Connect with us

Cleveland, OH

Cleveland Parental Rights Advocate Ray Lautenschlager Dies and Families Say Justice Lost a Champion

Published

on

Cleveland Parental Rights Advocate Ray Lautenschlager Dies and Families Say Justice Lost a Champion


CLEVELAND, OH — Ray R. Lautenschlager, a Cleveland-based family law reform advocate and president of Ohio Family Rights, died at home Feb. 9, according to friends and colleagues. Supporters remembered him as a relentless voice for parental rights and as a man who personally guided families through some of their most difficult custody battles.

“There will be a Zoom memorial on Feb. 19 at 8 p.m.,” a co-advocate and friend wrote in announcing his passing. Organizers later scheduled an additional online memorial for Feb. 26 at 8 p.m. Eastern to allow more friends, colleagues and family members to share stories.

Lautenschlager served as president and legislative director of Ohio Family Rights, focusing his work on shared parenting reform, constitutional parental rights, custody law reform and criticism of domestic relations court procedures. His advocacy was rooted in his own experience navigating divorce and parenting plan disputes, which led him to file federal civil rights litigation challenging Ohio custody statutes, domestic relations procedures and judicial conduct in his case. Public records show the lawsuit reflected his constitutional objections to family law practices and became a catalyst for his policy work.

In written testimony and committee appearances before Ohio legislative bodies, Lautenschlager argued that parental rights are fundamental civil rights and that courts often rely on inadequate evidentiary standards when limiting parental involvement. He promoted equal shared parenting as the default baseline in custody determinations and supported applying a clear and convincing evidence standard before restricting a parent’s time. He also criticized what he described as excessive judicial discretion in domestic relations courts and warned that inconsistent standards increase litigation costs and emotional strain on families.

Advertisement

His white papers and reform proposals contended that fit parents are routinely removed from meaningful roles in their children’s lives and that Ohio custody law requires structural reform. He submitted written critiques of proposed statutory language changes that he believed weakened protections for parents. Legislative tracking confirms his participation in hearings involving family and aging committee matters and related custody legislation.

Beyond formal testimony, Lautenschlager provided advice to parents across Ohio and in other states, often speaking by phone or online with people he had never met in person. “I wouldn’t have the relationship I have with my daughter if it wasn’t for Ray,” one community member wrote. Another said, “He was such a good man and so giving and helpful.”

Many described shock at the news of his death. “I’m in shock and so sorry to hear this,” one resident wrote. Another added, “This is a major loss for all of us.” A longtime acquaintance said, “I have known Ray for about 50 years. I am just in shock about this.”

Parents who credited Lautenschlager with guiding them through custody disputes said his impact extended far beyond policy papers. “He helped me through a battle I’m currently going through still,” one father wrote. “I didn’t even know him. I was a stranger, yet that man talked and walked me through so much.” Another community member said, “Although I never met Ray in person, he took the time to help me through some tough family court times. I am heartbroken.”

Colleagues in the parental rights movement described years of collaboration. “We’ve been working together for years,” one associate wrote, adding that Lautenschlager “embodied a good friend” and continued making himself available to families in need of empathy even while dealing with his own health issues. Another supporter said, “He dedicated his entire life to injustice for parents, especially fathers.”

Advertisement

Throughout his advocacy, Lautenschlager consistently framed parenting as a fundamental liberty interest deserving the highest procedural protections. He maintained that custody litigation is not only a private dispute but a broader social and economic issue affecting families, courts and state resources. Supporters said that commitment defined his life’s work.

“He was a leader, someone to look up to, someone to admire,” one community member wrote. “I’ll miss you, my friend.”
——————–
At Cleveland 13 News, we strive to provide accurate, up-to-date, and reliable reporting. If you spot an error, omission, or have information that may need updating, please email us at tips@cleveland13news.com. As a community-driven news network, we appreciate the help of our readers in ensuring the integrity of our reporting.



Source link

Cleveland, OH

Cleveland Cavaliers Creating Space Outside Arena to Honor 2016 Championship Team

Published

on

Cleveland Cavaliers Creating Space Outside Arena to Honor 2016 Championship Team


The Cleveland Cavaliers were crowned NBA champions for the first time in their franchise’s history ten years ago. The 2016 NBA Finals seems like it was just yesterday.

The memories of LeBron James pouncing on a vulnerable Andre Iguodala to swat away his layup attempt is still fresh in the memory of Cavs fans watching at the time.

Kyrie Irving’s stepback three-point shot over Stephen Curry is a moment in time that will be replayed in NBA documentaries and compilations for decades to come. This period of time was truly a magical time for the city of Cleveland and the state of Ohio.

Advertisement

The city had never experienced anything similar to what the 2016 Cavs did for Cleveland. The star duo of Mark Price and Brad Daugherty from the late 1980s and early 1990s got far into the playoffs routinely, but never into the NBA Finals, largely because of Michael Jordan’s Chicago Bulls.

Advertisement

The Cavaliers toppled the mighty record-breaking 73-win Golden State Warriors in 2016 and now the organization is keeping that memory alive in a huge way.

Jun 19, 2016; Oakland, CA, USA; Cleveland Cavaliers forward LeBron James (23) celebrates with the Larry O’Brien Championship Trophy after beating the Golden State Warriors in game seven of the NBA Finals at Oracle Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kelley L Cox-Imagn Images | Kelley L Cox-Imagn Images
Advertisement

A professional-sized basketball court

Plans to advance development of “Meet Me Here” Park went through City of Cleveland this past Friday. Developers are speeding up plans to revamp the park in order to have it ready by the 10th anniversary of the championship victory later this summer.

Advertisement

The space where this development will be built is in Downtown Cleveland. A NBA-sized basketball court will dominate the space, but benches for spectators and artwork is slated to be included as well. The design of the court will be based on the 2016 NBA championship victory. There’s room for additional mobile hoops to be inserted for specific community events.

Advertisement

The space is temporary and has room to grow

The current plans unveiled last Friday are set to be a temporary solution due to the 10th anniversary approaching. There could be more grand plans to revamp the surrounding area beyond the one professional-sized basketball court. The current space will feature grass areas, trees, and a fence to block basketball from wildly rolling into the street.

A nearby parking garage will also hang a banner with LeBron James famous “Cleveland, this is for you” quote after winning game seven of the 2016 NBA Finals.

This development is one of many recent advancements geared toward building up the surrounding areas of Rocket Arena. A riverfront park that supports residences is being developed near Rocket Arena.

Advertisement

The Cavaliers are opening a brand new practice, training, and sports medicine facility in 2027 called the Cleveland Clinic Global Peak Performance Center. On top of these developments and the new basketball court, a riverfront amphitheater fit to seat about 6,200 people is set to open around 2028. Cleveland is developing right before the eyes of nearby residents and it’s the consistent success of the Cavaliers that have contributed heavily to these possibilities.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Cleveland, OH

Judge pauses Ohio’s plan to fund new Browns stadium with unclaimed funds

Published

on

Judge pauses Ohio’s plan to fund new Browns stadium with unclaimed funds


CLEVELAND — Ohio’s plan to use unclaimed funds to help fund construction of a new domed stadium for the Cleveland Browns was temporarily blocked in court on Monday.


What You Need To Know

  • The class-action lawsuit argues that provisions of Ohio’s two-year, $60 billion budget that took $1 billion from the state’s Unclaimed Funds Account to pay for the stadium that Haslam Sports Group is planning for suburban Brook Park
  • The strategy was among several hotly debated topics during Ohio’s budget planning last year.
  • Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost’s office said it was reviewing the decision and determining next steps

In her preliminary injunction, Franklin County Magistrate Jennifer Hunt found that plaintiffs in a lawsuit brought by former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann are substantially likely to win their case on the merits. Her order pauses the plan while the case is heard.

The class-action lawsuit argues that provisions of Ohio’s two-year, $60 billion budget that took $1 billion from the state’s Unclaimed Funds Account to pay for the stadium that Haslam Sports Group is planning for suburban Brook Park, south of Cleveland, violate constitutional prohibitions against taking people’s private property for government use, as well as citizens’ due process rights.

The strategy was among several hotly debated topics during Ohio’s budget planning last year.

Dann and former state Rep. Jeffrey Crossman, both Democrats, filed the legal action on behalf of three named Ohio residents, as well as all other individuals whose unclaimed funds were being held by the state as of June 30, 2025.

Advertisement

The litigation challenges specific budget provisions that diverted more than $1 billion in unclaimed funds to create an Ohio Cultural and Sports Facility Performance Grant Fund and designate $600 million for the Browns as its first grant.

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost’s office said it was reviewing the decision and determining next steps.

Before ending his bid for governor last year, the Republican spoke out against using unclaimed funds for such a purpose, having gone so far as to urge DeWine to veto it. However, the state’s top lawyer has further said that he believed the plan was legally sound.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Cleveland, OH

Cleveland mother accused of burying daughters in suitcases prompts new focus on parenting bill

Published

on

Cleveland mother accused of burying daughters in suitcases prompts new focus on parenting bill


CLEVELAND, Ohio (WOIO) – A Cleveland mother was charged with two counts of murder after her daughters were found in suitcases partially buried in a park near E. 165th and Midland Ave last week.

In the days that followed, we spoke with DeShaun Chatman, who is the father of 8-year-old Mila Chatman.

He said he’s been trying for years to get access to his daughter but felt the courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) weren’t working with him.

There is a law in Columbus working its way through the process trying to clarify parenting roles and rights.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 174 (SB174) was passed in November and is currently sitting waiting in a House committee.

At the time the bill was passed one of the bill’s sponsors, Senator Theresa Gavarone (R-Bowling Green) said, “No one is a winner in parenting disputes. But if anyone is, it should be the kids. By passing this legislation, the Ohio Senate is taking the first step toward encouraging cooperation between separated parents.”

The bill has a number of provisions looking to make it easier for a judge to give equal rights to both the mother and father.

For example, it would prohibit a judge from giving preference to a father or a mother based on a person’s financial status or gender.

It also requires a parenting plan be filed that shows parenting and decisions will be a shared responsibility regardless of marital status.

Advertisement

There is also a prevision that would allow unmarried parents to file a complaint at no charge, requesting the allocation of parenting rights and responsibilities upon the father establishing parentage and provides an expedited hearing and temporary orders.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending