies that the purchases might be designed to circumvent federal laws barring foreigners from making political contributions in the U.S.
Democratic Sens. Adam Schiff of California and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts demanded that the federal Office of Government Ethics, an independent executive branch agency, open an inquiry into the “severe risk that President Trump and other officials may be engaging in ‘pay to play’ corruption by selling presidential access to individuals or entities, to include foreign nationals and corporate actors with vested interests in federal action, while personally enriching the President and his family.”
DWF, a crypto firm based in the United Arab Emirates, announced last month that it had bought $25 million in coins issued by the Trump-affiliated firm World Liberty Financial, in part to “enhance regulatory engagement with U.S. policymakers.” Freight Technologies, a Houston logistics company, announced April 30 that it had borrowed $20 million to buy Trump coins, calling the transaction “an effective way to advocate for fair, balanced, and free trade between Mexico and the US.”
The unease has spread to Republicans on Capitol Hill, who fear that the Trumps’ crypto deals will undermine their efforts to enact crypto-friendly regulations.
“This gives me pause,” Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), a leader in the legislative movement to pass a pro-crypto law, told NBC News. “Even what may appear to be ‘cringey’ with regard to meme coins, it’s legal, and what we need to do is have a regulatory framework that makes this more clear, so we don’t have this Wild West scenario.”
Trump’s activities already have derailed, if temporarily, the so-called GENIUS Act, which would regulate a form of cryptocurrency known as “stablecoins,” which are supposedly pegged to the value of underlying currencies such as dollars. Schiff and eight other Senate Democrats who had supported the measure have bailed on it, making passage in its current form virtually impossible.
Democrats in both chambers have introduced the “End Crypto Corruption Act,” which would bar the president, vice president, members of Congress and high-level executive branch appointees from issuing, sponsoring or endorsing any “cryptocurrency, meme coin, token, non-fungible token, stablecoin, or other digital asset that is sold for remuneration.”
Even some crypto promoters are no happier than the politicians. “They’re plumbing new depths of idiocy with the memecoin launch,” Nic Carter, a crypto investor and Trump supporter, told Politico.
As a crypto category, memecoins are disdained even by many participants in the field. They generally have even less utiilty or authenticity than mainstream cryptocurrencies, often originate as joke investments, and ride waves of pure hype. The Trump coin has no discernible value apart from its identification with Trump himself.
I asked the White House for comment on the accusations of corruption and received this reply from spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt: “President Trump is compliant with all conflict-of-interest rules, and only acts in the best interests of the American public.”
The memecoin isn’t Trump’s only venture into crypto, though some of his arrangements seem designed to give him plausible deniability if legal or ethics questions are raised. World Liberty Financial, which markets a crypto token designated $WLFI and a stablecoin designated USD1, is 60% owned by Trump and members of his family, who are entitled to up to 75% of the proceeds of sales of $WLFI.
The firm’s website features an image of Trump striking a heroic pose and says the WLFI token is “inspired by Donald J. Trump.” In the small print it asserts, however, that “any references to or quotes or imagery attributed to or associated with Donald J. Trump or his family members should not be construed as an endorsement or representation or warranty.”
Crypto investors really stepped up to the plate with political donations during the 2024 election cycle. Fairshake, the super PAC representing the class, spent nearly $41 million in contributions. That included $13 million to defeat two congressional candidates in Democratic primaries, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Irvine) and Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-New York). Both were known to favor stricter regulation of the asset class, and both lost their races.
The biggest crypto firms spent lavishly in 2023 and 2024 to fatten Fairshake’s war chest, which collected more than $162 million in that time frame; Coinbase contributed $46.5 million, Ripple Labs, $45 million and Andreessen Horowitz, a major crypto investor, $44 million. Much of the total was funneled to two other crypto-related political action committees, according to federal election records.
After the election, many of the firms, like more traditional businesses, made contributions of $1 million or more to Trump’s inauguration fund.
One can hardly deny that the crypto camp has gotten its money’s worth from the Trump administration so far. The Securities and Exchange Commission has dropped or deferred more than a dozen enforcement cases against Ripple, Coinbase, Gemini, Kraken and other crypto promoters.
The largest victory arguably belongs to Coinbase, the biggest crypto trading platform in the U.S. The SEC in 2023 charged the firm with running an unlawful trading exchange and marketing unregistered securities. The case reflected the SEC’s position that what crypto firms are marketing are securities by a different name, and thus need to be registered as securities so buyers and sellers get the same legal protections as stock and bond investors.
A federal judge in New York cleared the enforcement action to move ahead in 2024, after finding that the SEC had made a plausible case that Coinbase was operating illegally. The SEC dropped the case in February. Coinbase had asserted that the SEC was wrong “on the facts and the law,” and that “the case should never have been filed in the first place.”
Earlier this month, the agency settled its case against Ripple, which it had charged in 2020 with having raised $1.3 billion through unregistered securities. As part of the settlement, the SEC agreed to return to Ripple $75 million of a $125-million penalty it held in escrow. The settlement elicited a crisp rebuke from Commissioner Caroline A. Crenshaw, a member of the commission’s Democratic minority.
Crenshaw noted that the deal was part and parcel of the SEC’s effective abandonment of crypto regulation. “This settlement, alongside the programmatic disassembly of the SEC’s crypto enforcement program, does a tremendous disservice to the investing public,” she wrote.
That won’t be the end of the deregulation drive. On April 7, Deputy Atty. Gen. Todd Blanche — who was Trump’s defense attorney in the New York criminal case that resulted in guilty verdicts on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records — ordered an end to Justice Department regulatory cases based on interpreting crypto assets as securities or commodities. That closed down the government’s principal regulatory initiative against crypto promoters.
Blanche directed the DOJ’s Market Integrity and Major Frauds Unit to “cease cryptocurrency enforcement,” and disbanded the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, “effective immediately.”
There doesn’t seem to be any sign that Trump’s involvement with crypto will slow down even as he disembowels the government’s regulatory capacity over crypto ventures.
World Liberty Financial recently announced that Abu Dhabi would use its stablecoin to invest $2 billion in Binance, a multinational crypto firm that pleaded guilty and paid a $4.3-billion penalty in 2023 on charges of financial crimes including money laundering. Binance’s chief executive, Changpeng Zhao, also pleaded guilty and spent four months in U.S. prison.
Last month, the SEC put its civil case against Binance on hold for at least 60 days.
On its investor advice webpage, the SEC used to post a warning on its website about crypto. “Trendy investments are especially ripe for fraudsters so be aware there is a real risk of fraud,” it said. “Cryptocurrencies may be today’s shiny, new opportunity but there are serious risks involved.”
That page has been taken down.
Business
How Trump China Tariffs Hit One Shipment of T-Shirts

This is a customs form that companies must file to import goods into the United States. In recent days, these forms have become living documents that show how President Trump’s tariffs are squeezing businesses.
In this example, Leslie Jordan Inc., a company that sells activewear for special events, imported a shipment of women’s T-shirts from China at the end of April. That was after Mr. Trump aggressively escalated levies on Chinese imports, but before officials from both countries agreed on a temporary reprieve — an example of how companies have struggled to plan for their purchases as tariff levels continually shift.
The shipment was valued at $18,639, but this company paid $34,389 in tariffs — almost twice the value of the goods themselves. The import tax on this one shipment added up to nearly 185 percent.
Often Mr. Trump’s new tariffs are layered on top of existing ones. In this case, the T-shirts were subject to a base tariff of 32 percent based on the value of the import. Many goods typically have a very low base tariff, but garments and other textile goods are subject to some of the highest tariffs.
A number of goods from China are also subject to special tariffs to combat alleged unfair trade practices. These tariffs — known as Section 301 duties — were introduced during Mr. Trump’s first term and later expanded by former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. In this case, they resulted in a 7.5 percent additional charge.
One of Mr. Trump’s first trade actions when he started his second term in January was to impose a tariff on China for enabling the flow of fentanyl into the United States. The tariff started at 10 percent but was then raised to 20 percent.
In early April, the administration introduced “reciprocal” tariffs. China’s rate started at 34 percent, then escalated to 84 percent before rising to 125 percent. (This tariff, in addition to the 20 percent “fentanyl” tariff, amounts to a 145 percent tariff on most goods.)
To import one shipment of T-shirts, the company had to pay four different tariffs. “It is impossible to plan and run a business this way,” said Leslie Jordan, the company’s owner.
On Monday, the reciprocal portion of tariffs on Chinese imports was suspended for 90 days as the United States and China negotiate new trade terms.
That means if this same shipment were to arrive today, it would face a total tariff rate of 69.5 percent — a very high level, but a fraction of what the company was forced to pay just a couple of weeks ago. This lower rate means Ms. Jordan would have paid $21,000 less in tariffs on this one shipment than she did before.
Ms. Jordan, who founded her company nearly 40 years ago, said the administration’s tariff policy had been the hardest challenge she had faced running the business. While some of the tariffs have been lifted, at least temporarily, the time it takes to place orders, get products manufactured and then have them loaded onto ships and transported across the Pacific would probably exceed the 90-day reprieve.
And given the drastic changes in U.S. trade policy, Ms. Jordan said, she has little ability to predict how much she may need to pay when her next order lands at American ports. “If we base it on today’s tariff,” she said, “who knows what it will be when the goods are produced and arrive?”
-
Austin, TX5 days ago
Best Austin Salads – 15 Food Places For Good Greens!
-
Technology1 week ago
Be careful what you read about an Elden Ring movie
-
Technology7 days ago
Netflix is removing Black Mirror: Bandersnatch
-
Culture1 week ago
Pulitzer Prizes 2025: A Guide to the Winning Books and Finalists
-
Education1 week ago
University of Michigan President, Santa Ono, Set to Lead University of Florida
-
World7 days ago
The Take: Can India and Pakistan avoid a fourth war over Kashmir?
-
News7 days ago
Reincarnated by A.I., Arizona Man Forgives His Killer at Sentencing
-
News1 week ago
Jefferson Griffin Concedes Defeat in N.C. Supreme Court Race