Connect with us

New Hampshire

15 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security

Published

on

15 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security


In this article, we will discuss the 15 best places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security. You may skip our detailed discussion on inflationary pressures for women in the US and see the 5 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security.

According to Gallup’s annual Economy and Personal Finance Poll this year, 41% of Americans believe inflation or the high cost of living is the most important financial problem facing their family. This marks the third year in a row that inflation concerns have hit a record high among respondents. For context, during the economic crisis of 2008, the percentage of Americans who believed inflation to be their most important financial concern was 18%.

READ ALSO: 12 Best Places to Retire in Hungary and 15 Best Places to Retire in Uruguay.

Inflationary Pressures on Women

While inflationary pressures impact all Americans, studies show that such pressures can be particularly troublesome for certain demographics. For example, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2022, 4.4% of all women in the labor force were likely to be among the working poor in comparison to 3.7% of men. Alarmingly, 13.1% of families maintained by women earners were likely to be living below the poverty level. In contrast, 6.5% of families maintained by male earners were likely to be living below the poverty level.

Advertisement

The reasons women tend to be more susceptible to the risks of inflation tend to revolve around factors such as gender pay gaps, barriers in access to education & professional opportunities, and a lack of financial literacy. While households relying on women workers are the ones most significantly impacted by such dynamics, research from Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA) suggests that it may also impact the economy in general. According to Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA), closing the U.S. gender gap in labor force participation could boost the country’s GDP by an impressive 5%.

Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA) is one of the 50 largest institutional asset managers globally. In the last year, the company has managed to surpass analysts’ expectations for earnings in 3 separate quarters. On August 1st, the company released its Q2 2024 financial results in which it achieved a revenue of $2.03 billion. Adjusted operating EPS for the period were $2.27 which managed to surpass analyst expectations by 3.5%. The management credited its impressive earnings performance to strong fee-based revenues in the Wealth and Investment Management segments, which allowed it to offset its aggregate loss ratios in its Health segment.

Apart from achieving consistent growth in revenue and earnings, the company has improved its dividend payouts considerably over the last 2 years. During the first 2 quarters of 2024, Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA) paid out common stock dividends of $0.4 per share. Last month, the company declared a 12.5% increase in its common stock dividend, increasing it to $0.45 per share. With its impressive financial performance and stable outlook, Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA) looks to be one of the best dividend stocks in its industry.

While we acknowledge the potential of VOYA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and doing so within a shorter time frame. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than VOYA but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about the cheapest AI stock.

Advertisement

Retiring in New Hampshire

Results from Gallup’s Economy and Personal Finance Poll this year show that the second biggest financial concern for retirees is housing costs. 14% of respondents believe that the cost of owning or renting a home is their single biggest financial concern. Our article on the Best Places in Wisconsin for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security shows how households struggling to afford housing often have to compromise on their long-term savings in order to make ends meet in the short term. In such circumstances, individuals are compelled to withdraw funds from their retirement accounts, putting them at risk of being financially insecure in retirement.

For individuals retiring in states such as New Hampshire, these risks are amplified by the fact that it is quite an expensive state to retire in. In fact, according to Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: Z), the average home price in the state is currently $485,943. In comparison to the rest of the country, Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: Z) reports that the average home price in New Hampshire is 34% more expensive.

However, one advantage of retiring in the Granite State is that it has no state income tax. Thus, individuals looking to retire on social security alone will be glad to know that the state does not tax social security or other forms of retirement income. In addition, while some of the best places to retire in New Hampshire are quite expensive, there are numerous lesser-known locations that are among the cheapest.

Join us as we take a look at the best places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security.

15 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security

15 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security

15 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security

Advertisement

Methodology

To develop our list of best places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security, we initially picked out the most recommended places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security on the internet. We used 10+ sources including Movoto, Smart Asset, and World Atlas to develop a shortlist. Further research was narrowed down to these places only.

Among these best places, we developed a scorecard using metrics such as livability scores, cost of living, and average rent. Livability scores were sourced from Area Vibes while average rent was obtained from Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: Z). By standardizing these metrics on a linear scale, each place was scored, based on which we sorted our list in descending order. The top 15 places were chosen for our list of best places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security.

At Insider Monkey we are obsessed with the stocks that hedge funds pile into. The reason is simple: our research has shown that we can outperform the market by imitating the top stock picks of the best hedge funds. Our quarterly newsletter’s strategy selects 14 small-cap and large-cap stocks every quarter and has returned 275% since May 2014, beating its benchmark by 150 percentage points (see more details here).

Here are the 15 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on only Social Security.

15. Lincoln

Insider Monkey Score: 7.54

Advertisement

Livability Score: 64

Median Rent: $2,000

IM Cost of Living: 94.4

In terms of rent, Lincoln is the most expensive destination on our list. However, the cost of living in the city is 5.6% lower than the national average. Residents can enjoy excursions all year round, with opportunities for skiing & snowboarding in the winters and enjoying mountain biking adventures in the summers.

14. Franklin

Insider Monkey Score: 7.90

Advertisement

Livability Score: 66

Median Rent: $1,650

IM Cost of Living: 100.4

If you’re looking for small & affordable New England towns you should consider Franklin. It is located about 20 miles north of Concord, the state capital. With a median rent of just $1,650 and easy access to Concord’s amenities, Franklin is one of the best places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security.

13. Derry

Insider Monkey Score: 7.98

Advertisement

Livability Score: 79

Median Rent: $1,752

IM Cost of Living: 117.0

Just southeast of Manchester lies Derry. Derry offers an excellent blend of culture, history, and natural beauty. One downside of retiring to Derry is that in terms of cost of living, it is the most expensive destination on our list.

12. North Conway

Insider Monkey Score: 8.15

Advertisement

Livability Score: 74

Median Rent: $1,913

IM Cost of Living: 105.4

North Conway is a popular tourist destination located in the Mount Washington Valley. However, it is also one of the best places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security. It is bustling with activities and excursions all around the year, ranging from ski slopes to indoor water parks and even railroad tours.

11. Littleton

Insider Monkey Score: 8.58

Advertisement

Livability Score: 64

Median Rent: $1,500

IM Cost of Living: 94.4

Located near the Connecticut and Ammonoosuc Rivers, Littleton is a small town surrounded by a myriad of natural attractions. Apart from hiking trails and state parks, it is also home to attractions such as the Littleton Historical Museum and the Littleton Opera House. Since the town is located on the interstate highway 93, it also offers plenty of opportunities for road trips across the region.

10. Conway

Insider Monkey Score: 8.65

Advertisement

Livability Score: 73

Median Rent: $1,588

IM Cost of Living: 105.4

A few miles south of North Conway lies the town of Conway. While the cost of living in both places is similar, housing costs in Conway are much more affordable than in North Conway. Residents in Conway can enjoy access to the sights and sounds of the Echo Lake State Park, engaging in activities such as swimming, hiking, non-motorized boating, and fishing.

9. Manchester

Insider Monkey Score: 8.73

Advertisement

Livability Score: 80

Median Rent: $1,875

IM Cost of Living: 109.9

Manchester is the largest city in New Hampshire. It is the perfect destination for retirees who wish to have access to big city amenities and lifestyles. It is particularly appealing to art lovers as it is home to the Currier Museum of Art and several galleries and theatres.

8. Laconia

Insider Monkey Score: 8.97

Advertisement

Livability Score: 76

Median Rent: $1,900

IM Cost of Living: 101.6

Laconia is located on the shores of two stunning lakes Lake Winnipesaukee and Winnisquam Lake. It is an excellent retirement destination for sports enthusiasts due to its array of watersports. It is also home to the New Hampshire Fighting Spirit hockey team and the Winnipesaukee Muskrats baseball team.

7. Somersworth

Insider Monkey Score: 9.27

Advertisement

Livability Score: 79

Median Rent: $1,900

IM Cost of Living: 103.4

Somersworth lies in eastern New Hampshire, just a few miles from Maine. Whilst being a small and suburban city itself, it lies in close proximity to other more populated centers such as Dover.

6. Rochester

Insider Monkey Score: 9.53

Advertisement

Livability Score: 80

Median Rent: $1,800

IM Cost of Living: 104.4

Just 7 miles from Somersworth lies Rochester. The city offers an incredible balance of nature and culture, making it one of the best places in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security.

5. Newport

Insider Monkey Score: 10.76

Advertisement

Livability Score: 73

Median Rent: $1,500

IM Cost of Living: 89.1

In terms of both rent and cost of living, Newport is one of the most affordable places to retire in New Hampshire. It is the perfect destination for retirees looking to explore natural beauty during their golden years. It is home to attractions such as the Pollard Mill Falls, an incredible cascading waterfall feature that draws tourists from all over New England.

4. Concord

Insider Monkey Score: 10.89

Advertisement

Livability Score: 88

Median Rent: $1,850

IM Cost of Living: 103.7

Concord is the state capital of New Hampshire. It is one of the places that offers a perfect blend of vibrant city life along with access to plenty of serene natural wonders. In terms of affordability, the cost of living in Concord is 3.7% higher than the national average, however, its median rent is $1850, which is significantly lower than the national median.

3. Berlin

Insider Monkey Score: 10.18

Advertisement

Livability Score: 65

Median Rent: $1,300

IM Cost of Living: 85.8

In terms of affordability, Berlin is the best place in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security. Its median rent is $1,300 while its cost of living is 14.2% lower than the national average. Both these scores are the lowest out of all the destinations on our list.

2. Keene

Insider Monkey Score: 11.53

Advertisement

Livability Score: 86

Median Rent: $1,700

IM Cost of Living: 98.1

Keene is located in southern New Hampshire. It lies close to several natural attractions, such as the Horatio Colony Nature Preserve and the Green Mountain National Forest. It also hosts the Keene Music Festival every summer, which is one of the largest music festivals in New England.

1. Claremont

Insider Monkey Score: 12.85

Advertisement

Livability Score: 88

Median Rent: $1,600

IM Cost of Living: 91.6

Claremont is located in western New Hampshire, just 10 miles from the state border with Vermont. Whilst it is a small city, this close-knit community is the best place in New Hampshire for a couple to live on only social security. It is quite affordable in terms of both housing and cost of living. In addition, it is surrounded by acres of stunning forests and parks.

READ NEXT: $30 Trillion Opportunity: 15 Best Humanoid Robot Stocks to Buy According to Morgan Stanley and Jim Cramer Says NVIDIA ‘Has Become A Wasteland’.

Advertisement

Disclosure: None. 15 Best Places in New Hampshire for a Couple to Live on Only Social Security is originally published on Insider Monkey.



Source link

New Hampshire

Senate panel endorses reporting exemption for players on New Hampshire Fisher Cats

Published

on

Senate panel endorses reporting exemption for players on New Hampshire Fisher Cats





Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Possible 2028 Democratic White House contenders weigh in on Iran with New Hampshire voters

Published

on

Possible 2028 Democratic White House contenders weigh in on Iran with New Hampshire voters


As the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran overtakes the foreign policy debate in Washington, two Democratic governors with potential 2028 presidential aspirations — Gavin Newsom and Andy Beshear — recently traveled to New Hampshire, introducing themselves to the state’s famously engaged voters. The two weighed in on the war and both criticized and questioned President Trump’s strategy and endgame. 

“If a president is going to take a country into war, and risk the lives of American troops and Americans in the region, he has to have a real justification and not one that seems to change every five to 10 hours,” Beshear told CBS News after a Democratic fundraiser in Keene. 

“This President seems to use force before ever trying diplomacy, and he has a duty to sell it to the American people and to address Congress with it,” Beshear continued. “He hasn’t done any of that. In fact, it appears there isn’t even a plan for what success looks like. He’s gone from regime change to strategic objectives and now is talking about unconditional surrender, which isn’t realistic where he is.”

Beshear also said he thought that Congress should have reined in Mr. Trump’s war powers.

Advertisement

“He is trying to ignore Congress. He’s trying to even ignore the American people,” Beshear said. 

He went on to note that the president’s State of the Union address took place “three — four days before he launched this attack,” and Mr. Trump “didn’t even have the respect to tell the American people the threat that he thought Iran posed to us.” 

Last week, both the House and the Senate failed to pass resolutions to limit Mr. Trump’s war powers and stop him from taking further military action against Iran without congressional support.

Democratic Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear speaks with voters in Keene, New Hampshire, on March 7, 2026.

Advertisement

Anne Bryson


For Newsom, the war with Iran constitutes part of a broader criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 

At an event last Tuesday in Los Angeles, Newsom had compared Israel to an “apartheid state.” Later, in New Hampshire, he sought to clarify his comment.

“I was specifically referring to a Tom Friedman [New York Times] column last week, where Tom used that word of apartheid as it relates to the direction Bibi is going, particularly on the annexation of the West Bank,” Newsom explained during a book tour event Thursday night in Portsmouth. “I’m very angry, with what he is doing and why he’s doing it, what he’s going to ultimately try to do to the Supreme Court there, what he’s trying to do to save his own political career.” 

Friedman wrote that at the same time that the U.S. and Israel are prosecuting a war in Iran, within Israel, Netanyahu’s government has undertaken efforts to annex the West Bank, driving Palestinians from their homes; fire the attorney general who is leading the prosecution against Netanyahu for corruption; and block the government’s attempt to establish a commission to examine the failures that led up to the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre of Jews by Hamas.

Advertisement

CBS News has reached out to the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment.

On Iran, Newsom said, “I’m very angry about this war, with all due respect, you know, not because I’m angry the supreme leader is dead. Quite the contrary. I’m not naive about the last 37 years of his reign. Forty-seven years since ’79 — the revolution,” Newsom said. “But I’m also mindful that you have a president who still is inarticulate and incapable of giving us the rationale of why? Why now? What’s the endgame?”

img-4603.jpg

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks with political commentator Jack Cocchiarella at an event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, on March 5, 2026.

Anne Bryson


Many attendees at Newsom’s book event said that the situation in Iran is a top-of-mind issue for them, too. Some said they’re “horrified” by what is happening.

Advertisement

29-year-old Alicia Marr told CBS News she decided to attend Newsom’s event because of his social media response to the war with Iran. 

“There was one spot left, and I decided to pick it up, and it was due to his response to the war, that it is just unacceptable, and I would agree with that,” Marr said.

While some voters like Marr are eager to hear about where potential candidates stand on foreign policy, many at Newsom’s event said they care most about how potential candidates plan to address domestic issues. 

“I’m more focused on getting the middle class back on track and fighting the oligarchy, and I’m less invested in international issues,” said Anita Alden, who also attended Newsom’s event, 

“I wouldn’t call myself America first, but we have so many problems at home that are my priority,” she told CBS News. 

Advertisement

Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who may also be weighing another White House bid, told Fox 2 Detroit last week that she “unequivocally opposes” the Trump administration’s military action in Iran and urged Congress to take action. 

“If we want to stop Donald Trump with this random decision that he has arrived at, then Congress must act, and Congress must act immediately. The American people do not want our sons and daughters to go into this unauthorized war of choice,” Harris said. 

Mr. Trump has lashed out against Democrats who have pushed back on his Iran strategy, calling them “losers” last week and arguing that they would criticize any decision he made on Iran.

“If I did it, it’s no good. If I didn’t do it, they would have said the opposite, that you should have done this,” the president said.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Mass. man nabbed after allegedly driving over 100 mph in N.H.

Published

on

Mass. man nabbed after allegedly driving over 100 mph in N.H.


Local News

Police say the Attleboro man was driving 104 mph in a 55 mph zone on Route 202 near in Rindge, New Hampshire.

A Massachusetts man was arrested late Wednesday night after police say he was driving more than 100 mph on a New Hampshire roadway. 

Officers with the Rindge Police Department stopped a vehicle shortly after 11 p.m. on Route 202 near Sears Drive in Rindge following a report of a car traveling at excessive speed, according to a statement from Chief Rachel Malynowski. 

Advertisement

The vehicle, a 2020 Kia Stinger, was spotted traveling at 104 mph in a posted 55 mph zone, Malynowski said. 

The driver, a 21-year-old man from Attleboro, was arrested and charged with reckless operation of a motor vehicle, according to police. 

He is scheduled to be arraigned April 5. If convicted, the man faces a fine of at least $750, in addition to the court’s penalty assessment, and a 90-day license suspension, Malynowski said. 

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending