Finance
Is your partner ambitious? 3 financial red flags in a relationship
00:00 Speaker A
Picking a partner is one of the most consequential decisions you can make in your financial future. But nearly a third of Americans are uncomfortable discussing money in their relationship, according to a recent survey from Talker Research. Joining me now to talk all things finances and relationships, we’ve got Patty Assay, a finance expert with more than 1 million followers on TikTok. She’s also the author of a new book, “Never Date a Broke Dude: The Financial Freedom Playbook.” Patty, great to have you here in studio.
00:28 Patty Assay
Thank you for having me.
00:30 Speaker A
Okay. So, as we think about this, I got to ask you, how do you define a broke dude? We should just get that out of the way.
00:36 Patty Assay
Yeah. I’m so glad you asked that, because being a broke dude has very little to do with your bank account. It’s someone who regardless of gender can’t match your ambition, drive, commitment, or work ethic, right? You want someone that matches your energy. You can’t be hustling, and the person sitting on the sofa, eating Cheetos. And I always say you don’t have to match me dollar for dollar, but you do have to match me hustle for hustle. So, that’s what’s important.
01:01 Speaker A
And so when it comes to relationship red flags, what should people be on the lookout for?
01:06 Patty Assay
All right. I’m going to give you three. The first one is if they ask to borrow money. That tells you that they’re not good with money because they’re asking to borrow money, and that they’ve run through all their friends, all their families, and haven’t paid them back, and now that they’re asking you to borrow money. That’s a huge red flag. The next one is the person that’s always in between jobs, can’t get a job, can’t find a job, don’t have a job. They don’t want a job, all right? And that person is not going to change. And lastly, if a person doesn’t want you to earn your own income, or insists on merging accounts, that means that they’re trying to control you with your finances, and that’s a huge red flag.
02:00 Speaker A
There are plenty of, of stereotypes and expectations around dating, namely that a man should pay for everything. That’s one of the most popular. You say that that’s outdated. Explain more on that.
02:16 Patty Assay
That is so outdated, because what women don’t understand is that notion came from the patriarchy. The patriarchy created that, because women couldn’t work. We couldn’t have their own bank accounts. So we were dependent on men for our finances, and that was a means of control. So today, if a woman expects a man to pay for everything, she has to understand that in exchange for that money, she’s giving up her power and control over her own life. So each people, they should be financially independent, and they should contribute to the finances of the relationship.
02:51 Speaker A
And so as you’re starting that contribution together, what are some of the early steps for the conversations about merging finances, about making sure that for all the goals that you’ve collectively set together that you’re hitting those in stride?
03:04 Patty Assay
Sure. There’s I, I put seven in the book, but I’ll just give you a few. So the first one is, you want to make sure that your financial goals align. Maybe you want to buy a house and build investments, and the other person wants to live in an apartment, and they’re happy that way. Your financial goals have to align. You have to know, are you a saver? Are you a spender? What are your money habits like? You also have to know what their credit score is, because you can’t even rent an apartment without a good credit score, right? I mean, it’s crazy. What their debt to income ratio is, how much money they make, whether you have to support other people later on in life, like maybe you want to support your parents, and the other person’s like, “No. Why? I don’t want that.” So those are all the conversations that you need to have before you say, “I do,” because by that time, it’s too late.
04:04 Speaker A
And so as you’re thinking about people who’ve successfully picked right partnerships, and, and had those conversations, and made sure that they are charting that path forward together, where have you seen them continuously have check-ins over time as well, and how important are those check-ins?
04:22 Patty Assay
Those check-ins are huge. And you really need to have a check-in every six months. You need to sit down, put it on the calendar, because if you don’t, you’re not going to remember. Every six months, you’re going to sit down and you’re talk- going to talk about your financial goals. “Are we there yet? What can we do to get there? Are you frustrated about something? Am I frustrated about something?” Get those out on the table, because that’s going to help you in the long run.
04:52 Speaker A
Just lastly, while we have you here, how do you understand perhaps the changes that need to be made when your financial priorities change as well over time? Say, you’re starting a family. Or say you’re looking to own a home in the future.
05:05 Patty Assay
Right. So you need to sit down and figure out how much money you need in the future, and what budgeting you need to do now, because if you just have a child, it’s so expensive, and if you’re not ready for it financially, it’s a huge strain on the relationship. So anytime there’s things that are upcoming, sit down, talk about it, and make sure that you’re on the same page.
Finance
UK inflation held at 3% ahead of Iran war
UK inflation held at 3% in the year to February, before the start of the conflict in the Middle East, which has sent energy costs soaring and led to concerns of a resurgence in pricing pressures.
The latest consumer price index (CPI) reading from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), released on Wednesday, was in line with consensus expectations. This came after inflation fell to 3% in January from 3.4% in December.
The ONS said that clothing made the largest upward contribution to the monthly change in inflation in February, while motor fuels was the biggest downward contributor.
Read more: Multiple Bank of England interest rate rises expected after energy price surge
The data covered the period before the start of the conflict between the US, Israel and Iran on 28 February. The conflict has disrupted oil (BZ=F, CL=F) and gas (NG=F) supply, sending prices soaring, with concerns that a prolonged energy price shock could push inflation back up.
Grant Fitzner, chief economist at the ONS, said: “The largest upwards driver was the price of clothing, which rose this month but fell a year ago.”
“This was offset by falls in petrol costs, with prices collected before the start of the conflict in the Middle East and subsequent rise in crude oil prices.”
The Bank of England (BoE) warned last week that inflation will be higher in the “near term” due to the shock from higher energy prices, as it announced it had kept interest rates on hold at 3.75%.
Commenting on February’s inflation figures, chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “In an uncertain world we have the right economic plan, taking a responsive and responsible approach to supporting working people in the national interest.”
“We’re taking £150 off energy bills and providing targeted support for those facing higher heating oil costs. We’re also acting to protect people from unfair price rises if they occur, bring down food prices at the till, and cut red tape to boost long-term energy security — building a stronger, more secure economy.”
Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics, said: “The economy entered the energy price shock caused by the conflict in the Middle East with CPI inflation stuck at 3.0%.”
“And based on our current working assumptions about oil and gas prices, we now think CPI inflation could rise to a peak of about 4.6% in Q4.”
“With the energy price shock likely to extinguish growth and add to the already elevated unemployment rate, in our baseline scenario we still think an extended interest rate pause is more likely than interest rate hikes,” she said.
Finance
Digitized Assets & Tokenized Finance Impact Report 2026 FII Institute Site
What if the global financial system could move at the speed of the internet unlocking trillions in value while expanding access to capital worldwide?
Developed in collaboration with Dante Disparte, Chief Strategy Officer and Head of Global Policy & Operations at Circle; Fred Thiel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MARA, Inc.; and Ryan Hayward, Head of Digital Assets and Strategic Investments at Barclays, this report on digital assets and tokenized finance reveals how a rapidly emerging $16–30 trillion market is transforming traditional finance into a real-time, programmable, and borderless ecosystem.
It explores how the tokenization of real-world assets, the explosive growth of stablecoins processing over $30 trillion annually, and instant (T+0) settlement are redefining liquidity, reducing cross-border costs, and reshaping global investment flows. The report also highlights the critical role of financial inclusion, addressing a $330 billion SME financing gap alongside the rise of AI-driven transactions, energy-powered infrastructure, and evolving regulation that will ultimately determine who leads and who benefits in the next era of finance.
Finance
Oil rollercoaster pushes prices higher as US-Iran talks raise questions
Brent crude (BZ=F) and West Texas Intermediate (CL=F) futures contracts marched higher on Tuesday morning, having plummeted more than 10% at one point in Monday’s trading session. Questions continue to swirl around the potential reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and an end to the conflict between Iran and the US and Israel.
Brent crude (BZ=F) gained 1.7% after the opening bell in London, to around the $97.50 per barrel mark. West Texas Intermediate (CL=F) also rose 1.7% to $89.55 per barrel.
The moves come amid conflicting reports about talks between Iran and the US to end fighting. On Monday, president Donald Trump delayed strikes on Iranian power plants, having given Iran a deadline to restore trade through the Strait of Hormuz, saying Washington had productive conversations with Tehran.
But Tehran has since denied that it has been in touch with US negotiators, accusing Washington of price manipulation.
On Sunday night, Trump and prime minister Keir Starmer held a 20-minute phone call about the situation.
“They agreed that reopening the Strait of Hormuz was essential to ensure stability in the global energy market,” a Downing Street spokesperson said.
On Saturday, Trump gave Iran a 48-hour deadline to reopen the Strait — a measure set to expire shortly before midnight UK time on Monday.
In a Truth Social post, Trump wrote: “If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 hours from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!”
Yesterday, Iran’s defence council said in a statement that the “only way for non-hostile countries” to pass through Strait of Hormuz is “coordination with Iran”.
-
Detroit, MI7 days agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Georgia1 week agoHow ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
-
Movie Reviews6 days ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Turning Point USA Clubs Expand to High Schools Across America
-
Sports4 days agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
Science1 week agoIndustrial chemicals have reached the middle of the oceans, new study shows
-
Science1 week agoHow a Melting Glacier in Antarctica Could Affect Tens of Millions Around the Globe
-
Culture1 week agoTest Your Memory of Great Lines From Classic Irish Poems